Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Outcomes after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) improves access to transplant for patients lacking a fully matched donor. Previous Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) showed that Black patients had a lower overall survival (OS) than White patients following single UCBT. The current study draws on a larger modern cohort and compares outcomes among White, Latinx, Black, and Asian patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes by social determinants of health. STUDY DESIGN: We designed a retrospective study using CIBMTR data. US patients were between ages 1 and 80; 983 received single and 1529 double UCBT as reported to CIBMTR, following either a myeloablative (N=1752) or reduced intensity conditioning (N=759) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoid Leukemia, or Myelodysplasia. The primary outcome was 2-year OS. Secondary outcomes included disease free survival, transplant related mortality (TRM), acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD), and GVHD free, relapse free survival (GRFS). RESULTS: For 1705 adults, in univariate analysis, 2-year OS was 41.5% (99% CI, 37.6-45.3) for Whites, 36.1% (99% CI, 28.2-44.5) for Latinx, 45.8% (99% CI, 36.7-55.1) for Blacks, and 44.5% (99% CI, 33.6-55.6) for Asians. In multivariate analysis of adults, Latinx patients had inferior OS compared to black patients (p=0.0005, HR 1.45, 99% CI 1.18-1.79). OS improved over time for all racial/ethnic groups. GVHD rates were comparable among the different racial/ethnic groups. In the 807 children, the 2-year OS in univariate analysis was 66.1% (99% CI, 59.7-72.2) for Whites, 57.1% (99%CI, 49-64.9) for Latinx, 46.8% (99%CI, 35.3-58.4) for Blacks, and 53.8% (99%CI, 32.7-74.2) for Asians. In multivariate analysis, no difference in OS was observed among racial/ethnic groups (p = 0.051). Grade III/IV acute GVHD was higher in Blacks compared with Whites (p= 0.0016, HR 2.25, 99% CI 1.36-3.74) and Latinx (p= 0.0016, HR 2.17, 99% CI 1.43-3.30). There was no survival advantage to receiving a UCB unit from a donor of similar race and ethnicity, for any racial/ethnic groups, for both children and adults. Black and Latinx adult patients were more likely to live in areas defined as high poverty. Patients from high poverty level areas had worse OS (p =0.03), due to a higher rate of TRM (p=0.04). Educational level, and type of insurance did not impact overall survival, GVHD, TRM or other transplant outcomes. Children from areas with a higher poverty level had higher TRM, regardless of race and ethnicity (p=0.02). Public health insurance, such as Medicaid, was also associated with a higher TRM (p=0.02). However, poverty did not impact pediatric OS, DFS, or other post-transplant outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: OS for UCBT has improved over time. In adults, OS is comparable among Whites, Blacks, and Asians and lower for Latinx patients. In children, OS is comparable among Whites, Blacks, Latinx, and Asians, but Grade III/IV acute GVHD was higher in Black patients. There was no survival benefit to matching UCB unit and patient by race and ethnicity for adults and children.

Donor Types and Outcomes of Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: A CIBMTR Study.

We aim to evaluate impact of donor types on outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis, using CIBMTR registry data for HCTs done between 2013 and 2019. In all 1597 undergoing HCT for myelofibrosis, the use of haploidentical donors increased from 3% in 2013 to 19% in 2019. In study eligible, 1032 patients who received peripheral blood grafts for chronic phase myelofibrosis, 38% recipients of haploidentical-HCT were of non-White/Caucasian ethnicity. Matched sibling donor (MSD)-HCTs were independently associated with superior overall survival (OS) in the first 3 months [reference MSD, haploidentical HR 5.80 (95% CI 2.52-13.35), matched unrelated HR 4.50 (95% CI 2.24-9.03), and mismatched unrelated HR 5.13 (95% CI 1.44-18.31), P<0.001]. This difference in OS aligns with lower graft failure with MSD [haploidentical HR 6.11 (95%CI 2.98-12.54), matched unrelated HR 2.33 (95%CI 1.20-4.51), mismatched unrelated HR 1.82 (95%CI 0.58-5.72). There was no significant difference in OS among haploidentical, matched unrelated, and mismatched unrelated donor HCTs in the first 3 months. Donor type was not associated with differences in OS beyond 3 months post-HCT, relapse, disease-free survival or OS among patients who underwent HCT within 24 months of diagnosis. Patients who experienced graft failure had more advanced disease and commonly used nonmyeloablative conditioning. While MSDs remain a superior donor option due to improved engraftment, there is no significant difference in HCT outcomes from haploidentical and matched unrelated donors. These results establish haploidentical-HCT with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide as a viable option in myelofibrosis, especially for ethnic minorities underrepresented in the donor registries.

Safety and Feasibility of Third-Party Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes for High-Risk Patients with Covid-19.

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) destroy virally infected cells and are critical for the elimination of viral infections such as those caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Delayed and dysfunctional adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with poor outcomes. Treatment with allogeneic SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs may enhance cellular immunity in high-risk patients and provide a safe, direct mechanism of treatment. Thirty high-risk ambulatory patients with COVID-19 were enrolled on a phase I trial to assess the safety of 3rd party, SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs. Twelve Interventional patients, 6 of whom were immunocompromised, matched the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01 restriction of the CTLs and received a single infusion of one of four escalating doses of a product containing 68.5% SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ CTLs/total cells. Symptom improvement and resolution in these patients was compared to an Observational group of eighteen patients lacking HLA-A*02:01 who could receive standard of care. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any dosing level. Nasal swab PCR data showed ≥ 88% and >99% viral elimination from baseline in all patients at 4- and 14-days post-infusion. The CTLs did not interfere with the development of endogenous anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral or cellular responses. T-cell receptor beta (TCR) analysis comparing SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses derived from the CTL donor versus recipients showed persistence of donor-derived CTLs through the end of the 6-month follow-up period. Interventional patients consistently reported symptomatic improvement 2-3 days after infusion, whereas improvement was more variable in Observational patients. This study shows that SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs are a potentially feasible cellular therapy for COVID-19 illness. (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT04765449).

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Access in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Association of Access with Social Determinants of Health and Travel Time to Treatment Centers.

Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy represents a novel treatment with curative potential for relapsed or refractory (R/R) LBCL, but there are access barriers to this innovative therapy that are not well-studied. Study objectives were: (1) Assess the impact of geographic factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) on access to treatment with CAR T in a sample of patients with R/R LBCL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOT). (2) Compare and contrast patient characteristics, SDOH, and travel time between patients with R/R LBCL who received CAR T and those who did not. An observational, nested case-control study of patients with R/R LBCL, ≥2 prior LOT, not in a clinical trial, identified using 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service and national multi-payer claims databases. Patients were linked to near-neighborhood SDOH using 9-digit ZIP-code address. Driving distance and time between residence and nearest CAR T treatment center (TC) was calculated. Patients were stratified based on treatments received upon third LOT initiation (Index Date) or later: (1) received CAR T and (2) did not receive CAR T. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with CAR T. 5011 patients met inclusion criteria, with 628 (12.5%) in the CAR T group. Regression models found the likelihood of receiving CAR T decreased with patient age (odds ratio [OR] = .96, P < .001), and males were 29% more likely to receive CAR T (OR = 1.29, P = .02). Likelihood of CAR T increased with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR = 1.07, P < .001) indicating patients with more comorbidities were more likely to receive CAR T. Black patients were less than half as likely to receive CAR T than White patients (OR = .44, P = .01). Asian patients did not significantly differ from White patients (OR = 1.43, P = .24), and there was a trend for Hispanic patients to have a slightly lower likelihood of CAR T (OR = .50, P = .07). Higher household income was associated with receipt of CAR T, with the lowest income group more than 50% less likely to receive CAR T than the highest (OR = .44, P = .002), and the second lowest income group more than 30% less likely (OR = .68, P = .02). Finally, likelihood of CAR T therapy was reduced when the driving time to the nearest TC was 121 to 240 minutes (reference group: ≤30 minutes; OR = .64, P = .04). Travel times between 31 and 121 or greater than 240 minutes were not significantly different from ≤30 minutes. Payer type was collinear with age and could not be included in the regression analysis, but patients with commercial insurance were 1.5 to 3 times more likely to receive CAR T than other payers on an unadjusted basis. We identified significant disparities in access to CAR T related to demographics and SDOH. Patients who were older, female, low income, or Black were less likely to receive CAR T. The positive association of CCI with CAR T requires further research. Given the promising outcomes of CAR T, there is urgent need to address identified disparities and increase efforts to overcome access barriers.

A prospective study of posttransplant cyclophosphamide for unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant with special attention to graft content and the impact of a higher γδ T cell dose.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PtCy) has been shown to decrease post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In this study, PtCy was used in 44 patients along with mycophenolate and tacrolimus with HLA matched (29) and mismatched (15) unrelated donors to determine the impact of graft content on outcome; thus, all patients had flow cytometric analysis of their graft content including the number of B cells, NK cells, and various T cell subsets. Higher γδ T cell dose was associated with the development of acute GVHD (p = .0038). For PtCy, further studies of the cell product along with further graft manipulation, such as selective γδ T cell depletion, could potentially improve outcomes.

Projected Impact of Omidubicel-onlv on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (Allo-HCT) Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: In a phase III clinical trial (NCT02730299), omidubicel-onlv, a nicotinamide-modified allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell therapy, showed rapid hematopoietic and immune recovery compared with standard umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplant across all racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: A decision-tree model was used to project the effect of omidubicel-onlv availability on addressing health disparities in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) access and outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies. The model used a hypothetical population of 10,000 allo-HCT-eligible US adults, for whom matched related donors were not available. Patients received matched or mismatched unrelated donor, haploidentical, UCB transplant, or no transplant. Scenarios with omidubicel-onlv use of 0% (status quo), 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30% were modeled on the basis of proportional reductions in other allo-HCT sources or no transplant by racial/ethnic group. RESULTS: Increased omidubicel-onlv use was associated with a higher proportion of patients undergoing allo-HCT, decreased time to allo-HCT, decreased 1-year non-relapse mortality, and increased 1-year overall survival, particularly among racial minorities. In the scenario modeling 20% omidubicel-onlv use, the proportion of Black patients receiving allo-HCT increased by 129%; increases were also observed in Asian (64%), Hispanic (45%), and other (42%) patient groups. Modeled time to allo-HCT improved among transplanted patients (23%) from 11.4 weeks to 8.8 weeks. One-year OS in the overall population increased by 3%, with improvements ranging from 3% for White patients to 5% for Black patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that broad access to omidubicel-onlv could increase access to allo-HCT and improve outcomes for patients, with the greatest benefits seen among racial/ethnic minority groups.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T - Cell Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded in most of the CAR T-cell therapy trials. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy with CAR T-cell therapy in LBCL patients with CNS involvement. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed and Cochrane Library to identify all published literature associated with United States Food and Drug Administration approved CAR T-cell therapies for LBCL. Patients with CNS LBCL were included. Meta-analysis of proportion was performed to evaluate the overall response (ORR), complete response (CR) for efficacy, and cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome for safety assessment. Nineteen studies were qualified for inclusion with 141 CNS LBCL patients. The ORR and CR rates were 61% and 55% respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months. Severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade≥3) were reported in 25% (32/130) patients and severe cytokine release syndrome (grade≥3) were found in 10% (13/124) of the patients. The safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in CNS LBCL patients appears comparable to patients without CNS involvement.

Health care costs among patients with hematologic malignancies receiving allogeneic transplants: a US payer perspective.

ABSTRACT: Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) require extensive care. Using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (2016 Q1-2020 Q2), we quantified the costs of care and assessed real-world complication rates among commercially insured US patients diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy and aged between 12 and 64 years undergoing inpatient allo-HCT. Health care resource use and costs were assessed from 100 days before HCT to 100 days after HCT. Primary hospitalization was defined as the time from HCT until first discharge date. Incidence of complications was assessed using medical billing codes from HCT date to 100 days after HCT. Among the 1082 patients analyzed, allo-HCT grafts included peripheral blood (79%), bone marrow (11%), and umbilical cord blood (3%). In the 100 days after HCT, 52% of the patients experienced acute graft-versus-host disease; 21% had cytomegalovirus infection. The median primary hospitalization length of stay (LOS) was 28 days; 31% required readmission in first 100 days after HCT. Across the transplant period (14 days pretransplant to 100 days posttransplant), 44% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit with a median LOS of 29 days. Among those with noncapitated health plans (n = 937), median cost of all-cause health care per patient during the transplant period was $331 827, which was driven by primary hospitalization and readmission. Additionally, the predicted median incremental costs per additional day in an inpatient setting increased with longer LOS (eg, $3381-$4071, 10th-20th day.) Thus, decreasing length of primary hospitalization and avoiding readmissions should significantly reduce the allo-HCT cost of care.

Donor-Derived Malignancy and Transplantation Morbidity: Risks of Patient and Donor Genetics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a key treatment option for hematologic malignancies (HMs), although it carries significant risks. Up to 30% of patients relapse after allo-HSCT, of which up to 2% to 5% are donor-derived malignancies (DDMs). DDMs can arise from a germline genetic predisposition allele or clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in the donor. Increasingly, genetic testing reveals that patient and donor genetic factors contribute to the development of DDM and other allo-HSCT complications. Deleterious germline variants in CEBPA, DDX41, GATA2, and RUNX1 predispose to inferior allo-HSCT outcomes. DDM has been linked to donor-acquired somatic CH variants in DNMT3A, ASXL1, JAK2, and IDH2, often with additional new variants. We do not yet have evidence to standardize donor genetic sequencing prior to allo-HSCT. The presence of hereditary HM disorders should be considered in patients with myeloid malignancies and their related donors, and screening of unrelated donors should include family and personal history of cytopenia and HMs. Excellent multidisciplinary care is critical to ensure efficient timelines for screening and necessary discussions among medical oncologists, genetic counselors, recipients, and potential donors. After allo-HSCT, HM relapse monitoring with genetic testing effectively results in genetic sequencing of the donor, as the transplanted hematopoietic system is donor-derived, which presents ethical challenges for disclosure to patients and donors. We encourage consideration of the recent National Marrow Donor Program policy that allows donors to opt-in for notification about detection of their genetic variants after allo-HSCT, with appropriate genetic counseling when feasible. We look forward to prospective investigation of the impact of germline and acquired somatic genetic variants on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization/engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, and DDM to facilitate improved outcomes through knowledge of genetic risk.

The two-step approach to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides the only potentially curative option for multiple hematological conditions. However, allogeneic HSCT outcomes rely on an optimal balance of effective immune recovery, minimal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and lasting control of disease. The quest to attain this balance has proven challenging over the past few decades. The two-step approach to HSCT was conceptualized and pioneered at Thomas Jefferson University in 2005 and remains the main platform for allografting at our institution. Following administration of the transplant conditioning regimen, patients receive a fixed dose of donor CD3+ cells (HSCT step one-DLI) as the lymphoid portion of the graft on day -6 with the aim of optimizing and controlling T cell dosing. Cyclophosphamide (CY) is administered after the DLI (days -3 and -2) to induce donor-recipient bidirectional tolerance. On day 0, a CD34-selected stem cell graft is given as the myeloid portion of the graft (step two). In this two-step approach, the stem cell graft is infused after CY tolerization, which avoids exposure of the stem cells to an alkylating agent, allowing rapid count recovery. Here, the two-step platform is described with a focus on key results from studies over the past two decades. Finally, this review details lessons learned and current strategies to optimize the graft-versus-tumor effect and limit transplant-related toxicities.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment patterns in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Aim: To investigate real-world chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy treatment patterns. Patient & methods: Relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients who received CAR T-cell therapy were identified. Patient characteristics, setting of CAR T-cell infusion, incidence of CAR T-cell therapy-associated adverse events and healthcare resource utilization were assessed. Results: Of 1175 patients, 83% were infused inpatient. Within three days postinfusion, inpatient-infused patients had a significantly higher risk of CAR T-associated adverse events (hazard ratio: 2.67; 95% CI: 2.09-3.42) compared with outpatient-infused patients. By day 30, 67% of outpatient-infused patients were hospitalized at least once. Conclusion: These findings suggest that physicians were able to select lower-risk patients for outpatient infusion, but postinfusion hospitalizations still occur.

This study tracks outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy between 2017 and 2020. The authors used the Anlitiks All-Payor Claims (AAPC) database, which includes insurance claims of patients covered through Medicare, Medicaid or commercial insurance plans. AAPC includes over 80% of insured patients in the USA healthcare system. The study describes where patients received CAR T-cell therapy (inpatient/outpatient), rates of adverse events potentially related to CAR T-cell treatment and how much healthcare the patients received. In the 3 days after receiving CAR T-cell therapy, rates of CAR T-associated adverse events were significantly higher in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy in the inpatient setting, compared with outpatients. The findings suggest that lower-risk patients may receive CAR T-cell therapy as outpatients, but that most outpatient-infused patients will still require inpatient care.

A simple prognostic system in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a CIBMTR/EBMT analysis.

To develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.

Expert consensus on microtransplant for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients -report from the international microtransplant interest group.

Recent studies have shown that microtransplant (MST) could improve outcome of patients with elderly acute myeloid leukemia (EAML). To further standardize the MST therapy and improve outcomes in EAML patients, based on analysis of the literature on MST, especially MST with EAML from January 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2022, the International Microtransplant Interest Group provides recommendations and considerations for MST in the treatment of EAML. Four major issues related to MST for treating EAML were addressed: therapeutic principle of MST (1), candidates for MST (2), induction chemotherapy regimens (3), and post-remission therapy based on MST (4). Others included donor screening, infusion of donor cells, laboratory examinations, and complications of treatment.

Endemic or regionally limited bacterial and viral infections in haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) Review.

Literature discussing endemic and regionally limited infections in recipients of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) outside western Europe and North America is scarce. This Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) article is part one of two papers aiming to provide guidance to transplantation centres around the globe regarding infection prevention and treatment, and considerations for transplantation based on current evidence and expert opinion. These recommendations were initially formulated by a core writing team from the WBMT and subsequently underwent multiple revisions by infectious disease experts and HSCT experts. In this paper, we summarise the data and provide recommendations on several endemic and regionally limited viral and bacterial infections, many of which are listed by WHO as neglected tropical diseases, including Dengue, Zika, yellow fever, chikungunya, rabies, brucellosis, melioidosis, and leptospirosis.

Endemic or regionally limited parasitic and fungal infections in haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) Review.

There is a scarcity of data on endemic and regionally limited fungal and parasitic infections in recipients of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) outside western Europe and North America. This Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) Review is one of two papers aiming to provide guidance to transplantation centres worldwide regarding prevention, diagnosis, and treatment based on the currently available evidence and expert opinion. These recommendations were created and reviewed by physicians with expertise in HSCT or infectious disease, representing several infectious disease and HSCT groups and societies. In this paper, we review the literature on several endemic and regionally limited parasitic and fungal infections, some of which are listed as neglected tropical diseases by WHO, including visceral leishmaniasis, Chagas disease, strongyloidiasis, malaria, schistosomiasis, histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, and coccidioidomycosis.

Impact of second primary malignancy post-autologous transplantation on outcomes of multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis.

The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P < .001 and HR 5.01, P < .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P < .001 and HR 8.13, P < .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post-auto-HSCT.

The mutational landscape in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and its impact on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes: a Center for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR) analysis.

Somatic mutations are recognized as an important prognostic factor in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, limited data are available regarding their impact on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this registry analysis conducted in collaboration with the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry database/sample repository, we identified 313 adult patients with CMML (median age: 64 years, range, 28- 77) who underwent allogeneic HCT during 2001-2017 and had an available biospecimen in the form of a peripheral blood sample obtained prior to the start of conditioning. In multivariate analysis, a CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) score of intermediate-2 (HR=1.46, P=0.049) or high (HR=3.22, P=0.0004) correlated significantly with overall survival. When the molecularly informed CPSS-Mol prognostic model was applied, a high CPSS-Mol score (HR=2 P=0.0079) correlated significantly with overall survival. The most common somatic mutations were in ASXL1 (62%), TET2 (35%), KRAS/NRAS (33% combined), and SRSF2 (31%). DNMT3A and TP53 mutations were associated with decreased overall survival (HR=1.70 [95% CI: 1.11-2.60], P=0.0147 and HR=2.72 [95% CI: 1.37-5.39], P=0.0042, respectively) while DNMT3A, JAK2, and TP53 mutations were associated with decreased disease-free survival (HR=1.66 [95% CI: 1.11-2.49], P=0.0138, HR=1.79 [95% CI: 1.06-3.03], P=0.0293, and HR=2.94 [95% CI: 1.50-5.79], P=0.0018, respectively). The only mutation associated with increased relapse was TP53 (HR=2.94, P=0.0201). Nonetheless, the impact of TP53 mutations specifically should be interpreted cautiously given their rarity in CMML. We calculated the goodness of fit measured by Harrell's C-index for both the CPSS and CPSS-Mol, which were very similar. In summary, via registry data we have determined the mutational landscape in patients with CMML who underwent allogeneic HCT, and demonstrated an association between CPSS-Mol and transplant outcomes although without major improvement in the risk prediction beyond that provided by the CPSS.

Engraftment syndrome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Engraftment syndrome (ES) is associated with neutrophil recovery after stem cell transplantation (SCT). It is associated with autologous and allogeneic SCT. However, a literature review has shown that allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) is associated with ES without conclusive data on risk factors or effects on outcomes. This meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate the cumulative incidence of ES following allo-SCT, and to evaluate the risk factors and outcomes among patients with ES following allo-SCT. Current literature was searched using electronic databases, and manually. Studies with ES after allo-SCT were selected, and a meta-analysis of proportion was performed using the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine transformation, random-effects model to calculate the cumulative incidence of ES. Donor type, source of haematopoetic stem cells, graft vs. host disease (GvHD) prophylaxes, and conditioning regimens' intensity were evaluated for risk factors for ES. Association of acute GvHD (aGvHD), chronic GvHD (cGvHD), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS) between the ES and no ES groups were assessed using the odds ratio (OR). Eighteen studies were included comprising 3620 patients receiving allo-SCT and 774 of them had developed ES with a cumulative incidence of 35.4%. The odds of aGvHD (OR 2.5, p < 0.001), cGvHD (OR 4.5, p = 0.021), and NRM (OR 1.8, p = 0.01) were higher among patients who developed ES. The odds of relapse were significantly less (OR = 0.679, p = 0.011) among the ES group. OS (OR = 0.72, p < 0.001) was reduced in the ES group. Myeloablative conditioning was found to be a significant risk factor for ES development. In conclusion, ES after allo-SCT is common with higher odds of developing aGvHD, cGvHD, and NRM and lower odds of OS.

Next-Generation Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 6 CAR T cell (CAR-T) products, including tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in the last 5 years. CAR T-cell therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). However, recurrence and progression may occur after the initial response due to multiple mechanisms (Zeng and Zhang, 2022) [1]. Furthermore, CAR T-cell therapy is not broadly utilized in solid tumors due to various barriers. This review discusses the evolution of CAR T-cell therapies and how the "younger-generation" CAR T cells counteract these challenges to potentially broaden their applications in the future.