Impact of medical and pharmaceutical interventions on anti-infective prescriptions: an observational study.

Appropriate prescribing of anti-infectives is a public health challenge. In our hospital, clinical microbiologists (clinical microbiology mobile unit, UMMc) and clinical pharmacists (clinical pharmacy, PHAc) carry out interventions on anti-infective prescriptions to improve practices. Our main objective was to evaluate the acceptance of UMMc and PHAc interventions on anti-infective prescriptions by quantifying the rate of prescription change 24 h after intervention. The secondary objective was to characterize the type of intervention and associate the rate of change for each. All prescriptions are computerized, and interventions traced via DxCare® software, which feeds a local data warehouse (HEGP-CDW). This descriptive, retrospective, single-center, uncontrolled study was conducted from January 2015 to December 2018. The data were extracted over this period from the data warehouse and analyzed using R software. UMMc interventions were accepted 72.2% of the time and PHA interventions 87.3%. The types of interventions found were mostly dose adjustments (61.1% for the UMMc and 54.2% for the PHAc) and proposals to change or stop a drug. Interventions have an impact on anti-infective prescriptions and are generally followed by clinicians. For the category "discontinuation of a molecule", almost half of the advice from the UMMc was refused. The collaboration between the UMMc and PHAc should be reinforced to improve acceptance.

[Improvement of antibiotic therapy adequacy with local guidelines and their reassessment through a multidisciplinary action: Prospective study in an Internal Medicine department]. / Amélioration de l'adéquation des antibiothérapies aux recommandations et de leur réévaluation par une action pluridisciplinaire : étude prospective dans un service de médecine interne.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship actions is important in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary program on the adequacy of antibiotic prescriptions with local guidelines in terms of indication, molecule, dosage and treatment duration during the 48-72h reassessment in an internal medicine department. METHOD: This was a before/after monocentric, prospective study. All patients hospitalized in the internal medicine department who were treated with antibiotics for at least 48h were included. The intervention had two components: training of residents about antibiotic treatment and development of a multidisciplinary 48-72h reassessment team. Our primary endpoint was the adequacy of prescriptions with local guidelines, assessed by an independent blinded committee. We also measured antibiotic consumptions. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were included. Adequacy with local recommendations increased from 57.1% to 97.8% (P<0.01), including for the duration of treatment. Traceability of reassessment in medical records increased from 65.3 % to 97.8 % (P<0.01). Finally, the part of consumption of antibiotics with high risk of resistance selection decreased during the period "after" (-10.2 %, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The set-up of a multimodal (association of pedagogic and incentive actions) and multidisciplinary (internist, clinical pharmacist and antimicrobial stewards) action improved the adequacy of antibiotic prescriptions with local guidelines.

ß LACTA testing may not improve treatment decisions made with MALDI-TOF MS-informed antimicrobial stewardship advice for patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia: a prospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess if use of the ß LACTA test (BLT) for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) detection and/or early bacterial identification by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) improves therapeutic decision-making when combined with advice from the antimicrobial stewardship team (AMST) for the management of Gram-negative bacillary (GNB) bacteraemia. METHODS: Prospective observational theoretical study that included patients with GNB bacteraemia during a 6-month period. We compared, against the antimicrobial choice of the local AMST as informed of the Gram-stain result, a hypothetical choice, i.e. one AMST would have made had it been informed of the MALDI-TOF MS results only (option H) with the actual choice AMST made after being informed of the combined MALDI-TOF MS and BLT results (option A).Results/Key findings. A total of 131 episodes of GNB bacteraemia were included. Options H and A led to virtually the same rate of efficient antimicrobial therapy (in 120/131 and 123/131 episodes, respectively, P=0.63). Compared to the gold standard, options H and A did not lead to a significant reduction of carbapenem prescription (9/131, 6/131 and 12/131, P=0.57 and P=0.65, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Under our test conditions, BLT, when used in conjunction with MALDI-TOF MS and AMST advice, did not allow a significant optimization of the antimicrobial prescription made on the basis AMST advice only. However, the impact of BLT should be evaluated in a population with high prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and/or when treatment choices are not made by infectious disease specialists.

International experts' practice in the antibiotic therapy of infective endocarditis is not following the guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: The management of infective endocarditis (IE) may differ from international guidelines, even in reference centres. This is probably because most recommendations are not based on hard evidence, so the consensus obtained for the guidelines does not represent actual practices. For this reason, we aimed to evaluate this question in the particular field of antibiotic therapy. METHODS: Thirteen international centres specialized in the management of IE were selected, according to their reputation, clinical results, original research publications and quotations. They were asked to detail their actual practice in terms of IE antibiotic treatment in various bacteriological and clinical situations. They were also asked to declare their IE-related in-hospital mortality for the year 2015. RESULTS: The global compliance with guidelines concerning antibiotic therapy was 58%, revealing the differences between theoretical 'consensus', local recommendations and actual practice. Some conflicts of interest were also probably expressed. The adherence to guidelines was 100% when the protocol was simple, and decreased with the seriousness of the situation (Staphylococus spp. 54%-62%) or in blood-culture-negative endocarditis (0%-15%) that requires adaptation to clinical and epidemiological data. CONCLUSION: Worldwide experts in IE management, although the majority of them were involved and co-signed the guidelines, do not follow international consensus guidelines on the particular point of the use of antibiotics.

Switch to oral antibiotics in the treatment of infective endocarditis is not associated with increased risk of mortality in non-severely ill patients.

Although many international guidelines exist for the management of infective endocarditis (IE), recommendations are lacking on the opportunity of switching antibiotics from the intravenous (IV) to oral route during treatment. We present a cohort study of 426 cases of IE over a period of 13 years (2000-2012), including 369 cases of definite IE according to the Duke criteria. Predictors of mortality were identified using the Cox proportional hazard analysis. The median (range) age at diagnosis was 64.5 (7-98) years. One hundred six patients (25%) had healthcare-associated IE. Oral streptococci (n = 99, 23%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 81, 19%) were the predominant microorganisms. Ninety-two patients (22%) died during follow-up. After an initial phase of IV antibiotherapy, 214 patients (50%) were switched to oral route a median (range) of 21 (0-70) days after diagnosis of IE. Patients in the oral group had fewer comorbidities, and criteria of severity at inclusion and were less frequently infected by S. aureus. Oral antibiotics were amoxicillin alone in 109 cases or a combination therapy of clindamycin, fluoroquinolone, rifampicin and/or amoxicillin in 46 cases, according to the susceptibility of the microorganisms. In the multivariate analysis, a switch to oral route was not associated with an increased risk of mortality. During follow-up, only two relapses and four reinfections were observed in the oral group (compared to nine and eight in the IV group, respectively). In this study, switching to oral administration was not associated with an increased risk of relapse or reinfection. These promising results need to be confirmed by prospective studies.

False positive galactomannan Platelia due to piperacillin-tazobactam.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive aspergillosis is a serious disease, the lethality of which is important among hematology patients. Early diagnosis is crucial for treatment options and the prognosis. Detection of the antigen galactomannan is the most frequently used microbiological tools. But galactomannan detection may be falsely positive, and this false positivity has been associated with piperacillin-tazobactam treatment, the main antibiotic combination used in clinical hematology. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study, carried out from January 2009 to December 2010 at the Versailles hospital on in-patients with hematological disorders, was to evaluate the association between false galactomannan positivity and administration of piperacillin-tazobactam, and to study a possible variability of products issued by three manufacturers. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We noted that 207 patients were included (n=207), accounting for 69 false positive and 138 true negative results. The intrinsic galactomannan values in the study were sensitivity 100%, specificity 68%, positive and negative predictive values respectively 16%, 100%, and a likelihood positive and negative test at respectively 3.12, and 0. RESULTS: The statistical analysis did not determine any association between false positivity in galactomannan and piperacillin-tazobactam issued by two manufacturers (P=0.87 and P=0.94). But, there was a significant association between false galactomannan positivity and piperacillin-tazobactam issued by the third manufacturer (P=0.02). Four of the 25 batches issued by this manufacturer were tested and negative "in vitro" for galactomannan. DISCUSSION: This study results suggest that the association between false galactomannan positivity and piperacillin-tazobactam is not longer systematic, but can still prevail depending on the manufacturers. It also confirmed the positive contribution of testing piperacillin-tazobactam batches "in vitro" before using the antibiotic.