Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (Jeavons syndrome): Generalized, focal, or combined generalized and focal epilepsy syndrome?

Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (EM) or Jeavons syndrome (JS) is an epileptic syndrome related to the spectrum of genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE). We report two untreated children on which EEGs were performed several hours after a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS). These showed a unilateral, nearly continuous posterior slowing. This slow-wave activity was associated with contralateral epileptiform activity in one case, while in the second case, it was associated with an ipsilateral activity. However, in the latter child, a few months later an independent focus on the contralateral side was observed. A diagnosis of focal occipital lobe epilepsy was proposed in both cases, and one child underwent a left occipital lobectomy at 3.5 years of age. Despite surgery, absences with EM persisted in this child, and a marked photosensitivity to photic stimulation was observed two years later. The focal slow wave activity of one occipital lobe several hours after a GTCS in these two subjects was in favor of a focal onset preceding the generalization. The EEG evidence for independent left and right posterior focus in these two cases, the persistence of EM, and the development of a marked photosensitivity to photic stimulation in the child who underwent an occipital lobectomy, allow us to suggest that JS is associated with a network of bi-occipital hyperexcitability that rapidly engages bilaterally to produce generalized seizures.

Bilateral and synchronous "dents de scie" spikes: A highly specific EEG pattern of young adult Dravet syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In Dravet syndrome (DS), EEGs evolve over time. OBJECTIVE: To describe a peculiar EEG pattern in two adults with a de novo SCN1A gene mutation, in exon 5 (case 1) and 9 (case 2). METHODS: Two female patients underwent a prolonged video EEG (24 h) as part of their epilepsy assessment. RESULTS: In both cases, the EEG showed a very peculiar and stereotypical pattern of bilateral synchronous spikes at about 5-6 Hz. This activity was present during wakefulness and highly activated at sleep onset and in NREM sleep, which could show nearly continuous spike activity. This activity dramatically decreased in REM sleep and after awakening. This pattern of "dents de scie" (sawtooth) spikes maintained the same morphology throughout the entire EEG recording. In both patients, the spikes were favored by passive eye closure. During wakefulness, the spikes could evolve into atypical absences while keeping the same "dents de scie" pattern. Neither patient had tonic or myoclonic seizures at the time of the EEG assessment. Both were moderately retarded, and neither one had a typical DS gait disorder. Previous EEG recordings of case 1 performed at 9.5 and 18.5 years showed spike-waves, but the morphology did not correspond to the EEG recording observed at 22 years. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients have a similar electro-clinical phenotype. This "dents de scie" pattern appears to be very specific and could be pathognomonic in a subgroup of young adults with DS. Results of sleep EEG recording could be added to the diagnostic criteria for this syndrome.

Safety and efficacy of rufinamide in children and adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A post hoc analysis from Study 022.

BACKGROUND: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with the first symptoms usually appearing during early childhood. Due to the highly variable underlying etiologies, LGS cannot be considered as one disease but as an electro-clinical entity, often challenging to diagnose early and treat accordingly. The anti-seizure medication, rufinamide, is indicated for the adjunctive treatment of patients with LGS aged ≥1 year. This post hoc analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of adjunctive rufinamide for total and tonic-atonic seizures during Study 022 in children (aged <16 years) and adults (aged ≥16 years). METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III Study 022 included patients with a diagnosis of LGS and a history of multiple seizure types (including tonic-atonic or astatic seizures and atypical absence seizures; ≥90 seizures in the month prior to baseline). Assessments included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), percent change in tonic-atonic seizure frequency/28 days during the double-blind phase relative to study baseline (a primary endpoint), and percentage of patients with ≥25%, ≥50%, or ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline. RESULTS: Of 138 enrolled patients, 74 received rufinamide (<16 years, n = 49 [66%]) and 64 received placebo (<16 years, n = 43 [67%]). Incidence of TEAEs was generally similar between age groups. The frequency (per 28 days) of tonic-atonic seizures was reduced with rufinamide (vs. placebo) in both younger and older patients: age <16 years (-41% vs. -6%), age ≥16 years (-55% vs. +16%) (p < 0.025; both age groups). In patients aged <16 years receiving rufinamide, 38% and 17% achieved ≥50% and ≥75% reductions in tonic-atonic seizure frequency vs. 18% and 3% with placebo, respectively. Corresponding responder rates for patients aged ≥16 years were 52% and 32% (rufinamide) vs. 15% and 5% (placebo), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, adjunctive rufinamide was well tolerated and improved seizure control in patients with LGS, irrespective of age.

Lateralized Periodic Discharges: Which patterns are interictal, ictal, or peri-ictal?

There is an ongoing debate if Lateralized Periodic Discharges (LPDs) represent an interictal pattern reflecting non-specific but irritative brain injury, or conversely, is an ictal pattern. The challenge is: how to correctly manage these patients? Between this apparent dichotomous distinction, there is a pattern lying along the interictal-ictal continuum (IIC) that we may call "peri-ictal". Peri-ictal means that LPDs are temporally associated with epileptic seizures (although not necessarily in the same recording). Their recognition should lead to careful EEG monitoring and longer periods of video-EEG to detect seizure activity (clinical and/or subclinical seizures). In order to distinguish which kind of LPDs should be considered as representing interictal/irritative brain injury versus ictal/peri-ictal LPDs, a set of criteria, with both clinical/neuroimaging and EEG, is proposed. Among them, the dichotomy LPDs-proper versus LPDs-plus should be retained. Spiky or sharp LPDs followed by associated slow after-waves or periods of flattening giving rise to a triphasic morphology should be included in the definition of LPDs-plus. We propose defining a particular subtype of LPDs-plus that we call "LPDs-max". The LPDs-max pattern corresponds to an ictal pattern, and therefore, a focal non-convulsive status epilepticus, sometimes associated with subtle motor signs and epileptic seizures. LPDs-max include periodic polyspike-wave activity and/or focal burst-suppression-like patterns. LPDs-max have a posterior predominance over the temporo-parieto-occipital regions and are refractory to antiseizure drugs. Interpretations of EEGs in critically ill patients require a global clinical approach, not limited to the EEG patterns. The clinical context and results of neuroimaging play key roles.

Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonias (Jeavons syndrome): An electro-clinical study of 40 patients from childhood to adulthood.

PURPOSE: To describe the typical and atypical clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) features of 40 patients with Jeavons syndrome (JS). METHOD: Retrospective analysis from two French tertiary centers. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled (31 females and 9 males; sex ratio F/M = 3.44; mean age at epilepsy onset: 6.2 ± 3.4 years [range: 1-15 years]). A positive family history of generalized genetic epilepsy was reported by 13 patients (32.5 %). Eyelid myoclonias with or without absence were the seizure onset in 29 patients (72.5 %), and generalized tonic-clonic seizures in 11 (27.5 %). Over the course of the disease, all had absences. Intellectual disability and psychiatric disorders were reported in 14 (35 %) and 18 patients (45 %), respectively. Focal EEG abnormalities were observed in 65 % of patients, with a posterior (57.7 %) or anterior (30 %) distribution. Generalized EEG discharges were identified in 37 patients (92.5 %). Epileptiform abnormalities were activated during NREM sleep and increased upon awakening. Response to intermittent light stimulation (ILS) was observed in 34 patients (85 %), with an unusual pattern of epileptiform abnormalities at the same frequency of the flashes in 20 patients. Patients with all seizure types were more likely to have this response (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: JS is a lifelong genetic epileptic syndrome with onset in childhood, female preponderance, and a positive family history of epilepsy in one-third of the cases. Focal EEG abnormalities are frequent. Response to ILS appears different from other photosensitive syndromes, with an unusual pattern of photo-induced abnormal synchronization. Intellectual disability and psychiatric disorders are not rare.

How to carry out and interpret EEG recordings in COVID-19 patients in ICU?

There are questions and challenges regarding neurologic complications in COVID-19 patients. EEG is a safe and efficient tool for the evaluation of brain function, even in the context of COVID-19. However, EEG technologists should not be put in danger if obtaining an EEG does not significantly advance diagnosis or change management in the patient. Not every neurologic problem stems from a primary brain injury: confusion, impaired consciousness that evolves to stupor and coma, and headaches are frequent in hypercapnic/hypoxic encephalopathies. In patients with chronic pulmonary disorders, acute symptomatic seizures have been reported in acute respiratory failure in 6%. The clinician should be aware of the various EEG patterns in hypercapnic/hypoxic and anoxic (post-cardiac arrest syndrome) encephalopathies as well as encephalitides. In this emerging pandemic of infectious disease, reduced EEG montages using single-use subdermal EEG needle electrodes may be used in comatose patients. A full 10-20 EEG complement of electrodes with an ECG derivation remains the standard. Under COVID-19 conditions, an expedited study that adequately screens for generalized status epilepticus, most types of regional status epilepticus, encephalopathy or sleep may serve for most clinical questions, using simplified montages may limit the risk of infection to EEG technologists. We recommend noting whether the patient is undergoing or has been placed prone, as well as noting the body and head position during the EEG recording (supine versus prone) to avoid overinterpretation of respiratory, head movement, electrode, muscle or other artifacts. There is slight elevation of intracranial pressure in the prone position. In non-comatose patients, the hyperventilation procedure should be avoided. At present, non-specific EEG findings and abnormalities should not be considered as being specific for COVID-19 related encephalopathy.

Failure to recognize muscular artifacts on the EEG may cause a wrong diagnosis of myoclonic status epilepticus.

•Quetiapine may cause myoclonus.•Usually, no muscular artifact on the midline EEG electrodes•The EEG pattern of myoclonic jerks is rather polyspike-waves and not only polyspikes.•Failure to recognize muscular artifacts may cause a wrong diagnosis of polyspikes.

Open-label, uncontrolled retrospective study of perampanel in adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

PURPOSE: Perampanel (PER) was added to the anticonvulsant regimen of 71 patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) to evaluate its efficacy against seizures and its tolerability. METHOD: We evaluated at 3-month intervals 62 with pure LGS and 9 with LGS-like epileptic encephalopathy (28 females, 43 males, mean age 40.1 ± 11.5 yrs, median 38, range 20-71) in whom PER was introduced by 2 mg steps at 2- to 4-week intervals up to 6 mg/day, with possible dose reduction or increases after that. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Mean PER exposure was 538.9 days ± 425 (median 429), with 44 patients (62 %) on PER at last follow-up. About 2/3 of patients were responders, including 35.2 % that had a ≥75 % decrease in their seizures. Among these 16.9 % had a ≥90 % decrease. No improvement was seen in 14 patients; 5 had a less than 50 % response, and 6 had seizure aggravation. Therefore, 25 (35.2 %) were considered non-responders. Half of the patients developed at least one side-effect. Significant negative changes in behavior were noted in 1/3 of the cases, including irritability (8.5 %) and aggressivity (7 %). Contrastingly, 4 patients reported positive behavioral and psychological well-being side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective, open-label study provides evidence that PER may significantly help in LGS. PER should be tried in LGS patients who are not satisfactorily controlled. Its use may be limited in some patients due to behavioral side-effects occurring, particularly at doses ≥ 6 mg/d.

Treatment of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in Patients of Child-Bearing Potential.

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is both a frequent and a very characteristic epileptic syndrome with female preponderance. Treatment of JME in women of childbearing potential must consider multiple factors such as desire for pregnancy, use of contraception, seizure control and previously used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Approximately 85% of cases are well controlled with valproate, which remains the reference AED in JME but is nowadays considered unsafe for the expecting mother and her fetus. The prescription of valproate is now severely restricted in women of childbearing potential but may still be considered, at the lowest possible dose and when pregnancies can be reliably planned, with temporary alternatives to valproate prescribed before fertilization. Alternatives have emerged, especially lamotrigine and levetiracetam, but also topiramate, zonisamide, and recently perampanel, but none of these AEDs can be considered fully safe in the context of pregnancy. In special settings, benzodiazepines and barbiturates may be useful. In some cases, combination therapy, especially lamotrigine and levetiracetam, may be useful or even required. However, lamotrigine may have the potential to aggravate JME, with promyoclonic effects. Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin must be avoided. Valproate, levetiracetam, zonisamide, topiramate if the daily dose is ≤ 200 mg and perampanel if the daily dose is ≤ 10 mg do not affect combined hormonal contraception. Lamotrigine ≥ 300 mg/day has been shown to decrease levonorgestrel levels by 20% but does not compromise combined hormonal contraception. Patients with JME taking oral contraceptive should be counselled on the fact that the estrogenic component can reduce concentrations of lamotrigine by over 50%, putting patients at risk of increased seizures. Pregnancy is a therapeutic challenge, and the risk/benefit ratio for the mother and fetus must be considered when choosing the appropriate drug. Lamotrigine (< 325 mg daily in the European Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pregnancy) and levetiracetam seem to be comparatively safer in pregnancy than other AEDs, especially topiramate and valproate. Plasma concentration of lamotrigine and levetiracetam decreases significantly during pregnancy, and dosage adjustments may be necessary. With persisting generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the combination of lamotrigine and levetiracetam offer the chance of seizure control and lesser risks of major congenital malformations. The risk of malformation increases when valproate or topiramate are included in the drug combination. In one study, the relative risk of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in children born to women with epilepsy (WWE) treated with valproate were, respectively, 5.2 for autism and 2.9 for ASD versus 2.12 for autism and 1.6 for ASD in WWE not treated with valproate. More studies are needed to assess the risk of autism with AEDs other than valproate. The current knowledge is that the risk appears to be double that in the general population. In patients with JME, valproate remains an essential and life-changing agent. The consequences of a lifetime of poorly controlled epilepsy need to be balanced against the teratogenic risks of valproate during limited times in a woman's life. The management of JME in WWE should include lifestyle interventions, with avoidance of sleep deprivation, and planned pregnancy.

Perampanel in 12 patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease.

OBJECTIVE: Perampanel (PER) was used in 12 patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD) to evaluate its efficacy against myoclonus and seizures. METHODS: We treated 11 patients with EPM1 mutations (6 F, 5 M, aged 13-62 years) and a 43-year-old man with de novo KCNC1 mutation. PER was introduced by 2 mg steps at 2-4 week intervals until 6 mg/day, with a possible dose reduction or dose increase. RESULTS: Ten patients had a clear clinical response of myoclonus, and five were able to reduce concomitant therapy. Improvement was noted sometimes as soon as with 2 mg/day. Epileptic seizures stopped on PER in the six patients who still had experienced generalized tonic-clonic or myoclonic seizures (100%). Some abatement of efficacy on myoclonus was seen in two patients who still retained some benefit. Weight gain was reported in six patients (50%). Psychological and behavioral side-effects were observed in six patients (50%) and led to withdrawal of PER in three cases and dose reduction in three, with abatement of the problems. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides evidence that for ULD patients, PER may show marked efficacy even in severe cases, particularly against myoclonus, but also against seizures. PER should thus be tried in ULD patients whose seizures are not satisfactorily controlled. Its use is limited because of psychological and behavioral side effects, with higher doses of approximately 6 mg/day or greater likely risk factors.

The 'Photosensitivity Model' is (also) a model for focal (partial) seizures.

The 'Photosensitivity Model' uses a standardized stimulation protocol of repeated intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) over a three-day period, with administration of a single dose of an investigational antiepileptic drug (AED) after a baseline IPS day in photosensitive patients, followed by a third IPS day to determine duration of effect. This 'Photosensitivity Model' has shown its value in the development of new AEDs. Levetiracetam (LEV), currently a first-line AED in new-onset focal epilepsies, was not effective in classical animal models, but showed dose-dependent efficacy in the human 'Photosensitivity Model'. Nevertheless, concerns have been expressed that AEDs selectively suppressing focal seizures might not suppress generalized photoparoxysmal EEG responses (PPR), the pharmacodynamic outcome measure in the Model. Herein, the following questions have been addressed: I. Can patients with generalized epileptiform discharges, evoked by IPS, so-called PPR, have focal epilepsy (focal seizures)? II. Are the photosensitive patients with focal epilepsy, who have participated in the photosensitivity trials, non-responsive to a new AED under investigation, as compared to those with generalized epilepsies? III. Are "focal epilepsy" AEDs effective both in the 'Photosensitivity Model' and in real life in photosensitive patients? We performed a systematic literature review of PPR in focal seizures and focal epilepsy and we analyzed data (published and unpublished) from 20 different potential AEDs studied prospectively in the 'Photosensitivity Model'. Finally, the PPR effects of Na+ channel-blocking AEDs (considered as the most typical AEDs for focal epilepsy) are discussed with unequivocal examples given of the focal nature of a patient's PPR. Based on the entire data evidence, we conclude that: 1. PPRs certainly exist in focal epilepsy (17% on average); 2. Clinical signs and symptoms of PPRs can be focal and 3. PPRs can definitely be used to identify or to prove efficacy of new AEDs for patients with focal epilepsy.

Lafora disease.

Lafora disease (LD) is an autosomal recessive progressive myoclonus epilepsy due to mutations in the EPM2A (laforin) and EPM2B (malin) genes, with no substantial genotype-phenotype differences between the two. Founder effects and recurrent mutations are common, and mostly isolated to specific ethnic groups and/or geographical locations. Pathologically, LD is characterized by distinctive polyglucosans, which are formations of abnormal glycogen. Polyglucosans, or Lafora bodies (LB) are typically found in the brain, periportal hepatocytes of the liver, skeletal and cardiac myocytes, and in the eccrine duct and apocrine myoepithelial cells of sweat glands. Mouse models of the disease and other naturally occurring animal models have similar pathology and phenotype. Hypotheses of LB formation remain controversial, with compelling evidence and caveats for each hypothesis. However, it is clear that the laforin and malin functions regulating glycogen structure are key. With the exception of a few missense mutations LD is clinically homogeneous, with onset in adolescence. Symptoms begin with seizures, and neurological decline follows soon after. The disease course is progressive and fatal, with death occurring within 10 years of onset. Antiepileptic drugs are mostly non-effective, with none having a major influence on the progression of cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Diagnosis and genetic counseling are important aspects of LD, and social support is essential in disease management. Future therapeutics for LD will revolve around the pathogenesics of the disease. Currently, efforts at identifying compounds or approaches to reduce brain glycogen synthesis appear to be highly promising.

Autosomal recessive progressive myoclonus epilepsy due to impaired ceramide synthesis.

Autosomal recessive progressive myoclonus epilepsy due to impaired ceramide synthesis is an extremely rare condition, so far reported in a single family of Algerian origin presenting an unusual, severe form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy characterized by myoclonus, generalized tonic-clonic seizures and moderate to severe cognitive impairment, with probable autosomal recessive inheritance. Disease onset was between 6 and 16 years of age. Genetic study allowed to identify a homozygous nonsynonymous mutation in CERS1, the gene encoding ceramide synthase 1, a transmembrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), catalyzes the biosynthesis of C18-ceramides. The mutation decreased C18-ceramide levels. In addition, downregulation of CerS1 in neuroblastoma cell line showed activation of ER stress response and induction of proapoptotic pathways. This observation demonstrates that impairment of ceramide biosynthesis underlies neurodegeneration in humans.

Myoclonus and seizures in progressive myoclonus epilepsies: pharmacology and therapeutic trials.

Generalized motor seizures, usually tonic-clonic, tonic-vibratory, myoclonic or clonic, and stimulus-sensitive/action myoclonus are typical features of progressive myoclonus epilepsies (PMEs). Despite the introduction of many anticonvulsants, the treatment of these symptoms, particularly myoclonus, remains challenging, due to the incomplete and often transitory effects of most drugs. Moreover, treatment is only symptomatic, since therapy targeting the underlying aetiology for these genetic conditions is in its infancy. Traditional antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of PMEs are valproate, clonazepam, and phenobarbital (or primidone). These drugs may improve the overall performance of PME patients by decreasing their generalized seizures and, to a lesser extent, their myoclonic jerks. Newer drugs which have been shown to be effective include piracetam, levetiracetam, topiramate, zonisamide, and possibly perampanel for Lafora disease. The potential of other drugs (such as L-triptophan and N-acetylcysteine) and procedures (such as vagal and deep brain stimulation) has also been discussed. The available data on the efficacy of drugs are mainly based on small series or anecdotal reports. Two prospective, randomized, double blind studies investigating the novel SV2A ligand, brivaracetam, in genetically confirmed Unverricht-Lundborg patients have been performed with disappointing results. When treating PMEs, particular care should be paid to avoid drugs known to aggravate myoclonus or myoclonic seizures, such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, vigabatrin, tiagabine, gabapentin, and pregabalin. The emergency treatment of motor status, which often complicates the course of PMEs, consists of intravenous administration of benzodiazepines, valproate, or levetiracetam.

The history of progressive myoclonus epilepsies.

The history of the progressive myoclonus epilepsies (PMEs) spans more than a century. However, the recent history of PMEs begins with a consensus statement published in the wake of the Marseille PME workshop in 1989 (Marseille Consensus Group, 1990). This consensus helped define the various types of PME known at the time and set the agenda for a new era of genetic research which soon lead to the discovery of many PME genes. Prior to the Marseille meeting, and before the molecular era, there had been much confusion and controversy. Because investigators had but limited and biased experience with these rare disorders due to the uneven, skewed distribution of PMEs around the world, opinions and nosologies were based on local expertise which did not match well with the experiences of other researchers and clinicians. The three major areas of focus included: (1) the nature and limits of the concept of PME in varying scopes, which was greatly debated; (2) the description of discrete clinical entities by clinicians; and (3) the description of markers (pathological, biological, neurophysiological, etc.) which could lead to a precise diagnosis of a given PME type, with, in the best cases, a reliable correlation with clinical findings. In this article, we shall also examine the breakthroughs achieved in the wake of the 1989 Marseille meeting and recent history in the field, following the identification of several PME genes. As in other domains, the molecular and genetic approach has challenged some established concepts and has led to the description of new PME types. However, as may already be noted, this approach has also confirmed the existence of the major, established types of PME, which can now be considered as true diseases.

Unverricht-Lundborg disease.

We first review the clinical presentation and current therapeutic approaches available for treating Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD), a progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Next, we describe the identification of disease causing mutations in the gene encoding cystatin B (CSTB). A Cstb-deficient mouse model, which recapitulates the key features of ULD including myoclonic seizures, ataxia, and neuronal loss, was generated to shed light on the mechanisms contributing to disease pathophysiology. Studies with this model have elucidated the diverse biological roles for Cstb from functioning as a protease inhibitor, to regulating glial activation, oxidative stress, serotonergic neurotransmission, and hyperexcitability. These findings set the stage for future studies that may open avenues to improved therapeutic approaches.