RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: As many as 5% of normocephalic children may have a prematurely fused sagittal suture, yet the clinical significance and best course of management of this finding remain unclear. Providers in the Synostosis Research Group were surveyed to create a multicenter consensus on an optimal treatment and monitoring algorithm for this condition. METHODS: A four-round modified Delphi method was utilized. The first two rounds consisted of anonymous surveys distributed to 10 neurosurgeons and 9 plastic surgeons with expertise in craniosynostosis across 9 institutions, and presented 3 patients (aged 3 years, 2 years, and 2 months) with incidentally discovered fused sagittal sutures, normal cephalic indices, and no parietal dysmorphology. Surgeons were queried about their preferred term for this entity and how best to manage these patients. Results were synthesized to create a treatment algorithm. The third and fourth feedback rounds consisted of open discussion of the algorithm until no further concerns arose. RESULTS: Most surgeons preferred the term "premature fusion of the sagittal suture" (93%). At the conclusion of the final round, all surgeons agreed to not operate on the 3- and 2-year-old patients unless symptoms of intracranial hypertension or papilledema were present. In contrast, 50% preferred to operate on the 2-month-old. However, all agreed to utilize shared decision-making, taking into account any concerns about future head shape and neurodevelopment. Panelists agreed that patients over 18 months of age without signs or symptoms suggesting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) should not undergo surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Through the Delphi method, a consensus regarding management of premature fusion of the sagittal suture was obtained from a panel of North American craniofacial surgeons. Without signs or symptoms of ICP elevation, surgery is not recommended in patients over 18 months of age. However, for children younger than 18 months, surgery should be discussed with caregivers using a shared decision-making process.
Asunto(s)
Suturas Craneales , Craneosinostosis , Técnica Delphi , Hallazgos Incidentales , Humanos , Craneosinostosis/cirugía , Suturas Craneales/cirugía , Preescolar , Femenino , Masculino , Lactante , Neurocirujanos , AlgoritmosRESUMEN
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Standardized medical photography of the face is a vital part of patient documentation, clinical evaluation, and scholarly dissemination. Because digital photography is a mainstay in clinical care, there is a critical need for an easy-to-use mobile device application that could assist users in taking a standardized clinical photograph. ImageAssist was developed to answer this need. The mobile application is integrated into the electronic medical record (EMR); it implements and automates American Society of Plastic Surgery/Plastic Surgery Research Foundation photographic guidelines with background deletion. INITIAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A team consisting of a craniofacial plastic surgeon and the Health Information Technology product group developed and implemented the pilot application of ImageAssist. The application launches directly from patients' chart in the mobile version of the EMR, EPIC Haiku (Verona, Wisconsin). Standard views of the face (90-degree, oblique left and right, front and basal view) were built into digital templates and are user selected. Red digital frames overlay the patients' face on the screen and turn green once standardized alignment is achieved, prompting the user to capture. The background is then digitally subtracted to a standard blue, and the photograph is not stored on the user's phone. EARLY USER EXPERIENCE: ImageAssist initial beta user group was limited to 13 providers across dermatology, ENT, and plastic surgery. A mix of physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses was included to pilot the application in the outpatient clinic setting using Image Assist on their smart phone. After using the app, an internal survey was used to gain feedback on the user experience. In the first 2 years of use, 31 users have taken more than 3400 photographs in more than 800 clinical encounters. Since initial release, automated background deletion also has been functional for any anatomic area. CONCLUSIONS: ImageAssist is a novel smartphone application that standardizes clinical photography and integrated into the EMR, which could save both time and expense for clinicians seeking to take consistent clinical images. Future steps include continued refinement of current image capture functionality and development of a stand-alone mobile device application.
Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Teléfono Inteligente , Fotograbar/métodosRESUMEN
RVU valuations need to be revisited regularly as procedure complexity and patient care pathways continue to evolve. The NSQIP-P database was queried for craniofacial procedures performed in North America between 2012 and 2019. Multivariate regression was performed to determine correlation coefficients of perioperative variables deemed to reflect procedure severity, including procedure duration, blood transfusion, length of stay, serious adverse events, related readmission, and related reoperation. CPT 21159 Le Fort III with forehead advancement remains the craniofacial procedure with the highest RVUs using our model at 33.93 units. The most underestimated procedure is CPT 42235 Repair of anterior palate, including vomer flap, with a suggested change of +8.27 units, which is a 194% increase from current compensation. Adjusted RVUs based on quantitative and nationally representative perioperative variables that reflect procedure severity might be a better alternative for procedure valuation over current survey methods to determine appropriate insurance compensation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Many caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate experience a high level of anxiety throughout their child's medical and surgical care. We aim to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool to mitigate these feelings and can aid clinicians in the development of robust pediatric educational materials for caregivers and families. DESIGN: Thirteen of the most common postoperative questions following cleft lip and/or palate repair were developed by an expert panel of senior Pediatric Plastic Surgeons and were posed to ChatGPT. Professional answers from the expert panel were provided and compared to responses from ChatGPT. A literature review was also conducted to generate a new support model for caregivers with children undergoing a surgical procedure. SETTING: Department of Pediatric Plastic Surgery at a metropolitan Children's Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Senior Pediatric Plastic Surgeons at a metropolitan Children's Hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was to determine the ability of ChatGPT to respond to common postoperative questions and to develop a model for AI assistance in family-centered perioperative care. RESULTS: ChatGPT had a postoperative question response accuracy rate of 69% when compared with subject matter expert responses, with its greatest errors being information errors. An extensive literature search revealed that AI can assist in multiple traditional perioperative strategies to reduce caregivers and patient anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial Intelligence can help to reduce the burden of generating patient education materials as well as support caregivers in multiple aspects and perioperative care.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with unoperated craniosynostosis have different frontal sinus pneumatization than unaffected controls. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed between 2009 and 2020 of previously unoperated patients with craniosynostosis older than 5 years old at first presentation to our institution. Total frontal sinus volume (FSV) was calculated using 3D volume rendering tool in Sectra IDS7 PACS system. Age-matched normative FSV data was collected from 100 normal CT scans for the control group. The two groups were statistically compared using Fisher's exact test and T-test. RESULTS: Study group included nine patients, 5-39 years old, median age 7 years. Frontal sinus pneumatization was absent in 12% of the normal 7-year-old controls, while frontal sinus pneumatization was absent in 89% of the studied craniosynostosis patients (p < .001). Mean FSV of the study group (113 ± 340 mm3) was significantly different from that of age matched control mean FSV (2016 ± 2529 mm3) (p = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Frontal sinus pneumatization is suppressed in unreleased craniosynostosis and may be an intracranial space conservation phenomenon. This absent frontal sinus can have implications in future frontal region trauma and frontal osteotomies.
Asunto(s)
Craneosinostosis , Seno Frontal , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Proyectos Piloto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Craneosinostosis/complicaciones , Craneosinostosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Craneosinostosis/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: LeFort I osteotomy (LF1) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) have unique operative challenges and inherent anatomic considerations that predispose to certain adverse outcomes, yet their respective complication profiles continue to be debated given conflicting results from single-center investigations. The purpose of this study is to perform a multi-institutional analysis of complications, socioeconomic trends, and financial charges associated with orthognathic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of orthognathic procedures performed in the United States from 2010 through 2020 using the Pediatric Health Information System. Patients younger than 12 years of age were excluded. Medical complications, surgical complications, and admission costs were compared across procedures. Socioeconomic determinants and trends across regions of the country were also analyzed. RESULTS: During the study interval, 6640 patients underwent orthognathic surgery, including LF1 (59.2%, n=3928), BSSO (14.4%, n=959), and double-jaw surgery (26.4%, n = 1753). Patients undergoing LF1 were more likely to experience overall complications ( P <0.001), infections ( P <0.001), and blood transfusions ( P <0.001) than those undergoing BSSO. High-volume hospitals were more likely to perform double-jaw procedures than other hospitals ( P <0.001), yet high-volume hospitals were less likely to have surgical complications ( P =0.014). Patient admission charges related to orthognathic operations at high-volume hospitals were less than other hospitals ( P <0.001). Household income was higher for orthognathic procedures performed at high-volume hospitals ( P <0.001). White patients were 1.5 times more likely to choose a farther, higher volume hospital for orthognathic surgery than the one locally available ( P =0.041). CONCLUSIONS: LeFort I osteotomy procedures had higher infection and transfusion rates than BSSO procedures. High-volume hospitals were more likely to perform double-jaw procedures, yet high-volume hospitals had fewer complications and decreased admission charges. Future study will be needed to further elucidate case-mix index details and socioeconomic determinants of health contributing to these disparities.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Ortognática , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Hospitalización , PacientesRESUMEN
Study Design: Pediatric mandible fractures mandate special consideration because of unerupted teeth, mixed dentition, facial growth and the inability to tolerate maxillomandibular fixation. No consensus exists as to whether resorbable or titanium plating systems are superior with regards to clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aims to systematically review and compare the outcomes of both material types in the treatment of pediatric mandible fractures. Methods: After PROSPERO registration, studies from 1990-2020 publishing on outcomes of ORIF of pediatric mandible fractures were systematically reviewed according to PRISMA guidelines. An additional retrospective review was conducted at a pediatric level 1 trauma center. Results: 1,144 patients met inclusion criteria (30.5% resorbable vs. 69.5% titanium). Total complication rate was 13%, and 10% required a second, unplanned operation. Complication rates in the titanium and resorbable groups were not significantly different (14% vs. 10%; P = 0.07), and titanium hardware was more frequently removed on an elective basis (P < 0.001). Condylar/sub-condylar fractures were more often treated with resorbable hardware (P = 0.01); whereas angle fractures were more often treated with titanium hardware (P < 0.001). Within both cohorts, fracture type did not increase the risk of complications, and comparison between groups by anatomic level did not demonstrate any significant difference in complications. Conclusions: Pediatric mandible fractures requiring ORIF are rare, and hardware-specific outcomes data is scarce. This study suggests that titanium and resorbable plating systems are equally safe, but titanium hardware often requires surgical removal. Surgical approach should be tailored by fracture anatomy, age-related concerns and surgeon preference.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop guidelines for the transfer of patients with isolated craniomaxillofacial trauma. METHODS: A national, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled from leadership in national organizations and contributors to published literature on facial reconstruction. The final panel consisted of five plastic surgeons, four otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeons, and four oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The expert panelists' opinions on transfer guidelines were collected using the modified Delphi process. Consensus was predefined as 90 percent or greater agreement per statement. RESULTS: After four Delphi consensus building rounds, 13 transfer guidelines were established, including statements on fractures of the frontal sinus, orbit, midface, and mandible, as well as soft-tissue injuries. Twelve guidelines reached consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to transfer a patient with craniomaxillofacial trauma to another facility is complex and multifactorial. While a percentage of overtriage is acceptable to promote safe disposition of trauma patients, unnecessarily high rates of secondary overtriage divert emergency medical services, increase costs, delay care, overload tertiary trauma centers, and result in tertiary hospital staff providing primary emergency coverage for referring hospitals. These craniomaxillofacial transfer guidelines were designed to serve as a tool to improve and streamline the care of facial trauma patients. Such efforts may decrease the additional health care expenditures associated with secondary overtriage while decompressing emergency medical systems and tertiary emergency departments.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Traumatismos Faciales , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Traumatismos Faciales/cirugía , Humanos , Centros TraumatológicosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: The number IV orofacial cleft is extremely rare, and reports on long-term outcomes are limited. Here we present the management of a child born with bilateral Tessier number IV clefts and microphthalmia, who developed bilateral oro-sino-orbital fistulae. He presented 8âyears after his index procedure with persistent ocular drainage and radiographic evidence of bilateral oro-sino-orbital fistulae. His globes maintained light perception, and in order to protect them from chemical reflux he underwent fistula obliteration with demineralized bone matrix and acellular dermal matrix. His orbits were reconstructed by Imre and conjunctival flaps. In the presence of marginally functioning globes, the importance of timely intervention is critical in order to preserve residual ocular function. Light perception vision assists in the maintenance of circadian rhythm and physiologic functions that are critical to the developing pediatric patient. This case also emphasizes the importance of a multi-disciplinary team in the correction of complex craniofacial deformities.
Asunto(s)
Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Fístula , Niño , Fisura del Paladar/diagnóstico por imagen , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Cara , Humanos , Masculino , Colgajos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
Nasofrontal encephaloceles are extremely rare craniofacial defects that present with herniation of cerebral tissue through the junction of the frontal and nasal bones. They often have a cutaneous covering which allows management to be delayed until early infancy, decreasing the risks of anesthesia and acute blood loss. Further bone development also facilitates cranial remodeling. Encephaloceles with a compromised cutaneous envelope pose an imminent threat to life due to the risk of meningitis, necessitating surgical repair in the first days of life. This report presents a patient born with an open nasofrontal encephalocele that underwent encephalocele excision, dural repair, and cranial remodeling on the first day of life. Anterior encephaloceles represent a spectrum of uncommon craniofacial dysraphias. Given the rarity of these diseases, it is important to understand their many presentations and the treatment options that exist for each. When the cutaneous covering of the encephalocele is compromised, surgical correction must be undertaken urgently to mitigate the mortality associated with neonatal meningitis. This represents the first report of an open nasofrontal encephalocele managed in the first day of life. A multidisciplinary surgical approach involving the neurosurgical and craniofacial surgical teams is paramount to the treatment and survival of such complicated patients.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Encefalocele , Encefalocele/diagnóstico por imagen , Encefalocele/cirugía , Humanos , Recién Nacido , CráneoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Titanium associated risks have led to interest in resorbable hardware for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pediatric facial fractures. This study aims to systematically review and compare the outcomes of titanium/resorbable hardware used for ORIF of upper/midfacial fractures to determine which hardware carries a higher complication rate in the pediatric patient. METHODS: Studies published between 1990 and 2020 on the ORIF of pediatric upper/midfacial fractures were systematically reviewed. A retrospective institutional review was also conducted, and both arms were compiled for final analysis. The primary predictor value was the type of hardware used and the primary outcome was the presence of a complication. Fisher's exact test and 2-proportion 2-tailed z-test calculations were used to determine statistical significance, which was defined as a P value < .05. The low quality of published evidence precluded meta-analysis. RESULTS: Systematic review of 23 studies identified 659 patients, and 77 patients were identified in the institutional review. A total of 736 patients (299 resorbable, 437 titanium) were included in the final analysis. Total complication rate was 22.8%. The titanium group had a higher complication rate (27 vs 16.7%; P < .01), and more often underwent elective hardware removal (87.3 vs 0%, P < .01). In each hardware subgroup, the incidence of complications was analyzed by fracture site. In the titanium group, complication incidence was higher when treating maxillary fractures (32.8 vs 22.9%, P = .03). When comparing the 2 hardware groups by fracture site, maxillary fractures had a higher rate of complications when treated by titanium hardware compared with resorbable hardware (32.8 vs 18%, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Upper/midfacial pediatric fractures requiring ORIF, especially maxillary fractures, may be best treated with resorbable hardware. Additional hardware-specific outcomes data is encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Craneales , Titanio , Niño , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Reducción Abierta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The plastic surgery literature is devoid of research on the topic of professional development tools that may be used to enhance performance as a plastic surgeon. After an extensive review of the medical literature, we selected the most frequently referenced professional development tools utilized by plastic surgeons, which included the following: goal setting, positive visualization, scheduled practice, critically analyzing mistakes, professional development conferences, involvement in sports, motivational videos, podcasts & audiobooks, daily morning routines, self-development books, and advice from mentors. METHODS: A 10-question survey was sent to 2542 members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). The algorithm used to select ASPS members to survey was based on member demographics that would best reflect the views of the entire active society membership. Responses were compared based on demographic factors such as type of practice, gender, and age. RESULTS: A total of 286/2542 (11.25%) ASPS members participated in the survey. Analyzing mistakes (96.3%), goal setting (88.51%), and advice from mentors (85.2%) were most commonly attributed to self-development. Respondents in an academic practice favored conferences and advice from mentors. Participants in a solo practice favored self-help books and morning routines. No statistical differences were observed based on training background. CONCLUSIONS: ASPS members attribute their professional development to setting measurable goals, carefully analyzing surgical mistakes, and guidance from mentors. This information opens the door for continued analysis of professional development within plastic surgery as well as supplement training practices at the resident and post-graduate level.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Craniosynostosis (CS) affects about 1 in 2500 infants and is predominantly treated by surgical intervention in infancy. Later in childhood, many of these children wish to participate in sports. However, the safety of participation is largely anecdotal and based on surgeon experience. The objective of this survey study was to describe sport participation and sport-related head injury in CS patients. METHODS: A 16-question survey related to child/parent demographics, CS surgery history, sport history, and sport-induced head injury history was made available to patients/parents in the United States through a series of synostosis organization listservs, as well as synostosis-focused Facebook groups, between October 2019 and June 2020. Sports were categorized based on the American Academy of Pediatrics groupings. Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and the independent-samples t-test were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 187 CS patients were described as 63% male, 89% White, and 88% non-Hispanic, and 89% underwent surgery at 1 year or younger. The majority (74%) had participated in sports starting at an average age of 5 years (SD 2.2). Of those participating in sports, contact/collision sport participation was most common (77%), and 71% participated in multiple sports. Those that played sports were less frequently Hispanic (2.2% vs 22.9%, p < 0.001) and more frequently had undergone a second surgery (44% vs 25%, p = 0.021). Only 9 of 139 (6.5%) sport-participating CS patients suffered head injuries; 6 (67%) were concussions and the remaining 3 were nondescript but did not mention any surgical needs. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide survey of postsurgical CS patients and parents, sport participation was exceedingly common, with contact sports being the most common sport category. Few head injuries (mostly concussions) were reported as related to sport participation. Although this is a selective sample of CS patients, the initial data suggest that sport participation, even in contact sports, and typically beginning a few years after CS correction, is safe and commonplace.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Craneosinostosis , Deportes , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Craneosinostosis/epidemiología , Craneosinostosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Craniosynostosis affects 1 in 2,000 live births, which makes it one of the most common craniofacial abnormalities in the United States. Despite this fact, few national epidemiologic reports exist, although US and European studies have reported an increased incidence of metopic craniosynostosis. The aim of our study is to analyze the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to support those conclusions. METHODS: We identified hospitalizations from 1998 to 2012 by using the ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for congenital anomalies of skull and face bones (756.0) and procedure codes related to craniosynostosis repair (2.01, 2.03, 2.04, 2.06). RESULTS: We analyzed data from 37,815 hospitalizations and 49,505 reconstructive procedures. There was a 61.6% increase in the number of hospitalizations related to craniosynostosis repairs. There was a 180% increase in bone graft to skull procedures, 109% increase in other cranial osteoplasty, 54% increase in formation of cranial bone flap, and a 6% decrease in opening of cranial suture. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a steady rise in the number of craniosynostosis repairs performed, but whether this is a result of a true increase in incidence, better diagnosis, or change in treatment patterns needs further research. The current classification system does not provide information about the specific suture affected (metopic, sagittal, etc.), the type of repair performed (endoscopic, fronto-orbito advancement, etc.), and whether the repair is a primary procedure or a revision. More descriptive diagnosis and procedural codes are imperative to improve the epidemiologic and outcomes data of craniosynostosis in the United States.
RESUMEN
Many orthodontists working on patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) have shown great enthusiasm for presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) to improve surgical outcomes with minimal intervention. Even though every clinician aims to use the best treatment modality for their patients, PSIO effects can be confounded by surgical type and timing of the primary repair, as is discussed in many studies. In such cases, one should be cautious when evaluating the particular outcomes for patients with CLP since it is difficult to differentiate the sole effect of an individual surgical or orthodontic intervention. As with any treatment methodology, nasoalveolar molding (NAM) has both benefits and limitations. Commonly cited concerns with NAM, and PSIO in general, include increased cost, increased burden of care, and a negative impact on maxillary growth. However, NAM cannot be deemed as having apparent long-term negative or positive effects on skeletal or soft tissue facial growth, based on previous studies. A review of the literature suggests that NAM does not alter skeletal facial growth when compared with the samples that did not receive PSIO. Nevertheless, the published studies on NAM show evidence of benefits to the patient, caregivers, the surgeon, and society. These benefits include documented reduction in severity of the cleft deformity prior to surgery and as a consequence improved surgical outcomes, reduced burden of care on the care givers, reduction in the need for revision surgery, and consequent reduced overall cost of care to the patient and society.