Impact of Pretransplant Dialysis Modality on Posttransplant Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: It remains unclear whether posttransplant outcomes differ according to the pretransplant dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis). Our aim was to assess posttransplant outcomes in patients with different predialysis modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two thousand two hundred fifty-eight kidney recipients following up in Hamed Alessa Organ transplant center in Kuwait were included and divided into two groups according to pre-transplant dialysis modality: Group 1: those who received hemodialysis (HD) and group 2: those with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Demographics, pretransplant and posttransplant comorbidities, and patient and graft outcomes were studied. RESULTS: There were 1956 patients on hemodialysis, and 302 patients were on peritoneal dialysis. Most were male patients (1456 vs 802 female patients), with comparable mean age (P = .34). Chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy represented the most common original kidney disease before transplant (27.6% and 21.4%, respectively), with higher prevalence of glomerulonephritis in group 1 and diabetic nephropathy in group 2 (P = .001). The 2 groups were comparable with regard to immunosuppression (induction and maintenance) (P > .05). Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension were significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (P = .004 and P = 003, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to the graft outcome (P = .86). However, patient survival was significantly higher in the hemodialysis group (81.2% vs 64.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with peritoneal dialysis, pretransplant hemodialysis is associated with better posttransplant patient survival despite no difference in the graft outcome. Diabetes-related complications could be attributed to such outcomes.

Full Correction of Posttransplant Anemia Is Associated With Stabilized Cardiac Dimensions Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Posttransplant anemia might be associated with cardiovascular morbidity and increased mortality. To our knowledge, the debate on anemia correction has neither been revisited nor decided definitively. We aimed to assess the effects of full correction of posttransplant anemia on the cardiovascular system and quality of life among renal transplant recipients with stable graft function who were using erythropoietin-stimulating agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 247 kidney recipients with stable graft function to be assessed for anemia. Eligible patients were randomized to achieve targeted hemoglobin of 11 to 12 g/dL (group 1, n = 183) or of 13 to 15 g/dL (group 2, n = 64) with the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents. Patients underwent monthly clinical and laboratory evaluations of kidney graft function. Quality of life and echocardiography were assessed at study start and at 12 months. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable regarding pretransplant characteristics. In group 2, we observed comparable posttransplant complications (P > .05) but better graft function at 6 months and better cardiac indexes at 1 year of the study (P < .05). At 12 months, quality of life had improved after full correction of posttransplant anemia in the renal transplant recipients who received erythropoietinstimulating agents. CONCLUSIONS: Full correction of posttransplant anemia in renal transplant recipients was associated with improved quality of life and cardiac indexes without an effect on cardiovascular comorbidity.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors & glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, efficacy & safety in diabetic kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular and renal complications define the outcomes of diabetic kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The new diabetes medications have changed the management of diabetes. However, transplant physicians are still reluctant to use sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) post kidney transplantation due to fear of drug related complications and lack of established guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected 1-year follow-up data from records of 98 diabetic KTRs on SGLT2I, 41 on GLP- 1RA and 70 on standard-of-care medicines. Patients were more than 3 months post-transplant with a minimum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25 ml/min/1.73 m2 . Demographic data were similar except for a slightly lower HbA1c in the control group and higher albuminuria in SGLT2i group. RESULTS: HbA1c dropped significantly by .4% in both SGLT2i and GLP-1RA compared to .05% in the control group. A significant decrease in BMI by .32 in SGLT2i and .34 in GLP-1RA was observed compared to an increase by .015 in control group. A tendency for better eGFR in study groups was observed but was non-significant except for the SGLT2i group with an eGFR above 90 (p = .0135). The usual dip in eGFR was observed in the SGLT2i group at 1-3 months. Albuminuria was significantly reduced in both study groups. Adverse events were minimal with comparable safety in all groups. CONCLUSION: The use of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA appears to be effective and safe in diabetic KTRs with good outcomes. Randomized control trials are required to confirm these findings and establish guidelines.

Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients are scarce despite the distinct risk factors such as the use of immunosuppressive agents, sympathetic denervation, glomerular hyperfiltration, and high prevalence of the cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CIN in KT recipients who received low-osmolality iodine-based contrast material (CM) for radiological assessment. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 79 of the 3180 KT recipients followed at Hamed Al-Essa organ transplant center received low-osmolality iodine-based contrast for radiological assessment for various indications. Preventive measures including holding metformin, intravenous hydration, sodium bicarbonate and N-acetylcysteine were given before contrast administration. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 25% from the baseline within 72 hours. RESULTS: The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: those who developed CIN (n = 7) and those with no increase in serum creatinine level (n = 72). The mean age of the patients was 52.1 ± 12.3 years; 44 of them were males, and the cause of end-stage kidney disease was mostly diabetic nephropathy. The pre-transplant demographics were comparable between the two groups. Fortyseven cases received contrast for coronary angiography, and 32 received it for a CT scan. The graft function deteriorated in group 1, but no significant difference was found between the two groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: CIN is not uncommon in KT recipients receiving CM, especially with ischemic heart disease. Risk stratification, optimizing hemodynamics, and avoiding potential nephrotoxins are essential before performing CM-enhanced studies in KT recipients.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7165.

Fludrocortisone Among Adult Renal Transplant Recipients With Persistent Hyperkalemia: Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Calcineurin inhibitors are the cornerstone of immunosuppression following solid-organ transplant. However, hyperkalemia may occur by multiple mechanisms affecting potassium in the distal tubule. Hyperkalemia is commonly observed in renal transplant recipients, and it is dose-dependent. Here, we evaluated the impact of fludrocortisone in the management of calcineurin inhibitor-induced hyperkalemia after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated newly transplanted patients who developed hyperkalemia or those with hyperkalemia who attended our outpatient renal transplant clinic (Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center, Kuwait). Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before starting fludrocortisone (baseline values) and then at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Drug history was assessed, with any drugs that could induce hyperkalemia being discontinued (such as spironolactone); otherwise, essential drugs like prophylactic agents (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) were maintained. Oral anti-hyperkalemic doses (bicarbonate, resonium calcium, fludrocortisone) were noted. RESULTS: Our study included 29 patients; most were men (aged 45.8 ± 15 years). Body weight did not significantly change after introduction of fludrocortisone (79.53 ± 24.31, 79.82 ± 23.85, 80.62 ± 24.24, 77.03 ± 20.7, and 79.21 ± 27.93 kg at baseline and at postdose week 1, 2, 4, and 8, respectively). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were also similar at baseline versus postdose. Steroid doses (prednisolone) were significantly reduced over 1 month (15.7 ± 12.4, 14.1 ± 10.19, 12.6 ± 8.7, 9.5 ± 5.2, and 9.5 ± 5.2 mg/ day). Serum potassium levels significantly improved (5.18 ± 0.58, 4.9 ± 0.49, 4.8 ± 0.54, 4.8 ± 0.65, and 4.4 ± 0.72 mmol/L). Serum creatinine levels significantly improved by postdose week 8 (129.28 ± 48.9, 130.92 ± 52.2, 127.66 ± 50.9, 121.42 ± 41.7, and 124.1 ± 51.27 µmol/L). Serum bicarbonate levels remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: Fludrocortisone was a safe and effective option in management of calcineurin inhibitor-induced hyperkalemia among renal transplant recipients.

Pure Red Cell Aplasia in a Renal Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Severe anemia requiring multiple blood transfusions in the posttransplant period can trigger rejection. The evaluation of anemia among transplant recipients is a challenging task. Awareness should be continued for tacrolimus to manage pure red cell aplasia, but further evidence is needed to prove whether tacrolimus is a real cause of posttransplant anemia. Our case patient, a 66-year-old male patient with end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy, underwent a preemptive living donor renal transplant in September 2018. He had received a coronary artery bypass graft with transcatheter aortic valve implantation 3 years before renal transplant. Initially, he was maintained on prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus after basiliximab induction. One month later, he presented with low cardiac output symptoms. His complete blood count showed normocytic normochromic anemia with reticulocytopenia (his hemoglobin level dropped from 112 to 69 g/L), which necessitated regular blood transfusions. His iron profile, serum folate, and vitamin B12 were within normal limits, and he had negative hemolytic and autoimmune screening tests. A bone marrow biopsy revealed acquired pure red cell aplasia, which was most likely drug induced as viral profiles were negative for parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus. The patient was managed by discontinuing mycophenolate mofetil, and the steroid dose was increased up to 20 mg/day but without improvement. With tacrolimus then considered, 3 weeks after presentation, we replaced tacrolimus with cyclosporine. Complete blood count follow-up showed improvement without any need for further blood transfusions. After 1 month of cyclosporine maintenance, mycophenolate mofetil was resumed with a steady increase of hemoglobin up to 150 g/L and serum creatinine of 122 µmol/L. Pure red cell aplasia is a rare disorder among renal transplant recipients, which could be induced by maintenance tacrolimus therapy.

Disseminated Rhinocladiella mackenziei infection in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report and literature review.

Rhinocladiella mackenziei is a rare fungal pathogen which belongs to a large group of pigmented fungi causing phaeohyphomycosis. R. mackenziei primarily infects the brain and leads to high fatality rates among both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. Among solid organ transplant recipients, the infection may disseminate to extra-neuronal sites, necessitating comprehensive radiologic imaging. Here we describe a new case of R. mackenziei infection in a renal transplant patient involving the brain and renal allograft. She received liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole but no surgical intervention. Ultimately, the patient died after two months of hospital stay. A review of all reported cases of transplant patients infected with R. mackenziei is also presented.

Better outcome of COVID-19 positive kidney transplant recipients during the unremitting stage with optimized anticoagulation and immunosuppression.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic with high morbidity and mortality and with a reported high risk of severe disease in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). AIM: We aimed to report the largest number of COVID-19-positive cases in KTR in a single center and to discuss their demographics, management, and evolution. METHODS: We enrolled all the two thousand KTR followed up in our center in Kuwait and collected the data of all COVID-19-positive KTR (104) from the start of the outbreak till the end of July 2020 and have reported the clinical features, management details, and both patient and graft outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the one hundred and four cases reported, most of them were males aged 49.3 ± 14.7 years. Eighty-two of them needed hospitalization, of which thirty-one were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Main comorbidities among these patients were hypertension in 64.4%, diabetes in 51%, and ischemic heart disease in 20.2%. Management strategies included anticoagulation in 56.7%, withdrawal of antimetabolites in 54.8%, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in 33.7%, the addition of antibiotics in 57.7%, Tocilizumab in 8.7%, and antivirals in 16.3%. During a follow-up of 30 days, the reported number of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 28.7%, respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy 46.2%, and overall mortality rate was 10.6% with hospital mortality of 13.4% including an ICU mortality rate of 35.5%. CONCLUSION: Better outcome of COVID-19-positive KTR in our cohort during this unremitting stage could be due to the younger age of patients and early optimized management of anticoagulation, modification of immunosuppression, and prompt treatment of secondary bacterial infections. Mild cases can successfully be managed at home without any change in immunosuppression.

Screening for BK Viremia/Viruria and the Impact of Management of BK Virus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of BK-induced nephritis in renal transplant recipients is estimated to be 1% to 10%; the rate of graft loss within 1 year is 30% to 65%. We conducted this study to evaluate screening of BK virus in blood and/or urine among renal transplant recipients and to assess the effects of different therapeutic modalities in renal transplant recipients with BK nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients were screened at the time of transplant and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months posttransplant. Fiftynine patients were diagnosed with BK virus viremia. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment: group 1 (n = 29) received an active treatment and group 2 (n = 30) received minimized immunosuppression. RESULTS: Most patients required graft biopsies to confirm diagnosis (86.2% in group 1 vs 50% in group 2; P = .03). Both groups were comparable regarding demographic data. Initial posttransplant graft function was significantly better in group 1 (P = .017); ultimately, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding graft survival (P= .51). Fifty percent of patients had biopsy-proven acute T-cell-mediated rejection before BK virus-associated nephropathy diagnosis (significantly higher in group 1). Serum creatinine levels were significantly better in group 2 at 3, 4, and 5 years after BK nephropathy (P = .001, .017, and .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of BK nephropathy in our renal transplant recipients was 5.9% with a rate of graft loss ranging from 43% to 51%. Regular screening, less intensive immunosuppressive therapy, and early intervention by reduction of immunosuppressive medications are advisable to obtain early diagnosis and to have better outcomes of BK virus-associated nephropathy with antiviral agents.

Pregnancy After Renal Transplant: Single Center Experience From the Middle East in Patients Using Different Calcineurin Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy after kidney transplant has a high risk for maternal and fetal complications; however, it can be successful if patients are properly selected. Here, we studied outcomes and complications of pregnancies in kidney transplant recipients who received calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case control study, we reviewed patients who became pregnant between 2004 and 2017. For this analysis, each pregnancy was considered an event. We divided pregnancies into 2 groups according to calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression: group 1 (49 pregnancies) received cyclosporine, and group 2 (33 pregnancies) received tacrolimus. Patients also received steroids and azathioprine. Patients had regular antenatal follow-up at the Hamed Alessa Organ Transplant Center (Kuwait) and in the maternity hospital (monthly until month 7 and then weekly until delivery). RESULTS: Of 750 female kidney transplant recipients within childbearing potential, there were 82 pregnancies (10.9%) in 49 recipients (6.5%). Seventy-eight pregnancies were planned, and 4 pregnancies occurred while women were using contraception. There was 1 triple pregnancy, 5 double, and 76 single pregnancies. Two women had preeclampsia as maternal complication, 2 had uncontrolled hypertension, and 7 developed graft dysfunction. Forty-seven women (57.3%) had caesarean section, and the remaining had vaginal deliveries. Of 89 babies, 86 were viable (1 intrauterine fetal death and 2 abortions). Eight babies were delivered prematurely with low birth weight, and 2 needed incubators. Mean serum creatinine levels were 97.9 ± 24, 109 ± 38, 100 ± 39, 120 ± 46, and 115 ± 57 µmol/L at baseline, first, second, and third trimesters, and postpartum, respectively. Twelve patients showed high panel reactive antibodies but without donor-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplant pregnancy can be successful in most renal allograft recipients, but the increased risk of fetal and maternal complications, including low birth weight, spontaneous abortus, and preeclampsia, should be considered.

Kidney Transplant in a Patient With Factor VII Deficiency: Case Report.

Organ transplant in patients with congenital bleeding disorders is a challenge requiring an integrated approach of various specialists. Inherited factor VII deficiency is the most common of the rare bleeding disorders, with a wide set of hemorrhagic features. Although a kidney allograft is the most frequent type of solid-organ transplant, it is rarely performed in individuals with congenital hemorrhagic disorders. Here, we highlight the course of a patient with coagulation factor VII deficiency who underwent successful kidney transplant without significant coagulopathy. Our patient was a 19-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease and congenital coagulation factor VII deficiency. Perioperative bleeding was successfully prevented by administration of recombinant factor VII, confirming its safety in solid-organ transplants. Success requires evaluation of doses and therapeutic schedules, as well as a multidisciplinary approach.

Thymoglobulin-Resistant T-Cell-Mediated Acute Rejection in a Pregnant Renal Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

To avoid graft rejection during pregnancy, frequent monitoring of serum drug levels is recommended. Pregnancy induces hyperfiltration in transplanted kidneys, as in native kidneys; therefore, detection of rejection can be difficult when monitoring by serum creatinine. If rejection is suspected, ultrasonographguided graft biopsy can be done; once proven, it can be treated with pulse steroids, but data are scarce regarding other agents. Here, we present a 28-year-old pregnant female patient with resistant acute rejection but with successful pregnancy outcome. Our patient had end-stage kidney disease secondary to lupus nephropathy and underwent living-donor renal transplant in May 2013 after hemodialysis support for 1 year. She received thymoglobulin as induction therapy and was maintained on prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. She had normal renal graft function without proteinuria. After she received counseling, she became pregnant in February 2015. In June 2015, she presented with acute graft dysfunction with serum creatinine level of 365 µmol/L. Her abdominal ultrasonography showed mild hydronephrosis and viable fetus. She received empirical pulse steroids with partial response, and her graft biopsy showed acute T-cell-mediated rejection and negative C4d. Intravenous immunoglobulins and minipulse steroids were administered but without response. After gynecologic counseling and informed consent, she received 5 doses of thymoglobulin. She was dialysis dependent until premature vaginal labor, which resulted in birth of a viable 2-kg boy. We suggest that successful pregnancy outcomes could occur with close monitoring and daily dialysis in female kidney transplant patients with resistant rejection.

Extended Efficacy of Low-Dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Intermediate-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Two-Year Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVES: In a previous study, we evaluated 1-year outcomes of using low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in intermediate-risk kidney transplant recipients. Whether this effect persists in the long term is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the 2-year follow up of such adopted prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomized 2 matched groups of kidney transplant recipients (1:1) to receive valganciclovir as 450 mg daily (group 1) or 900 mg daily (group 2) for the first 6 months after kidney transplant. The final analysis included 196 patients as intermediate-risk patients (98 in each treatment group) after exclusion of 5 high-risk patients. Serologically, all patients were at moderate risk for cytomegalovirus infection. Long-term outcomes including cytomegalovirus disease, acute rejection, new-onset diabetes after transplant, graft loss, and patient survival were assessed. RESULTS: Through year 2 of follow-up, cytomegalovirus infection was reported in only 1 patient in group 1 (at month 13) and 1 patient in group 2 (at month 19) (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were not statistically different between the groups (2 episodes in group 1 and 6 in group 2; P = .431). New-onset diabetes posttransplant was reported in 8.1% in group 1 and 13.2% in group 2 (P = .535). Graft failure was equal in both groups (1 in each group) at 2 years of follow up (not significant). Patient survival was comparable in both groups (100% in group 1 versus 97.9% in group 2; P = .661). The total number of cytomegalovirus infections at 2 years was numerically less in group 1 (P = .128). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis for 6 months was associated with sustained reduction of cytomegalovirus infection up to 2 years after kidney transplant without significant impact on the acute rejection, new-onset diabetes posttransplant, or patient and graft outcomes.

Steroid avoidance reduce the cost of morbidities after live-donor renal allotransplants: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Steroids have had the main role in renal transplant for more than 4 decades. However, chronic use of steroids is associated with many comorbidities, owing to a lack of assessing cost-benefit of steroid avoidance in live-donor renal allotransplants. In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, we aimed to assess the cost-benefit of a steroid-free immunosuppression regimen among Egyptian live-donor renal transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were randomly allocated to receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for only 3 days (n=50 patients; study group) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids on a maintenance basis (n=50 patients; control group). All patients received basiliximab (Simulect) induction, with median follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable graft and patient survivals, rejection episodes, and graft functioning. Posttransplant comorbidities were significantly more prevalent in the steroid-maintenance group. Hypertension was detected in 4% of steroid-free group versus 24% in the steroid-maintenance group (P = .0009). Posttransplant diabetes mellitus, serious infections, and hyperlipidemia were significantly more prevalent in the steroid-maintenance group (P < .05). Associated hospitalization costs were 2.2-fold higher in the steroid-maintenance group than they were in the steroid-free group. One year after transplant, the cost of managing posttransplant comorbidities was significantly higher in steroid-maintenance group, despite comparable costs of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: In low, immunologic risk recipients of live-donor renal transplants, using basiliximab induction and maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, steroid avoidance was associated with lower first annual total costs despite comparable immunosuppression costs, which was attributed to lower costs of associated morbidities.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Egypt: progression despite handicaps.

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-known advantages of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), it continues to be grossly underutilized in many developing countries. However, some developing countries, such as Mexico, use the modality very effectively. In view of this, we started the first CAPD program in Egypt. METHODS: Since its start in 1997, our program has treated 33 patients. Straight double-cuffed Tenckhoff catheters were surgically placed in all patients. Twin-bag systems were used. All patients underwent monthly clinical and biochemical assessment and measurement of Kt/V urea. Peritonitis and exit-site infection rates were monitored. RESULTS: Most treated patients were adult and female. Mean age was 31.7 years and mean follow-up duration was 18 months. Peritonitis rate was 1 episode /21.3 months and was easily managed in most patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism (24%) but 49% of cases were culture negative. There were no exit-site infections. Mean weekly Kt/V urea was 1.78 +/- 0.23. CONCLUSION: We report the successful development of a small CAPD program in Egypt, made possible by well-established financial support, a motivated team of doctors and nurses, and good patient selection and training.

Cost-benefit of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Steroids have played a major role in renal transplantation for more than four decades. However, chronic use of steroids is associated with a lot of comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the cost-benefit of steroid-free immunosuppression regimen in a prospective randomized controlled study of live donor renal transplantation, which was lacking in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus (Tac), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), basiliximab (Simulect) induction and steroids only for 3 days (50 patients, study group) or Tac, MMF, Simulect induction and steroid maintenance (50 patients, control group). Median follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable graft and patient survival, rejection episodes and graft function. Post-transplant hypertension was detected in 4% of the steroid-free group and 24% of the steroid maintenance group (p = 0.0009), while post-transplant diabetes mellitus was detected in 4% and 16% of these two groups, respectively (p = 0.037). By the end of the first year, the cost of managing post-transplant morbidities was significantly higher in the steroid maintenance group, despite the comparable cost of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Among low immunological risk recipients of live donor renal transplants, steroid avoidance was feasible, safe and with less morbidity, using Simulect induction, and tacrolimus and MMF as maintenance immunosuppression. Steroid avoidance was associated with a lower total cost despite comparable immunosuppression cost, which was attributed to the lower cost of associated morbidities.

Ionized alkaline water: new strategy for management of metabolic acidosis in experimental animals.

Metabolic acidosis can occur as a result of either the accumulation of endogenous acids or loss of bicarbonate from the gastrointestinal tract or the kidney, which represent common causes of metabolic acidosis. The appropriate treatment of acute metabolic acidosis has been very controversial. Ionized alkaline water was not evaluated in such groups of patients in spite of its safety and reported benefits. So, we aimed to assess its efficacy in the management of metabolic acidosis in animal models. Two models of metabolic acidosis were created in dogs and rats. The first model of renal failure was induced by ligation of both ureters; and the second model was induced by urinary diversion to gut (gastrointestinal bicarbonate loss model). Both models were subjected to ionized alkaline water (orally and by hemodialysis). Dogs with renal failure were assigned to two groups according to the type of dialysate utilized during hemodialysis sessions, the first was utilizing alkaline water and the second was utilizing conventional water. Another two groups of animals with urinary diversion were arranged to receive oral alkaline water and tap water. In renal failure animal models, acid-base parameters improved significantly after hemodialysis with ionized alkaline water compared with the conventional water treated with reverse osmosis (RO). Similar results were observed in urinary diversion models as there was significant improvement of both the partial pressure of carbon dioxide and serum bicarbonate (P = 0.007 and 0.001 respectively) after utilizing alkaline water orally. Alkaline ionized water can be considered as a major safe strategy in the management of metabolic acidosis secondary to renal failure or dialysis or urinary diversion. Human studies are indicated in the near future to confirm this issue in humans.

Characteristics of patients with Banff borderline changes in renal allograft biopsies.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to characterize the patients who experienced borderline rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were enrolled in this study. Forty-seven patients out of 106 patients with borderline rejection (after exclusion of those with associated chronic interstitial fibrosis) were compared with patients with acute cellular rejection grade 1 (n = 650), and patients free of rejection episodes (n = 444) regarding the different characteristics. RESULTS: Patients aged 20 years or younger were frequently in borderline rejection group than other groups (which was statistically significant) (P = .001). Significant differences were found in recipient and donor ages, consanguinity, pretransplant blood transfusion, and immunosuppression plan. Most patients in borderline rejection group received triple immunosuppression therapy than other groups (P = .001). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of different variables on graft survival in borderline rejection patients revealed that none of them was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Borderline rejection is a frequent finding in biopsy-proven acute rejection after kidney transplant. Time of occurrence, frequency, treatment or not, and response to therapy were not predictors to graft survival.

Comparative analysis of azathioprine versus cyclosporine-based therapy in primary haplo-identical live-donor kidney transplantation: a 20-year experience.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains a major cause of graft failure over the long term, second only to patient mortality. The main adverse effects of cyclosporine A (CsA) include nephrotoxicity, hypertension, symptomatic hyperuricemia, hirsutism, and gum hyperplasia. Available studies among live related donor renal transplants lack adequate information regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of primary CsA-based immunosuppressive regimens. This prospective randomized study is aimed at evaluating the long-term results of CsA-based immunosuppressive protocols in live-donor kidney transplantation. The follow-up data of 444 renal transplant recipients operated at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, prior to 1996 were reviewed. Primary immuno-suppressive protocols included: steroids and azathioprine (group I, 130 cases); steroids and CsA (group II, 75 cases); and steroids, CsA, and azathioprine (group III, 239 cases). Only adult primary renal transplant recipients with age ranging between 18 and 60 years and one haplotype HLA mismatch with the donor were included. All patients received kidneys from living related donors with previous donor non-specific blood transfusions. The percentage of cases with chronic rejection was significantly higher in group III. Living cases with graft failure were significantly higher in group III, whereas mortality was significantly higher in group I. Diabetic patients and those with serious bacterial infections were significantly more prevalent in group II. Hypertensive patients were significantly more common in groups I and II. Liver disease was more prevalent among patients in group III. Our study suggests that the long-term results of treatment with steroids and azathioprine are satisfactory in live related donor kidney transplant recipients. Chronic rejection was significantly higher in patients in group III, possibly due to the risk of CsA nephrotoxicity. Groups with CsA-based protocols experienced many adverse reactions of CsA such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic rejection.

Steroid and azathioprine versus steroid, cyclosporine, and azathioprine therapies in primary haplo-identical living donor kidney transplantation: twenty-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Achievements in short-term graft survival since the introduction of cyclosporine has not been matched by improvement in long-term graft function, and chronic allograft nephropathy remains the second commonest cause of graft attrition over time. We aimed to evaluate the long-term results of conventional immunosuppression by steroid and azathioprine in comparison with cyclosporine-based triple therapy in living donor kidney transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the long-term follow-up data of 369 living related kidney transplant recipients that were on prednisolone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy (group 1) or triple therapy by prednisolone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine (group 2). All recipients were followed-up for more than 10 years (mean, 240 +/- 12 months). Comparative analyses included patient and graft survival rates, condition at last follow-up, graft rejection, and graft function. RESULTS: There were 130 patients in group 1 and 239 in group 2. The overall frequency of acute rejection episodes was not significantly different between the two groups. However, the proportion of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly higher in group 2 (21% versus 35%, P = .001). Graft survival rates were 85.3% versus 92.4% at 1 year, 69.9% versus 71.9% at 5 years, and 52.5% versus 50.8% at 10 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .03). The two groups were comparable regarding posttransplant malignancies, diabetes mellitus, serious bacterial infections, and hepatic diseases. However, hypertensive patients were significantly more frequent in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly higher in patients receiving cyclosporine, possibly due to the risk of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, glomerular disease recurrence, and hypertension. Nowadays, it is possible to achieve excellent calcineurin inhibitors-free regimen using newer maintenance immunosuppressive agents.