Analysis of motor, cognitive and language performance of infants undergoing treatment for congenital hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the association between the age of treatment onset and confirmatory TSH level (as an indicator of severity) with a greater risk of developmental delay in infants with congenital hypothyroidism (CH). METHOD: The authors conducted a cross-sectional, observational, unmatched case-control study at a Brazilian neonatal screening reference center. Seventy-seven infants with CH (mean age: 12 ± 6.4 months) were examined. The authors evaluated their performance using the Bayley-III Screening Test and categorized them as "LOWER RISK" (competent category) or "GREATER RISK" (combined at-risk + emergent categories) for developmental delay based on the 25th percentile cutoff. RESULTS: Infants with CH are at a higher risk of non-competent performance in cognition, receptive language, fine motor skills, and gross motor skills when compared to infants without CH. This risk is more pronounced in infants with more severe indications of CH (TSH > 30 µUI/L in the confirmatory test) for cognition (OR = 5.64; p = 0.01), receptive language (OR = 14.68; p = 0.000), fine motor skills (OR = 8.25; p = 0.000), and gross motor skills (OR = 5.00; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The level of TSH in the confirmatory test can be a good indicator for identifying infants with CH who are at a higher risk of non-competent performance in cognition, receptive language, and motor skills. Monitoring development, early detection of delays, and intervention programs are particularly important for infants with CH.

Neonatal screening: 9% of children with filter paper thyroid-stimulating hormone levels between 5 and 10 µIU/mL have congenital hypothyroidism / Triagem neonatal: 9% das crianças com TSH em papel filtro entre 5 e 10 µUI/mL têm hipotireoidismo congênito

Abstract Objectives: To determine the prevalence of congenital hypothyroidism in children with filter-paper blood-spot TSH (b-TSH) between 5 and 10 µIU/mL in the neonatal screening. Methods: This was a retrospective study including children screened from 2003 to 2010, with b-TSH levels between 5 and 10 µIU/mL, who were followed-up during the first two years of life when there was no serum TSH normalization. The diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism was defined as serum TSH ≥10 µIU/mL and start of levothyroxine treatment up to 2 years of age. Results: Of the 380,741 live births, 3713 (1.04%) had filter paper TSH levels between 5 and 10 µIU/mL and, of these, 339 (9.13%) had congenital hypothyroidism. Of these, 76.11% of the cases were diagnosed in the first three months of life and 7.96% between 1 and 2 years of age. Conclusion: The study showed that 9.13% of the children with b-TSH levels between 5 and 10 µIU/mL developed hypothyroidism and that in approximately one-quarter of them, the diagnosis was confirmed only after the third month of life. Based on these findings, the authors suggest the use of a 5 µIU/mL cutoff for b-TSH levels and long-term follow-up of infants whose serum TSH has not normalized to rule out congenital hypothyroidism.

Resumo Objetivos: Determinar a prevalência de hipotireoidismo congênito em crianças com TSH em papel filtro (TSH-f) entre 5 e 10 µUI/mL na triagem neonatal. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo que incluiu crianças triadas de 2003 a 2010, com TSH-f entre 5 e 10 µUI/mL, acompanhadas nos dois primeiros anos de vida quando não houve normalização do TSH sérico. O diagnóstico de hipotireoidismo congênito foi definido como TSH sérico igual ou superior a 10 µUI/mL e início de tratamento com levotiroxina até os dois anos. Resultados: Dos 380.741 nascidos vivos triados, 3.713 (1,04%) apresentaram TSH-f entre 5 e 10 µUI/mL e, desses, 339 (9,13%) tinham hipotireoidismo congênito. Desses, 76,11% dos casos foram diagnosticados nos primeiros três meses de vida e 7,96% entre um e dois anos. Conclusão: O estudo mostra que 9,13% das crianças com TSH-f entre 5 e 10 µUI/mL desenvolveram hipotireoidismo e que em cerca de um quarto delas o diagnóstico só se confirmou após o terceiro mês de vida. Com base nesses achados, sugere-se, para descartar o hipotireoidismo congênito, o uso do ponto de corte de TSH-f de 5 µUI/mL e o acompanhamento em longo prazo dos lactentes cujo TSH sérico não tenha se normalizado.

Neonatal screening: 9% of children with filter paper thyroid-stimulating hormone levels between 5 and 10µIU/mL have congenital hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of congenital hypothyroidism in children with filter-paper blood-spot TSH (b-TSH) between 5 and 10µIU/mL in the neonatal screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including children screened from 2003 to 2010, with b-TSH levels between 5 and 10µIU/mL, who were followed-up during the first two years of life when there was no serum TSH normalization. The diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism was defined as serum TSH ≥10µIU/mL and start of levothyroxine treatment up to 2 years of age. RESULTS: Of the 380,741 live births, 3713 (1.04%) had filter paper TSH levels between 5 and 10µIU/mL and, of these, 339 (9.13%) had congenital hypothyroidism. Of these, 76.11% of the cases were diagnosed in the first three months of life and 7.96% between 1 and 2 years of age. CONCLUSION: The study showed that 9.13% of the children with b-TSH levels between 5 and 10µIU/mL developed hypothyroidism and that in approximately one-quarter of them, the diagnosis was confirmed only after the third month of life. Based on these findings, the authors suggest the use of a 5µIU/mL cutoff for b-TSH levels and long-term follow-up of infants whose serum TSH has not normalized to rule out congenital hypothyroidism.

Comparison of motor and cognitive performance in infants during the first year of life.

PURPOSE: To compare motor and cognitive performance in infants with typical development in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months after birth. METHODS: This was a repeated-measures study with unequal sample sizes in the follow-up periods, comprising 94 infants born at term. Infants with genetic syndromes, malformations, congenital infections, or hospitalized in intensive care units were excluded. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development II were used for evaluation of cognitive and motor performance. RESULTS: There were significant differences between motor and cognitive performance at 1, 2, and 3 months. However, at 6, 9, and 12 months, there was no difference between domains. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that during the first year, development can be synchronous in the 2 areas evaluated by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II, especially from the sixth month of age onward.

Motor performance of infants born small or appropriate for gestational age: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the motor performance of infants born small for gestational age (SGA) with those appropriate for gestational age (AGA) at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted including infants born full-term, with birth weight under the 10th percentile for the SGA group and between the 10th and 90th percentiles for the AGA group. The Motor Scale of Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II was used to document motor performance. RESULTS: The SGA group presented a mean motor index score lower than the AGA group at 2 and 6 months, with the SGA group presenting fewer infants that successfully accomplished "makes crawling movements," "turns from side to back," "balances head," "sits alone momentarily," and "sits alone for 30 seconds." CONCLUSIONS: Data analysis suggested that infants who are SGA present greater risk of adverse outcomes that are detectable in motor performance measures at 2 months.

Agreement between scales for screening and diagnosis of motor development at 6 months.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the degree of agreement between a score for screening and another for diagnosis of motor development in 6-month old infants and to define the most appropriate cutoff point for screening. METHODS: A sectional study, enrolling asymptomatic full term newborns with gestational ages from 37 to 41 weeks, who were discharged from the maternity unit 2 days after birth and are resident in the Campinas area. Infants were excluded if they presented genetic syndromes, malformations, congenital infections, intensive care admission or low birth weight. The assessment instruments investigated were the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II). Two cutoff points were evaluated for the AIMS, the 5th and 10th percentiles, and for the BSID-II infants were classified according to its motor index score (IS) as having inadequate (IS < 85, at least 1 standard deviation below the mean) or adequate performance (IS >or= 85, above the mean minus 1 standard deviation). RESULTS: The study sample comprised 43 infants. Six infants (14.00%) exhibited inadequate motor performance. Using the BSID-II motor classification and the 5th percentile AIMS cutoff, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 78.37%, accuracy 81.39%, kappa index 0.50 and p < 0.001; whereas, using the BSID-II motor classification and the 10th percentile AIMS cutoff, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 48.64%, accuracy 55.81%, kappa index 0.20 and p 0.025. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that concordance between the two 6-month assessment scales is good. The parameters employed are best combined using the 5th percentile AIMS cutoff point.

Agreement between scales for screening and diagnosis of motor development at 6 months

OBJETIVO: Verificar o grau de concordância entre uma escala de triagem e uma de diagnóstico do desenvolvimento motor de lactentes no sexto mês de vida, estabelecendo o ponto de corte mais apropriado para triagem. MÉTODOS: Estudo seccional, incluindo recém-nascidos a termo, com idade gestacional entre 37 e 41 semanas, assintomáticos, que receberam alta da maternidade 2 dias após o nascimento, residentes na região de Campinas. Foram excluídas síndromes genéticas, malformações, infecções congênitas, internações em unidade de terapia intensiva e baixo peso ao nascimento. Os instrumentos de avaliação foram: Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) e Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II). Para a AIMS, foram utilizados dois pontos de corte, percentil 5 ou 10 e, para as BSID-II, foi utilizada a classificação dos lactentes na escala motora conforme a pontuação do index score (IS): desempenho inadequado (IS < 85, abaixo de menos 1 desvio padrão da média) ou desempenho adequado (IS > 85, maior ou igual a menos 1 desvio padrão da média). RESULTADOS: A amostra foi constituída por 43 lactentes. Seis lactentes (14,00 por cento) apresentaram desempenho motor inadequado. Considerando a classificação motora das BSID-II e o percentil 5 da AIMS, obteve-se sensibilidade = 100 por cento, especificidade = 78,37 por cento, acurácia = 81,39 por cento, índice kappa = 0,50 e p < 0,001; considerando a classificação motora das BSID-II e o percentil 10 da AIMS, obteve-se sensibilidade = 100 por cento, especificidade = 48,64 por cento, acurácia = 55,81 por cento, índice kappa = 0,20 e p = 0,025. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem boa concordância entre os instrumentos de avaliação no sexto mês. A melhor combinação para os parâmetros analisados é a utilização do percentil 5 da AIMS.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the degree of agreement between a score for screening and another for diagnosis of motor development in 6-month old infants and to define the most appropriate cutoff point for screening. METHODS: A sectional study, enrolling asymptomatic full term newborns with gestational ages from 37 to 41 weeks, who were discharged from the maternity unit 2 days after birth and are resident in the Campinas area. Infants were excluded if they presented genetic syndromes, malformations, congenital infections, intensive care admission or low birth weight. The assessment instruments investigated were the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II). Two cutoff points were evaluated for the AIMS, the 5th and 10th percentiles, and for the BSID-II infants were classified according to its motor index score (IS) as having inadequate (IS < 85, at least 1 standard deviation below the mean) or adequate performance (IS > 85, above the mean minus 1 standard deviation). RESULTS: The study sample comprised 43 infants. Six infants (14.00 percent) exhibited inadequate motor performance. Using the BSID-II motor classification and the 5th percentile AIMS cutoff, sensitivity was 100 percent, specificity 78.37 percent, accuracy 81.39 percent, kappa index 0.50 and p < 0.001; whereas, using the BSID-II motor classification and the 10th percentile AIMS cutoff, sensitivity was 100 percent, specificity 48.64 percent, accuracy 55.81 percent, kappa index 0.20 and p 0.025. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that concordance between the two 6-month assessment scales is good. The parameters employed are best combined using the 5th percentile AIMS cutoff point.