Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(3): 445-450, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of delivery at a comprehensive fetal care center co-located in a pediatric hospital on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) exposure and survivorship of children with CDH. METHODS: This retrospective study includes maternal-fetal dyads with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated CDH who received any prenatal care at a single fetal center between February 2006 and March 2021. The principal variables included: (1) delivery setting (children born in the pediatric hospital ["inborn"] vs. children who were delivered elsewhere ["outborn"]), (2) exposure to ECMO (yes vs. no), and (3) survival-at-discharge from birth hospitalization (yes vs. no). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between delivery setting and ECMO cannulation, and whether delivery setting moderates the association between exposure to ECMO and survival-at-discharge. RESULTS: Among 418 maternal-fetal dyads, 77.0% of children were inborn and 32.0% of children were exposed to ECMO during their index hospitalization. Inborn children had more severe prenatal prognostic indicators but had a 57% lower odds of extracorporeal than outborn children. In multivariable logistic regression, delivery setting moderated the association between exposure to ECMO and survival-at-discharge. Although there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between inborn and outborn children who were not exposed to ECMO, inborn children exposed to ECMO had a 6.86 (1.98, 23.74) increased odds of death and outborn children exposed to ECMO had a 17.71 (4.69, 66.87) increased odds of death when both were compared to non-cannulated outborn children. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive fetal care with delivery co-located in a pediatric hospital was associated with decreased exposure to ECMO and a survivorship advantage among children with CDH who required extracorporeal support. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Embarazo , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Atención Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Pronóstico
2.
J Palliat Med ; 27(4): 537-544, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831928

RESUMEN

The acknowledgment and promotion of dignity is commonly viewed as the cornerstone of person-centered care. Although the preservation of dignity is often highlighted as a key tenet of palliative care provision, the concept of dignity and its implications for practice remain nebulous to many clinicians. Dignity in care encompasses a series of theories describing different forms of dignity, the factors that impact them, and strategies to encourage dignity-conserving care. Different modalities and validated instruments of dignity in care have been shown to lessen existential distress at the end of life and promote patient-clinician understanding. It is essential that palliative care clinicians be aware of the impacts of dignity-related distress, how it manifests, and common solutions that can easily be adapted, applied, and integrated into practice settings. Dignity-based constructs can be learned as a component of postgraduate or continuing education. Implemented as a routine component of palliative care, they can provide a means of enhancing patient-clinician relationships, reducing bias, and reinforcing patient agency across the span of serious illness. Palliative care clinicians-often engaging patients, families, and communities in times of serious illness and end of life-wield significant influence on whether dignity is intentionally integrated into the experience of health care delivery. Thus, dignity can be a tangible, actionable, and measurable palliative care goal and outcome. This article, written by a team of palliative care specialists and dignity researchers, offers 10 tips to facilitate the implementation of dignity-centered care in serious illness.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos , Respeto , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Pacientes , Muerte
3.
Semin Pediatr Surg ; 32(6): 151354, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37967486

RESUMEN

There are notable inequities in health outcomes for children based on their social determinants of health (SDOH), including where they are born and live, their primary language, their race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and more. These health inequities are not restricted to resource limited settings; here we highlight three broad topics that are relevant to pediatric surgeons in the United States (US): access to care and disparities, and examples of inequities in firearm-related injuries and appendicitis. Most of our patients will at some point require operative interventions, yet there can be significant challenges in accessing this care and navigating our health systems, particularly around complex perioperative care. There are significant opportunities to improve equitable care by helping patients navigate our health systems and connecting them with additional resources, including screening for primary care services. Firearm-related injuries are now the leading cause of death in children in the US, with significant associated morbidity for non-fatal injuries. There are notable inequities in the risk of injury and types of injuries experienced by children based on their SDOH. Appendicitis is one of the most common pathologies managed by pediatric surgeons, with similar inequities in the rates of perforated appendicitis based on a child's SDOH. For both issues, addressing the inequities our patients experience requires moving upstream and working towards prevention. Key opportunities include better research and data to understand the drivers for observed inequities, multidisciplinary collaboration, community engagement, and public health advocacy among others. As a profession, we have a responsibility to work to address the health inequities our patients experience.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Equidad en Salud , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(12): 2368-2374, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37659921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with prolonged birth admission length of stay (LOS) and to evaluate the association between these characteristics and readmission in the year following discharge for children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of children with isolated CDH born in the Special Delivery Unit and admitted to the Newborn/Infant Intensive Care Unit at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from April 2008 to August 2019. Birth admission hospitalization was categorized into 3 groups (≤35, 36-75, and >76 days) based on the data distribution. Participant factors included gestational age (days), side of CDH (right/left), liver position (up/down), CDH repair technique (open/minimally invasive), exposure to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, lung-to-head circumference ratio, and feeding tube at discharge. Chi-squared, t-tests and analysis of variance were used to examine bivariable associations between participant characteristics, birth admission LOS and readmission in the year following initial hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with readmission. RESULTS: Children hospitalized ≥76 days at birth had 4.33 (95% CI: 1.2, 15.2) higher odds of readmission than those admitted for ≤35 days. Children with a non-operative feeding tube at discharge had 4.12 (895% CI: 1.6, 10.5) higher odds of readmission when compared to those with no feeding tube at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Longer birth hospitalization and non-operative feeding tube are associated with increased readmissions in the year after discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Niño , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/complicaciones , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación
5.
J Surg Educ ; 80(9): 1287-1295, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37451882

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive, socially-minded healthcare has historically been delivered in the primary care setting. For underserved patient populations, however, a surgical care episode may serve as the health care access point. To maximize patient wellbeing during the perioperative period, our surgical center developed the Additional Needs Screener (ANS). Operationalized into practice by GME and UME trainees, this tool screens surgical patients across 3 domains (social, emotional, and immigration needs) and connects patients to partner organizations if appropriate. This study describes the pilot utilization of the ANS among underserved and underinsured surgical patients. DESIGN: Clinical quality improvement and retrospective cohort study of patients completing the ANS from implementation in September 2021 to September 2022. SETTING: The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, PA-a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and 10 underinsured and/or underserved patients completed at least 1 ANS domain. RESULTS: Patients were majority female (55F, 53M, 2 other) and Hispanic/Latinx (72%) with a median age of 38 (IQR = 34-48). Most patients spoke a primary language other than English (77%), and nearly all were either uninsured (82%) or received emergency medical assistance or Medicaid (14%) at referral. Patients demonstrated significant needs; 39% endorsed difficulty affording housing, 32% endorsed difficulty paying for food, 29% endorsed experiencing current life-interfering distress, and 75% had undocumented immigration status. Ultimately, 57% of screened patients accepted referrals to our needs response teams. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved and underinsured patients presenting for surgical care face significant challenges relating to social, emotional, and immigration needs. Through adoption of the ANS, trainees gained competency identifying and addressing these barriers in the perioperative period. Future works will focus on categorizing referral outcomes, developing interventions to increase patient trust, and improving screener dissemination.


Asunto(s)
Área sin Atención Médica , Pacientes no Asegurados , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes
6.
Ann Surg ; 278(6): e1175-e1179, 2023 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226825

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine access to cholecystectomy and postoperative outcomes among non-English primary-speaking patients. BACKGROUND: The population of U.S. residents with limited English proficiency is growing. Language affects health literacy and is a well-recognized barrier to health care in the United States of America. Historically marginalized communities are at greater risk of requiring emergent gallbladder operations. However, little is known about how primary language affects surgical access and outcomes of common surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients after receipt of cholecystectomy in Michigan, Maryland, and New Jersey utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (2016-2018). Patients were classified by primary spoken language: English or non-English. The primary outcome was admission type. Secondary outcomes included operative setting, operative approach, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Multivariable logistics and Poisson regression were used to examine outcomes. RESULTS: Among 122,013 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 91.6% were primarily English speaking and 8.4% were non-English primary language speaking. Primary non-English speaking patients had a higher likelihood of emergent/urgent admissions (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44, P = 0.015) and a lower likelihood of having an outpatient operation (odds ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P = 0.0008). There was no difference in the use of a minimally invasive approach or postoperative outcomes based on the primary language spoken. CONCLUSIONS: Non-English primary language speakers were more likely to access cholecystectomy through the emergency department and less likely to receive outpatient cholecystectomy. Barriers to elective surgical presentation for this growing patient population need to be further studied.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Lenguaje , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Colecistectomía
7.
Pediatr Radiol ; 53(6): 1085-1091, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36823375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The utilization of 3-T magnetic field strength in obstetric imaging is increasingly common. It is important to ensure that magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with higher magnetic field strength is safe for the fetus. Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates undergoing prenatal MR imaging with 1.5-T versus 3-T is of interest but has not yet been examined. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized no clinically meaningful difference in neurodevelopmental outcome between fetuses undergoing 1.5-T versus 3-T fetal MR imaging. As imaging a normal fetus for research purposes is illegal in Pennsylvania, this study was conducted in a population of fetuses with left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (left-CDH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of neurodevelopmental outcome of fetuses with left-CDH scanned at 1.5-T (n=75) versus 3-T (n=25) magnetic field strength between July of 2012 and December of 2019 was performed. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III). RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in median age of assessment (1.5-T: 18 [12, 25] versus 3-T: 21 [11, 26], P=0.79), in mean BSID-III cognitive (1.5-T: 91 ± 14 versus 3-T: 90 ± 16, P=0.82), language (1.5-T: 92 ± 20 versus 3-T: 91 ± 20, P=0.91), and motor composite (1.5-T: 89 ± 15 versus 3-T: 87 ± 18, P=0.59) scores, subscales scores (for all, P>0.50), or in risk of abnormal neuromuscular exam (P=0.29) between neonates with left-CDH undergoing a 1.5-T versus 3-T MR imaging during fetal life. Additionally, the distribution of patients with average, mildly delayed, and severely delayed BSID-III scores was similar between the two groups (for all, P>0.50). The overall distribution of the composite scores in this CDH population was similar to the general population independent of exposure to 1.5-T or 3-T fetal MR imaging. Two 3-T patients (8%) and five 1.5-T patients (7%) scored within the significant delayed range for all BSID-III domains. Subjects with lower observed-to-expected fetal lung volume (O/E FLV) and postnatal need for ECMO had lower cognitive, language, motor, and subscales scores (for all, P<0.03) regardless of being imaged at 1.5-T versus 3-T. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that, compared to 1.5-T MR imaging, fetal exposure to 3-T MR imaging does not increase the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment in fetuses with left-CDH. Additional MR imaging studies in larger CDH cohorts and other fetal populations are needed to replicate and extend the present findings.


Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Embarazo , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Feto/patología , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar/métodos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Pulmón
8.
J Surg Educ ; 80(4): 528-536, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36572606

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To date, education about health equity for early-stage healthcare trainees is largely situated outside of surgical disciplines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical equity curriculum offered to a voluntary group of medical and graduate students. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cohort study from January to June 2021. Pre- and post-course surveys measured domains of attitudes, self-reported confidence, and knowledge via 5-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. Paired t tests were used to analyze quantitative responses. Qualitative responses were studied via iterative thematic analysis. SETTING: At the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA which provides tertiary level, institutional care, 10, interdisciplinary 1.5-hour sessions were held over 1 semester, teaching surgical equity topics that spanned the peri-operative continuum. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four medical and graduate students from across the University of Pennsylvania enrolled. Twenty completed both surveys. RESULTS: From pre- to post-course, students improved across all domains. Students improved in their self-rated ability to identify strategies to talk about sensitive health topics with patients (pre: 20%, post: 90%) and identify strategies to address healthcare disparities in surgery (pre: 10%, post: 90%). Qualitatively, from pre- to post-course, more students could articulate the role of bias and identify opportunities for surgeons to engage in surgical equity. The course strengthened any pre-existing interest in surgical equity, and for 1 student, created interest in a surgical career where it had not previously existed. Many also expressed greater resolve to provide patient-centric care. CONCLUSIONS: Formal curricula can improve students' ability to advocate for surgical equity. A similar framework may fill a need for medical students interested in health equity and surgical careers at other institutions.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Educación Médica , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Curriculum , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos
9.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 63(3): 359-365, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890727

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Critical illness confers a significant risk of psychological distress, both during and after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The Patient Dignity Inventory is a 25-item instrument initially designed to measure psychosocial, existential and symptom-related distress in terminally ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to validate the inventory as a means of identifying distress in inpatient critical care settings. METHODS: Single-center prospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to one of five ICUs within the University of Pennsylvania Health System for greater than 48 hours from January 2019 to February 2020. Patients completed the inventory in addition to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-seven questionnaires. RESULTS: The tool's internal structure was assessed via principal components analysis. 155 participants consented, completed the surveys and were included for analysis. Scores on the inventory showed evidence of internal consistency when used in critical care settings (Cronbach's α=0.95). Moreover, principal components analysis elucidated four themes prevalent in critically-ill patients: Illness-related Concerns, Interactions with Others, Peace of Mind and Dependency. Construct validity was assessed through correlational analysis with depression and anxiety questionnaires. Scores on the inventory appear to be valid for assessing dignity-related psychological concerns in the critical care setting although there is overlap among components and with anxiety and depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the inventory can be used to assess patient distress in critical care settings. Further research may elucidate the role of dignity-based interventions in treating and preventing post-intensive care psychological symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Respeto , Adulto , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermo Terminal/psicología
10.
Linacre Q ; 88(4): 409-415, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34949887

RESUMEN

We are the Center for Surgical Health (CSH), an academic community partnership that supports, educates, and advocates for vulnerable Philadelphians with surgical diseases, founded in 2016 by Dr. Jon B. Morris, a leader in surgical education and a general surgeon at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Alan Herbst, a current third-year Penn general surgery resident. At the time, Dr. Morris, raised in a Reform Jewish household, had been participating in an RCIA Program to convert to Catholicism. The mission of providing surgery to uninsured patients, primarily undocumented individuals, by helping them obtain insurance and see Penn providers was seen by Dr. Morris as a form of Catholic charity, which he has continued to remain dedicated to as his faith in Jesus Christ has deepened. Dr. Herbst, now Associate Director of Clinics for the CSH, recalls working with Dr. Morris as a sub-intern during his conversion, beginning with passion and a neon poster board inviting people to "See the Surgeon." Since that time, the CSH has grown from an organization with 10 volunteers, called "personal patient navigators," who provide insurance support and advocacy at every step of the perioperative continuum, to one with over 50, who have now seen 156 patients and assisted in providing 49 needed procedures. Much of this growth has been brought about through the dedication and vision of Dr. Matthew Goldshore, the Deputy Director of the CSH and a fifth-year Penn general surgery resident, as well as Dr. Carrie Z. Morales, Associate Deputy Director of the CSH and a recent Perelman School of Medicine graduate. Through their leadership, and the talent and commitment of other members of the CSH board, overseen by Director Dr. Morris, the CSH now has policy and research divisions, a surgical equity curriculum, and continues to develop new ways of providing better care.

11.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(11): 1439-1448, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based observed/expected total lung volume (O/E TLV) and outcome in neonates with giant omphalocele (GO). METHODS: Between 06/2004 and 12/2019, 67 cases with isolated GO underwent prenatal and postnatal care at our institution. MRI-based O/E TLVs were calculated based on normative data from Meyers and from Rypens and correlated with postnatal survival and morbidities. O/E TLV scores were grouped based on severity into <25% (severe), between 25% and 50% (moderate), and >50% (mild) for risk stratification. RESULTS: O/E TLV was calculated for all patients according to Meyers nomograms and for 49 patients according to Rypens nomograms. Survival for GO neonates with severe, moderate, and mild pulmonary hypoplasia based on Meyers O/E TLV categories was 60%, 92%, and 96%, respectively (p = 0.04). There was a significant inverse association between Meyers O/E TLV and risk of neonatal morbidities (p < 0.05). A similar trend was observed with Rypens O/E TLV, but associations were less often significant likely related to the smaller sample size. CONCLUSION: Neonatal outcomes are related to fetal lung size in isolated GO. Assessment of Meyers O/E TLV allows identification of GO fetuses at greatest risk for complications secondary to pulmonary hypoplasia.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Umbilical/diagnóstico , Pulmón/crecimiento & desarrollo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/normas , Femenino , Feto/fisiología , Edad Gestacional , Hernia Umbilical/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar/instrumentación , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Nomogramas , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/métodos , Pruebas Prenatales no Invasivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
J Adolesc Health ; 68(5): 978-984, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067151

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and outcomes of firearm injuries in adolescents and the effect of trauma center (TC) designation on their mortality. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2016) was queried for all encounters involving adolescents aged 13-16 years with firearm injuries. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to determine the association of covariates with mortality (α = .05). Propensity score matching was also used to explore the relationship between TC designation and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 9,029 adolescents met inclusion criteria. Patients aged 15 and 16 years compromised 77.8% of the cohort and were more often male (87.9% vs. 80.6%, p < .001), black (63.8% vs. 56.1%, p < .001), injured in the abdomen (25.4% vs. 22.4%, p = .007) or extremities (62.3% vs. 56.7%, p < .001), and incurred severe injuries (54.5% vs. 50.9%, p = .004) versus 13- and 14-year-old patients. Younger patients were more often injured in the head/neck (23.8% vs. 20.5%, p = .001). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated no difference in mortality between age groups. Poor neurologic presentation, severe injury, abdominal, chest, and head injuries were all associated with an increased odds of death. Odds of mortality were 2.88 times higher at adult TCs compared to pediatric TCs (CI: 1.55-5.36, p = .001). However, using a 1:1 propensity score matching model, no difference in mortality was found between TC types (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Variability exists in outcomes for adolescents after firearm injuries. Understanding and identifying the potential differences between pediatric and adult TCs managing adolescent firearm victims may improve survival in all treatment venues, but these data support patients being treated at the closest available TC.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 59(1): 41-48, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32564804

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of screening can prevent death from colorectal cancer, yet people without regular healthcare visits may not realize the benefits of this preventive intervention. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a mailed screening invitation or mailed fecal immunochemical test in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake in veterans without recent primary care encounters. STUDY DESIGN: Three-arm pragmatic randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were screening-eligible veterans aged 50-75 years, without a recent primary care visit who accessed medical services at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2017. All data were analyzed from March 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to (1) usual opportunistic screening during a healthcare visit (n=260), (2) mailed invitation to screen and reminder phone calls (n=261), or (3) mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach plus reminder calls (n=61). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome under investigation was the completion of colorectal cancer screening within 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: Of 782 participants in the trial, 53.9% were aged 60-75 years and 59.7% were African American. The screening rate was higher in the mailed fecal immunochemical test group (26.1%) compared with usual care (5.8%) (rate difference=20.3%, 95% CI=14.3%, 26.3%; RR=4.52, 95% CI=2.7, 7.7) or screening invitation (7.7%) (rate difference=18.4%, 95% CI=12.2%, 24.6%; RR=3.4, 95% CI=2.1, 5.4). Screening completion rates were similar between invitation and usual care (rate difference=1.9%, 95% CI= -2.4%, 6.2%; RR=1.3, 95% CI=0.7, 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Mailed fecal immunochemical test screening promotes colorectal cancer screening participation among veterans without a recent primary care encounter. Despite the addition of reminder calls, an invitation letter was no more effective in screening participation than screening during outpatient appointments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT02584998.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Atención Primaria de Salud , Veteranos , Anciano , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sangre Oculta
15.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 55(6): 1456-1467, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191392

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is associated with variable degrees of lung hypoplasia. Pulmonary support at 30 days postnatal age was found to be the strongest predictor of inpatient mortality and morbidity among CDH infants and was also associated with higher pulmonary morbidity at 1 and 5 years. It is not known, however, if there is a relationship between the need for medical therapy at 30 days of life and subsequent abnormalities in lung function as reflected in infant pulmonary function test (iPFT) measurements. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that CDH infants who require more intensive therapy at 30 days would have more abnormal iPFT values at the time of their first infant pulmonary function study, reflecting the more severe spectrum of lung hypoplasia. METHODS: A single-institution chart review of all CDH survivors who were enrolled in a Pulmonary Hypoplasia Program (PHP) through July 2019, and treated from 2002 to 2019 was performed. All infants were divided into groups based on their need for noninvasive (supplemental oxygen, high flow therapy, noninvasive mechanical ventilation) or invasive (mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) respiratory assistance, bronchodilators, diuretic use, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) therapy (inhaled and/or systemic drugs) at 30 days. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed between groups comparing subsequent lung function measurements. RESULTS: A total of 382 infants (median gestational age [GA] 38.4 [interquartile range (IQR) = 37.1-39] weeks, 41.8% female, 70.9% Caucasian) with CDH were enrolled in the PHP through July 2019, and 118 infants underwent iPFT. The median age of the first iPFT was 6.6 (IQR = 5.3-11.7) months. Those requiring any pulmonary support at 30 days had a higher functional residual capacity (FRC) (z) (P = .03), residual volume (RV) (z) (P = .008), ratio of RV to total lung capacity (RV/TLC) (z) (P = .0001), and ratio of FRC to TLC (FRC/TLC) (z) (P = .001); a lower forced expiratory volume at 0.5 seconds (FEV0.5) (z) (P = .03) and a lower respiratory system compliance (Crs) (P = .01) than those who did not require any support. Similarly, those requiring diuretics and/or PH therapy at 30 days had higher fractional lung volumes, lower forced expiratory flows and Crs than infants who did not require such support (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Infants requiring any pulmonary support, diuretics and/or PH therapy at 30 postnatal days have lower forced expiratory flows and higher fractional lung volumes, suggesting a greater degree of lung hypoplasia. Our study suggests that the continued need for PH, diuretic or pulmonary support therapy at 30 days can be used as additional risk-stratification measurements for evaluation of infants with CDH.


Asunto(s)
Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/terapia , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Terapia Respiratoria
16.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 88(3): 402-407, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric firearm injury is a leading cause of death for U.S. children. We sought to further characterize children who die from these injuries using a validated national database. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank 2010 to 2016 was queried for patients aged 0 to 19 years old. International Classification of Diseases external cause of injury codes were used to classify patients by intent. Differences between groups were analyzed using χ or Mann-Whitney U tests. Patterns over time were analyzed using nonparametric tests for trend. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate associations between the above factors and mortality. RESULTS: There were a total of 45,288 children with firearm injuries, 12.0% (n = 5,412) of whom died. Those who died were younger and more often white than survivors. Mortality was associated with increased injury severity, shock on presentation, and polytrauma (p < 0.001 for all). There was an increasing trend in the proportion of self-inflicted injuries over the study period (p < 0.001), and mortality from these self-inflicted injuries increased concordantly (35.3% in 2010 to 47.8% in 2016, p = 0.001). Location of severe injuries had significant different mortality rates, ranging from 51.3% of head injuries to 3.9% in the extremities. In the multivariable model, treatment at a pediatric trauma center was protective against mortality, with odds ratios of 2.10 (confidence interval, 1.64-2.68) and 1.80 (confidence interval, 1.39-2.32) for death at adult and dual-designated trauma centers, respectively. This finding was confirmed in age-stratified cohorts. CONCLUSION: Proportions of self-inflicted pediatric firearm injury in the National Trauma Data Bank increased from 2010 to 2016, as did mortality from self-inflicted injury. Because mortality is highest in this subpopulation, prevention and treatment efforts should be prioritized in this group of firearm-injured children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, level V.


Asunto(s)
Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Adolescente , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Armas de Fuego , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(4): 688-692, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31126687

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and outcomes of angiography in pediatric patients with blunt solid organ injury (SOI). METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for patients ≤19 years who experienced isolated blunt SOI. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate characteristics associated with radiological and surgical intervention. RESULTS: Patients with isolated blunt injuries to the spleen (n = 7542), liver (n = 4549), and kidney (n = 2640) were identified. Use of angiography increased yearly from 1.6% to 3.1% of cases (p = 0.001) and was associated with older age (OR 2.61 [CI: 1.94-3.50], p < 0.001) and grade III or higher injury (OR 4.63 [CI: 3.11-6.90], p < 0.001). Odds of angiography were 4.9 times higher at adult trauma centers (TCs) than pediatric TCs overall, and almost 9 times higher for isolated splenic trauma (p < 0.001 for each). There was no improvement in splenic salvage after angiography for high grade injuries (3.5% vs. 4.8%, p = NS). Only 1.8% of cases began within 30 min of arrival (median time = 3.6 h). CONCLUSION: Variability exists in the utilization of angiography in pediatric blunt SOI between adult and pediatric TCs, with no improvement in splenic salvage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Treatment study.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Embolización Terapéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Riñón/lesiones , Hígado/lesiones , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bazo/lesiones , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
18.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 87(6): 1321-1327, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergent procedures are infrequent in pediatric trauma. We sought to determine the frequency and efficacy of life-saving interventions (LSI) performed for pediatric trauma patients within the first hour of care at a trauma center. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for patients 19 years or younger who underwent LSIs within 1 hour of arrival to the emergency department. Life-saving interventions included emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) and emergent airway procedures (EAP). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on mortality. RESULTS: Of 725,284 recorded traumatic encounters, only 1,488 (0.2%) pediatric patients underwent at least one of the defined LSI during the 5-year study period (EDT, 1,323; EAP, 187). Most patients (85.6%) were 15 years or older. Mortality was high but varied by procedure type (EDT, 64.3%; EAP, 28.3%). Mortality for patients younger than 1 year undergoing EDT was 100%, decreasing to 62.6% in patients aged 15 years to 19 years. For EAP, mortality ranged from 66.7% for infants to 27.2% in 15-year-old to 19-year-old patients. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, higher Injury Severity Score, presence of shock, and a blunt mechanism of injury were independently associated with mortality in the EDT cohort. On average, trauma centers in this study performed approximately one LSI per year, with only 13.8% of cases occurring at a verified pediatric trauma center. CONCLUSION: Life-saving interventions in the pediatric trauma population are uncommon and outcomes variable. Novel solutions to keep proficient at such interventions should be sought, especially for younger children. Guidelines to improve identification of appropriate candidates for LSI are critical given their rare occurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, III.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Traumático/etiología , Choque Traumático/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
19.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 29(8): 1052-1059, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237470

RESUMEN

Purpose: To characterize injury patterns and institutional trends associated with the utilization of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric abdominal trauma. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for encounters involving patients ≤14 years who underwent an open or laparoscopic abdominal operation within 48 hours of emergency department arrival. Patient, injury, and hospital characteristics associated with each approach were identified. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on operative approach. Results: Laparoscopy comprised 7.8% (n = 355) of all abdominal trauma operations. Patients undergoing laparoscopy had lower injury severity scores and higher Glasgow Coma Scale scores on arrival compared with laparotomy subjects (P < .001). Laparoscopic patients also had a shorter length of hospital stay (5.0 versus 8.6 days, P < .001), but longer time to the operating room (9.2 versus 6.3 hours, P < .001) compared with their open counterparts. The proportion of cases managed laparoscopically increased from 6.2% in 2010 to 10.1% in 2014 (P = .013), with increase in utilization primarily driven by university hospitals (P = .026) and level I pediatric trauma centers (P = .043). Conversion to laparotomy was uncommon (18.6%), and mortality in the laparoscopic cohort was low (0.4%). Conclusions: Use of laparoscopy has increased in the pediatric abdominal trauma population, typically in a less injured cohort of patients. As familiarity with and availability of minimally invasive techniques increase, this trend will likely continue.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología
20.
Child Obes ; 13(2): 85-92, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27854496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infants of obese women are at a high risk for development of obesity. Prenatal interventions targeting gestational weight gain among obese women have not demonstrated consistent benefits for infant growth trajectories. METHODS: To better understand why such programs may not influence infant growth, qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 mothers who participated in a prenatal nutrition intervention for women with BMI 30 kg/m2 or greater, and with 19 clinicians (13 pediatric, 6 obstetrical). Interviews were transcribed and coded with themes emerging inductively from the data, using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Mothers were interviewed a mean of 18 months postpartum and reported successful postnatal maintenance of behaviors that were relevant to the family food environment (Theme 1). Ambivalence around the importance of postnatal behavior maintenance (Theme 2) and enhanced postnatal healthcare (Theme 3) emerged as explanations for the failure of prenatal interventions to influence child growth. Mothers acknowledged their importance as role models for their children's behavior, but they often believed that body habitus was beyond their control. Though mothers attributed prenatal behavior change, in part, to additional support during pregnancy, clinicians had hesitations about providing children of obese parents with additional services postnatally. Both mothers and clinicians perceived a lack of interest or concern about infant growth during pediatric visits (Theme 4). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal interventions may better influence childhood growth if paired with improved communication regarding long-term modifiable risks for children. The healthcare community should clarify a package of enhanced preventive services for children with increased risk of developing obesity.


Asunto(s)
Centros de Salud Materno-Infantil , Obesidad/prevención & control , Padres , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Aumento de Peso , Adulto , Baltimore/epidemiología , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Fenómenos Fisiologicos Nutricionales Maternos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/psicología , Padres/educación , Padres/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...