To observe or not to observe: Evaluation of the modified brain injury guideline management of small volume intracranial hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with small volume intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are categorized as modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) 1 and are managed with a 6-h emergency department (ED) observation period. The current study aimed to describe the mBIG 1 patient population and determine the utility of the ED observation period. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients with small volume ICH. Exclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 13 and penetrating injuries. RESULTS: 359 patients were identified over the 8-year study period. The most common ICH was SDH (52.7%) followed by SAH (50.1%). Two patients (0.56%) had neurologic deterioration, but neither had radiographic progression. Overall, 14.3% of the cohort had radiographic progression; none required neurosurgical intervention. Four patients (1.1%) had readmission related to TBI from the index admission. CONCLUSION: There were no patients with small volume ICH that required neurosurgical intervention despite a small subset of patients having radiographic or clinical deterioration. Patients who meet the mBIG 1 criteria may be managed safely without an ED observation period.

Prediction and moderation of improvement in cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic psychotherapy for panic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables predicting psychotherapy outcome for panic disorder or indicating which of 2 very different forms of psychotherapy-panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy (PFPP) or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-would be more effective for particular patients. METHOD: Data were from 161 adults participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) including these psychotherapies. Patients included 104 women; 118 patients were White, 33 were Black, and 10 were of other races; 24 were Latino(a). Predictors/moderators measured at baseline or by Session 2 of treatment were used to predict change on the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS). RESULTS: Higher expectancy for treatment gains (Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire d = -1.05, CI95% [-1.50, -0.60]), and later age of onset (d = -0.65, CI95% [-0.98, -0.32]) were predictive of greater change. Both variables were also significant moderators: patients with low expectancy of improvement improved significantly less in PFPP than their counterparts in CBT, whereas this was not the case for patients with average or high levels of expectancy. When patients had an onset of panic disorder later in life (≥27.5 years old), they fared as well in PFPP as CBT. In contrast, at low and mean levels of onset age, CBT was the more effective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive variables suggest possibly fruitful foci for improvement of treatment outcome. In terms of moderation, CBT was the more consistently effective treatment, but moderators identified some patients who would do as well in PFPP as in CBT, thereby widening empirically supported options for treatment of this disorder. (PsycINFO Database Record

Do comorbid personality disorders moderate panic-focused psychotherapy? An exploratory examination of the American Psychiatric Association practice guideline.

OBJECTIVE: The American Psychiatric Association (APA) practice guideline for panic disorder recommends psychodynamic psychotherapy for panic disorder patients with comorbid personality disorders. No data underlie this recommendation. This exploratory study assessed the moderating effect of personality disorder on psychodynamic and non-psychodynamic psychotherapy outcome. METHOD: Forty-nine subjects with primary DSM-IV panic disorder were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of twice-weekly Panic-Focused Psychodynamic Psychotherapy or Applied Relaxation Training. The primary outcome measure was the Panic Disorder Severity Scale; the moderating effect of Axis II psychopathology on the Sheehan Disability Scale was also tested. The trial was conducted between February 2000 and January 2005. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects (49%) met DSM-IV criteria for a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders-diagnosed personality disorder, of whom 19 (79%) had a cluster C diagnosis. Presence of a cluster C diagnosis moderated treatment outcome. Such subjects experienced greater improvements in Panic-Focused Psychodynamic Psychotherapy than subjects without cluster C comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its small sample size, this exploratory analysis provides initial preliminary evidence corroborating the APA practice guideline recommendation. Future panic disorder clinical trials should explore Axis II moderator effects. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00128388.

A randomized controlled clinical trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy relative to applied relaxation training, a credible psychotherapy comparison condition. Despite the widespread clinical use of psychodynamic psychotherapies, randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating such psychotherapies for axis I disorders have lagged. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first efficacy randomized controlled clinical trial of panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, a manualized psychoanalytical psychotherapy for patients with DSM-IV panic disorder. METHOD: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial of subjects with primary DSM-IV panic disorder. Participants were recruited over 5 years in the New York City metropolitan area. Subjects were 49 adults ages 18-55 with primary DSM-IV panic disorder. All subjects received assigned treatment, panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy or applied relaxation training in twice-weekly sessions for 12 weeks. The Panic Disorder Severity Scale, rated by blinded independent evaluators, was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Subjects in panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy had significantly greater reduction in severity of panic symptoms. Furthermore, those receiving panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy were significantly more likely to respond at treatment termination (73% versus 39%), using the Multicenter Panic Disorder Study response criteria. The secondary outcome, change in psychosocial functioning, mirrored these results. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small cohort size of this trial, it has demonstrated preliminary efficacy of panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy for panic disorder.