Assigning trabecular bone material properties in finite element models simulating the pelvis before and after the development of peri-prosthetic osteolytic lesions.

Estimating strain distribution in the acetabulum before and after the development of peri-prosthetic osteolytic lesions secondary to total hip arthroplasty may assist with understanding the pathogenesis of this condition. This could be achieved by performing patient-specific finite element analysis of (1) total hip arthroplasty recipients with developed acetabular osteolytic lesions, and (2) models simulating the patient's pelvis and implant immediately after primary surgery. State of the art patient-specific total hip arthroplasty finite element analysis simulations obtain trabecular bone material properties from Hounsfield units within computed tomography (CT) scans of patients. However, this is not feasible when an implant is already in situ due to metal artefact disruption and, in turn, incorrectly reproduced Hounsfield units. Therefore, alternative methods of assigning trabecular bone material properties within such models were tested and strain results compared. It was found that assigning set material properties throughout the trabecular bone geometry was sufficient for the desired application. Simulating the primary implant and pelvis requires geometric and material based assumptions. Therefore, comparisons were made between strain values obtained from simulated primary models, from state of the art methods using material properties obtained from intact bone within a CT scan, and from models with osteolytic lesions. Strain values found using the finite element models simulating the pelvis before osteolytic lesion developed were considerably closer to those found using state of the art methods than those found for the bone loss models. These models could be used to determine relationships between strain distribution and factors such as bone loss.

A semiautomated method to quantitatively assess osteolytic lesion volume and bone mineral density within acetabular regions of interest from CT.

The objectives of this study were to (1) develop a semiautomated method to obtain lesion volume and bone mineral density (BMD) in terms of Hounsfield units from pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans in three regions of interest, and (2) assess accuracy and reliability of the method based on cadaveric CT scans. Image artefacts due to metal implants reduce CT clarity and are more severe with more than one implant in situ. Therefore, accuracy and reliability tests were performed with varying numbers of total hip arthroplasties implanted. To test the accuracy of lesion size measurements, microcomputed tomography was used as a reference. Mean absolute error ranged from 36 to 284 mm3 after five measurements. Intra- and inter-operator reliability of the entire method was measured for a selection of parameters. All coefficient of variation values were good to excellent for CT scans of the native pelvic anatomy and a CT scans of the same pelvis with one and two implants in situ. Accuracy of quantifying lesion volume decreased with decreasing CT image clarity by 0.6%-3.6% mean absolute relative error. Reliability of lesion volume measurement decreased with decreasing CT clarity. This was also the case for reliability of BMD measurements in the region most disrupted by metal artefact. The presented method proposes an approach for quantifying bone loss which has been proven to be accurate, reliable, and clinically applicable.