Percutaneous operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis may not increase the general rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment.

PURPOSE: Despite an increasing number of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) over the last 2 decades, controversy persists on their therapy with special regard to potential complications. Therefore, the present study compared the complication rates and in-hospital mortality of non-operative therapy, percutaneous treatment and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pelvic fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for FFP between January 2013 and December 2017 aged 65 years or older were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Demographic data and specific patient data were collected with a special focus on pre-existing comorbidities. General and surgical complications, hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality rates were compared. RESULTS: 379 patients (81.3 ± 7.5 years; 81% female) were identified, 211 (55.7%) were treated non-operatively, 74 (19.5%) percutaneously and 94 (24.8%) with ORIF. The rate of general complications did not differ between treatment groups (non-operative: 21.8%; percutaneous: 28.4%; ORIF: 33.0%; p = 0.103). Surgery-related complications were twofold more frequent in the ORIF group as than in the percutaneously treated group (18.1% vs. 9.5%). The LOS differed significantly (non-operatively: 8.9 ± 7.1 days; percutaneous: 16.6 ± 8.2 days; ORIF: 19.3 ± 12.8 days; p < 0.001). Hospital mortality rate was higher in patients with ORIF (5.3%) than percutaneous treatment (0%) (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates and hospital mortality in elderly patients with FFPs are high and associated with long LOS. For surgical treatment of FFPs, the complication rate and mortality can be significantly reduced using percutaneous procedures compared to ORIF. Therefore, percutaneous surgery should be preferred where possible.

Time-to-treatment is a risk factor for the development of pressure ulcers in elderly patients with fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum are associated with pain and immobilization and, hence, pose the risk of developing a pressure ulcer - especially in elderly patients. In the literature, information on risk factors for the occurrence of pressure ulcers related to geriatric pelvic or acetabulum fractures is missing. METHODS: Consecutive in-hospital patients aged 55 years or older treated for closed pelvis and/or acetabulum fractures between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively identified from an institutional prospective database. Epidemiologic characteristics and patient specifics with special focus on the time from admission to treatment, duration of hospitalization and comorbidities were retrospectively assessed by chart review. RESULTS: During the evaluated interval, 407 patients with isolated fractures of the pelvis or acetabulum (mean age 78 years, range 55 to 101 years, 69,3% female) were treated. A new pressure ulcer that developed during the hospitalization was observed in 46/407 patients (11.3%). This included pressure ulcers of stage 1 in 18/46 cases (39%), stage 2 in 24/46 cases (52%), and stage 3 in 4/46 cases (9%). No stage 4 ulcers were seen in this cohort. The mean duration of hospitalization was longer in patients with a pressure ulcer (25 days, SD 17) than in patients with no ulcers (12 days, SD 9; p < .001). Patients who developed a pressure ulcer, had waited significantly longer for treatment of their pelvis/acetabulum fracture when compared to patients without an ulcer (5 days, SD 5 vs. 3 days SD 4, p = =.001). A logistic regression analysis confirmed "time to treatment" as an independent risk factor for the occurrence of a pressure ulcer during hospitalization. In an analysis adjusted for the confounders age, male gender, diabetes and malignancy, the odds ratio to develop a pressure ulcer remained 1.10 (CI 1.03 to 1.19; c-value = 0.774, p = .008) for each day of waiting treatment. CONCLUSION: "Time to treatment" is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of a pressure ulcer during hospitalization after a pelvis/acetabulum fracture in elderly patients. Each day of waiting treatment increases the risk of developing a pressure ulcer by 10%.