Denosumab for osteoporosis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT)-related osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Women over 50 years of age with PHPT or postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) were retrospectively recruited into this longitudinal study. These PHPT and PMO groups were further categorized into subgroups based on the presence of CKD (Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). All patients were given denosumab over 24 months due to verified osteoporosis. The primary outcomes were changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and serum calcium levels. RESULTS: 145 postmenopausal women median age 69 [63;77] were recruited and assigned to one of the subgroups: PHPT patients with CKD (n = 22), PHPT patients without CKD (n = 38), PMO patients with CKD (n = 17) and PMO patients without CKD (n = 68). Denosumab treatment significantly increased BMD in patients with PHPT-related osteoporosis and CKD: median T-score L1-L4 from -2.0 to -1.35 (p < 0.001), femur neck from -2.4 to -2.1 (p = 0.012), radius 33% from -3.2 to -3 (p < 0.05)) at 24 months. Changes in BMD were similar in all four studied groups compared to baseline. A marked decline in calcium was noted in the primary study group of PHPT with CKD (median ΔCa = -0.24 mmol/L p < 0.001), compared to PHPT without CKD (median ΔCa = -0.08 mmol/L p < 0.001) and PMO with or without CKD. Denosumab treatment was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Denosumab treatment was similarly effective at increasing BMD in patients with PHPT and PMO with and without renal insufficiency. The calcium lowering effects of denosumab were most significant in patients with PHPT and CKD. The safety of denosumab did not differ among participants with and without CKD.

A summary of the Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Key statements of the Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis are summarized. They were developed by a task force representing the key Russian professional associations involved in the management of osteoporosis and approved by the Russian Ministry of Health. PURPOSE: To summarize key statements of the Russian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. METHODS: The Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis were developed by a task force representing the key Russian professional associations involved in the management of osteoporosis: These comprised the Russian Association of Endocrinologists, the Russian Association for Osteoporosis, the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia, the Association of Orthopedic surgeons and Traumatologists of Russia, the Russian Association of Gynecologists-Endocrinologists, and the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatrics. The guidelines are based on a systematic literature review and principles of evidence-based medicine and were compiled in accordance with the requirements for clinical recommendations developed by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. RESULTS: Key statements included in the Russian guidelines of osteoporosis approved by the Russian Ministry of Health in 2021 are summarized. The statements are graded based on levels of evidence and supported by short comments. The guidelines are focused on the current approach to screening, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: These guidelines are a practical tool for general practitioners, as well as medical specialists, primarily endocrinologists, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and other physicians who are involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis.

Three-year progress report of Bone Health TeleECHO Moscow: a strategy to improve the care of patients with osteoporosis and other metabolic skeletal diseases in underserved communities of Russia.

Bone Health TeleECHO Moscow is the first Russian-speaking Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) program that is modeled after the original Bone Health TeleECHO created in the USA. Bone Health TeleECHO Moscow was effective (effect size of 0.87 p < 0.001) at improving clinicians' skills in the management of osteoporosis based on self-evaluation over 3 years. INTRODUCTION: Bone Health TeleECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) Moscow is the first Russian-speaking ECHO program, modeled after Bone Health TeleECHO at the University of New Mexico, USA. The bone ECHO programs are designed to expand the capacity to deliver best practice skeletal healthcare worldwide through ongoing technology-enabled case-based collaborative learning. To evaluate the impact of the first 3 years of Bone Health TeleECHO Moscow on physicians' knowledge in the management of bone diseases. METHODS: Demographic data were obtained, and outcomes were assessed through an electronic blinded self-efficacy questionnaire focusing on competence and skills in 20 domains of osteoporosis care before and after each year of participation in the Bone Health TeleECHO Moscow. RESULTS: Over 3 years, a total of 296 participants completed the questionnaire. Average attendance for each monthly session increased from 64 in 2019 to 73 in 2020 and to 96 in 2021. Participants were from all regions of Russia and Russian-speaking countries. The mean age of respondents was 43 years with the youngest being 23 and the eldest 74. The most common participants' primary specialties were endocrinology (n = 263), gynecology (n = 20), orthopedics (n = 3), and other (n = 10). All of our participants were physicians, including 73 MD PhDs. This educational intervention was associated with a statistically significant improvement in each of the 20 domains of osteoporosis care, with an effect size of 0.87 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Bone Health TeleECHO is effective at improving clinicians' skills in the management of osteoporosis based on self-evaluation over 3 years.

Clinical course and outcome of patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome infected with novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): case presentations.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical presentations of patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) affected by Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were referred to our clinic with active CS from 31st March to 15th May 2020 were screened for COVID-19 using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Late-night serum cortisol (64-327 nmol/L), late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) (0.5-9.4 nmol/L), or 24-h urinary free cortisol (24 hUFC) (100-379 nmol/24 h) were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. RESULTS: Among 22 patients with active CS we found three cases affected by COVID-19. Nonspecific inflammation markers were within the reference range or slightly elevated in these patients. A 71-year-old woman with newly diagnosed CS (late-night serum cortisol >1750 nmol/L, LNSC 908.6 nmol/L) developed dyspnea as an only symptom and died from bilateral polysegmantal hemorrhagic pneumonia 7 days later. A 38-year-old woman with a 5-year medical history of active Cushing's disease (CD) (late-night serum cortisol 581.3 nmol/L, 24 hUFC 959.7 nmol/24-h) suffered from dyspnea, cough, fever (39.3 °C) and chest pain. Oxygen therapy, antibiotics and symptomatic treatments lead to full recovery 24 days later. A 66-year-old woman with a 4-year medical history of mild CD (late-night serum cortisol 603.4 nmol/L, LNSC 10.03 nmol/L) tested positive for COVID-19 in routine screening and remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of COVID-19 in patients with CS depends on the severity of hypercortisolism. Thus, severe hypercortisolism is a warning sign that CS affected by COVID-19 could require emergency care despite a lack of clinical presentations and low inflammation biomarkers.

[Epidemiology, clinical manifestations and efficiency of different methods of treatment of acromegaly according to the United Russian Registry of Patients with Pituitary Tumors].

BACKGROUND: The registry is the main source of information about patients with acromegaly for assessing the quality of medical care, effectiveness of treatment, determining the compliance of real clinical practice with existing standards and patient management protocols. AIMS: To evaluate epidemiological, demographic and clinical characteristics of acromegaly in Russian Federation and effectiveness of treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The object of the study was the database of the united Russian registry of patients with pituitary tumors with specific analysis of patients with acromegaly only. We analyzed the data of 4114 patients with acromegaly stored on the online system in February 2019. RESULTS: Based on the data 32% of patients had complete clinical and laboratory remission of acromegaly; the percentage of patients with no remission was 68%, among them 22.5% had significant improvements in clinical symptoms and a decrease in growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) without IGF-1 normalization. The average age of patients at the onset of the disease was 42.7 years and at diagnosis – 45.8 years. The ratio of men to women was 1:2.6. In patients with acromegaly hypopituitarism was registered in 14.7% of cases and among them hypothyroidism (66%) and hypogonadism (52%) were registered more often. Among other complications the leading were diabetes mellitus (15.7%) and acromegalic arthropathy (15%). The proportion of patients receiving neurosurgical treatment increased from 35.7% to 49.6% in 2012–2019; the portion of patients undergoing radiation therapy decreased significantly from 17.7% in 2012 to 0.8% in 2019. Remission was achieved in 40.47% after neurosurgery and 28.95% after medical treatment as a first line therapy p<0.01. The number of patients receiving medical treatment at the time of the study was 1209. Among them 51% of patients treated with long-acting lanreotide and 24% receiving long-acting octreotide achieved remission (p<0.0001) CONCLUSIONS: The remission rate of acromegaly remains suboptimal despite increased surgical activity, which corresponds to global trends. Long-acting lanreotide was significantly superior versus long-acting octreotide in the rate of acromegaly remission, which does not correspond with clinical trials.