Long-term clinical benefit from salvage EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR wild-type tumors.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib has been approved for the management of NSCLC patients after failure of the first or subsequent line of chemotherapy. Although the efficacy of erlotinib is clearly associated with the presence of EGFR mutations, there is a subset of patients with EGFR wild-type (EGFRwt) tumors who impressively respond. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with EGFRwt NSCLC who received salvage (≥2nd line) treatment with erlotinib for a prolonged period (>6 months), were sought from the database of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics of the patients with available tumor material. RESULTS: Forty-four patients that received erlotinib for >6 months (median 10.1 months) were enrolled in the study. The majority of them were male, never-smokers with adenocarcinoma histology and a good performance status. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 21% (9/42 tested) and 13% (4/30 tested) of the patients, respectively. The ALK-EML4 translocation was found in 10% (2/20 tested); there was no patient with HER2 or BRAF mutated tumor. Twelve (54.5%) tumor specimens were considered positive for EGFR-overexpression. Eleven patients experienced a partial response (objective response rate 25%; 95% CI 12-38%) and the remaining 33 had stable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.1 (95% CI 8.6-11.6 months) and 24.1 (95% CI 11.2-37 months), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with erlotinib significantly improves the clinical outcome in a subset of NSCLC patients with EGFRwt tumors. Further molecular analysis of such tumor specimens could provide a more comprehensive characterization of this particular group of patients. Nevertheless, the presence of other mutations should not prevent the treating physician from using erlotinib at later lines of salvage therapy for NSCLC patients.

Salvage treatment with irinotecan/cisplatin versus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum-based regimen in the first-line setting: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, non-platinum combinations of third-generation chemotherapeutic agents are considered an alternative therapeutic option for patients who cannot tolerate the toxic effects of platinum compounds. In this study, the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC) was compared to pemetrexed plus cisplatin (PC) regimen, in platinum-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, who had been previously treated with the combination of a taxane plus gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to either irinotecan 110 mg/m2 on day 1 and 100 mg/m2 on day 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks (IC arm) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (PC arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The ORR and median progression-free survival (PFS) in the IC arm were 18 % and 3.3 months, respectively, while in the PC arm were 19 % and 4.2 months (p = ns). Median overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients with PC (6.9 vs. 10.9; p = 0.013). PC regimen had a better toxicity profile compared to IC, with a statistically significant lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (3 vs. 31 %; p = 0.0001) and diarrhea (1.6 vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with docetaxel/gemcitabine, the combination of pemetrexed/cisplatin is associated with increased OS and is better tolerated than the combination of irinotecan/cisplatin and should be considered as a valid therapeutic option for platinum-naive, previously treated patients. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00614965.

Predictive and prognostic value of LPS-stimulated cytokine secretion in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients usually develop malnutrition which may alter their innate immune system integrity. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of chemokine response after lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulation in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Blood samples from metastatic NSCLC patients were incubated with LPS before the onset of systemic therapy. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 levels at baseline and after LPS-stimulation were measured and the fold change compared to baseline levels was evaluated as the stimulation index for each cytokine per patient. Results were correlated with sex, age, smoking status, histologic subtype, performance status (PS), albumin, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) status and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Totally 103 patients were evaluated. Mean (±SD) stimulation index was 37.6 (±57.8) for IL-6 and 76.7 (±133.4) for IL-8. The disease control rate after first-line chemotherapy was 44/80 (55 %) and the mean (±SD) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 (±3.9) and 9.2 (±1.1) months, respectively. MNA, PS, albumin, IL-6 and IL-8 stimulation indices were univariately associated with PFS and OS. IL-8 stimulation index emerged as an independent predictor of both PFS and OS, along with PS, and albumin levels. CONCLUSION: The extent of IL-6 and IL-8 stimulation after ex vivo induction with LPS is an important predictor of clinical outcome in metastatic NSCLC patients.