Catheter ablation of parahisian premature ventricular complexes in patients with and without cardiac scar.

BACKGROUND: Ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) originating from the parahisian area is challenging. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) scar may influence procedural outcomes; the impact of cardiac scar on parahisian PVCs has not been described. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the incidence and significance of LGE-CMR scarring in patients undergoing ablation for parahisian PVCs. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent preprocedure LGE-CMR imaging and ablation of parahisian PVCs were included. Acute and long-term outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (male, n = 37; age, 66 ± 10 years; ejection fraction, 50% ± 12%; preprocedure PVC burden, 21% ± 12%). Intramural LGE-CMR scar was present in 33 of 48 (69%) patients. Cryoablation was used in 9 patients; ablation in multiple chambers was required in 28 (58%) patients. The PVC site of origin (SOO) was intramural (n = 25 patients), left ventricular (n = 5), and right ventricular (n = 18). Patients with LGE-CMR scar were more likely to have intramural PVCs (64% vs 27%; P < .04) and to require ablation in multiple cardiac chambers (58% vs 13%; P < .02). Patients with intramural scar required longer duration of ablation delivery (31 ± 20 minutes vs 17 ± 8 minutes; P < .02). Acute procedural success was 69%; PVC burden on follow-up was 6% ± 9% and similar for those with and without scar. CONCLUSION: Ablation of parahisian PVCs often requires mapping and ablation of multiple cardiac chambers, with an intramural SOO identified in most patients. An intramural scar was associated with an intramural SOO of the PVCs requiring more extensive ablation procedures, with similar long-term outcomes compared with those without scar.

Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

INTRODUCTION: Bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are the most common congenital heart defects and the extent of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with BAV is unclear. The objective of this study is to describe VAs and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) in patients with BAV. METHODS: A total of 19 patients with BAV (18 males, age: 58 ± 13 years) were referred for VA ablation procedures. Ten patients had BAVs at the time of ablation, nine patients had prior aortic valve replacement for a BAV. All but one patient had LGE-CMR and all patients underwent programmed ventricular stimulation at the time of the ablation. RESULTS: Frequent PVCs were the targeted VAs in 17/19 patients and VT in 2/19 patients. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was inducible in 6 patients. A total of 15 VTs were inducible (2.5 ± 1.0 VTs per patient with a mean cycle length of 322 ± 83 msec). LGE was present in 13 patients. Patients with inducible VT had larger borderzone and core scar compared to non-inducible patients (7.8 ± 2.1 cm3 vs. 2.5 ± 3.1 cm3 and 5.1 ± 2.6 cm3 vs. 1.9 ± 3.0 cm3, p-value < .05 for both). PVCs and VTs were mapped to the periaortic valve area in 12 patients and 4 patients, respectively. The PVC burden was reduced from 27 ± 13 to 3 ± 6 (p < .001) and the ejection fraction improved from 49 ± 13% to 55 ± 9% (p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: VAs in patients with BAV often originate from the perivalvular area and patients often have LGE and inducible VT. LGE may be due to ventricular remodeling secondary to the presence of BAV and harbors the arrhythmogenic substrate for VT.

Clinical outcomes of patients referred for left atrial appendage exclusion who did and did not undergo the procedure.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Not all patients considered for LAAE undergo the procedure because of ineligibility, anatomic or medical constraints, and preference of the patient. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report on the management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary LAAE clinic, including all who subsequently did and did not undergo LAAE. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from all patients referred to the comprehensive multidisciplinary LAAE clinic at the University of Michigan between 2016 and 2022. A consecutive 301 patients (age, 75 ± 8 years; 106 women) with atrial fibrillation were evaluated. LAAE was performed in 168 patients (56%) with use of the Watchman device in 146 (49%) and surgically in 22 (7%). LAAE was not performed in 133 patients (44%, no-LAAE group) because of ineligibility in 62 (21%), anatomic constraints in 23 (7%), and preference of the patient in 48 (36%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.6; P = .002) and HAS-BLED score (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.1; P < .001) were higher in the LAAE groups. RESULTS: Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 137 of 146 (94%) and 61 of 133 (61%) in the Watchman and no-LAAE groups, respectively (P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.0 years), in the LAAE (n = 168) and no-LAAE (n = 133) groups, respectively, 39 (23%) vs 29 (22%) deaths, 13 (8%) vs 5 (4%) thromboembolic events, and 24 (14%) vs 23 (17%) bleeding complications occurred. Continued long-term anticoagulation was not a predictor of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: After a comprehensive evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic, ∼50% of the patients referred for LAAE did not proceed with LAAE and resumed anticoagulation.

Posterior left atrial isolation is associated with a lower incidence of atrial tachycardia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients may develop atrial tachycardia (AT) after left atrial (LA) ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: The population consisted of 101 consecutive patients (age = 64.3 ± 8.7 years, 70 males (69%), LA = 4.6 ± 0.8 cm, ejection fraction = 48.5 ± 16%) undergoing their initial procedure for persistent AF. After pulmonary vein isolation, patients either underwent posterior LA isolation (n = 50; study group) or linear ablation at the LA roof with verification of conduction block (n = 51; control group). RESULTS: A repeat procedure was performed in 17 (34%) and 28 (55%) patients in the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients in the study group were less likely to develop AT (9/50 [18%] vs. 18/51 [35%]; p = 0.02), roof-dependent (1/50 [2%] vs. 8/51 [16%]; p = 0.008), and multi-loop AT (6/50 [12%] vs. 14/51 [27%]; p = 0.03) as compared to controls. Among various factors, only posterior LA isolation was associated with a lower likelihood of AT recurrence and roof tachycardia at redo procedure (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.00, p = 0.05, and OR, 0.1, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96; p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, posterior LA isolation is associated with a lower risk of a redo procedure, roof-dependent macro-reentry, and post-ablation AT in general as compared to controls who only received roof ablation. Posterior LA isolation also obviates the need for pacing maneuvers, and may be a more definitive endpoint than linear ablation at the LA roof.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplakin (DSP) pathogenic variants are rare causes of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and often involve the right and left ventricles. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations may be required in these patients, but procedural characteristics have not been reported. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors sought to report a multicenter experience of VT ablation in patients with DSP pathogenic variants. METHODS: VT ablations performed in patients with known DSP pathogenic variants were analyzed across 6 centers in 3 countries. Patient characteristics and acute and long-term procedural outcomes were reported. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (13 men, median age 43 years [Q1-Q3: 41.5-53.0 years], left ventricular ejection fraction 43.0% [Q1-Q3: 41.5%-53.0%], 11 previous failed ablations) were referred for VT ablation procedures. All patients had symptomatic VTs, with ICD therapy in 19 patients. Epicardial procedures were performed in 16 of the 20 patients. VT target sites were located in the right ventricular (RV) endocardium (n = 11), the RV epicardium (n = 4), the left ventricular (LV) endocardium (n = 2) and the LV epicardium (n = 7). In 3 patients, the VT target sites were in close proximity to coronary arteries, limiting ablation. During follow-up, VTs recurred in 11 patients, and repeated ablations were performed in 9 patients. Allowing for multiple procedures, 19 of the 20 patients remained free of VT recurrence after a median follow-up of 18 months [Q1-Q3: 5-60 months]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DSP cardiomyopathy often have biventricular involvement, and ablation procedures often require ablation in both ventricles and the epicardium. Recurrences are not uncommon, and the pathologic substrate can be located in close proximity to epicardial coronary arteries, limiting the success rate of ablations.

Pleomorphism of premature ventricular complexes originating from papillary muscles and their myocardial connections.

BACKGROUND: Patients with arrhythmias originating from papillary muscles (PAPs) often have pleomorphic ventricular arrhythmias (PVAs) that can result in failed ablations. The mechanism of PVAs is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and mechanisms of PVAs and the impact on outcomes in patients with focal left ventricular PAP ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). METHODS: The sites of origin (SOOs) of VAs in 43 consecutive patients referred for ablation of focal left ventricular PAP VAs were determined by activation and pacemapping. SOOs were classified as (1) unifocal generating a single VA morphology; (2) unifocal from a deeper-seated origin generating multiple VA morphologies; (3) unifocal located on a PAP branching site; (4) multifocal from a single or multiple PAPs generating multiple VA morphologies; and (5) multifocal from a PAP and a different anatomic source. RESULTS: Most patients had multiple morphologies (n = 34 [79%]) and multiple mechanisms (79%) generating the different VA morphologies. Most of the patients with PVAs had multiple SOOs from a single or different PAPs (n = 23 [68%]), followed by patients with SOOs from PAP and non-PAP sites (n = 19 [56%]). In 13 patients (38%), single SOOs accounted for the observed PVAs. The frequent observation (n = 20) of changing QRS morphologies after radiofrequency energy delivery targeting a single VA suggests the presence of a deeper focus with changing sites of preferential conduction. CONCLUSION: VA pleomorphism in patients with PAP arrhythmias is most often due to premature ventricular complexes originating from different SOOs. The second most common cause is preferential conduction from a single SOO via PAP branching sites.

Long-term outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and negative programmed ventricular stimulation followed with implantable loop recorders: Impact of delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Programed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a risk stratification tool in patients at risk for adverse arrhythmia outcomes. Patients with negative PVS may yet be at risk for adverse arrhythmia-related events, particularly in the presence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (VA). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of real-world patients with symptomatic VA without indication for device therapy and negative PVS, and to examine the role of cardiac scaring on arrhythmia recurrence. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic VA, and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR), and negative PVS testing were included. All patients underwent placement of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Survival analysis was performed to investigate the impact of LGE-CMR findings on survival free from adverse arrhythmic events. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included (age 60 ± 14 years, women n = 36 (46%), ejection fraction 57 ± 9%, cardiomyopathy n = 26 (33%), mitral valve prolapse [MVP] n = 9 (12%), positive LGE-CMR scar n = 49 (62%), history of syncope n = 23 (29%)) including patients with primarily premature ventricular contractions (n = 21) or nonsustained VA (n = 57). Patients were followed for 1.6 ± 1.5 years during which 14 patients (18%) experienced VA requiring treatment (n = 14) or syncope due to bradycardia (n = 2). Four/9 patients (44%) with MVP experienced VA (n = 3) or syncope (n = 1). Baseline characteristics between those with and without adverse events were similar (p > 0.05); however, the presence of cardiac scar on LGE-CMR was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio: 5.6 95% confidence interval: [1.2-27], p = 0.03, log-rank p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort with long-term follow-up, adverse arrhythmic outcomes occurred in 18% of patients with symptomatic VA despite negative PVS, and this risk was significantly greater in patients with positive DE-CMR scar. Long term-monitoring, including the use of ICM, may be appropriate in these patients.

Gender and race-related disparities in the management of ventricular arrhythmias.

Modern studies have revealed gender and race-related disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias, but few studies have focused on outcomes for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The aim of this article is to review relevant studies and identify outcome differences in the management of VA among Black and female patients. We found that female patients typically present younger for VA, are more likely to have recurrent VA after catheter ablation, are less likely to be prescribed antiarrhythmic medication, and are less likely to receive primary prevention ICD placement as compared to male patients. Additionally, female patients appear to derive similar overall mortality benefit from primary prevention ICD placement as compared to male patients, but they may have an increased risk of acute post-procedural complications. We also found that Black patients presenting with VA are less likely to undergo catheter ablation, receive appropriate primary prevention ICD placement, and have significantly higher risk-adjusted 1-year mortality rates after hospital discharge as compared to White patients. Black female patients appear to have the worst outcomes out of any demographic subgroup.

Value of genotyping and scar-phenotyping for VT ablation procedures in patients with nonischemic left ventricular cardiomyopathies.

INTRODUCTION: Variants of cardiomyopathy genes in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) generate various phenotypes of cardiac scar and delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) imaging which may impact ventricular tachycardia (VT) management. METHODS: The objective was to compare the findings of cardiomyopathy genetic testing on DE-CMR imaging and long-term outcomes among patients with NICM undergoing VT ablation procedures. Image phenotyping and genotyping were performed in a consecutive series of patients referred for VT ablation and correlated to survival free of VT. Scar depth index (SDI) (% of scar at 0-3 mm, 3-5 mm and >5 mm projected on the closest endocardial surface) was determined. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included (11 women, 55 ± 14 years, ejection fraction (EF) 45 ± 16%) and were followed for 3.4 ± 2.9 years. Pathogenic variants (PV) were identified in 16 patients (37%) in the following genes: LMNA (n = 5), TTN (n = 5), DSP (n = 2), AMLS1 (n = 1), MYBPC3 (n = 1), PLN (n = 1), and SCN5A (n = 1). A ring-like septal scar (RLSS) pattern was more often seen in patients with pathogenic variants (66% vs 15%, p = .001). RLSS was associated with deeper seated scars (SDI >5 mm 30.6 ± 22.6% vs 12.4 ± 16.2%, p = .005), and increased VT recurrence (HR 5.7 95% CI[1.8-18.4], p = .003). After adjustment for age, sex, EF, and total scar burden, the presence of a PV remained independently associated with worse outcomes (HR 4.7 95% CI[1.22-18.0], p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural genotyping and scar phenotyping is beneficial to identify patients with a favorable procedural outcome. Some PVs are associated with an intramural, deeper seated scar phenotype and have an increase of VT recurrence after ablation.

Implications of the anatomy of papillary muscle connections for mapping and ablation of focal ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from papillary muscles (PAPs) can be challenging when targeted with catheter ablation. Reasons may include premature ventricular complex pleomorphism, structurally abnormal PAPs, or unusual origins of VAs from PAP-myocardial connections (PAP-MYCs). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to correlate PAP anatomy with mapping and ablation of PAP VAs. METHODS: In a series of 43 consecutive patients with frequent PAP arrhythmias referred for ablation, the anatomy and structure of PAPs and VA origins were analyzed using multimodality imaging. Successful ablation sites were analyzed for location on the PAP body or a PAP-MYC. RESULTS: In a total of 17 of 43 patients (40%), VAs originated from a PAP-MYC (in 5 of 17 patients, the PAP inserted into the mitral valve anulus); and in 41 patients, VAs originated from a PAP body. VAs from a PAP-MYC more often had delayed R-wave transition than did other PAP VAs (69% vs 28%; P < .001). Patients with failed procedures had more PAP-MYCs (24.8 ± 8 PAP-MYCs per patient vs 16 ± 7 PAP-MYCs per patient; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Multimodality imaging identifies anatomic details of PAPs that facilitate mapping and ablation of VAs. In more than a third of patients with PAP VAs, VAs originate from connections between PAPs and the surrounding myocardium or between other PAPs. VA electrocardiographic morphologies are different when VAs originate from PAP-connection sites as compared with VAs originating from the PAP body.

Strain Analysis in Patients with Frequent Premature Ventricular Complexes and Preserved Left Ventricular Function Undergoing Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can cause PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. The value of PVC ablation in patients with preserved left ventricular function in the low-normal range (ejection fraction: 50-55%) is not established. Strain analysis has been used to estimate changes in left ventricular function beyond assessment of the ejection fraction (EF). Longitudinal strain has been proposed as a method to detect changes over time in the setting of frequent asymptomatic premature ventricular complexes and preserved left ventricular (LV) function. A decrease in strain may be evidence of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we assessed the role of PVC ablation in patients with low-normal EF and the effect on EF and myocardial strain before and after PVC ablation. METHODS: A total of 70 consecutive patients with either low-normal EF (0.5-<0.55, n = 35) or high-normal EF (≥0.55; n = 35), using available imaging and Holter data, were referred for ablation due to frequent PVCs. EF and longitudinal strain were assessed pre- and post-ablation. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in EF (53.2 ± 0.4% to 58.3 ± 0.5%, p < 0.001) and improvement in longitudinal strain (-15.2 ± 3.3 to -16.6 ± 3, p = 0.007) post-ablation in patients with low-normal EF and successful ablation. There was no change in EF or longitudinal strain in patients with high-normal EF and a successful ablation pre- vs. post-ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with frequent PVCs and low-normal LV EF compared to patients with frequent PVCs and high-normal LV EF have evidence of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy and may benefit from ablation despite a preserved left ventricular EF.

Mitral Annular Substrate and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse With Mitral Annular Disjunction.

BACKGROUND: In patients with bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP), mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death via incompletely understood mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the substrate for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with bileaflet MVP and MAD as well as outcomes of catheter ablation with an emphasis on sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS: A total of 18 consecutive patients (11 women, mean age 54 ± 15 years) with bileaflet MVP and MAD underwent catheter ablation for VT, and/or premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Eight patients had a prior cardiac arrest. RESULTS: PVCs were targeted for ablation in all 18 patients (symptomatic PVCs n = 15, PVC-induced ventricular fibrillation n = 3). Sustained monomorphic VT was targeted in 7 of 18 patients. Electroanatomic mapping showed low voltage in the area of the mitral annulus corresponding to VT target sites in 6 of 7 patients with sustained VT. Four of 7 patients had low voltage in the areas of MAD. Six of 7 patients with VT were rendered noninducible post-ablation. The PVC burden was reduced from 11.0% ± 10.4% to 4.0% ± 5.5% (P = 0.004). Over a mean follow-up of 33.9 ± 43.4 months, no VTs recurred. There were no major complications. No repeat ablations for VT occurred. Five of 18 patients required repeat ablation for PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bileaflet MVP and MAD undergoing catheter ablation, the mitral valve annulus often contains low-voltage areas harboring the substrate for monomorphic VT and PVCs. Ablation in these patients was safe and improved arrhythmia control.

Left and Right PVC-Induced Ventricular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can result in a reversible form of cardiomyopathy that usually affects the left ventricle (LV). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess whether frequent PVCs have an impact on right ventricular (RV) function. METHODS: Serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) studies were performed in a series of 47 patients before and after ablation of frequent PVCs. RESULTS: Patients with RV cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction [EF] <0.45) had more frequent PVCs than did patients without decreased RV function (23% ± 11% vs 15% ± 11%, P = 0.03). Likewise, patients with LV cardiomyopathy (EF <0.50) had more frequent PVCs than did patients without decreased LV function (23% ± 10% vs 14% ± 12%, P = 0.003). LV dysfunction was present in 21 patients (45%). In patients with LV dysfunction, 15 patients (32%) had biventricular dysfunction, and 6 patients (13%) had isolated LV dysfunction. A total of 19 patients (40%) had RV dysfunction, and 4 of the patients with RV dysfunction (9%) had isolated RV dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance was repeated 1.9 ± 1.3 years after ablation. In patients with successful ablation, RV function improved, and in patients without successful ablation, RV function did not significantly change (before and after ablation RVEF 0.45 ± 0.09 and 0.52 ± 0.09; P < 0.001 vs. 0.46 ± 0.07 and 0.48 ± 0.04; P = 0.14, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent PVCs can cause RV cardiomyopathy that parallels LV cardiomyopathy and is reversible with successful ablation.

Incidental left atrial appendage isolation after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms and long-term risk of thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Incidental left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation may occur during radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aims to describe the mechanisms and long-term thromboembolic risk related to incidental LAA isolation. METHODS: Patients who experienced incidental LAA isolation after AF ablation were included. Culprit sites where ablation resulted in LAA isolation were identified. Thromboembolic risk despite oral anticoagulation (OAC) was compared to that in a propensity-matched control group without LAA isolation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with LAA isolation, and 82 matched patients without LAA isolation were included. The patient age, ejection fraction, LA diameter, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc score were 64 ± 11 years, 55 ± 12%, 45.0 ± 7 mm and 2.62 ± 1.5, respectively. Culprit sites included the LAA base, mitral isthmus, inferior LA, Bachmann's bundle, coronary sinus, and Marshall vein. After 4.2 ± 3.6 years follow-up, thromboembolism occurred in 7 of 41 patients (17%) with LAA isolation versus 3 of 82 patients (4%) without isolation (log rank p < .009, HR 5.14, 95% CI [1.32-19.94], p = .02). Patients with and without thromboembolism had similar CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores (2.65 ± 1.3 vs. 2.71 ± 0.76, p = .89). Thromboembolism occurred during noncompliance with or temporary discontinuation of OAC in four of the seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental LAA isolation may occur during ablation of atrial arrhythmias in the vicinity of, or even at sites remote from the appendage. Patients with incidental LAA isolation had higher rates of thromboembolism compared to patients without isolation. Since thromboembolism may occur despite prescription for OAC, the risks of LAA isolation must be weighed against clinical benefit and appendage occlusion devices should be considered in vulnerable patients.

Comparison of warfarin with direct oral anticoagulants for thromboembolic prophylaxis after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolic events after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) can result in significant morbidity. Thromboembolic prophylaxis after catheter ablation can be achieved by the use of antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonists, or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The relative safety and efficacy of these modes of prophylaxis are uncertain. We sought to compare the outcomes of patients who received warfarin or DOACs for thromboembolic prophylaxis after catheter ablation of VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Anticoagulation with DOACS was started after left ventricular VT ablation in a series of 42 consecutive patients with structural heart disease (67 ± 11 years, 3 women, ejection fraction 32 ± 14%). Duration of hospital stay, bleeding episodes, and thromboembolic events were compared to a historic consecutive group of patients (n = 38, 65 ± 13 years, 14 women, ejection fraction 36 ± 13%) in whom anticoagulation with a formerly described protocol of heparin and vitamin K antagonist was used after VT ablation procedures. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the group where DOACs were used as compared to vitamin K antagonists (3.3 ± 1.8 vs. 5.0 ± 2.5 days postablation; p = 0.001) without an increase of bleeding or thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Anticoagulation with DOACs is safe and shortens hospital stay in patients with structural heart disease undergoing left ventricular VT ablation procedures.

Importance of Right Ventricular Mapping and Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Postinfarction Patients.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of patients with post-myocardial infarction (PMI) ventricular tachycardia (VT) who require right ventricular (RV) ablation are underreported. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing PMI VT ablation who have target sites in the right ventricle and to compare patient and VT characteristics between patients with free wall vs septal RV target sites. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing ablation for PMI VT with target sites located within the right ventricle were included. Patients were stratified on the basis of the presence of free wall vs septal RV target sites. RESULTS: Among 277 consecutive patient undergoing PMI VT ablation, 30 (11%) had RV target sites (mean age 68.71 ± 9.5 years, 29 men [97%], mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 28.7% ± 16.7%). Twenty patients had only septal VTs, and 10 patients had only free wall VTs. Fifty-seven VTs with RV targets (1.9 ± 1.4 per patient, mean cycle length 338 ± 90 ms, 53 left bundle branch, 36 superior axis) were induced. Patients with RV free wall VTs had greater rates of RV dysfunction (80% vs 30%; P = 0.023) but had greater LVEFs (38.3% ± 21.06% vs 23.9% ± 11.93%; P = 0.02). Over a mean follow-up period of 3.4 ± 3.2 years, patients with RV septal target sites had worse survival free of VT, transplantation, or left ventricular assist device placement after ablation (log-rank P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The arrhythmogenic substrate in PMI patients often involves the right ventricle, including the septum and free wall. The presence of RV dysfunction and greater LVEF were associated with the presence of RV free wall target sites. Patients with only RV septal target sites had worse postablation outcomes.