Early response to Tezepelumab in type-2 severe asthma patients non-responders to other biological treatments: a real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios. OBJECTIVE: We sought investigate Tezepelumab's response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs. METHODS: Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs. RESULTS: Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab's potential in real-world settings. CONCLUSION: In real-world scenarios, despite the study's limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab's promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Incidence and Prevalence of Children's Diffuse Lung Disease in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Children's diffuse lung disease, also known as children's Interstitial Lung Diseases (chILD), are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases with relevant morbidity and mortality, which diagnosis and classification are very complex. Epidemiological data are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyse incidence and prevalence of chILD in Spain. METHODS: Multicentre observational prospective study in patients from 0 to 18 years of age with chILD to analyse its incidence and prevalence in Spain, based on data reported in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 381 cases with chILD were notified from 51 paediatric pulmonology units all over Spain, covering the 91.7% of the paediatric population. The average incidence of chILD was 8.18 (CI 95% 6.28-10.48) new cases/million of children per year. The average prevalence of chILD was 46.53 (CI 95% 41.81-51.62) cases/million of children. The age group with the highest prevalence were children under 1 year of age. Different types of disorders were seen in children 2-18 years of age compared with children 0-2 years of age. Most frequent cases were: primary pulmonary interstitial glycogenosis in neonates (17/65), neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy in infants from 1 to 12 months (44/144), idiopathic pulmonary haemosiderosis in children from 1 to 5 years old (13/74), hypersensitivity pneumonitis in children from 5 to 10 years old (9/51), and scleroderma in older than 10 years old (8/47). CONCLUSIONS: We found a higher incidence and prevalence of chILD than previously described probably due to greater understanding and increased clinician awareness of these rare diseases.

Incidence and Prevalence of Children's Diffuse Lung Disease in Spain / Incidencia y prevalencia de las neumopatías intersticiales pediátricas en España

Background Children's diffuse lung disease, also known as children's Interstitial Lung Diseases (chILD), are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases with relevant morbidity and mortality, which diagnosis and classification are very complex. Epidemiological data are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyse incidence and prevalence of chILD in Spain. Methods Multicentre observational prospective study in patients from 0 to 18 years of age with chILD to analyse its incidence and prevalence in Spain, based on data reported in 2018 and 2019. Results A total of 381 cases with chILD were notified from 51 paediatric pulmonology units all over Spain, covering the 91.7% of the paediatric population. The average incidence of chILD was 8.18 (CI 95% 6.28–10.48) new cases/million of children per year. The average prevalence of chILD was 46.53 (CI 95% 41.81–51.62) cases/million of children. The age group with the highest prevalence were children under 1 year of age. Different types of disorders were seen in children 2–18 years of age compared with children 0–2 years of age. Most frequent cases were: primary pulmonary interstitial glycogenosis in neonates (17/65), neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy in infants from 1 to 12 months (44/144), idiopathic pulmonary haemosiderosis in children from 1 to 5 years old (13/74), hypersensitivity pneumonitis in children from 5 to 10 years old (9/51), and scleroderma in older than 10 years old (8/47). Conclusions We found a higher incidence and prevalence of chILD than previously described probably due to greater understanding and increased clinician awareness of these rare diseases.

Antecedentes Las neumopatías intersticiales pediátricas, también conocidas con el acrónimo chILD (del inglés children's Interstitial Lung Diseases), es un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades raras con morbimortalidad relevante, cuyo diagnóstico y clasificación son complejos. Los estudios epidemiológicos son escasos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la incidencia y la prevalencia de chILD en España. Métodos Estudio prospectivo observacional multicéntrico en pacientes de 0 a 18 años afectos de chILD para analizar la incidencia y la prevalencia en España, a partir de datos recogidos en 2018 y 2019. Resultados Se recogieron 381 casos de chILD entre 51 unidades de neumología pediátrica de toda España, que cubrían el 91,7% de la población pediátrica. La incidencia promedio fue 8,18 (IC 95%: 6,28-10,48) casos nuevos/millón de niños por año. La prevalencia promedio fue de 46,53 (IC 95%: 41,81-51,62) casos/millón de niños. El grupo de edad con mayor prevalencia fue el de niños menores de un año. Se observaron diferentes entidades en niños de 2 a 18 años en comparación con niños de 0 a 2 años. Los diagnósticos más frecuentes fueron: glucogenosis intersticial pulmonar primaria en neonatos (17/65), hiperplasia de células neuroendocrinas en lactantes de uno a 12 meses (44/144), hemosiderosis pulmonar idiopática en niños de uno a 5 años (13/74), neumonía por hipersensibilidad en niños de 5 a 10 años (9/51) y esclerodermia en mayores de 10 años (8/47). Conclusiones Encontramos una mayor incidencia y prevalencia de chILD que las descritas previamente, probablemente debido a un mayor conocimiento y detección de estas enfermedades raras.

Broncodilatadores en bronquiolitis: ¿debemos replantearnos su uso selectivo? / Bronchodilators in bronchiolitis: should we reassess their selective use?

Conclusiones de los autores del estudio: en comparación con el manejo según recomendaciones de las guías actuales, el tratamiento de lactantes con bronquiolitis aguda utilizando la estrategia de terapia broncodilatadora guiada por fenotipos es una estrategia más rentable. Implica una menor probabilidad de ingreso hospitalario a costos totales más bajos. Se deben realizar ensayos controlados aleatorizados utilizando biomarcadores para estratificar a los pacientes con más probabilidades de responder a los broncodilatadores.Comentario de los revisores: la información disponible no parece suficiente para realizar cambios en las recomendaciones actuales en el manejo de la bronquiolitis aguda. Seguimos necesitando un modelo predictivo que permita identificar a los potenciales respondedores a broncodilatadores, así como un ensayo clínico con suficiente tamaño muestral que estime la eficacia de la estrategia de su uso selectivo. (AU)

Authors’ conclusions: compared to guidelines‐guided strategy, treating infants with viral bronchiolitis using the phenotypic‐guided bronchodilator therapy strategy is a more cost‐effective strategy, because it involves a lower probability of hospital admission at lower total treatment costs. Randomized controlled trials using biomarkers to stratify patients most likely to respond to bronchodilators are necessary.Reviewers’ commentary: the available information does not seem sufficient to make changes to the current recommendations in acute bronchiolitis management. There is still need for a predictive model that allows to identify potential responders to bronchodilators, as well as a clinical trial with a sufficient sample size to estimate the effectiveness of the strategy of its selective use. (AU)

Omalizumab outcomes for up to 6 years in pediatric patients with severe persistent allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Various studies have assessed omalizumab outcomes in the clinical practice setting but follow-up and/or number of patients included were limited. We aim to describe the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients with severe persistent allergic asthma receiving omalizumab in the largest real-life cohort reported to date. METHODS: ANCHORS was a multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study conducted in 25 Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology units in Spain. We collected data of patients < 18 years and initiating omalizumab between 2006 and 2018, from the year prior to omalizumab initiation to discontinuation or last available follow-up. The primary outcome was the evolution of the annual number of moderate-to-severe exacerbations compared with the baseline period. RESULTS: Of the 484 patients included, 101 (20.9%) reached 6 years of treatment. The mean ± standard deviation number of exacerbations decreased during the first year of treatment (7.9 ± 6.6 to 1.1 ± 2.0, P < .001) and remained likewise for up to 6 years. The other clinical parameters assessed also improved significantly during the first year and stabilized or continued to improve thereafter. The percentage of patients experiencing adverse events was consistently low, and the main reason for discontinuation was good disease evolution. CONCLUSION: In this large, long-term, observational study, moderate-to-severe exacerbations decreased significantly from the first year of treatment with omalizumab. The beneficial effect was maintained in the long term, along with a good safety profile. Our results position omalizumab as an effective long-term treatment in pediatric patients with severe persistent allergic asthma.

¿Son eficaces los corticoides inhalados en las exacerbaciones asmáticas? Evidentia praxis / Are inhaled corticosteroids effective in asthma exacerbations? Evidentia praxis

Se presenta un escenario clínico del que surge una pregunta clínica estructurada: en niños o adolescentes asmáticos con síntomas de exacerbación, ¿el uso de corticoides inhalados (de nueva instauración o aumento de dosis habitual) reduce el riesgo de exacerbaciones que requieran corticoides sistémicos y/o ingreso? Para contestarla realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica con selección, valoración y jerarquización de la evidencia, siguiendo criterios GRADE. No encontramos evidencia suficiente como para considerar los corticoides inhalados intermitentes una alternativa a los corticoides inhalados de mantenimiento para evitar exacerbaciones que requieran el uso de corticoides sistémicos. El uso de una combinación de corticoides inhalados con formoterol, como tratamiento de rescate al inicio de síntomas, solo es eficaz en los pacientes con dicho tratamiento de base, en comparación con los que solo tienen corticoides inhalados y hacen rescate con beta2-agonistas de acción corta; cuando los pacientes ya toman tratamiento combinado de base, el rescate combinado no mejora el riesgo. En pacientes con crisis asmáticas atendidas en urgencias, los corticoides inhalados en comparación con placebo reducen el riesgo de ingreso, pero no si se compara con corticoides sistémicos

A clinical scenario is presented, from which a structured clinical question arises: In asthmatic children or adolescents with exacerbation symptoms, does the use of inhaled corticosteroids (newly instituted or base dose increased) reduce the risk of exacerbations that require systemic steroids and/or hospitalization? To answer it, we carried out a bibliographic search, with selection, evaluation and graduation of the evidence, following GRADE criteria. We did not find sufficient evidence to consider intermittent inhaled steroids as an alternative to maintenance inhaled steroids to avoid exacerbations that require the use of systemic steroids. The use of a combination of inhaled steroids with formoterol, as a rescue treatment at the onset of symptoms, is only effective when used by patients with this maintenance treatment, compared to those who only have inhaled steroids and rescue with beta2-agonists of short action; when patients already take maintenance combined therapy, combined rescue does not reduce the risk. In patients with asthma attacks attended in the emergency department, inhaled steroids compared to placebo reduce the risk of admission, but not when compared to systemic corticosteroids

[Are inhaled corticosteroids effective in asthma exacerbations? Evidentia praxis]. / ¿Son eficaces los corticoides inhalados en las exacerbaciones asmáticas? Evidentia praxis.

A clinical scenario is presented, from which a structured clinical question arises: In asthmatic children or adolescents with exacerbation symptoms, does the use of inhaled corticosteroids (newly instituted or base dose increased) reduce the risk of exacerbations that require systemic steroids and/or hospitalization? To answer it, we carried out a bibliographic search, with selection, evaluation and graduation of the evidence, following GRADE criteria. We did not find sufficient evidence to consider intermittent inhaled steroids as an alternative to maintenance inhaled steroids to avoid exacerbations that require the use of systemic steroids. The use of a combination of inhaled steroids with formoterol, as a rescue treatment at the onset of symptoms, is only effective when used by patients with this maintenance treatment, compared to those who only have inhaled steroids and rescue with beta2-agonists of short action; when patients already take maintenance combined therapy, combined rescue does not reduce the risk. In patients with asthma attacks attended in the emergency department, inhaled steroids compared to placebo reduce the risk of admission, but not when compared to systemic corticosteroids.

Preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia: new tools for an old challenge.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most prevalent chronic lung disease in infants and presents as a consequence of preterm birth. Due to the lack of effective preventive and treatment strategies, BPD currently represents a major therapeutic challenge that requires continued research efforts at the basic, translational, and clinical levels. However, not all very low birth weight premature babies develop BPD, which suggests that in addition to known gestational age and intrauterine and extrauterine risk factors, other unknown factors must be involved in this disease's development. One of the main goals in BPD research is the early prediction of very low birth weight infants who are at risk of developing BPD in order to initiate the adequate preventive strategies. Other benefits of determining the risk of BPD include providing prognostic information and stratifying infants for clinical trial enrollment. In this article, we describe new opportunities to address BPD's complex pathophysiology by identifying prognostic biomarkers and develop novel, complex in vitro human lung models in order to develop effective therapies. These therapies for protecting the immature lung from injury can be developed by taking advantage of recent scientific progress in -omics, 3D organoids, and regenerative medicine.

La actitud expectante en la otitis media aguda ¿reduce los costes? / Does watchful waiting reduce costs in acute otitis media?

Conclusiones de los autores del estudio: el empleo apropiado de la actitud expectante para el manejo de la otitis media aguda podría simultáneamente mejorar los resultados de salud y ahorrar costes a la sociedad. En contraposición, los autores interpretan que esta actitud podría suponer un aumento de las visitas, requiriendo educación adicional de los padres y del personal sanitario. Comentario de los revisores: este análisis de coste-efectividad demuestra que la actitud expectante basada en las pautas de la Academia Americana de Pediatría para el manejo de la otitis media se asocia con menores costes totales y evita la pérdida de años de vida ajustados por discapacidad. Sería necesario realizar estudios de costes en Atención Primaria y adaptados a nuestro medio, donde se puede asegurar un seguimiento más exhaustivo de los pacientes obteniendo incluso costes menores

Author's conclusions: the appropriate use of watchful waiting for the management of acute otitis media could simultaneously improve health outcomes and save costs for society. In contrast, the authors interpret that this attitude could imply an increase in visits, requiring additional education from parents and health personnel. Reviewer's commentary: this cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates that watchful waiting management for acute otitis media in patients meeting criteria of the AAP guidelines, stratifying by age and severity symptoms, is associated with lower total costs and also avoids the loss of years of life due to disability. It would be necessary to conduct cost studies in Primary Care, adapted to our environment where it can be ensured a more exhaustive monitoring of patients and the costs could be even lower

Colestasis neonatal, una complicación infrecuente de la taquicardia fetal / No disponible

No disponible