RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rotational vertebral artery syndrome, also referred to as Bow Hunter's syndrome (BHS), manifests when the vertebral artery (VA) is compressed following head rotation. This compression is often caused by an osteophyte and may lead to symptoms of a posterior stroke. This systematic review aims to shed light on the current management strategies for BHS resulting from osteophytes. Additionally, we present two illustrative cases where the VA compression by an osteophyte was effectively resolved by complete resection of the problematic bone spur. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across Embase, PubMed and Medline in September 2023. Keywords related to vertebral artery [MESH], vertebrobasilar insufficiency [MESH] and osteophyte [MESH] were the focus of this review. Risk of bias in retained studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Qualitative Research. A narrative synthesis of our findings is presented. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies were included in this review. Vertigo was the most reported symptom by patients (n = 16). On imaging, the VA was often compressed at C4-5 (n = 10) and C5-6 (n = 10) with no evident side predominance observed. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF, n = 13) followed by anterior decompression without fusion (n = 8) were the most performed surgical procedures to manage BHS. CONCLUSION: Surgical decompression of the VA is a safe and effective intervention for patients experiencing symptomatic osteophytic compression during head rotation. This procedure restores normal vascular function and reduces the risk of ischemic events. This review highlights the importance of timely diagnosis and intervention in such cases.
Asunto(s)
Osteofito , Insuficiencia Vertebrobasilar , Humanos , Insuficiencia Vertebrobasilar/cirugía , Osteofito/cirugía , Osteofito/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Arteria Vertebral/cirugía , Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Circumferential fusion by the anterior (ALIF) or transforaminal (TLIF) approach combined with posterior instrumentation is currently used for the surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. But few studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of various interbody fusion techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results at 2 years postoperative of two fusion techniques-TLIF versus ALIF plus posterior instrumentation-for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational multicenter study done at nine French healthcare facilities specialized in spine surgery. The inclusion criteria were minimum age of 18 years, grade 1-3 isthmic spondylolisthesis, ALIF+posterior fixation (ALIF+PS) or TLIF, minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical and radiological evaluations were done preoperatively and at 2 years of follow-up. A lumbar CT scan was done at 1 year postoperative to evaluate fusion. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 89 patients (50 women, 39 men) with a mean age of 47.7±12.3 (18-79) years. The patients in the ALIF groups (n=71) had a significantly longer hospital stay than those in the TLIF group (n=18): 5.7 days versus 4.6 days (p=.04). However, their medical leave from work was significantly shorter: 31.0 weeks versus 40.7 (p=.003). Lumbar pain VAS diminished faster in the ALIF groups, with a significantly larger drop than the TLIF group in the first 3 months postoperative. Only the increase in lumbar disc lordosis was larger in the ALIF group: 11.7°±12.0° versus 6.0°±11.7° (p=.036). There was a significant correlation between the increase in global lordosis and reduction in lumbar VAS at 2 years postoperative (ρ=-0.3295; p=.021). CONCLUSION: ALIF+PS provides a faster relief of postoperative low back pain than TLIF but there are no significant clinical differences between techniques at 2 years of follow-up. Despite better restoration of disc lordosis in the ALIF+PS group, there was no difference in the restoration of global lordosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; multicenter comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Lordosis , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Espondilolistesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
We describe the surgical aspects of the resection of a large 2cm intramedullary ependymoma at the C6-7 level associated with an extensive syrinx using a unilateral minimally invasive approach through a fixed tubular retractor. A gross total resection was achieved. Total operative time was 5 hours. Estimated blood loss was less than 100 cc. Postoperative evolution was favorable, with the improvement of the patient's neurological status. There was no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula. Hospital stay was four days. All narcotics were stopped on day 1 after surgery. Post-operative MRI showed no residual tumor. At the six-month follow-up, there was continued improvement in his neurological status. Scoliosis films did not reveal any cervicothoracic kyphosis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare different survival prognosis scores among patients operated on for spinal metastasis from lung cancer. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of patients with lung cancer and spinal metastases who underwent spinal surgery at our institution from January 2008 to October 2020 was conducted. We calculated the prognostic value of the following scoring systems: revised Tokuhashi, revised Bauer, Skeletal Oncology Research Group classic, and New England Spinal Metastatic Score. For each scoring system, discrimination was assessed by computing the area under the curve. RESULTS: The study included 94 patients operated on for spinal metastasis from lung cancer. Mean patient age was 62 years (range, 32-79 years); 51% of patients were male. The 1-year survival rate was 18%, and the median survival time was 4 months. The 6- and 12-month area under the curve was 60% and 76%, respectively, for revised Tokuhashi, 55% and 58% for revised Bauer, 58% and 63% for Skeletal Oncology Research Group classic, and 61% and 69% for New England Spinal Metastatic Score. CONCLUSIONS: The revised Tokuhashi score seemed to be the most accurate scoring system for assessing survival prognosis in patients operated on for spinal metastasis from lung cancer. Newer scores including biological parameters did not add further precision among this specific population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One of the main concerns of anterior lumbar spine approaches are vascular complications. The aim of our study is to provide technical details about a flap technique using the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) when approaching the lumbar spine via an anterior corridor. This can help decrease complications by protecting the adjacent vascular structures. We also include a retrospective cohort review. METHODS: This is a retrospective bicentric study: 189 patients with a mean age of 44.2 years underwent anterior lumbar spine surgery using the ALL flap technique. Patients were diagnosed with degenerative pathologies. We treated 239 lumbar levels primarily at the L4-5 and L5-S1: 88 single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusions, 9 two-level ALIFs, 51 total disk replacements (TDR), and 41 hybrid constructs (i.e., ALIF L5S1 and TDR L4L5). Anterior approaches were performed by two senior spine surgeons. The ALL flap technique was utilized in all of these cases, by carefully dissecting the ALL, with the flap suspended using sutures. As such, this ALL flap provided a "safe corridor" to avoid any potential vascular laceration. RESULTS: The operative and early surgical complication rate was 3.2%. There was no arterial injury. There were only 2 minor venous lacerations (1.05%). No blood transfusion was required. Neither lacerations happened during disk space preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we provide technical details about a simple and reproducible technique using the ALL as a flap, which may help spine surgeons minimize vascular injuries during ALIF or even TDR surgeries.
Asunto(s)
Laceraciones , Fusión Vertebral , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Adulto , Humanos , Laceraciones/etiología , Ligamentos Longitudinales/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive treatment option for osteolytic spinal lesions. It provides pain relief and stability with established good results. In this paper, we describe a new CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty technique using a direct lateral approach between the carotid sheath and the vertebral artery, that can be safely performed under conscious sedation in an outpatient setting. We report the case of a patient presenting a lytic lesion of C2 treated using the CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty under conscious sedation. Local anesthesia using approximately 10 mL of lidocaine 1% was delivered in the skin, soft tissues and to the periosteum of C2. With the patient in dorsal decubitus on the CT table, a bone biopsy needle was introduced laterally, through the parotid and between the carotid artery and vertebral artery. The entry point on C2 was right under the lateral mass of C1 and anterolaterally to the vertebral vascular foramen. The procedure was well tolerated by the patient. No neurological changes were noted per-operatively. No immediate or short-term complications were noted. Patient was observed on a stretcher for 2 hours with nursing supervision before being discharged home. Patient reported satisfactory pain control at 6-month follow-up. CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty under conscious sedation can be safely performed in an outpatient setting.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The silastic tube technique, in which a chest tube is placed into the vertebral body defect and impregnated with polymethyl methacrylate, showed good results in patients with lumbar and thoracic neoplastic diseases. There has been only 1 study about the effectiveness and safety of this technique in patients with cervical metastases. We aimed to report our experience in using this technique to reconstruct the spine after corpectomy for cervical metastasis. METHODS: All patients with cervical spinal metastasis who underwent surgical treatment using a chest tube impregnated with polymethyl methacrylate in conjunction with anterior cervical plate stabilization were retrospectively recruited. Demographics, tumor histology, revised Tokuhashi score, preoperative and postoperative American Spinal Injury Association score, preoperative and postoperative ambulatory status, perioperative complications, and survival time were collected. RESULTS: This study included 16 patients. The most common primary tumor site was the lung (6 patients; 37.5%). The mean (SD) survival time was 408 (795) days (range, 1-2797 days), and the median survival time was 72 days (95% confidence interval 28-116 days). Four patients (25%) died within 30 postoperative days. There was no surgical site infection or instrument failure after the surgery. Five patients (31.2%) lived >180 days, and 3 patients (18.8%) lived >360 days. One patient (6.2%) was still alive at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The silastic tube technique in conjunction with anterior cervical plate stabilization might be safe, effective, and cost-effective for patients with cervical spine metastasis.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Tubos Torácicos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Polimetil Metacrilato/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Anciano , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques have been described to address intraforaminal/extraforaminal lumbar lesions. They vary from the classic posterior open approaches to minimally invasive techniques with tubular retractors and even endoscopy. These lesions have been approached from either an ipsilateral or a contralateral approach. Only a few reports have described a contralateral minimally invasive tubular approach to address these lesions. However, none of them have been able to address calcified pathologies. METHOD: We used a contralateral tubular approach to remove the calcified disc herniations in 2 patients presenting with radiculopathy secondary to a calcified intraforaminal L5-S1 disc herniation. RESULTS: Early clinical and radiological outcomes were positive. No perioperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of the expanded use of fixed tubular retractors to address calcified lumbar intraforaminal disc herniations. This approach allows a satisfactory access and view of the contralateral foramen and offending lesion. It permits a wide decompression while preserving the facet joint and thus prevents iatrogenic instability. It can also avoid the iliac crest, which does not allow an ipsilateral extraforaminal approach at the L5-S1 level. This approach is a safe and effective way to treat this specific pathology.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis/cirugía , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Canal Medular/cirugía , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Canal Medular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify radiological factors and functional outcomes associated with good results after implantation of a single lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct (anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lumbar disc prosthesis) in the setting of painful degenerative lumbar discopathy. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective 10-year study included 92 patients Ë18 years old with chronic low back pain evolving for at least 1 year. The patients had degenerative disc disease and had failed conservative treatment and underwent lumbar arthroplasty. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Functional evaluation was based on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical rating scale. Radiological analysis was based on lumbar x-rays and magnetic resonance imaging parameters. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to the reduction in ODI score (>15 points or <15 points), and statistical analysis was done in both groups to find predictive radiological factors for a satisfactory functional outcome. RESULTS: Clinically, 60 patients (65.2%) had a satisfactory functional result and 32 patients (34.8%) had a poor outcome according to ODI score. Radiographically, gain in segmental lordosis was statistically associated with good functional outcomes (8.9° for ODI decrease >15 vs. 3.2° for ODI decrease <15). CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that gain in segmental lordosis is associated with a satisfactory functional outcome after a single-level lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct. Our study demonstrates that segmental lordosis gain may represent a significative useful positive predictor factor of patient outcome.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Lordosis , Recuperación de la Función , Reeemplazo Total de Disco/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Transfacet screws (TFS) are an alternative to the classic bilateral pedicular screws (BPS) in addition to anterior (ALIF) or oblique (OLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Spinal navigation could help the surgeon in technically demanding procedures in order to avoid screw malposition. Although spinal navigation is commonly used in BPS, its contribution in TFS remains unclear. Our aim here was to assess the feasibility of TFS using spinal navigation in addition to anterior lumbar fusion. Five patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disc disease were included. During the same general anaesthesia, we performed successively an ALIF or OLIF and then a TFS according to Boucher technique using spinal navigation (O-arm). No peri-operative complication occurred, and all the screws were successfully positioned (n = 10). All clinical scores (ODI, VAS L and VAS R) improved at 6-month follow-up. Segmental lordosis increased from 6° [2.4°-12°] to 13.6° [8°-17°]. Fusion was achieved for the five patients. TFS using O-arm in addition to ALIF/OLIF is feasible. To confirm our early favourable outcomes on clinical and radiological data, this technique must be evaluated on larger samples of patients.
Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Tornillos Óseos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In France, surgery for lumbar disc herniation is now being done in the outpatient ambulatory setting at select facilities. However, surgery for the cervical spine in this setting is controversial because of the dangers of neck hematoma. We wanted to share our experience with performing ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy in 30 patients at our facility. RESULTS: Since 2014, 30 patients (16 men, 14 women; mean age of 47.2 years) with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level cervical disc disease (19 at C5-C6 and 11 at C6-C7) were operated at our ambulatory surgery center. After anterior cervical discectomy, cervical disc replacement was performed in 13 patients and fusion in 17 patients. The mean operative time was 38minutes and the mean duration of postoperative monitoring was 7hours 30minutes. The patients stayed at the healthcare facility for an average of 10hours 10minutes. One female patient (3%) was transferred to a standard hospital unit due to a neurological deficit requiring surgical revision with no cause identified. Two patients (7%) were rehospitalized on Day 1 due to dysphagia that resolved spontaneously. Thus the "ambulatory success rate" was 90% (27/30). There were no other complications and the overall satisfaction rate was excellent (9.6/10). DISCUSSION: Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy is now widely performed in the United States. Ours is the first study of French patients undergoing this procedure. The complication rate was very low (<2%) and even lower than patients treated in an inpatient hospital setting in comparative studies. Note that our patients were carefully selected for outpatient surgery as certain risk factors for complications have previously been identified (age, 3+levels, comorbidities/ASA>2). No deaths in the first 30 days postoperative have been reported in the literature. Wound hematoma leading to airway compromise is rare in the ambulatory setting (0.2%). The few cases that occurred were detected early and the hematoma drained before the patient was discharged. Dysphagia is actually the most common complication (8 to 30%). CONCLUSION: Cervical spine surgery can be performed in an ambulatory surgery center in carefully selected patients. Our criteria are patients less than 65 years of age, single-level disease, ASA<2, and standard cervical morphology. The complication and readmission rates are low. Careful hemostasis combined with close postoperative monitoring for at least 6hours helps to reduce the risk of neck hematoma. Prevention of postoperative dysphagia must be a focus of the care provided.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía , Hematoma/etiología , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prótesis e Implantes , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Radiculopatía/etiología , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to report an independent real-life experience about the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in lumbar interbody fusion with a special focus on complications. This is a retrospective single-center cohort study between 2007 and 2013 including 277 patients treated for anterior or posterior lumbar fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. We report the complications occurring during the 12 first postoperative months and analyze the fusion rate on X-rays. There are 58 cases (22.8%) of clinical complications. In 15 cases (5.9%), these complications were related to the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. Only one patient (0.4%) required a new intervention due to recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. Fusion rate at 1 year was 98%. The low rate of specific complication suggests that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 can be safe and effective in anterior and posterior interbody fusion when used with simple precautions.
Asunto(s)
Proteína Morfogenética Ósea 2/uso terapéutico , Vértebras Lumbares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Radiografía , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Single-use surgical instruments were recently introduced to improve OR efficiency and reduce infection risks. This study aimed to investigate clinical results 1 year after instrumented lumbar fusion, with the aid of single-use surgical instruments, with particular attention to surgical site infection and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). METHOD: This prospective bi-centric study included 21 men and 28 women, aged 61.6 ± 12.8 years, that underwent short instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease, canal stenosis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis. All patients underwent posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, using the SteriSpine™ PS Pedicle Screw System, available in multiple traceable sterile kits. RESULTS: Instrumented fusion was performed at one level in 31, two levels in 11, three levels in 5, and four levels in 2 patients. The mean follow-up was 16.4 ± 2.1 months, during which the ODI improved by 20 or more points in 28 patients (57 %), improved by less than 20 points in 17 patients (35 %), and remained unchanged or worsened in 4 patients (8 %). Only one infection (2 %) was observed in a 60-year-old man with previous spine surgery and two additional risk factors (diabetes mellitus and BMI 38). Compared to an older series, using reusable instrumentation, performed by the same team for the same indications, the clinical outcomes were similar but the infection rate was 6 %. DISCUSSION: Single-use instrumentation could reduce the incidence of surgical site infections following lumbar fusion to acceptable levels as in hip and knee arthroplasties. The preservation of screws and rods in sterile packs until ready for insertion reduces their exposure to air-borne bacteria in the OR and eliminates their contamination through repetitive hospital sterilization. The short operation time and minimal blood loss achieved could also contribute to the reduction in infection risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective randomized bi-centric study.