Family caregivers' satisfaction with telerehabilitation and follow-up intervention for older people with dementia: Randomized clinical trial.

The present study aimed to assess caregiver satisfaction with a telerehabilitation program and remote monitoring for older adults with dementia and their caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify the factors influencing caregiver satisfaction. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach and was part of a randomized clinical trial, with blinded assessors, comprising two groups: the Intervention Group (IG) receiving a telerehabilitation program involving standardized physical exercises for older adults with dementia, along with caregiver guidelines for the caregiver; and the Control Group (CG) receiving remote monitoring. At baseline, factors related to older adults with dementia and their caregivers were measured. After 12 weeks, caregiver satisfaction with the interventions was assessed. The final sample consisted of 64 pairs of family caregivers and older people with dementia. Caregivers in the IG showed higher satisfaction levels with the intervention, Internet-based treatment, and healthcare received compared to caregivers in the CG. Both groups expressed positive views towards the treatment, with excellent ratings for audio and video quality, and a preference for Internet-based treatment over face-to-face. In the IG, only the amount of time dedicated to caregiving influenced satisfaction with the intervention, whereas in the CG, cognitive and functional performance of the older people influenced satisfaction with remote monitoring. Our findings suggest the potential of the program in providing effective care for older people with dementia and their caregivers.

Effects of case management based on preventing falls in older people: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Falls among older adults can lead to negative consequences with physical, functional, social, and psychological functioning, and a high prevalence of mortality. However, it is still unclear whether case management can reduce the number of falls in this population. AIMS: The aims of this review were to analyze the effects of case management on preventing falls and reducing risk factors for falls in older people. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted, searching for and synthesizing clinical trials involving case management in older people who had falls or risk for fall outcomes. Two authors extracted data using predefined data fields, and risk of bias was assessed by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the final review. Case management in older people did not significantly reduce the number of falls, falls per person, or severity of falls compared to control groups. Adherence to recommendations in case management ranged from 25% to 88%. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: There is limited evidence of reduced rates of falls and specific risk factors for falls among people who received case management interventions. Randomized trials with good quality are needed.

Six-month change in gait speed to discriminate between those with and without falls history in older people with Mild Cognitive Impairment and mild Alzheimer disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to identify differences in gait speed performance over 6 months between older people with Preserved Cognition (PrC), with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and with Alzheimer disease (AD) in mild stage; and to verify if the change in gait speed could discriminate fallers in older people with MCI and AD in a mild stage METHODS: A longitudinal study was conducted with community-dwelling older adults, including 40 with PrC, 36 with MCI and 34 with AD in the mild stage. Gait speed (in m/s) changes were captured through a 10-meter walk test. We documented the number of self-reported falls by monthly calendars that were returned after a 6-month follow-up. During this period, the participants received monthly telephone calls to remind them to fill in the calendar RESULTS: There was a significant difference in terms of sex and age between the groups: 23%, 31% and 19% were female and had a mean age of 72.8, 75.9 and 76.9 years in the PrC, MCI and AD groups respectively. During the follow-up, 45%, 52.7% and 52.9% of the PrC, MCI and AD groups fell. The MCI and AD groups presented lower gait speed compared to the PrC Group at both moments. There was no significant difference in the change of gait speed between groups. In the model adjusted by age, the change in gait speed failed to discriminate fallers in older people with MCI and with AD CONCLUSION: Older people with MCI and AD in the mild stage present lower gait speed compared to older people with PrC. Changes in gait speed over a short period of time do not discriminate fallers in older people with MCI or AD in a mild stage.