Do Plastic Surgery Residents Get Sued? An Analysis of Malpractice Lawsuits.

Trainees may be implicated in malpractice lawsuits. Our study examines malpractice cases involving plastic surgery trainees. Methods: Using the LexisNexis database, verdicts and settlements from appellate state and federal cases between February 1988 and 2020 were queried. A nonrepresentative sample of 300 cases was compiled. Results: During a 32-year period, 21 lawsuits involving plastic surgery trainees were identified. Of these, 14 (66.67%) involved claims when a trainee was directly named as a defendant. Eighteen (85.7%) cases were due to procedural-related adverse outcomes, while three (14.3%) cases were associated with clinical or diagnostic-related adverse outcomes. Of the procedure-related cases, five (27.8%) occurred when the trainee was the lead surgeon. Allegations included lack of informed consent of procedure complications (11, 52.4%), procedural error (11, 52.4%), failure to supervise trainee (11, 52.4%), inexperience of trainee (eight, 38.1%), incorrect diagnosis or treatment (five, 23.8%), delay in evaluation (three, 14.3%), lack of awareness of resident involvement (three, 14.3%), lack of follow-up (three, 14.3%), and prolonged operative time (one, 4.8%). Median time from injury to lawsuit resolution was 3.8 years [interquartile range (IQR), 3-5 years]. Verdicts were ruled in favor of the defense in eight (38.1%) cases and for plaintiff in six (28.6%) cases. A settlement was made in seven (33.3%) cases. Median payout for plaintiff-won cases was $5,100,000 (IQR, $1,530,000-$17,500,000); the median settlement was $2,500,000 (IQR, $262,500-$4,410,000). Conclusions: Procedural error, improper informed consent, improper trainee supervision, and resident inexperience were the most common allegations. These factors can lead to financial and psychological burdens early in a physician's career.

Availability of medications for opioid use disorder in outpatient and inpatient pharmacies in South Florida: a secret shopper survey.

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and recent reduction in barriers to prescribers, numerous obstacles exist for patients seeking MOUD. Prior studies have used telephone surveys to investigate pharmacy-related barriers to MOUD. We applied this methodology to evaluate inpatient and outpatient pharmacy barriers to MOUD in South Florida. METHODS: Randomly selected pharmacies in South Florida (Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties) were called using a standardized script with a "secret shopper" approach until 200 successful surveys had been completed. The primary outcome was the availability of any buprenorphine products. Second, a list of all 48 acute care hospitals within the aforementioned counties was compiled, and hospitals were contacted by telephone using a second structured script. RESULTS: A total of 1374 outpatient pharmacies and 48 inpatient pharmacies were identified. 378 randomly selected outpatient pharmacies were contacted to accrue 200 successful calls (53% success rate). All 48 inpatient pharmacies were contacted to successfully complete 25 inpatient surveys (52%). Of the 200 outpatient pharmacies contacted, 38% had any buprenorphine available. There was a significant difference in buprenorphine availability by county, with Miami-Dade having the least availability and Palm Beach having the most availability (27% vs. 47%, respectively; p = 0.04). Of the 38% with buprenorphine available, 82% had a sufficient supply for a two-week prescription of buprenorphine 8 mg twice daily. Of the pharmacies that did not have buprenorphine, 55% would be willing to order with a median estimated time to receive an order of 2 days (IQR 1.25-3 days). Of the 25 surveyed inpatient pharmacies, 88% reported having buprenorphine on inpatient formulary, and 55% of hospitals had at least one restriction on ordering of buprenorphine beyond federal regulations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight significant pharmacy-related barriers to comprehensive OUD treatment across the healthcare system including both acute care hospital pharmacies and outpatient community pharmacies. Despite efforts to increase the number of MOUD providers, there still remain downstream obstacles to MOUD access.

Facial Feminization Surgery: Part 1 of the Plastic Surgeon's Perspective of Gender-Affirming Surgery.

The perceived feminine face is distinctly unique from the perceived masculine face. Facial feminization surgery (FFS) includes a range of surgical procedures designed to change characteristically masculine facial features into feminine ones. FFS encompasses a set of bone and soft-tissue reconstructive procedures including, but not limited to, forehead contouring with or without frontal sinus setback, hairline adjustment, brow lift, rhinoplasty, lip lift, mandibular shaping, genioplasty, and "tracheal" shave, and fat grafting. Some patients choose to undergo one, all, or groupings of the procedures. The surgical decision is tailored to the individual and based on clinical opinion, patient desire, and insurance status or means to pay. FFS improves patient quality of life, has good general aesthetic outcomes, and improves feminine gender appearance (Morrison et al., 2020).

Joint-Venture Ambulatory Surgery Centers: The Perfect Partnership.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery growth has increased in the last few decades as ambulatory surgery centers have been shown to succeed in cost efficiencies through their smaller size and breadth, specialization of care, and ability to quickly participate in perioperative process improvement and education. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective fiscal review was performed for all Northwell Health-physician ambulatory surgery center joint ventures. The outcome measures studied included model of ownership, specialty types, and gross revenue. Additional facility characteristics were studied, including growth trajectory, facility size, and cost to build a de novo facility. RESULTS: Eleven free-standing ambulatory surgery centers were identified at Northwell Health during the 5-year study period. The total gross revenue for all Northwell clinical joint ventures for 2019 alone was $102,854,000. Northwell Health is a majority stakeholder in eight of their joint venture ambulatory surgery centers, with an average Northwell ownership of 53 percent and an average number of physician owners per facility of 11. The number of hospital-physician joint-venture ambulatory surgery centers grew from two to 11 facilities during the study period (450 percent). Surgical volume followed a similar trajectory, increasing 295 percent over the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: The ambulatory surgery center setting provides a vast number of possibilities for key stakeholders, including patients themselves, to benefit from financial and clinical efficiencies. Ambulatory surgery centers have been popular, as they meet patient expectations for convenience of elective surgery, reduce payer and clinical pressures to minimize length of stay in hospitals, and achieve similar or higher quality care with less intense resources.

Osseous Genioplasty: Prevention of Witch's Chin Deformity with No-Degloving Technique.

BACKGROUND: Osseous genioplasty is a powerful procedure that can correct chin dysmorphology; however, traditional techniques may result in chin ptosis or a "witch's chin" deformity. Iatrogenic chin ptosis is thought to be caused by excessive degloving of soft tissue with a failure to reattach the mentalis muscle. In the authors' study, they compared the "no-degloving" technique (using a 90-degree plate with lag-screw fixation) to the "traditional" technique, for minimization of chin ptosis. METHODS: The authors compared genioplasty techniques for consecutive patients: group 1 (traditional) underwent degloving for fixation of a stair-step plate, whereas group 2 (no-degloving) underwent lag-screw fixation (n = 50; 25 patients per group). The authors compared operating room time, advancement, complications, preoperative-to-postoperative vertical height change of the pogonion and menton (obtained through cone beam computed tomographic scans), surgeons' assessment of witch's chin, and FACE-Q surveys. RESULTS: No-degloving versus traditional groups had similar age and sex distributions, horizontal/vertical change (5 mm/2 mm versus 6 mm/2 mm), length of surgery, and complication rate (5 percent). The traditional group had more deviation from expected position for both the pogonion (3.4 mm versus 1.2 mm; p ≤ 0.05) and menton (2.9 mm versus 0.8 mm; p ≤ 0.05), and more occurrences of witch's chin (six versus zero). No-degloving was superior for several FACE-Q scales, including Chin Appearance, Quality of Life, Satisfaction with Decision to Undergo Procedure, and Satisfaction with Outcome. CONCLUSION: No-degloving osseous genioplasty is a safe, reproducible technique that results in decreased soft-tissue ptosis and increased patient satisfaction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Mandibular Subcondylar Fracture: Improved Functional Outcomes in Selected Patients with Open Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Subcondylar fractures represent 25 to 35 percent of all mandibular fractures, yet the treatment paradigm has remained controversial. Closed treatment relies on the plasticity of the condyle head during recovery, whereas open treatment is challenging and risks facial nerve injury. Perioperative, functional, and patient-reported outcomes were measured to compare methods of open versus closed treatment of subcondylar fractures. METHODS: Selected displaced subcondylar fracture cases with open (open reduction and internal fixation of subcondylar fracture with maxillomandibular fixation) versus closed (maxillomandibular fixation) treatment were compared (n = 60). Demographics, perioperative data, complications, persistent symptoms, chin deviation, malocclusion, change in mouth opening, functional scores, and FACE-Q patient satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: Open versus closed groups had similar demographics and perioperative data, except the open group had longer operating room time (76.39 minutes versus 56.15 minutes). In long-term follow-up, open-treated patients had fewer symptoms (9 percent versus 67 percent), less chin deviation (0 percent versus 40 percent), a less restricted mouth opening (3mm versus 5mm), and better functional scores (1.92 versus 0.861). Transient facial nerve weakness was seen in 6 percent of open cases. CONCLUSION: For selected subcondylar fracture patients, open treatment with endoscopic assistance, nerve monitoring, and specialized plates provides superior long-term results compared to closed treatment when considering symptoms and functional parameters. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Online Reviews in a Major City: Who Will Choose You?

OBJECTIVE: A large factor influencing a patient's choice of aesthetic plastic surgeons is online patient reviews. METHODS/TECHNIQUE: Plastic surgeons whose practices are located in counties within the New York metro area were included. Selected surgeons were divided into private and academic surgeons (defined as having a residency program). For each surgeon, the quantity and quality of their Google reviews were collected. RESULTS/COMPLICATIONS: A total of 145 aesthetic surgeons from the New York area were included in the study, both private (n = 126) and academic (n = 19). Given the small size of the latter cohort, 19 private aesthetic surgeons were randomly selected, and compared with the academic surgeons, it was shown that private surgeons had both higher average quality and quantity of online patient Google reviews (confidence interval, 95%; P = 0.0223). Similar results were found when comparing all private American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) surgeons (n = 126) with all academic ASAPS surgeons (n = 19); private ASAPS surgeons had a higher average rating and number of reviews when compared with academic surgeons, again representing a statistically significant difference for the quality of online reviews between private and academic surgeons (confidence interval, 95%; P = 0.031975). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in both the quality and quantity of online ratings for private and academic aesthetic surgeons.

Facelift Surgery Turns Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence and Patient Satisfaction Quantitate Value of Procedure Type and Specific Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Patients desire facelifting procedures to look younger, refreshed, and attractive. Unfortunately, there are few objective studies assessing the success of types of facelift procedures and ancillary techniques. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to utilize convolutional neural network algorithms alongside patient-reported FACE-Q outcomes to evaluate perceived age reduction and patient satisfaction following various facelift techniques. METHODS: Standardized preoperative and postoperative (1-year) images of patients who underwent facelift procedures were analyzed by 4 neural networks to estimate age reduction after surgery (n = 105). FACE-Q surveys were employed to measure patient-reported facial aesthetic outcome. We compared (1) facelift procedure type: skin-only vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS)-plication, vs SMAS-ectomy; and (2) ancillary techniques: fat grafting (malar) vs no fat grafting. Outcomes were based on complications, estimated age-reduction, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The neural network preoperative age accuracy score demonstrated that all neural networks were accurate in identifying our patients' ages (mean score = 100.4). SMAS-ectomy and SMAS-plication had significantly greater age-reduction (5.85 and 5.35 years, respectively) compared with skin-only (2.95 years, P < 0.05). Fat grafting compared to no fat grafting demonstrated 2.1 more years of age reduction. Facelift procedure type did not affect FACE-Q scores; however, patients who underwent fat grafting had a higher satisfaction with outcome (78.1 ± 8 vs 69 ± 6, P < 0.05) and decision to have the procedure (83.0 ± 6 vs 72 ± 9, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence algorithms can reliably estimate the reduction in apparent age after facelift surgery. Facelift technique, like SMAS-ectomy or SMAS-plication, and specific technique, like fat grafting, were found to enhance facelifting outcomes and patient satisfaction.