RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Predicting the risk of early distant brain failure (DBF) is in demand for management decisions in patients who are candidates for local treatment of brain metastases. This study aimed to analyze the association between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and brain disease control after stereotactic radiation therapy/radiosurgery (SRT) for breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively assessed CTCs before (CTC1) and 4 to 5 weeks after (CTC2) SRT and their relationship with the number of new lesions (NL) suggestive of BCBM before SRT. CTC were quantified and analyzed by immunocytochemistry to evaluate the expression of the proteins COX2, EGFR, ST6GALNAC5, NOTCH1, and HER2. Distant brain failure-free survival (DBFFS), the primary endpoint, diffuse DBFFS (D-DBFFS), and overall survival were estimated. Analysis for DBF within 6 months, with death as competing risk, was performed. RESULTS: Patients were included between 2016 and 2018. CTCs were detected in all 39 patients before and in 34 of 35 patients after SRT. After median follow-up of 16.6 months, median DBFFS, D-DBFFS, and overall survival were 15.3, 14.1, and 19.5 months, respectively. DBF at 6 months was 40% with CTC1 ≤0.5 and 8.82% with CTC1 >0.5 CTC/mL (P = .007), and D-DBF at 6 months was 40% with CTC1 ≤0.5 and 0 with CTC1 >0.5 CTC/mL (P = .005) and 25% with NL/CTC1 >6.8 and 2.65% with NL/CTC1 ≤6.8 (P = .063). On multivariate analysis, DBFFS was inferior with CTC1 ≤0.5 (hazard ratio, 8.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-32.3; P = .002), and D-DBFFS was inferior with CTC1 ≤0.5 (hazard ratio, 10.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-52.41; P = .005). Protein expression was not associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CTC1 and NL/CTC1 may have a role as a biomarker of early diffuse DBF and as a subsequent guide between focal or whole-brain radiation therapy in patients with BCBM.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optimal treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas (ESTS) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) plus concomitant hypofractionated RT (hypo-RT) in local and distant disease relapse. Here we report safety, feasibility and early outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single arm study with a goal accrual of 70 patients. Between 2015 and 2018, 18 patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic ESTS were assigned to receive doxorubicin and ifosfamide for three neoadjuvant cycles, concomitant with hypo-RT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were pathologic response, wound complications (WC), and morbidity rates. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months. At last follow-up, 13/18 patients were alive without evidence of local or systemic disease (DFS 72%), 1 had died due to metastatic disease, and 3 were alive with distant metastasis. One patient presented with local relapse within the irradiated field. Mean DFS time was 48.6 months (95% CI: 37.3-59.9). Six patients (33%) had no residual viable tumor detected in pathologic specimens (3 of these myxoid liposarcomas). There was a significant difference in WC among patients with acute RT skin toxicity. Six patients (33%) developed major WC. No grade 3 or 4 ChT adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited sample size, these early outcomes demonstrate that this treatment regimen is feasible and well tolerated with high rates of limb preservation, local control, and pathologic complete response, supporting further investigation in a multi-institutional setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02812654; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02812654.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Sarcoma , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Extremidades , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Prospectivos , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in collision between patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and those with cancer on different fronts. Patients with cancer have been impacted by deferral, modification, and even cessation of therapy. Adaptive measures to minimize hospital exposure, following the precautionary principle, have been proposed for cancer care during COVID-19 era. We present here a consensus on prioritizing recommendations across the continuum of sarcoma patient care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 125 recommendations were proposed in soft-tissue, bone, and visceral sarcoma care. Recommendations were assigned as higher or lower priority if they cannot or can be postponed at least 2-3 months, respectively. The consensus level for each recommendation was classified as "strongly recommended" (SR) if more than 90% of experts agreed, "recommended" (R) if 75%-90% of experts agreed and "no consensus" (NC) if fewer than 75% agreed. Sarcoma experts from 11 countries within the Sarcoma European-Latin American Network (SELNET) consortium participated, including countries in the Americas and Europe. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of clinical benefit scale was applied to systemic-treatment recommendations to support prioritization. RESULTS: There were 80 SRs, 35 Rs, and 10 NCs among the 125 recommendations issued and completed by 31 multidisciplinary sarcoma experts. The consensus was higher among the 75 higher-priority recommendations (85%, 12%, and 3% for SR, R, and NC, respectively) than in the 50 lower-priority recommendations (32%, 52%, and 16% for SR, R, and NC, respectively). CONCLUSION: The consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high-level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a tool for sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID-19 outbreak. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The Sarcoma European-Latin American Network (SELNET) consensus on sarcoma prioritization care during the COVID-19 era issued 125 pragmatical recommendations distributed as higher or lower priority to protect critical decisions on sarcoma care during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary team from 11 countries reached consensus on 115 recommendations. The consensus was lower among lower-priority recommendations, which shows reticence to postpone actions even in indolent tumors. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit scale was applied as support for prioritizing systemic treatment. Consensus on 115 of 125 recommendations indicates a high level of convergence among experts. The SELNET consensus provides a practice tool for guidance in the decisions of sarcoma multidisciplinary treatment committees during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/normas , Sarcoma/terapia , COVID-19/prevención & control , Consenso , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Atención al Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Sarcoma/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). To justify a non-surgical approach, identification of pathologic complete response (pCR) is required. Analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be used to evaluate pCR. We hypothesize that monitoring of thymidylate synthase (TYMS) and excision repair protein, RAD23 homolog B (RAD23B), can be used to predict resistance to chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Therefore, the aims of this study were to analyze CTCs from patients with LARC who underwent NCRT plus surgery for expression of TYMS/RAD23B and to evaluate their predictive value. Blood samples from 30 patients were collected prior to NCRT (S1) and prior to surgery (S2). CTCs were isolated and quantified by ISET®, proteins were analyzed by immunocytochemistry, and TYMS mRNA was detected by chromogenic in situ hybridization. CTC counts decreased between S1 and S2 in patients exhibiting pCR (p = 0.02) or partial response (p = 0.01). Regarding protein expression, TYMS was absent in 100% of CTCs from patients with pCR (p = 0.001) yet was expressed in 83% of non-responders at S2 (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, RAD23B was expressed in CTCs from 75% of non-responders at S1 (p = 0.01) and in 100% of non-responders at S2 (p = 0.001). Surprisingly, 100% of non-responders expressed TYMS mRNA at both timepoints (p = 0.001). In addition, TYMS/RAD23B was not detected in the CTCs of patients exhibiting pCR (p = 0.001). We found 83.3% of sensitivity for TYMS mRNA at S1 (p = 0.001) and 100% for TYMS (p = 0.064) and RAD23B (p = 0.01) protein expression at S2. Thus, TYMS mRNA and/or TYMS/RAD23B expression in CTCs, as well as CTC kinetics, have the potential to predict non-response to NCRT and avoid unnecessary radical surgery for LARC patients with pCR.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Timidilato Sintasa/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Células , Quimioradioterapia , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/sangre , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/sangre , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/efectos de los fármacos , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/efectos de la radiación , Periodo Preoperatorio , Proctectomía , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tolerancia a Radiación , Radioterapia Conformacional , Neoplasias del Recto/sangre , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/efectos de los fármacos , Recto/patología , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Timidilato Sintasa/sangre , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes in patients with posterior choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium ((106)Ru) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective single institutional analysis of 83 of 94 consecutive patients who underwent (106)Ru brachytherapy was performed. Disease was mainly staged as small- and medium-sized nonmetastatic melanoma. The main parameters evaluated were tumor control (local control [LC] and progression-free survival [PFS]) and ocular preservation (enucleation-free survival [EFS]). Besides, functional evaluation was performed and complications were described. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 39 (6-83) months. The median values of height and maximal basal diameter were 4.3 and 9.3mm, respectively. Median apical and basal doses were 100 and 307Gy, respectively. The actuarial 2-year LC, PFS, and EFS were 96.2%, 96.2%, and 95.5%, respectively. Actuarial 5-year LC, PFS, and EFS were 93.6%, 93.6%, and 84.1%, respectively. Preinsertion visual acuity (VA) maintenance was 34% (equal or better than before treatment). Approximately 56% of patients stayed with a minimum functional VA of 0.1 or more, from whom more than half stayed with 0.5 or more. Cataract was seen in 16% of treated eyes, and glaucoma was the rarest complication, with an incidence of 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Small- and medium-sized choroidal melanomas can be adequately treated with (106)Ru brachytherapy, with high rates of tumor control and ocular preservation. Moreover, acceptable incidence of complications such as glaucoma and cataract are seen, and a reasonable part of patients stay with a minimum functional VA.