RESUMEN
Oxalyl-CoA synthetase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of the most abundant peroxisomal proteins in yeast and hence has become a model to study peroxisomal translocation. It contains a C-terminal Peroxisome Targeting Signal 1, which however is partly dispensable, suggesting additional receptor bindings sites. To unravel any additional features that may contribute to its capacity to be recognized as peroxisomal target, we determined its assembly and overall architecture by an integrated structural biology approach, including X-ray crystallography, single particle cryo-electron microscopy and small angle X-ray scattering. Surprisingly, it assembles into mixture of concentration-dependent dimers, tetramers and hexamers by dimer self-association. Hexameric particles form an unprecedented asymmetric horseshoe-like arrangement, which considerably differs from symmetric hexameric assembly found in many other protein structures. A single mutation within the self-association interface is sufficient to abolish any higher-level oligomerization, resulting in a homogenous dimeric assembly. The small C-terminal domain of yeast Oxalyl-CoA synthetase is connected by a partly flexible hinge with the large N-terminal domain, which provides the sole basis for oligomeric assembly. Our data provide a basis to mechanistically study peroxisomal translocation of this target.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Microscopía por Crioelectrón , Microcuerpos/química , Microcuerpos/metabolismo , Proteínas de Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Ligasas/análisis , Ligasas/metabolismoRESUMEN
LysR-type transcription regulators (LTTRs) comprise one of the largest families of transcriptional regulators in bacteria. They are typically homo-tetrameric proteins and interact with promoter DNA of ~ 50-60 bp. Earlier biochemical studies have suggested that LTTR binding to promoter DNA bends the DNA and, upon inducer binding, the bend angle of the DNA is reduced through a quaternary structure change of the tetrameric LTTR, leading to the activation of transcription. To date, crystal structures of full-length LTTRs, DNA-binding domains (DBD) with their target DNAs, and the regulatory domains with and without inducer molecules have been reported. However, these crystal structures have not provided direct evidence of the quaternary structure changes of LTTRs or of the molecular mechanism underlying these changes. Here, we report the first crystal structure of a full-length LTTR, CbnR, in complex with its promoter DNA. The crystal structure showed that, in the absence of bound inducer molecules, the four DBDs of the tetrameric CbnR interact with the promoter DNA, bending the DNA by ~ 70°. Structural comparison between the DNA-free and DNA-bound forms demonstrates that the quaternary structure change of the tetrameric CbnR required for promoter region-binding arises from relative orientation changes of the three domains in each subunit. The mechanism of the quaternary structure change caused by inducer binding is also discussed based on the present crystal structure, affinity analysis between CbnR and the promoter DNA, and earlier mutational studies on CbnR. DATABASE: Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the full-length Cupriavidus necator NH9 CbnR in complex with promoter DNA are available in the Protein Data Bank under the accession code 7D98.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/química , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Factores de Transcripción/química , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Sitios de Unión , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Cupriavidus necator/química , ADN/química , ADN/metabolismo , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Unión Proteica , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
Tail-anchored (TA) proteins contain a single transmembrane domain (TMD) at the C-terminus that anchors them to the membranes of organelles where they mediate critical cellular processes. Accordingly, mutations in genes encoding TA proteins have been identified in a number of severe inherited disorders. Despite the importance of correctly targeting a TA protein to its appropriate membrane, the mechanisms and signals involved are not fully understood. In this study, we identify additional peroxisomal TA proteins, discover more proteins that are present on multiple organelles, and reveal that a combination of TMD hydrophobicity and tail charge determines targeting to distinct organelle locations in mammals. Specifically, an increase in tail charge can override a hydrophobic TMD signal and re-direct a protein from the ER to peroxisomes or mitochondria and vice versa. We show that subtle changes in those parameters can shift TA proteins between organelles, explaining why peroxisomes and mitochondria have many of the same TA proteins. This enabled us to associate characteristic physicochemical parameters in TA proteins with particular organelle groups. Using this classification allowed successful prediction of the location of uncharacterized TA proteins for the first time.
Asunto(s)
Compartimento Celular , Mamíferos/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/química , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Animales , Retículo Endoplásmico/metabolismo , Células Hep G2 , Humanos , Interacciones Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Membranas Intracelulares/metabolismo , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Peroxisomas/metabolismo , Transporte de Proteínas , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Fracciones Subcelulares/metabolismoRESUMEN
The correct topogenesis of peroxisomal membrane proteins is a crucial step for the formation of functioning peroxisomes. Although this process has been widely studied, the exact mechanism with which it occurs has not yet been fully characterized. Nevertheless, it is generally accepted that peroxisomes employ three proteins - Pex3, Pex19 and Pex16 in mammals - for the insertion of peroxisomal membrane proteins into the peroxisomal membrane. Structural biology approaches have been utilized for the elucidation of the mechanistic questions of peroxisome biogenesis, mainly by providing information on the architecture of the proteins significant for this process. This review aims to summarize, compare and put into perspective the structural knowledge that has been generated mainly for Pex3 and Pex19 and their interaction partners in recent years.