[Development and clinical value of programmed ventricular stimulation in coronary artery disease and dilated cardiomyopathy]. / Entwicklung und Bedeutung der programmierten Ventrikelstimulation bei der koronaren Herzerkrankung und dilatativen Kardiomyopathie.

Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), a clinical tool introduced in the early 1980s, aims to prove the electrical vulnerability of the heart and, independent of spontaneous arrhythmia variability, to trigger arrhythmias under controlled conditions. A specific response is the inducibility of monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia. This depends on the underlying heart disease, e.g., only for coronary artery disease but not for nonischemic diseases. The value of pharmacologic arrhythmia control as serial electrical testing is uncertain. Up to now there seems to be no prognostic value of PVS concerning sudden cardiac death. PVS is used as a tool to monitor the results of ventricular tachycardia (VT)-catheter ablation in patients who were primarily inducible.

Prevention of cerebral thromboembolism by oral anticoagulation with dabigatran after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: the ODIn-AF trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. Prospective data are missing. The ODIn-AF study aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC on the incidence of silent cerebral embolic events and clinically relevant cardioembolic events in patients at intermediate to high risk for embolic events, free from AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded endpoint interventional trial enrolled patients who were scheduled for PVI to treat paroxysmal or persistent AF. Six months after PVI, AF-free patients were randomized to receive either continued OAC with dabigatran or no OAC. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new silent micro- and macro-embolic lesions detected on brain MRI at 12 months of follow-up compared to baseline. Safety analysis included bleedings, clinically evident cardioembolic, and serious adverse events (SAE). RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2021, 200 patients were randomized into 2 study arms (on OAC: n = 99, off OAC: n = 101). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of new cerebral microlesions between the on OAC and off OAC arm [2 (2%) versus 0 (0%); P = 0.1517] after 12 months. MRI showed no new macro-embolic lesion, no clinical apparent strokes were present in both groups. SAE were more frequent in the OAC arm [on OAC n = 34 (31.8%), off OAC n = 18 (19.4%); P = 0.0460]; bleedings did not differ. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of OAC after successful PVI was not found to be associated with an elevated risk of cerebral embolic events compared with continued OAC after a follow-up of 12 months.

Single beta-blocker or combined amiodarone therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator patients: Insights from the German DEVICE registry.

BACKGROUND: Because of its antiarrhythmic potency and due to the lack of alternatives, amiodarone is often used for antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator systems. To date, robust data on the safety and clinical benefit of amiodarone therapy in these patients are missing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the periprocedural and postprocedural outcomes of combined therapy with beta-blockers plus amiodarone compared to treatment with single beta-blockers in the "real-life" cohort of ICD recipients of the German DEVICE registry. METHODS: A total of 4499 patients who underwent ICD implantation, revision, or upgrade in 49 centers participating in the German DEVICE registry were enrolled from March 2007 to February 2014. RESULTS: Amiodarone had no significant effect on the success of defibrillation testing. Early implantation-associated complications were similar between the groups. However, 1-year overall mortality was significantly higher in the beta-blocker plus amiodarone cohort (adjusted hazard ratio 2.09; P <.001). Interestingly, among the surviving patients, amiodarone was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of ICD discharges or syncopal events. Furthermore, the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm or incessant VTs and the number of patients scheduled for intracardiac ablation did not differ among both groups, whereas the rate of rehospitalization was lower in the cohort with only beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Although amiodarone has no adverse effect on the success of defibrillation testing, our data suggest an increased all-cause mortality under amiodarone therapy, especially in the subgroups of patients with sinus rhythm or severely reduced left ventricular function. In surviving patients, rates of arrhythmic events were comparable.

[Magnetic resonance imaging in cardiological patients : Basic principles for application]. / Magnetresonanztomographie bei kardiologischen Patienten : Grundlagen der Anwendung.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be safely performed in patients with cardiac implants such as pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Prerequisites for safe use are knowledge of the physical conditions as well as professional indication and cardiological monitoring by an experienced cardiologist.

Cardiac glycosides are not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates in ICD and CRT-ICD patients after adjustment for baseline-characteristics at one-year follow-up: Results from the German DEVICE registry.

AIMS: Despite lacking supporting randomized trials, cardiac glycosides (CGs) are widely used in heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, several pro- and retrospective studies and registry-data have recently raised serious concerns in terms of efficacy and safety of CGs in this field. We have therefore examined the association between CGs and clinical outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization (CRT-ICD) patients of the large German DEVICE registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2014, 3782 ICD and 1529 CRT-ICD patients were enrolled in the German DEVICE registry. Those two groups were analyzed independently according to medication with or without CGs. After adjustment for patient characteristics, CGs were not significantly associated with increased one-year mortality (HR 1.27, 95%-CI 0.91-1.76, p = 0.162), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR 1.36, 95%-CI 0.98-1.89, p = 0.063), ICD-shocks (OR 1.29, 95%-CI 0.95-1.74, p = 0.104) or the need for rehospitalization in ICD patients at one-year-follow-up. Similar findings were obtained in CRT-ICD patients. Regarding possible determinants for glycoside treatment, atrial fibrillation at enrollment was found to be most strongly associated with the prescription of glycosides in ICD (adjusted OR 3.25, 95%-CI 2.63-4.02) and CRT-ICD patients (adjusted OR 3.17, 95%-CI 2.39-4.19). CONCLUSION: Overall harmful effects of CGs in ICD- and CRT-ICD patients could not be confirmed in DEVICE. Further large and randomized-controlled trials that investigate dose-dependent effects of CGs in addition to contemporary therapy of heart failure and atrial fibrillation are needed.

Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, specialized chest pain units (CPUs) were implemented across Germany ensuring structured diagnostics in acute chest pain. This study aims to analyze the management of pulmonary embolism (PE) patients in such certified CPUs. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 13,902 patients enrolled in the German CPU registry and analyzed for the diagnosis of PE including patient characteristics, critical time intervals, diagnostic workup, treatment, and prognosis. PE patients were compared to the overall CPU patient cohort. Only patients with a complete 3-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: Overall, 1.1% of all CPU patients were diagnosed with PE. Chest pain and dyspnea were the leading symptoms. Patients with PE were older, presented with higher heart rates, and more frequently exhibited signs of heart failure, despite a normal left ventricular function. PE patients showed significantly longer time delays between symptom onset and the first medical contact, while PE patients with chest pain presented earlier than PE patients with dyspnea only. Whereas more PE patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit, in-CPU mortality and event rates over 3 months were low. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study suggests a certain risk for underdiagnosis and consecutive potential undertreatment of PE patients in German Cardiac Society (GCS)-certified CPUs, which is thought to result from an anticipated focus on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Public awareness for PE beyond chest pain should be improved. Certified CPUs should be urged to implement strategic pathways for a better simultaneous diagnostic workup of differential diagnosis beyond ACS.

Efficacy and complications of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation in patients with and without structural heart disease: results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: The impact of structural heart disease (SHD) on safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (AFLU) is unclear. In addition, recent data suggest a higher complication rate of AFLU ablation compared to the more complex atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within our prospective multicenter registry, 3526 consecutive patients underwent AFLU ablation at 49 German electrophysiological centers from 2007 to 2010. For the present analysis, the patients were divided into a group with SHD (n = 2164 [61.4%]; median age 69 years; 78.5% male) and a group without SHD (n = 1362 [38.6%]; 65 years; 70.3% male). In our study, SHD mainly encompasses coronary artery disease (52.6%), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50% (47.6%), and hypertensive heart disease (28.0%). The primary ablation success (97%) and the incidence of major (0.2%) or moderate (1.2%) complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 1.0 and 0.87, respectively). Vascular access site complications (0.6%), AV block III° (0.2%), and bleeding (≥ BARC II: 0.2%) were most common. After a median 562 days of follow-up, we observed a 2.92-fold higher one-year mortality (P < 0.0001) in patients with SHD. Patients' satisfaction with the ablation therapy (72.0% satisfied) was close to the overall subjective tachyarrhythmia-free rate (70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis demonstrates that ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent AFLU in patients with SHD has a comparable, excellent risk-benefit profile in our large "real-world" registry. Mortality rates expectedly are higher in patients with SHD and AFLU compared to patients without SHD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01197638, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01197638.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in severe calcified annulus using the Lotus valve system: Increased incidence of fatal major vascular complications.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the outcome of a highly selected transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) population. BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic valve stenosis and severe calcification of the left ventricular outflow tract and/or the annulus, the Boston Scientific Lotus valve provided a low paravalvular leakage rate omitting the risk of annular rupture. METHODS: Until now more than 3,600 TAVI procedures were performed at our institution. Between 8/2015 and 2/2017, 634 TAVI procedures were performed, of which 80 TAVI patients with severe calcifications consecutively received the Lotus valve. Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria of these procedures were prospectively documented in our institutional TAVI registry. One year follow-up for the Lotus treated patients was completed. RESULTS: Mean age was 82.0 ± 5.5 years. Device success was 95.0%. Conversion was required in two cases (2.5%). New permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 33.3%. Vascular complications occurred more frequent in comparison to non-Lotus treated patients (13.8 vs. 8.1%; p < .05): five minor and six major vascular complications (6.3 and 7.5%), including four fatal aortic injuries (three acute aortic dissections type A, one rupture of the aortic arch). Seventy-two-hour and 30-day mortality rates were also higher in Lotus patients (6.3 and 12.5% vs. 0.3 and 2.5%; each p < .05). One-year mortality in Lotus patients was 22.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In TAVI procedures with the Lotus valve occurrence of vascular complications including lethal aortic injuries and mortality rates were considerably high. Furthermore, in every TAVI procedure careful examination of the aorta should be mandatory and be a part of planning it.

Single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: less is more! Data from the German Device Registry.

BACKGROUND: In patients with high risk for sudden cardiac death the implantation of a defibrillator is an established treatment. However the benefits and risks for patients in accordance to the number of the leads are not clear. Even in the current guidelines a recommendation to this question is missing. We analyzed advantage and disadvantages of single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (VVI-ICD) versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (DDD-ICD) in the prospective German Device Registry. METHODS: The data of 2240 patients who underwent ICD implantation in 45 German Centers between January 2007 and March 2011 were included in a prospective device registry (VVI: n = 1629, male = 1358, EF = 34% ± 13%; DDD: n = 611, male = 491, EF = 35% ± 14%). RESULTS: The in-hospital complications were significantly higher in the DDD-ICD group with higher revision/device complication rates (3.0% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.003) but also higher mortality rate (1.0% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.001). Regarding the adjusted data at 1-year follow-up DDD-ICD caused more device revisions, but no difference in rehospitalization and mortality. CONCLUSION: It is still unclear whether DDD-ICD may be beneficial for patients with preserved sinus and atrioventricular nodal function. Our data show that the decision of the operator to choose a DDD-ICD in these patients must be taken very carefully. By choosing a DDD-ICD the patient is exposed to a significantly higher periprocedural complication rate and higher in-hospital mortality. In absence of relevant bradycardias implantation of a DDD-ICD is not justified.

Feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with coronary heights ≤7 mm: insights from the transcatheter aortic valve implantation Karlsruhe (TAVIK) registry.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with low coronary heights is generally denied but is not impossible. Information about these high-risk procedures is sparse. METHODS: Since May 2008, data of more than 3000 patients who had TAVI were prospectively collected in the institutional TAVI Karlsruhe registry. Characteristics, peri- and postoperative outcome of patients with low coronary heights of ≤7 mm were analysed according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with an average coronary height of 6.4 ± 1.1 mm (mean age 81.0 ± 5.3 years, logistic EuroSCORE I 19.6 ± 13.3%) were treated. TAVI was performed in 72 transfemoral (83.7%) and 14 transapical (16.3%) cases using 44 CoreValve/Evolut R (51.2%), 21 Sapien XT/S3 (24.4%), 14 ACURATE (16.3%), 5 Lotus (5.8%) and 2 Portico (2.3%) prostheses. Ten procedures were valve-in-valve (VinV) TAVI (VinV, 11.6%). The 72-h, 30-day, 1-year and follow-up (3.0 ± 1.6 years) mortality rates were 2.3%, 8.0%, 10.5% and 26.7%, respectively. Within 30 days, 4 cardiac deaths and 3 non-cardiac deaths occurred (4.7% and 3.5%). Three coronary obstructions (3.5%) occurred-2 during VinV TAVI. One patient was connected to extracorporeal circulation that could not be weaned later due to an unsuccessful percutaneous coronary intervention. Another patient, the only conversion (1.2%), required delayed surgical valve replacement. The third patient died of right heart failure after aortic dissection. The procedural success rate was 95.3%. VinV procedures were associated with increased follow-up deaths (P < 0.001; hazard ratio 7.96). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary-related complications in TAVI procedures in patients with coronary heights ≤7 mm occurred less frequently, but once they occurred, they were serious. These TAVI procedures are feasible, with a high procedural success rate, but meticulous preoperative planning should be mandatory. In VinV procedures, the follow-up mortality rate is increased; therefore, we do not recommend these procedures.

Long-term outcomes after event-free cardioverter defibrillator implantation: comparison between patients discharged within 24 h and routinely hospitalized patients in the German DEVICE registry.

AIMS: To analyse the long-term safety of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients discharged within 24 h or after 2- 5-day hospitalization, respectively, after complication-free implantation, in circumstances of actual care. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in the multicentre, nationwide German DEVICE registry were contacted 12-15 months after their first ICD implantation or device replacement. Data were collected on complications, potential arrhythmic events, syncope, resuscitation, ablation procedures, cardiac events, hospitalizations, heart failure status, change of medication, and quality of life. Of 2356 patients from 43 centres, 527 patients were discharged within 24 h and 1829 were hospitalized routinely for >24 h after complication-free implantations. The disease profiles and rates of co-morbidities were similar at baseline for both cohorts. During between 384 and 543 days of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of complications, hospitalizations, or quality of life. One-year rates of death were 4.5% in patients discharged early compared with 7.2% in hospitalized patients (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.42-1.02; P = 0.052). Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events or defibrillator events were not higher in patients discharged after 24 h. In both groups, a high rate of patients declared that they would opt for the procedure again in the same situation. CONCLUSION: Data from a large-scale registry reflecting current day-to-day practice in Germany suggest that most patients can be discharged safely within 24 h of successful ICD implantation if there are no procedure-related events. Follow-up data up to 1.5 years after implantation did not raise long-term safety concerns.

Complications and 1-year benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients over 75 years of age - Insights from the German Device Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in older patients is scarce and conflicting. Nevertheless, CRT in the elderly is of major practical relevance as heart failure prevalence increases with age. METHODS: The German Device Registry (DEVICE) is a nationwide, prospective registry with a longitudinal follow-up design investigating device implantations in 60 German centres. The present analysis of DEVICE focussed on perioperative complication rates and 1-year outcome of patients ≥75years (n=320) compared to younger patients (n=879) receiving a CRT device. RESULTS: Comorbidities were more common in older patients (chronic kidney disease (CKD): 27.5% vs. 21.5%, p=0.029; atrial fibrillation (AF): 26.9% vs. 15.6%, p<0.001). Despite higher NYHA classes in the older age group, ejection fractions were comparable (27.2±7.1% ≥75years, 26.2±7.1% <75years, p=0.06). Perioperative complications and mortality rates did not show significant difference between groups. After new device implantation, absolute 1-year mortality was higher in older patients (11.0% ≥75years, 6.4% <75years, p=0.014), with a significantly lower proportion of cardiac deaths in the older group (p=0.05). Patients ≥75years being alive after 1year had lower response rates, with chronic kidney disease (OR 0.46, p<0.05) and smaller QRS complexes (OR 0.31, p<0.01) being particular risk factors for missing improvement of heart failure symptoms. As expected severe heart failure (NYHA IV) was a strong independent predictor of death (HR 1.95, p=0.01), whereas AF as underlying rhythm could be worked out as predictor for mortality especially in the younger patients (HR 2.31, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients ≥75years of age receiving a CRT device do not have a higher perioperative mortality and complication rate although comorbidities (CKD and AF) occur more frequently. The absolute 1-year mortality is higher; nevertheless, the proportion of cardiac deaths is even lower in the older patients reflecting a benefit of CRT in this group.

A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in 1,141 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and less than high risk.

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement but with less than high risk. BACKGROUND: While there is abundant data for high risk patients there is insufficient data for reduced risk. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAVI or SAVR between 2007 and 2012 in Karlsruhe were considered. They were assessed by cardiac computed tomography, transoesophageal echocardiogram, and logistic EuroSCORE I (ES) and groups compared using Propensity Score Matching. RESULTS: The mean ES was 10.1±2.8 in the TAVI group (n = 419) and 5.7 ± 3.2 in the SAVR group (n = 722; P < 0.0001). Mean survival probability over 3 years was higher in patients undergoing surgery (P < 0.0001). A total of 432 patients were considered for the matched-pairs analysis based on propensity scores (216 in each group). Major vascular complications (10.6% vs. 0.0%; P < 0.0001), new pacemaker implantation (13.9% vs. 4.6%; P < 0.001) and moderate aortic insufficiency (3.2% vs. 0.5%; P = 0.03) were more frequent in patients undergoing TAVI. Major (20.8% vs. 4.2%; P < 0.0001) and life-threatening (14.5% vs. 2.3%; P < 0.0001) bleeding complications were more frequent in those undergoing surgery. Survival probability over 3 years in the propensity matched cohort was comparable between both groups (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, single center, real world dataset there was no difference in mortality between patients undergoing TAVI or SAVR during a 3-year follow-up but there was a TAVI related increase in major vascular complications, new pacemaker implantation and aortic insufficiency and a SAVR related increased bleeding risk.

Long-term results of transapical versus transfemoral TAVI in a real world population of 1000 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation is generally perceived to be associated with increased morbidity compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. We aimed to compare access-related complications and survival using propensity score matching. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, single-center registry of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing transapical and transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation between May 2008 and April 2012. Transapical was performed in 413 patients and transfemoral in 587 patients. Patients with transapical access were less often women and less had pulmonary hypertension. Further they had more peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, and recurrent surgery and a higher logistic EuroSCORE I (24.3% ± 16.2% for transapical versus 22.2% ± 16.2% for transfemoral; P < 0.01). After building 2 propensity score-matched groups of 354 patients each with either access route (total 708 patients), baseline characteristics were comparable. In this analysis, there was no significant difference in 30 day mortality (5.9% transapical versus 8.5% transfemoral; P = 0.19), the rate of myocardial infarction (2.5% transapical versus 2.0% transfemoral; P = 0.61), stroke (2.0% transapical versus 2.3% transfemoral; P = 0.79), bleeding complications, pacemaker implantation rates, or moderate aortic insufficiency. Stage 1 renal complications were more common in transapical patients (odds ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-4.09), whereas major vascular complications were less common (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.29). Survival probability over the long term was not statistically different (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.10; log-rank Test, P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that in an experienced multidisciplinary heart team, either access route can be performed with comparable results.

Clinical impact of a new left bundle branch block following TAVI implantation: 1-year results of the TAVIK cohort.

BACKGROUND: Compared with surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with a higher risk of developing a new conduction disorder that necessitates permanent pacemaker implantation (PM). The most frequently observed conduction disorder is left bundle branch block (LBBB), which impairs left ventricular function. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the incidence and prognostic significance of persistent new-onset LBBB following TAVI. Factors predictive of persistent new-onset LBBB were also explored. METHODS: This study included a total of 793 patients who underwent TAVI between May 2008 and April 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: those with persistent new-onset LBBB and those without persistent new-onset LBBB. Follow-up was conducted within 1-year of TAVI. RESULTS: Persistent new-onset LBBB was observed in 31.1 % (n = 197) out of 634 eligible patients. At 30 days and 1-year post-TAVI, the all-cause mortality rate was higher in patients with persistent new-onset LBBB (6.1 %, n = 12 and 20.8 %, n = 41, respectively) than in patients without new-onset LBBB (3.3 %, n = 10 and 13.0 %, n = 57, respectively; p = 0.014 and p = 0.010 for the two time points). Multivariate regression analyses revealed, that persistent new-onset LBBB was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 1 year (HR 1.84, 95 %CI 1.35-2.02). PM implantation was observed slightly more frequently in patients with persistent new-onset LBBB (14.2 %) than in those without (9.4 %; HR 1.60, 95 %CI 0.96-2.67). Risk factors for pacemaker (PM) were baseline RBBB (HR 6.23, 95 %CI 3.76-10.33), chronic atrial fibrillation (HR 1.75, 95 %CI 1.10-2.56) and the Medtronic CoreValve implantation (HR 2.40, 95 %CI 1.55-3.75). At 1-year follow-up, the mean survival of patients with PM (81.2 %) was slightly lower, but not significantly different from that of patients without PM (85.0 %; p = 0.377). Upon multivariable logistic binary regression analysis Medtronic CoreValve was associated with an increase rate of persistent new-onset LBBB (HR 2.52, 95 %CI 1.67-3.80) and PM implantation. Mortality during 1 year of follow-up, however, was neither increased in the total population (p = 0.232), nor in a subgroup of those with LBBB in a comparison of Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards SAPIEN. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that persistent new-onset LBBB was associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Compared with the Edwards SAPIEN valve, implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve resulted in a higher rate of both persistent new-onset LBBB and PM but not death.