Etravirine in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children 1 year to less than 6 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of etravirine (ETR) in HIV-infected children 1 to less than 6 years of age. DESIGN: Phase I/II, open-label, multicenter, dose-finding study. METHODS: Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced children in two age cohorts (I: 2 to <6 years; II: 1 to less than 2 years) received weight-based ETR, swallowed whole or dispersed in liquid, with optimized ART including a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. Intensive pharmacokinetics occurred 7-18 days after starting ETR. Participants with ETR AUC12h less than 2350 ng h/ml had a dose increase and repeat pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Twenty-six children enrolled and 21 (15 in cohort I and 6 in cohort II) had evaluable intensive pharmacokinetics sampling at the final weight-based dose. On the final dose, the geometric mean ETR AUC12h was 3823 ng h/ml for cohort I and 3328 ng h/ml for cohort II. Seven children (33.3%) on the final dose, all taking ETR dispersed, had an AUC12  h less than 2350 ng h/ml and underwent a dose increase. ETR AUC12  h was 3.8-fold higher when ETR was swallowed whole vs. dispersed, P less than 0.0001. On the final dose, 75 and 33.3% in cohorts I and II, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA 400 copies/ml or less or at least 2 log reductions from baseline at week 48. Three children (11.5%) experienced a grade at least 3 adverse event related to ETR but only 1 discontinued. CONCLUSION: ETR was well tolerated. Predefined pharmacokinetics targets were met but overall exposures were low vs. historical data in adults, particularly in young children taking dispersed tablets. A high rate of viral efficacy was observed among those aged 2 to more than 6 years but not in those less than 2 years.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-infected Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: IMPAACT Protocol P1092.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of antiretroviral therapy. The phase IV study, IMPAACT P1092, compared PK, safety, and tolerability of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in children with and without SAM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children living with HIV 6 to <36 months of age with or without World Health Organization (WHO)-defined SAM received ZDV, 3TC, and LPV/r syrup for 48 weeks according to WHO weight band dosing. Intensive PK sampling was performed at weeks 1, 12, and 24. Plasma drug concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Steady-state mean area under the curve (AUC0-12h) and clearance (CL/F) for each drug were compared. Grade ≥3 adverse events were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Fifty-two children were enrolled across 5 sites in Africa with 44% (23/52) female, median age 19 months (Q1, Q3: 13, 25). Twenty-five children had SAM with entry median weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) -3.4 (IQR -4.0, -3.0) and 27 non-SAM had median WHZ -1.0 (IQR -1.8, -0.1). No significant differences in mean AUC0-12h or CL/F were observed (P ≥ 0.09) except for lower 3TC AUC0-12h (GMR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0; P = 0.047) at week 12, higher ZDV AUC0-12h (GMR, 1.52; 1.2-2.0; P = 0.003) at week 24 in the SAM cohort compared with non-SAM cohort. Treatment-related grade ≥3 events did not differ significantly between cohorts (24.0% vs. 25.9%). CONCLUSION: PK and safety findings for ZDV, 3TC, and LPV/r support current WHO weight band dosing of syrup formulations in children with SAM.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Raltegravir-Containing Regimen in Children Aged 4 Weeks to 2 Years Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Receiving Rifampin for Tuberculosis.

Pharmacological interactions limit treatment options for children living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB). We found that 12 mg/kg twice daily raltegravir chewable tablets (administered after crushing) safely achieved pharmacokinetic targets in children living with HIV aged 4 weeks to <2 years receiving concurrent rifampin to treat TB. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01751568.

Impact of Low Birth Weight and Prematurity on Neonatal Raltegravir Pharmacokinetics: Impaact P1097.

BACKGROUND: HIV treatment of neonates requires identifying appropriate antiretroviral dosing regimens. Our aims were to characterize raltegravir elimination kinetics in low birth weight (LBW) neonates after maternal dosing and to develop a pharmacokinetic model to predict raltegravir plasma concentrations for term and preterm neonates. METHODS: Mothers living with HIV who received raltegravir during pregnancy and their LBW neonates participated in IMPAACT P1097 study. Up to 6 serial plasma samples were collected from each infant over the first 2 postnatal weeks to characterize raltegravir elimination. Safety laboratory evaluations were obtained, and infants were monitored for 6 weeks for signs of raltegravir toxicity. An integrated maternal-neonatal pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict neonatal raltegravir plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Sixteen mothers and their 18 LBW neonates were enrolled. The median (range) raltegravir elimination half-life was 24.4 (10.1-83) hours (N = 17 neonates). No adverse events related to raltegravir in utero exposure were observed. Pharmacokinetic modeling revealed that raltegravir clearance in full-term LBW neonates was well described by allometric scaling but clearance in preterm LBW neonates was better described using slower clearance maturation kinetics. Simulations suggest receipt of the current dosing recommendations in a 34-week gestation neonate would result in plasma concentrations up to 2.5-fold higher than those observed in full-term LBW infants. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling suggests that prematurity reduces raltegravir clearance and a modified raltegravir dosing regimen will be necessary to avoid elevated plasma raltegravir concentrations.

Raltegravir (RAL) in Neonates: Dosing, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Safety in HIV-1-Exposed Neonates at Risk of Infection (IMPAACT P1110).

BACKGROUND: Adequate pharmacokinetic and safety data in neonates are lacking for most antiretroviral agents. Raltegravir is a selective HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor available in a granule formulation suitable for use in neonates and young infants as prophylaxis or treatment of HIV infection. METHODS: IMPAACT P1110 is a phase 1, multicenter, noncomparative dose-finding study of raltegravir in infants exposed to HIV-1 infection. A 2-cohort adaptive design was utilized where pharmacokinetic data from infants in cohort 1 who received 2 single doses of raltegravir 3 mg/kg were included in population modeling and simulations to guide selection of a daily dose for infants in cohort 2. RESULTS: A total of 52 infants enrolled in IMPAACT 1110: cohort 1 (N = 16) and cohort 2 (N = 36). Using simulations based on population PK modeling incorporating cohort 1 data, the following daily dosing regimen was selected for study: 1.5 mg/kg daily from birth through day 7; 3 mg/kg twice daily from days 8-28 of life; and 6 mg/kg twice daily after 4 weeks of age through 6 weeks of age. The geometric mean protocol exposure targets for AUC, Ctrough, and Cmax were met or slightly exceeded in all infants. The chosen neonatal raltegravir dosing regimen was safe and well tolerated in full-term neonates during treatment over the first 6 weeks of life and follow-up to age 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir can be safely administered to full-term infants using the daily dosing regimen studied. This regimen is not recommended for use in premature infants in a new version of P1110.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Dolutegravir in Treatment-Experienced Adolescents With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Results of the IMPAACT P1093 Study.

BACKGROUND: P1093 is an ongoing phase I/II multicenter open-label study of dolutegravir plus an optimized background regimen in age-defined pediatric cohorts; here we report the long-term safety and virologic efficacy outcomes for the oldest cohort. METHODS: The study enrolled human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected treatment-experienced adolescents aged 12 to <18 years, with an HIV-1 RNA level ≥1000 copies/mL . Cumulative safety and HIV-1 RNA outcomes were assessed once the last enrolled participant reached 144 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Among 23 adolescents enrolled, 16 remained in the study at least 144 weeks; the median follow-up was 153 weeks (range, 55-193 weeks). Dolutegravir was well tolerated, with grade 3 clinical adverse events in 5 participants, grade 3 laboratory abnormalities in 3, and grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in 1; none of the adverse events or abnormalities were judged to be treatment related. In an-intent-to-treat analysis, an HIV-1 RNA level <400 copies/mL at week 144 was achieved in 43% (10 of 23 participants; 95% confidence interval, 23.2%-65.5%); in addition, 35% (8 of 23; 16.4%-57.3%) had an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL. Nine participants (39%) discontinued study treatment before 144 weeks, but none because of adverse events or drug intolerance. All participants with sustained virologic control had excellent adherence; most who experienced virologic failure had adherence levels <90%. HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance testing was available at time of failure from 6 participants; 1 had evolution in integrase resistance with E138T, S147G, and R263K mutations at week 192 and phenotypic dolutegravir resistance of a 5.1-fold change. CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir plus an optimized background regimen seemed safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in this cohort of treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected adolescents. Adherence remains problematic in this population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01302847.

Sertraline Pharmacokinetics in HIV-Infected and Uninfected Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

Objective: Due to potential disease and drug interactions, the appropriate sertraline starting dose and titration range may require adjustment in pediatric patients living with HIV. This is the first report of sertraline pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected youth. Methods: IMPAACT P1080 was a multicenter pilot study describing psychiatric medication pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected and uninfected youth. Participants were stable on sertraline, >6 to <25 years old, and (1) HIV-uninfected (HIV(-)), (2) HIV-infected taking efavirenz (EFV), or (3) HIV-infected taking boosting ritonavir/protease inhibitor (PI/r). Sampling occurred at pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24-h post-dose. Analyses were performed for sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline, and CYP2D6 phenotyping was completed with dextromethorphan. Results: Thirty-one participants (16 HIV(-), 12 PI/r, and 3 EFV) had median (range) weight, age, and dose of 69.5 (31.5-118.2) kg, 21.8 (9.1-24.7) years, and 75.0 (12.5-150.0) mg once daily. Sertraline exposure was highest for HIV(-) and lowest for EFV cohorts; median dose-normalized AUC 0-24 was 1176 (HIV(-)), 791 (PI/r) and 473 (EFV) ng*hr/mL, and C24 was 32.7 (HIV(-)), 20.1 (PI/r), and 12.8 (EFV) ng/mL. The urinary dextromethorphan/dextrorphan (DXM/DXO) ratio was higher in HIV(-) vs. PI/r cohorts (p = 0.01). Four HIV(-) participants were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (ln(DXM/DXO) of >-0.5). Conclusions: HIV(-) cohort had the highest sertraline exposure. Sertraline exposure was ~40% lower in the PI/r cohort than in HIV(-); the need to alter sertraline dose ranges for PI/r participants is not clear. The impact of efavirenz on sertraline needs further investigation due to limited numbers of EFV participants.

Safety and efficacy at 240 weeks of different raltegravir formulations in children with HIV-1: a phase 1/2 open label, non-randomised, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Raltegravir is an integrase inhibitor approved for use in adults and children with HIV-1 infection, but there are no data on the long-term use of this medication in children. We aimed to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of multiple raltegravir formulations in children aged 4 weeks to 18 years with HIV-1 infection. METHODS: In this phase 1/2 open-label multicentre trial (IMPAACT P1066), done in 43 IMPAACT network sites in the USA, South Africa, Brazil, Botswana, and Argentina, eligible participants were children aged 4 weeks to 18 years with HIV-1 infection who had previously received antiretroviral therapy (ART), had HIV-1 RNA higher than 1000 copies per mL, and no exposure to integrase inhibitors. Participants were separated into five age groups and enrolled in six cohorts. Three formulations of open-label raltegravir-adult tablets, chewable tablets, and granules for oral suspension-were added to individualised optimised background therapy, according to the age and weight of participants. The primary outcome at 48 weeks has been previously reported. In the 240-week follow-up, outcomes of interest included graded clinical and laboratory safety of raltegravir formulations during the study and virological efficacy (with virological success defined as HIV-1 RNA reduction of >1 log10 from baseline or HIV-1 RNA <400 copies per mL) at week 240. The primary analysis group for safety and efficacy comprised patients treated only with the final selected dose of raltegravir. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00485264. FINDINGS: Between August, 2007, and December, 2012, 220 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 153 were enrolled and treated. Of these patients, 122 received only the final selected dose of raltegravir (63 received adult tablets, 33 chewable tablets, and 26 oral granules), and one was not treated. There were few serious clinical or laboratory safety events noted, with two patients having a drug-related adverse event (skin rash), which led one patient to discontinue the study treatment. The addition of raltegravir to an individually optimised ART regimen resulted in virological success at week 240 in 19 (44·2%, 95% CI 29·1-60·1) of 43 patients receiving 400 mg tablets, 24 (77·4%, 58·9-90·4) of 31 patients receiving the chewable tablets, and 13 (86·7%, 59·5-98·3) of 15 patients receiving oral granules. Among patients with virological failure, raltegravir resistance was noted in 19 (38%) of 50 patients who had virological rebound after initial suppression and had samples at virological failure available for testing. INTERPRETATION: Our study suggests that raltegravir can be used for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in children as young as 4 weeks, with the expectation of long-term safety and efficacy, but should be used with caution among older children who had previous extensive antiretroviral therapy. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Mental Health, and Merck.

Concomitant nevirapine impacts pharmacokinetic exposure to the antimalarial artemether-lumefantrine in African children.

BACKGROUND: The antiretroviral drug nevirapine and the antimalarial artemisinin-based combination therapy artemether-lumefantrine are commonly co-administered to treat malaria in the context of HIV. Nevirapine is a known inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, which metabolizes artemether and lumefantrine. To address the concern that the antiretroviral nevirapine impacts the antimalarial artemether-lumefantrine pharmacokinetics, a prospective non-randomized controlled study in children presenting with uncomplicated malaria and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa was carried out. METHODS: Participants received artemether-lumefantrine (20/120 mg weight-based BID) for 3 days during nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) co-administration (158-266 mg/m2 QD). HIV positive participants who were not yet on ART drugs were also enrolled as the control group. The target enrollment was children aged 3-12 years (n = 24 in each group). Intensive pharmacokinetics after the last artemether-lumefantrine dose was assessed for artemether, its active metabolite dihydroartemisinin, and lumefantrine. Pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC), maximum concentration and day 7 lumefantrine concentrations) were estimated using non-compartmental methods and compared to controls. RESULTS: Nineteen children (16 on nevirapine and three not on ART) enrolled. Fifteen of the 16 (aged 4 to 11 years) on nevirapine-based ART were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Due to evolving WHO HIV treatment guidelines, insufficient children were enrolled in the control group (n = 3), so the pharmacokinetic data were compared to a historical control group of 20 HIV-uninfected children 5-12 years of age who also presented with malaria and underwent identical study procedures. Decreases of pharmacokinetic exposure [as estimated by AUC (AUC0-8hr)] were marginally significant for artemether (by -46%, p = 0.08) and dihydroartemisinin (-22%, p = 0.06) in the children on nevirapine-based ART, compared to when artemether-lumefantrine was administered alone. Similarly, peak concentration was decreased by 50% (p = 0.07) for artemether and 36% (p = 0.01) for dihydroartemisinin. In contrast, exposure to lumefantrine increased significantly in the context of nevirapine [AUC0-120hr:123% (p<0.001); Cday7:116% (p<0.001), Cmax: 95% (p<0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: Nevirapine-based ART increases the exposure to lumefantrine in pre-pubescent children with a trend toward diminished artemether and dihydroartemisinin exposure. These findings contrast with other studies indicating NVP reduces or results in no change in exposure of antimalarial drugs, and may be specific to this age group (4-12 years). Considering the excellent safety profile of artemether-lumefantrine, the increase in lumefantrine is not of concern. However, the reduction in artemisinin exposure may warrant further study, and suggests that dosage adjustment of artemether-lumefantrine with nevirapine-based ART in children is likely warranted.

Safety and Efficacy of Atorvastatin in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) have increased prevalence of hyperlipidemia and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. No studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of statins in this population. METHODS: HIV-infected youth 10 to <24 years of age on stable ART with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥130 mg/dL for ≥6 months initiated atorvastatin 10 mg once daily. Atorvastatin was increased to 20 mg if LDL-C efficacy criteria (LDL-C < 110 mg/dL or decreased ≥30% from baseline) were not met at week 4. Primary outcomes were safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight youth initiated atorvastatin; 7 were 10-15 years and 21 were 15-24 years. Mean baseline LDL-C was 161 mg/dL (standard deviation 19 mg/dL). Efficacy criteria were met at week 4 by 17 of 27 (63%) participants. Atorvastatin was increased to 20 mg in 10 participants. Mean LDL-C decreased from baseline by 30% (90% confidence interval: 26%, 35%) at week 4, 28% (90% confidence interval: 23%, 33%) at week 24 and 26% (90% confidence interval: 20%, 33%) at week 48. LDL-C was less than 110 mg/dL in 44% at week 4, 42% at week 12 and 46% at weeks 24 and 48. Total cholesterol, non high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL)-C and apolipoprotein B decreased significantly, but IL-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein did not. Two participants in the younger age group discontinued study for toxicities possibly related to atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin lowered total cholesterol, LDL-C, non HDL-C and apolipoprotein B in HIV-infected youth with ART-associated hyperlipidemia. Atorvastatin could be considered for HIV-infected children with hyperlipidemia, but safety monitoring is important particularly in younger children.

Pharmacokinetics of Darunavir/Ritonavir With Etravirine Both Twice Daily in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Adolescents and Young Adults.

Data on the combination of darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine both given twice daily in adolescents/young adults are lacking. In this study, we assessed the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg with etravirine 200 mg twice daily in 36 treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected adolescents and young adults and found that exposures were comparable to those reported in adults.

Pharmacokinetics of Unboosted Atazanavir in Treatment-experienced HIV-infected Children, Adolescents and Young Adults.

HIV protease inhibitor use in pediatrics is challenging due to the poor palatability and/or toxicity of concomitant low-dose ritonavir. Atazanavir without ritonavir (unboosted) is not recommended for patients with prior virologic failure, a common problem for perinatally-infected adolescents. Atazanavir 400 mg once-daily provided suboptimal exposure. Higher unboosted doses or splitting the daily dose to twice-daily warrants investigation in this treatment-experienced population.

Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Darunavir/Ritonavir With and Without Etravirine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available for once-daily (QD) darunavir (DRV)/ritonavir (r) in the pediatric population. Coadministration of etravirine (ETR) may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRV. We evaluated the PK interactions between DRV/r (QD) and ETR QD or twice-daily (BID) in children, adolescents, and young adults. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects 9 to < 24 years old on optimized background therapy including DRV/r 800/100 mg QD alone or combined with ETR 200 mg BID or ETR 400 mg QD were enrolled. Protocol-defined target drug exposure ranges based on adult data were used to assess the adequacy of each regimen. Intensive 24-hour blood sampling was performed, and PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects (14 males) completed the study; 16 received DRV/r QD alone (group 1), 6 received DRV/r plus ETR BID (group 2A), and 9 received DRV/r plus ETR QD (group 2B). The geometric mean (90% confidence interval [CI] geometric mean) for DRV area under the curve at 24 hours (AUC24) was 57.9 (49.6-67.6), 74.9 (44.4-126.5), and 66.4 (50.8-86.9) mg × h/L for patients in groups 1, 2A, and 2B, respectively. The increased DRV exposure when coadministered with ETR was not statistically significant. The geometric mean (90% CI geometric mean) of ETR AUC24 was 8.6 (4.4-16.8) and 11.9 (7.5-18.9) mg × h/L for groups 2A and 2B, respectively, with comparable C24. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that DRV/r QD with ETR 400 mg QD or 200 mg BID is appropriate and support further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the once-daily regimen in older children, adolescents, and young adults.

Rilpivirine Pharmacokinetics Without and With Darunavir/Ritonavir Once Daily in Adolescents and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Rilpivirine (RPV), a recently developed, once daily human immunodeficiency virus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, is not currently approved for pediatric patients, but is sometimes prescribed for adolescents with multiple treatment failures, for regimen simplification or to minimize toxicity. Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) administered once daily is also increasingly used in adolescents and may alter RPV pharmacokinetics (PK). We evaluated the PK interactions between RPV and DRV/r once daily in adolescents and young adults. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects 12 to <24 years old receiving a stable background therapy including RPV 25 mg once daily without or combined with DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily were enrolled. Intensive 24-hour blood sampling was performed, and PK indices were determined using noncompartmental analysis. Protocol-defined target drug exposure ranges based on adult data were used to assess the adequacy of each regimen. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects receiving RPV without and 14 subjects with DRV/r were enrolled. When dosed without DRV/r, the RPV geometric mean (90% confidence interval) for RPV AUC0-24, Cmax and C24 h were 2.38 µg h/mL (1.92-2.94), 0.14 µg/mL (0.12-0.18) and 0.07 µg/mL (0.03-0.10), respectively, similar to adult values. RPV concentrations were significantly increased with concomitant DRV/r use: RPV AUC24, Cmax and C24 h were 6.74 µg h/mL (4.89-9.28), 0.39 µg/mL (0.27-0.57) and 0.23 µg/mL (0.17-0.32), respectively, well above the target ranges based on adult data. DRV/r PK was not affected by coadministration of RPV. CONCLUSIONS: RPV PK in this adolescent population was similar to adults when dosed without DRV/r. DRV/r coadministration increased RPV exposure 2- to 3-fold, indicating that drug-related side effects should be closely monitored.

Pharmacokinetics and 48-Week Safety and Efficacy of Raltegravir for Oral Suspension in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1-Infected Children 4 Weeks to 2 Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: IMPAACT P1066 is a Phase I/II open-label multicenter trial to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of multiple raltegravir (RAL) formulations in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected youth. METHODS: Dose selection of the oral suspension formulation for each cohort (IV: 6 months to <2 years and V: 4 weeks to <6 months) was based on review of short-term safety (4 weeks) and intensive PK evaluation. Safety data through Weeks 24 and 48 and Grade ≥3 or serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The primary virologic endpoint was achieving HIV RNA <400 copies/mL or ≥1 log10 reduction from baseline at Week 24 (Success). For Cohort IV, optimized background therapy (OBT) could have been initiated with RAL either at study entry or after intensive PK sampling was completed at Day 5-12. An OBT was started when RAL was initiated for Cohort V subjects because they were not permitted to have received direct antiretroviral therapy before enrollment. RESULTS: Total accrual was 27 subjects in these 2 cohorts, including 1 subject who was enrolled but never started study drug (excluded from the analyses). The targeted PK parameters (area under the curve [AUC]0-12hr and C12hr) were achieved for each cohort allowing for dose selection. Through Week 48, there were 10 subjects with Grade 3+ AEs. Two were judged related to study drug. There was 1 discontinuation due to an AE of skin rash, 1 event of immune reconstitution syndrome, and no drug-related deaths. At Week 48, for Cohorts IV and V, 87.5% of subjects achieved virologic success and 45.5% had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. At Week 48, gains in CD4 cells of 527.6 cells/mm(3) and 7.3% were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 6 mg/kg per dose twice daily of RAL for oral suspension was well tolerated and showed favorable virologic and immunologic responses.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of raltegravir pediatric formulations in HIV-infected children 4 weeks to 18 years of age.

P1066 is an open-label study of raltegravir in HIV positive youth, ages 4 weeks-18 years. Here we summarize P1066 pharmacokinetic (PK) data and a population PK model for the pediatric chewable tablet and oral granules. Raltegravir PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. A 2-compartment model was developed using data from P1066 and an adult study of the pediatric formulations. Interindividual variability was described by an exponential error model, and residual variability was captured by an additive/proportional error model. Twelve-hour concentrations (C12h ) were calculated from the model-derived elimination rate constant and 8-hour observed concentration. Simulated steady-state concentrations were analyzed by noncompartmental analysis. Target area under the curve (AUC0-12h ) and C12h were achieved in each cohort. For the pediatric formulations, geometric mean AUC0-12h values were 18.0-22.6 µM-hr across cohorts, and C12h values were 71-130 nM, with lower coefficients of variation versus the film-coated tablet. A 2-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately described raltegravir plasma PK in pediatric and adult patients. Weight was a covariate on clearance and central volume and was incorporated using allometric scaling. Raltegravir chewable tablets and oral granules exhibited PK parameters consistent with those from prior adult studies and older children in P1066, as well as lower variability than the film-coated tablet.

Long-term safety and efficacy of atazanavir-based therapy in HIV-infected infants, children and adolescents: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 1020A.

BACKGROUND: Atazanavir (ATV) is an attractive option for the treatment of Pediatric HIV infection, based on once-daily dosing and the availability of a formulation appropriate for younger children. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 1020A was a phase I/II open label study of ATV (with/without ritonavir [RTV] boosting)-based treatment of HIV-infected children; here we report the long-term safety and virologic and immunologic responses. METHODS: Antiretroviral-naïve and experienced children, ages 91 days to 21 years, with baseline plasma HIV RNA > 5000 copies/mL (cpm) were enrolled at sites in the United States and South Africa. RESULTS: Of 195 children enrolled, 142 (73%) subjects received ATV-based regimens at the final protocol recommended dose; 58% were treatment naive. Overall, at week 24, 84/139 subjects (60.4%) and at week 48, 83/142 (58.5%) had HIV RNA ≤ 400 cpm. At week 48, 69.5% of naïve and 43.3% of experienced subjects had HIV RNA ≤ 400 cpm; median CD4 increase was 196.5 cells/mm. The primary adverse event (AE) was increased serum bilirubin; 9% of subjects had levels ≥ 5.1 times upper limit of normal (ULN) and 1.4% noted jaundice. Three percent of subjects experienced grade 2 or 3 prolongation in PR or QTc intervals. At week 48, there was a 15% increase in total cholesterol (TC), with TC > 199 mg/dL increasing from 1% at baseline to 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of once-daily ATV, with/without RTV, was safe and well tolerated in children, with acceptable levels of viral suppression and CD4 count increase. The primary AE, as expected, was an increase in bilirubin levels.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and 48-week efficacy of oral raltegravir in HIV-1-infected children aged 2 through 18 years.

BACKGROUND: IMPAACT P1066 is a phase I/II open-label multicenter trial to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple raltegravir formulations in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected youth. METHODS: Dose selection for each cohort (I: 12 to <19 years; II: 6 to <12 years; and III: 2 to <6 years) was based on review of short-term safety (4 weeks) and intensive pharmacokinetic evaluation. Safety data through weeks 24 and 48, and grade ≥ 3 or serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The primary virologic endpoint was achieving HIV RNA <400 copies/mL or ≥ 1 log10 reduction between baseline and week 24. RESULTS: The targeted pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-12h and C12h) were achieved for each cohort, allowing dose selection for 2 formulations. Of 96 final dose subjects, there were 15 subjects with grade 3 or higher clinical AEs (1 subject with drug-related [DR] psychomotor hyperactivity and insomnia); 16 subjects with grade 3 or higher laboratory AEs (1 with DR transaminase elevation); 14 subjects with serious clinical AEs (1 with DR rash); and 1 subjects with serious laboratory AEs (1 with DR transaminase increased). There were no discontinuations due to AEs and no DR deaths. Favorable virologic responses at week 48 were observed in 79.1% of patients, with a mean CD4 increase of 156 cells/µL (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir as a film-coated tablet 400 mg twice daily (6 to <19 years, and ≥ 25 kg) and chewable tablet 6 mg/kg (maximum dose 300 mg) twice daily (2 to <12 years) was well tolerated and showed favorable virologic and immunologic responses. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00485264.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of tenofovir-based regimens in HIV-infected pediatric patients.

HIV-infected children are treated with tenofovir in combination with other, potentially interacting, antiretroviral agents. We report the pharmacokinetic parameters of tenofovir in combination with efavirenz, darunavir-ritonavir, or atazanavir-ritonavir in HIV-infected children. HIV-infected patients 8 to 18 years of age receiving a tenofovir (300 mg)-based regimen containing efavirenz (300 or 600 mg) once daily (group 1), darunavir (300 or 600 mg)-ritonavir (100 mg) twice daily (group 2), or atazanavir (150 to 400 mg)-ritonavir (100 mg) once daily (group 3) were enrolled. Plasma samples were collected over a 24-h time interval. The 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of the geometric means for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the minimum concentration of drug in serum (C(min)) of each antiretroviral were computed and checked for overlap with intervals bracketing published values obtained in adult or pediatric studies demonstrating safety and/or efficacy. Group 1 efavirenz plasma concentrations were observed to be higher in patients receiving fixed-dose combination tablets compared with subjects receiving the individual formulation. In group 2, tenofovir and darunavir exposure was observed to be lower than expected. In group 3, tenofovir and atazanavir administered concomitantly produced exposures similar to those published for adult patients. The 90% CI of AUC and C(min) for tenofovir overlapped the target range for all combinations. Informal comparisons of treatment groups did not indicate any advantage to any combination with respect to tenofovir exposure. Further study of exposures achieved with antiretrovirals administered in combination is warranted.

Atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected infants, children, and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV) and ritonavir-boosted ATV (ATV/r) in children aged 91 days to 21 years. DESIGN: A phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study of once-daily ATV and ATV/r as part of combination antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected treatment-experienced and treatment-naive children. SETTING: Sites in the United States and South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety-five children enrolled; 172 had evaluable ATV pharmacokinetics on day 7. INTERVENTION: Children were entered in age, dose, and formulation (powder or capsule) cohorts. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling occurred 7 days after starting ATV. ATV doses were increased or decreased if the 24-h area under the concentration time curves (AUC0-24hr) were less than 30 or more than 90 µg × h/ml, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES: Cohorts satisfied protocol-defined pharmacokinetic criteria if the median ATV AUC0-24hr was 60 µg × h/ml or less, and AUC0-24hr and ATV concentrations 24-h postdose (C24) were more than 30 µg × h/ml and at least 60 ng/ml, respectively, in at least 80% of the children, with no individual AUC0-24hr less than 15 µg × h/ml. RESULTS: Unboosted ATV capsules satisfied pharmacokinetic criteria at a dose of 520 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 13 years or less and 620 mg/m for those aged more than 13 to 21 years or less. ATV/r capsules satisfied criteria at a dose of 205 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 21 years or less. ATV/r powder satisfied criteria at a dose of 310 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 13 years or less, but pharmacokinetics in those aged 2 years or less were highly variable. CONCLUSION: Body surface area-determined doses of ATV capsules and of ATV/r powder and capsules provide ATV exposures in children of more than 2 years that approximate concentrations in adults receiving ATV/r.