Towards a comprehensive diagnostic assay for scoliosis.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is one of the most common childhood deformities worldwide, characterized by a 3D spinal deformity with unknown cause, and represents both an immediate medical challenge and a chronic condition affecting individuals throughout their lives. The standard of care for scoliosis has not changed in any significant manner in decades. Patients today are treated in a substantially similar manner to those 20 or 30 years ago: observation, bracing and spinal surgery as last resort. Recent progress allow the identification of potential candidate genes, but the function of these still remains elusive and further efforts should be made to connect the predisposing genetic background to the physiopathology. To overcome that situation, we developed functional and biochemical assays that represent promising alternatives. They can help to understand the physiopathology of AIS and direct genetic studies, but more importantly they will contribute to an improved stratification of AIS patients, and thus lead to accurate personalized diagnoses, prognoses and treatment strategies.

The genetic epidemiology of idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Idiopathic scoliosis is a complex developmental syndrome defined by an abnormal structural curvature of the spine. High treatment costs, chronic pain/discomfort, and the need for monitoring at-risk individuals contribute to the global healthcare burden of this musculoskeletal disease. Although many studies have endeavored to identify underlying genes, little progress has been made in understanding the etiopathogenesis. The objective of this comprehensive review was to summarize genetic associations/linkages with idiopathic scoliosis, as well as explore the strengths and weaknesses of each study, such that it may serve as a guide for the design and interpretation of future genetic studies in scoliosis. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) Navigator using the search terms "gene and scoliosis". Linkage or association studies published in English and available full-text were further analyzed as regards results, experimental design, and statistical approach. RESULTS: We identified and analyzed 50 studies matching our criteria. These consisted of 34 candidate gene studies (6 linkage, 28 association) and 16 genome-wide studies [14 pedigree-based linkage, 2 genome-wide association studies (GWAS)]. Findings involved genes related to connective tissue structure, bone formation/metabolism, melatonin signaling pathways, puberty and growth, and axon guidance pathways. Variability in results between studies suggested ethnic and/or genetic heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The major difficulty in idiopathic scoliosis research is phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Genetic research was overrepresented by underpowered studies. The use of biological endophenotypes, as well as restricted clinical definitions, may help to partition variation and increase the power of studies to detect or confirm an effect.