Surgical Management of Intraocular Pressure With Ab Interno Canaloplasty in Postkeratoplasty Patients: 12-Month Results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes of ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC) with the iTrack microcatheter (Nova Eye Medical, Fremont, CA) for surgical management of intraocular pressure (IOP) in postkeratoplasty patients. METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective case series of postkeratoplasty eyes undergoing ABiC. Efficacy was evaluated based on graft survivability and mean reduction in IOP at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary end points consisted of visual acuity outcomes, number of topical hypotensive medications, and rate of complications. RESULTS: ABiC was successfully performed in 17 eyes after keratoplasty (8 penetrating keratoplasty, 6 DSAEK, 2 penetrating keratoplasty + DSAEK, and 1 DMEK) with elevated IOP refractory to topical hypotensive medications. The baseline mean IOP was 26.2 ± 8.4 mm Hg and reduced significantly to 15.0 ± 4.21 mm Hg at 6 months and 13.0 ± 2.99 mm Hg at 12 months ( P < 0.005). The best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.61 ± 0.55 logMAR at baseline to 0.47 ± 0.59 and 0.49 ± 0.64 at 6 and 12 months, respectively, following ABiC (not statistically significant: P = 0.6769). The baseline mean number of topical hypotensive medications was 3.7 ± 1.8 and reduced to 2.7 ± 1.4 and 2.9 ± 1.3 at 6 and 12 months, respectively ( P = 0.096). One patient developed a hyphema which required anterior chamber washout. One patient required additional glaucoma surgery 19 months after ABiC. No patients experienced graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: ABiC is a clinically safe and effective treatment that can be performed in postkeratoplasty patients to reduce IOP for at least 1 year without any significant complications.

Reversible HER2 antibody-drug conjugate-induced ocular toxicity.

PURPOSE: To report 3 cases of reversible epitheliopathy induced by A166-a human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy for resistant HER2 tumours. METHODS: Advanced HER2 tumour patients were enrolled in A166 phase I/II clinical trial using Bayesian logistic regression model dose escalation. Key exclusion criteria were ≥grade 2 (G2) corneal pathology, severe organ disease, and other cancer therapy within 4 weeks. Eye exams were performed at baseline, regularly scheduled intervals, and additionally upon A166-induced ocular symptoms. Topical therapy with autologous serum tears (ASTs) was implemented based on visual acuity, symptoms, and slit lamp exam. A166 was withheld if ≥G2 ocular toxicity developed; if status improved to ≤G1, A166 therapy was resumed. Visual acuity, corneal exam, and subjective comfort were recorded. RESULTS: After ≥2 cycles of A166, 6 eyes of 3/23 enrolled patients developed whorl pattern epitheliopathy suggestive of limbal stem cell (LSC) dysfunction requiring cessation of A166 despite positive tumour response. Patients 1 and 3 received 3.6 mg/kg A166 dose, and patient 2 received 3.0 mg/kg. Topical steroids (2/4 eyes) failed to improve epitheliopathy. Adding ASTs improved vision, ocular comfort, and whorl pattern epitheliopathy in 6/6 eyes within 3 weeks. Patient 1 continues to improve on ASTs; patient 2 withdrew from the study; and patient 3 resumed A166 therapy. CONCLUSION: A166 precipitates LSC dysfunction-like epitheliopathy. Combination therapy including aggressive lubrication, withholding drug, and ASTs help reverse toxicity. Recognizing that ADC-induced epitheliopathy can respond to ocular management may enable cancer patients to continue lifesaving therapy.

Fill levels, cost comparisons, and expulsion force requirements of commonly used topical ophthalmic steroids.

PURPOSE: To determine volume fill levels, estimated costs, and force expulsion requirements per bottle of topical ophthalmic steroids commonly used in the United States. SETTING: Tertiary care academic referral center. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. METHODS: 8 commercially available medications were tested: loteprednol 0.5%, loteprednol gel 0.5%, loteprednol gel 0.38%, difluprednate 0.05%, generic fluorometholone 0.1%, branded fluorometholone 0.1%, generic prednisolone 1.0%, and branded prednisolone 1.0%. 10 bottles of each medication were tested. A double-blinded method was used to measure actual bottle fill volume and number of drops dispensed per bottle. The total perioperative cost per drop was calculated for each medication using a mean cash price. Force requirements were measured using a customized force gauge apparatus. Formulations were compared using Kruskal-Wallis 1way analysis of variances. RESULTS: All formulations were able to cover postoperative periods commensurate with commonly used dosing regimens for cataract surgery. All medications had greater than sticker volume. Loteprednol 0.5% suspension and branded fluorometholone had the highest and lowest number of drops among the medications tested, respectively. Loteprednol 0.38% gel was the most expensive medication, whereas generic prednisolone 1.0% was the least expensive. Gel and branded formulations of ophthalmic steroids required less expulsion force compared with other tested formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Volume fill levels, patient-incurred costs, and expulsion force requirements per bottle of topical steroid medications vary widely. Clinicians may wish to consider these findings when determining their perioperative prescribing regimen.