Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; : 1-8, 2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We report the final results of the clinical usage of ceftobiprole in patients in Canada from data in the national CLEAR (Canadian Le adership on Antimicrobial Real-Life Usage) registry. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The authors review the final data using the national ethics approved CLEAR study. Thereafter, the literature is surveyed regarding the usage of ceftobiprole to treat patients with infectious diseases via PubMed (up to March 2024). RESULTS: In Canada, ceftobiprole is primarily used as directed therapy to treat a variety of severe infections caused by MRSA. It is primarily used in patients failing previous antimicrobials, is frequently added to daptomycin and/or vancomycin with high microbiological and clinical cure rates, along with an excellent safety profile. Several reports attest to the microbiological/clinical efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole is also reported to be used empirically in select patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), as well as hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP). CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, ceftobiprole is used mostly as directed therapy to treat a variety of severe infections caused by MRSA, in patients failing previous antimicrobials. It is frequently added to, and thus used in combination with daptomycin and/or vancomycin with high microbiological/clinical cure rates, and an excellent safety profile.

2.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 38: 154-157, 2024 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908823

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We report the use of IV dalbavancin in Canadian patients using data captured by the national CLEAR registry. METHODS: The CLEAR registry uses the web-based data management program, REDCap™ (online survey https://rcsurvey.radyfhs.umanitoba.ca/surveys/?s=TPMWJX98HL) to facilitate clinicians entering details associated with their clinical experiences using IV dalbavancin. RESULTS: Data were available for 40 patients. The most common infections treated were acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) (62.5% of patients), bone/joint infection (22.5%), bloodstream/vascular infection (7.5%) and endocarditis (5.0%). Dalbavancin was used as directed (75.0%) and empiric therapy (25.0%). MRSA was the most common identified pathogen (70.0%). Dalbavancin was used both in outpatient (e.g., emergency department) (65.0%), and inpatient treatment settings (e.g., hospital ward) (35.0%). Dalbavancin was used due to the convenience of a single dose treatment (77.5%) as well as to facilitate hospital discharge (7.5%). Dalbavancin was primarily used alone (90.0%), and most commonly using a single 1500 mg dose (77.5%). Microbiological success (pathogen eradicated or presumed eradicated) occurred in 88.2% of known cases, while clinical success (cure and/or improvement) occurred in 93.3% of known cases. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, IV dalbavancin is used as both directed and empiric therapy to treat ABSSSI as well as off-label (bone/joint, bacteremia/vascular, endocarditis, device-related) infections. It is used in both outpatient and inpatient settings due primarily to its convenience as a single-dose treatment regimen and to facilitate early hospital discharge. Dalbavancin use is associated with high microbiological and clinical cure rates along with an excellent safety profile.

4.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1125574, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37122293

RESUMEN

Background and objectives: An increasing number of research studies point toward the importance and prevalence of long-term neurocognitive symptoms following infection with COVID-19. Our objectives were to capture the prevalence of cognitive impairments from 1 to 16 months post-COVID-19 infection, assess the changes in neuropsychological functions over time, and identify factors that can predict long-term deficits in cognition. Methodology: A cross-sectional research design was adopted to compare four sub-samples recruited over a 16-month timeframe (1-4, 5-8, 9-12, and 13-16 months). Phone interviews were conducted at least 6 weeks after being infected by COVID-19. Sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires were administered followed by standardized neurocognitive and psychological tests and health questionnaires screening cognitive symptoms, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and autonomy. Results: Regarding general health questionnaires, 55.2% of the 134 participants had symptoms of psychiatric illness, while 21.6% of patients had moderate-to-severe anxiety or depression. Cognitive efficiency was diminished in 19.4% of our population. Executive dysfunction was screened in 56% of patients, and an impairment of cognitive flexibility and inhibition was revealed in 38.8%. Depression, hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the duration of hospital or ICU stay were associated with an inhibition deficit. The duration elapsed from the initial infection, and the neurocognitive assessment was not associated with a decrease in inhibition deficit. The prevalence of cognitive impairments, other than inhibition deficit, tended to decrease during the study period. Discussion: This study supports the extensive literature on the cognitive and neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 and highlights long-lasting inhibition deficits, while other cognitive functions seemed to improve over time. The severity of infection could interact as a catalyst in the complex interplay between depression and executive functions. The absence of a relation between inhibition deficits and sociodemographic or medical factors reinforces the need for cognitive screening in all COVID-19 patients. Future research should focus on inhibition deficits longitudinally to assess the progression of this impairment.

5.
CMAJ Open ; 11(2): E305-E313, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37015743

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Insufficient data on the rate and distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canada has presented a substantial challenge to the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a representative sample of pregnant people throughout Canada, across multiple time points over 2 years of the pandemic, to describe the seroprevalence and show the ability of this process to provide prevalence estimates. METHODS: This Canadian retrospective serological surveillance study used existing serological prenatal samples across 10 provinces over multiple time periods: Feb. 3-21, 2020; Aug. 24-Sept. 11, 2020; Nov. 16-Dec. 4, 2020; Nov. 15-Dec. 3, 2021; and results from the province of British Columbia during a period in which the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant was predominant, from Nov. 15, 2021, to June 11, 2022. Age and postal code administrative data allowed for comparison with concurrent polymerase chain reactivity (PCR)-positive results collected by Statistics Canada and the Canadian Surveillance of COVID-19 in Pregnancy (CANCOVID-Preg) project. RESULTS: Seropositivity in antenatal serum as early as February 2020 indicates SARS-CoV-2 transmission before the World Health Organization's declaration of the pandemic. Seroprevalence in our sample of pregnant people was 1.84 to 8.90 times higher than the recorded concurrent PCR-positive prevalence recorded among females aged 20-49 years in November-December 2020. Overall seropositivity in our sample of pregnant people was low at the end of 2020, increasing to 15% in 1 province by the end of 2021. Seroprevalence among pregnant people in BC during the Omicron period increased from 5.8% to 43% from November 2021 to June 2022. INTERPRETATION: These results indicate widespread vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccine availability in Canada. During the time periods sampled, public health tracking systems were under-reporting infections, and seroprevalence results during the Omicron period indicate extensive community spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Colombia Británica/epidemiología
6.
Am J Med Genet A ; 188(3): 965-969, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851034

RESUMEN

We present a case of a female diagnosed with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) type 21 with non-previously reported extrapulmonary symptoms, including facial features and congenital vascular anomalies. Whole genome sequencing in our patient revealed a homozygous pathogenic variant in the DRC1 gene and no other notable structural nor punctual variants. This case demonstrates a unique clinical manifestation of PCD, which is possibly associated with the presence of a homozygous pathogenic DRC1 variant. Therefore, we suggest that analysis of DRC1 be considered with PCD type 21 when such features are present.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Motilidad Ciliar , Cilios/patología , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ciliar/genética , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ciliar/patología , Femenino , Homocigoto , Humanos , Proteínas Asociadas a Microtúbulos/genética , Mutación , Fenotipo
7.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can ; 4(2): 108-112, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36337742

RESUMEN

Background: The preferred ambulatory IV therapy for cellulitis is often once-daily cefazolin combined with once-daily oral probenecid (C+P). However, due to a national probenecid drug shortage in 2011, our centre developed a replacement protocol for the administration of cefazolin continuous infusion (CCI) using elastomeric infusers. Our goal was to compare treatment efficacy, duration of IV therapy, and recurrence associated with CCI and C+P using retrospective data from our centre. Methods: We conducted a non-inferiority single-centre retrospective cohort study of emergency department medical records. Patients received either C+P (cefazolin 2 g IV once daily plus probenecid 1 g PO once daily) or CCI (cefazolin 2 g IV loading dose, followed by cefazolin 6 g IV via continuous infusion over 24 hours, via an elastomeric infuser). We compared treatment efficacy, duration of IV therapy, and recurrence rates. Results:  total of 203 patients were analyzed, with 107 included in the CCI arm and 96 in the C+P arm. Overall, CCI users and C+P users were comparable in their sociodemographic and clinical variables measured at admission. We observed increased odds of achieving successful treatment among the CCI group, however it did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio [OR] 2.25; 95% CI 0.84 to 6.07). Recurrence rates were similar between both groups (OR 1.91; 95% CI 0.32 to 11.31). The average duration of IV therapy was similar between groups (p = 0.6). Conclusions: ith results suggesting that CCI was non-inferior to C+P, and that both approaches required similar treatment durations, CCI could represent an acceptable alternative to C+P for the ambulatory IV treatment of cellulitis.


Historique: Le traitement intraveineux (IV) ambulatoire favorisé pour la cellulite prend souvent la forme d'une injection quotidienne de céfazoline associée à une dose quotidienne de probénécide par voie orale (PO) (C+P). Cependant, à cause d'une pénurie nationale de probénécide en 2011, le centre des auteurs a mis au point un autre protocole de perfusion continue de céfazoline (PCC) à l'aide de perfuseurs élastomériques. Les auteurs ont comparé l'efficacité du traitement, la durée du traitement IV et la récurrence associée à la PCC et aux C+P à partir des données rétrospectives du centre. Méthodologie: Les auteurs ont réalisé une étude de cohorte rétrospective monocentrique de non-infériorité à partir des dossiers médicaux du département d'urgence. Les patients ont reçu soit des C+P (2 g de céfazoline IV une fois par jour associés à 1 g de probénécide PO une fois par jour), soit une PCC (dose de charge de 2 g de céfazoline IV, suivie d'une perfusion continue de 6 g de céfazoline IV par perfuseur élastomérique sur une période de 24 heures). Ils ont comparé l'efficacité thérapeutique, la durée du traitement IV et le taux de récurrence. Résultats: Au total, les auteurs ont analysé 203 patients, dont 107 faisaient partie du volet de PCC et 96, du volet de C+P. Dans l'ensemble, les utilisateurs de la PCC et des C+P présentaient des variables sociodémographiques et cliniques semblables à l'admission. Les auteurs ont observé que le traitement du groupe sous PCC avait tendance à être plus efficace, mais cette constatation n'était pas statistiquement significative (rapport de cotes [RC] 2,25; IC à 95 %, 0,84 à 6,07). Les taux de récurrence étaient semblables entre les deux groupes (RC 1,91; IC à 95 %, 0,32 à 11,31). La durée moyenne du traitement IV était semblable entre les groupes (p = 0,6). Conclusions: Puisque, selon les résultats, la PCC n'était pas inférieure aux C+P et que la durée du traitement était semblable dans les deux cas, il serait acceptable comme traitement de rechange acceptable de C+P pour le traitement IV ambulatoire de la cellulite.

9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 19(1): 119-22, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23260201

RESUMEN

We describe 3 culture-proven cases of adenovirus serotype 14 infection in New Brunswick, Canada, during the summer of 2011. Strains isolated from severely ill patients were closely related to strains of a genomic variant, adenovirus 14p1, circulating in the United States and Ireland. Physicians in Canada should be aware of this emerging adenovirus.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/virología , Adenovirus Humanos/genética , ARN Viral/genética , Infecciones por Adenovirus Humanos/patología , Adenovirus Humanos/clasificación , Adenovirus Humanos/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nuevo Brunswick , Filogenia , ARN Viral/clasificación , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Serotipificación
10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23450274

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the role of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 (HSV1) in the epidemiology of genital herpes in Canada. Data on herpes viral cultures for two consecutive years obtained from L'Hôpital Dr GL Dumont, which performs all the viral culture testing in New Brunswick, were reviewed. It was hypothesized that HSV1 was the main cause of genital herpes in New Brunswick. METHODS: Samples of genital origin sent to the laboratory for HSV culture testing between July 2006 and June 2008 were analyzed. Samples from an unspecified or a nongenital source were excluded from analysis. Multiple positive samples collected from the same patient were pooled into a single sample. RESULTS: HSV was isolated from 764 different patients. HSV1 was isolated in 62.6% of patients (male, 55%; female, 63.8%). HSV1 was isolated in 73.2% of patients 10 to 39 years of age and in 32% of patients ≥40 years of age. The difference in rates of HSV1 infection between the 10 to 39 years of age group and the ≥40 years of age group was statistically significant (P<0.001 [χ(2)]). In a similar Canadian study performed in Nova Scotia, HSV1 was recovered in 53.7% of positive cultures (male, 36.7%; female, 58.1%). The rates of HSV1 infection reported by this study and the present study were significantly different (P<0.001 [χ(2)] for male, P=0.012 for female). CONCLUSION: In New Brunswick, HSV1 is the dominant type of HSV isolated in samples collected from a genital site. Significant rate differences were demonstrated between the groups 10 to 39 years of age and ≥40 years of age. INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the role of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 (HSV1) in the epidemiology of genital herpes in Canada. Data on herpes viral cultures for two consecutive years obtained from L'Hôpital Dr GL Dumont, which performs all the viral culture testing in New Brunswick, were reviewed. It was hypothesized that HSV1 was the main cause of genital herpes in New Brunswick. METHODS: Samples of genital origin sent to the laboratory for HSV culture testing between July 2006 and June 2008 were analyzed. Samples from an unspecified or a nongenital source were excluded from analysis. Multiple positive samples collected from the same patient were pooled into a single sample. RESULTS: HSV was isolated from 764 different patients. HSV1 was isolated in 62.6% of patients (male, 55%; female, 63.8%). HSV1 was isolated in 73.2% of patients 10 to 39 years of age and in 32% of patients ≥40 years of age. The difference in rates of HSV1 infection between the 10 to 39 years of age group and the ≥40 years of age group was statistically significant (P<0.001 [χ2]). In a similar Canadian study performed in Nova Scotia, HSV1 was recovered in 53.7% of positive cultures (male, 36.7%; female, 58.1%). The rates of HSV1 infection reported by this study and the present study were significantly different (P<0.001 [χ2] for male, P=0.012 for female). CONCLUSION: In New Brunswick, HSV1 is the dominant type of HSV isolated in samples collected from a genital site. Significant rate differences were demonstrated between the groups 10 to 39 years of age and ≥40 years of age.


INTRODUCTION: On ne sait pas grand-chose du rôle du virus de l'herpès simplex de type 1 (VHS1) dans l'épidémiologie de l'herpès génital au Canada. Les chercheurs ont analysé les données des cultures d'herpès viral obtenues pendant deux années consécutives à L'Hôpital Dr-Georges-L.-Dumont, où toutes les cultures virales sont effectuées au Nouveau-Brunswick. Ils ont postulé que le VHS1 était la principale cause d'herpès génital dans la province. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont analysé les prélèvements génitaux envoyés en laboratoire entre juillet 2006 et juin 2008, en vue de cultures du virus d'herpès simplex (VHS). Ils ont exclu de l'analyse les prélèvements tirés d'une source non précisée ou d'origine non génitale. Ils ont regroupé dans un seul échantillon les multiples échantillons positifs prélevés chez le même patient. RÉSULTATS: Le VHS a été isolé chez 764 patients, et le VHS1, chez 62,6 % des patients (55 % chez les hommes, et 63,8 % chez les femmes), soit 73,2 % des patients de dix à 39 ans et 32 % des patients de 40 ans et plus. La différence de taux d'infection par le VHS1 entre le groupe des dix à 39 ans et celui des 40 ans et plus était statistiquement significative (χ2, P<0,001). Dans une étude canadienne similaire menée en Nouvelle-Écosse, 53,7 % des cultures positives contenaient le VHS1 (36,7 % chez les hommes, 58,1 % chez les femmes). Le taux d'infection par le VHS1 déclaré dans cette étude et celui de la présente étude différaient de manière significative (χ2, P<0,001 chez les hommes, P=0,012 chez les femmes). CONCLUSION: Au Nouveau-Brunswick, le VHS1 est le principal type de VHS isolé dans des échantillons d'origine génitale. On a établi des différences de taux significatives entre le groupe des dix à 39 ans et celui des 40 ans et plus.

11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22379488

RESUMEN

Adenovirus is a commonly isolated virus in clinical samples. Life-threatening infections, although rare, are described worldwide. An epidemic spread of an adenovirus type 3 strain occurred in the province of New Brunswick during the fall of 2008 to the winter of 2009; it resulted in three severely ill patients, with one fatality. Adenovirus should be considered as a cause of severe community-acquired viral pneumonia, especially when the influenza test is negative.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...