Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(12): 2447-2454, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31573074

RESUMEN

Supporting gender equity for women working in geriatrics is important to the growth of geriatrics across disciplines and is critical in achieving our vision for a future in which we are all able to contribute to our communities and maintain our health, safety, and independence as we age. Discrimination can have a negative impact on public health, particularly with regard to those who care for the health of older Americans and other vulnerable older people. Women working in the field of geriatrics have experienced implicit and explicit discriminatory practices that mirror available data on the entire workforce. In this position article, we outline strategic objectives and accompanying practical recommendations for how geriatrics, as a field, can work together to achieve a future in which the rights of women are guaranteed and women in geriatrics have the opportunity to achieve their full potential. This article represents the official positions of the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2447-2454, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Geriatría , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(1): 145-150, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285285

RESUMEN

In July 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed Medicare Physician Fee Schedule rule for calendar year 2019 (MPFS2019). The proposal sets forth CMS-recommended updates to Medicare payment policies, payment rates, and quality provisions for services provided in the next calendar year. From year to year, the rule also can serve as a vehicle for soliciting input on new payment proposals and changes to existing policies. Among the payment and quality proposals in the MPFS2019 proposal, CMS proposed extensive changes to Current Procedural Terminology codes that are the framework for documentation and payment for office-based evaluation and management (E/M) services. The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) believes the proposed payment methodology changes for E/M services would have had a significant negative impact on care for older Americans. On September 10, 2018, the AGS submitted its comments on this proposal and other aspects of the rule, and the AGS also submitted a comment letter signed by 41 organizations from an AGS-led multispecialty coalition. The coalition also worked collaboratively on outreach to Congress, which included visits to Capitol Hill and a coalition letter stressing our collective support for reducing the burden of documentation for clinicians and our opposition to the proposed changes in payment methodology. In all letters, we noted that the AGS and members of our coalition hoped to work collaboratively with CMS and other stakeholders to develop a refined approach that would achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, particularly frail older Americans with multiple chronic conditions. In releasing their final MPFS2019, CMS postponed the E/M coding collapse for at least two years, a decision that speaks to the hard work of the AGS, its members, and the multi-specialty coalition, and which opens the door for further discussions about the future of payment for E/M services so critical to older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:145-150, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Tabla de Aranceles/economía , Geriatría/economía , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Medicare/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Documentación/métodos , Tabla de Aranceles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Geriatría/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(11): 2059-2064, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30222181

RESUMEN

This article examines the work and leadership of the American Geriatrics Society in making payment for services provided under new, innovative payment codes a reality for geriatrics healthcare professionals. We examine more than a decade of work spanning from a proposal to pay for comprehensive geriatric assessments in 2003 to the multiyear effort that led to Medicare coverage for transitional care management (2013), chronic care management (2015, 2017), and assessment and care planning for cognitive impairment (2017). We review the forces that created an environment for change and the concurrent work of the American Medical Association and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that made this possible. We highlight opportunities seized that led to seats on crucial panels and legislative victories that helped us make our case for improved payment for geriatrics care. Finally, we address lessons learned and address opportunities where we are currently active. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2059-2064, 2018.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/economía , Medicare/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Anciano , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Current Procedural Terminology , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Medicare/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendencias , Estados Unidos
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 65(4): 674-679, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28306149

RESUMEN

Commencing in 2017, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 will change how Medicare pays health professionals. By enacting MACRA, Congress brought an end to the (un)sustainable growth rate formula while also setting forth a vision for how to transform the U.S. healthcare system so that clinicians deliver higher-quality care with smarter spending by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In October 2016, CMS released the first of what stakeholders anticipate will be a number of (annual) rules related to implementation of MACRA. CMS received extensive input from stakeholders including the American Geriatrics Society. Under the Quality Payment Program, CMS streamlined multiple Medicare value-based payment programs into a new Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). CMS also outlined how it will provide incentives for participation in Advanced Alternative Payment Models (called APMs). Although Medicare payments to geriatrics health professionals will not be based on the new MIPS formula until 2019, those payments will be based upon performance during a 90-day period in 2017. This article defines geriatrics health professionals as clinicians who care for a predominantly older adult population and who are eligible to bill under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Given the current paucity of eligible APMs, this article will focus on MIPS while providing a brief overview of APMs.


Asunto(s)
Geriatría , Medicare/economía , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislación & jurisprudencia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humanos , Médicos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA