Comparison of Laminectomy with Fusion and Laminoplasty Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Comparing laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) and comparative analysis of neck pain and sagittal cervical parameters. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively analyzed MCSM patients treated with LF or LP in our department between June 2018 and January 2023, with at least a 12-month follow-up. T-tests were used to identify operation time, hemoglobin, hospital stay, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, cervical range of motion (cROM), and C4/5 anterior and posterior spinal canal diameter (A-P diameter) and area. Nonparametric tests were used to identify visual analog scale (VAS) score (assessing neck pain). Pearson correlation analyses were used to identify the neck pain. RESULTS: Of all 67 patients (LF: 24, LP: 43), both groups' mJOA scores significantly improved (P < 0.001). The VAS scores had both significantly decreased, with the LF group exhibiting a more marked reduction (LF: P < 0.001, LP: P = 0.037). Both groups' C4/5 A-P diameters and areas increased significantly (P < 0.001). The cROM had both significantly decreased, with the LF group exhibiting a greater reduction. At the last follow-up, the LF group's T1 slope and C2-C7 Cobb angle considerably increased, and pain VAS scores substantially correlated with the C2-C7 Cobb angle (R = -0.451, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LF and LP were efficacious for MCSM. LF relieved neck pain better but caused greater reduction in cervical mobility. Cervical lordosis improvement was significantly correlated with neck pain alleviation.

Comparison of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) and laminoplasty treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with developmental canal stenosis: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical effectiveness and radiologic results of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) comparing with laminoplasty (LP) in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) with developmental canal stenosis (DCS). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 41 patients who had MCSM with DCS treated with ACDF or LP from December 2018 to April 2023. Patients were split into ACDF and LP groups for comparison, and patients were further separated into subgroups based on whether or not a reserving canal space was present. The operation time, hemoglobin, hospital stay, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to assess clinical efficacy. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and cervical range of motion were applied to evaluate imaging changes. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients, 19 received ACDF, and 22 received LP. At the final follow-up, both groups' mJOA scores significantly improved, and the intercomparison showed no differences; the VAS score was much lower in the ACDF group but remained unchanged in the LP group. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 Cobb angle and T1 slope had significantly increased in the ACDF group, while the LP group showed no change; the cervical range of motion had significantly decreased in both groups, with the ACDF group exhibiting a more marked reduction. Within the ACDF subgroup, there was no postoperative symptom improvement for those with reserving space, whereas there was postoperative symptom resolution for those with non-reserving space; however, postoperative symptom in the LP subgroup was resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACDF and LP were efficacious for MCSM patients with DCS. While ACDF could improve cervical lordosis and alleviate neck pain more effectively, it can also result in cervical sagittal imbalance and decreased mobility. Furthermore, the recovery from LP was superior to that from ACDF for patients with reserving space. In contrast, the recovery from both decompression techniques was comparable for individuals in non-reserving space.

Tranexamic acid dosage for spinal surgery: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in spinal surgery. METHODS: We searched relevant academic articles from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed quality, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. RevMan 5.4 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were identified, including 740 patients. According to the different dose regimens of intravenous TXA, the included studies' patients were divided into the high dose of intravenous TXA group and the low dose of intravenous TXA group. Compared with the low-dose group, the high-dose group can reduce the intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 100.87, 95% CI: [- 147.81, - 53.92], P < 0.0001). For the postoperative Hb and HCT, the high-dose group can separately maintain 4.54 g/dL (MD = 4.54, 95% CI: [2.08, 6.99], P = 0.003) and 1.27% (MD = 1.27, 95% CI: [0.59, 1.94], P = 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences in total blood loss, preoperative Hb and HCT, operative time, and blood transfusion rate between the high-dose group and the low-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present meta-analysis, compared with the low-dose of intravenous TXA in spinal surgery, the high dose of intravenous TXA decreases the intraoperative blood loss and preserves higher postoperative Hb and HCT levels without increasing the operative time and blood transfusion rate.