Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0285285, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315675

RESUMEN

There currently exists no comprehensive and up-to date overview on the financial impact of the different adverse events covered by the Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. We conducted a retrospective case-control study using propensity score matching on a national administrative data set of 1 million inpatients in Switzerland to compare excess costs associated with 16 different adverse events both individually and on a nationally aggregated level. After matching 8,986 cases with adverse events across the investigated PSIs to 26,931 controls, we used regression analyses to determine the excess costs associated with the adverse events and to control for other cost-related influences. The average excess costs associated with the PSI-related adverse events ranged from CHF 1,211 (PSI 18, obstetric trauma with instrument) to CHF 137,967 (PSI 10, postoperative acute kidney injuries) with an average of CHF 27,409 across all PSIs. In addition, adverse events were associated with 7.8-day longer stays, 2.5 times more early readmissions (within 18 days), and 4.1 times higher mortality rates on average. At a national level, the PSIs were associated with CHF 347 million higher inpatient costs in 2019, which corresponds to about 2.2% of the annual inpatient costs in Switzerland. By comparing the excess costs of different PSIs on a nationally aggregated level, we offer a financial perspective on the implications of in-hospital adverse events and provide recommendations for policymakers regarding specific investments in patient safety to reduce costs and suffering.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Seguridad del Paciente , Femenino , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Suiza/epidemiología , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud
2.
Eur J Health Econ ; 2023 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38070018

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the established positive association between patient experience and patient volume, the relationship between patient experience and the financial performance of hospitals has not been studied thoroughly. METHODS: To investigate this relationship, we used longitudinal data from 132 Swiss acute-care hospitals from 2016 to 2019 to examine the associations between patient experience and the proportion of elective patients, revenue, costs, and profits of hospitals. To account for a potential time lag effect, we utilized annual patient experience data and employed multilevel mixed-effects regression modeling to investigate its association with the aforementioned financial performance indicators for the following year. RESULTS: Data for private and public hospitals were analyzed both separately and in combination, to account for the different proportions of elective patients in these types of hospitals. The resulting mixed models, revealed that for each year studied, the previous year's patient experience was positively associated with the current year's proportion of elective patients (ß = 0.09, p = 0.004, all hospitals) and revenue (ß = 1789.83, p = 0.037, private hospitals only), and negatively associated with costs (ß = - 1191.13, p = 0.017, all hospitals); but not significantly associated with future profits (ß = 629.12, p = 0.240, all hospitals). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that better patient experience is associated with a higher proportion of elective patients, greater revenue, and lower costs. Our findings may assist hospital managers and regulators in identifying strategies to increase revenue and reduce costs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA