Impact of Neighborhood Deprivation and Social Vulnerability on Outcomes and Interventions in Patients with Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether neighborhood disadvantage impacts length of follow-up, interventions, and outcomes for patients with cleft palate. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Cleft Palate Craniofacial Institute Database at St. Louis Children's Hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cleft palate following in St. Louis Children's Hospital Cleft Palate Multidisciplinary Team Clinic. INTERVENTIONS: Primary palatoplasty between 2012-2017. Patients were divided into quartiles across area deprivation index (ADI) and social vulnerability index (SVI), two validated, composite metrics of neighborhood disadvantage, to examine whether living in neighborhoods from different deprivation quartiles impacts outcomes of interest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Follow-up through age 5, surgeries and surgical complications, speech, developmental, and behavioral outcomes. RESULTS: 205 patients were included. 39% of patients belonged to the most deprived ADI quartile, while 15% belonged to the most vulnerable SVI quartile. There were no differences between ADI or SVI quartiles in number of operations received (p ≥ 0.40). Patients in the most deprived ADI quartile were significantly more likely to have speech/language concerns (OR 2.32, 95% CI [1.20-4.89], p = 0.01). Being in a more vulnerable SVI quartile was associated with developmental delay (OR 2.29, 95% CI [1.04-5.15], p = 0.04). ADI and SVI quartile did not impact risk of loss to follow-up in the isolated and combined cleft lip and palate subgroups (p ≥ 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood disadvantage impacts speech and developmental outcomes in patients with cleft palate despite comparable length of follow-up in multidisciplinary team clinic.

Impact of a Palatal Fistula After Cleft Palate Repair on Velopharyngeal Closure.

PURPOSE: A palatal fistula is an adverse outcome of cleft palate repair. It is unknown if a palatal fistula will influence velopharyngeal closure, even after repair of the fistula. This study determines the effect of a soft palate fistula on the risk of developing velopharyngeal insufficiency. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 2000 and 2015, with complete records at 4 years of age. Fistulae involving the secondary palate following primary palatoplasty were classified as the soft or hard palate. A forced-entry multivariate logistic regression model was built to detect predictors of velopharyngeal dysfunction. RESULTS: Records of 329 patients were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. A palatal fistula was identified in 89/329 patients (27%) and 29/329 patients (9%) underwent an independent fistula repair. Of the patients with fistula, 44% were located in the hard palate only and 56% had soft palate involvement. Compared to patients without a fistula, rates of velopharyngeal dysfunction were significantly higher in patients with a fistula involving the soft palate (OR 3.875, CI: 1.964-7.648, P < .001) but not in patients with a hard palate fistula (OR 1.140, CI: 0.497-2.613, P = .757). Veau class, age at primary repair, and syndromic status were not significant predictors of VPI (0.128≤P ≤ .975). CONCLUSIONS: A palatal fistula involving the soft palate is a significant predictor for development of velopharyngeal dysfunction after primary palatoplasty. Surgical intervention, at the time of fistula repair, to add vascularized tissue may be indicated to prophylactically decrease the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Using "Real-World Data" to Study Cleft Lip/Palate Care: An Exploration of Speech Outcomes from a Multi-Center US Learning Health Network.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a cleft-specific multi-site learning health network registry to describe variations in cleft outcomes by cleft phenotypes, ages, and treatment centers. Observed variations were assessed for coherence with prior study findings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data from 2019-2022. SETTING: Six cleft treatment centers collected data systematically during routine clinic appointments according to a standardized protocol. PARTICIPANTS: 714 English-speaking children and adolescents with non-syndromic cleft lip/palate. INTERVENTION: Routine multidisciplinary care and systematic outcomes measurement by cleft teams. OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech outcomes included articulatory accuracy measured by Percent Consonants Correct (PCC), velopharyngeal function measured by Velopharyngeal Competence (VPC) Rating Scale (VPC-R), intelligibility measured by caregiver-reported Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS), and two CLEFT-Q™ surveys, in which patients rate their own speech function and level of speech distress. RESULTS: 12year-olds exhibited high median PCC scores (91-100%), high frequency of velopharyngeal competency (62.50-100%), and high median Speech Function (80-91) relative to younger peers parsed by phenotype. Patients with bilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate reported low PCC scores (51-91%) relative to peers at some ages and low frequency of velopharyngeal competency (26.67%) at 5 years. ICS scores ranged from 3.93-5.0 for all ages and phenotypes. Speech Function and Speech Distress were similar across phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This exploration of speech outcomes demonstrates the current ability of the cleft-specific registry to support cleft research efforts as a source of "real-world" data. Further work is focused on developing robust methodology for hypothesis-driven research and causal inference.

Multidisciplinary Optimal Outcomes Reporting and Team Clinic Retention in Isolated Nonsyndromic Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal Outcomes Reporting was recently introduced to categorize outcomes after cleft palate repair. We seek to propose an expanded version of Optimal Outcomes Reporting and to determine if correlation exists between the expanded outcomes and persistence with team care follow-up through age 9. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Cleft team at large pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with isolated nonsyndromic cleft palate (n = 83) born from 2001-2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients who continued to present at age 5 or greater were assessed for optimal outcomes. Optimal outcomes were: surgery - no fistula or velopharyngeal insufficiency; otolaryngology - no obstructive sleep apnea or signs of chronic middle ear disease; audiology - no hearing loss; speech-language pathology - no assessed need for speech therapy. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients identified, 41 were assessed for optimal outcomes. Optimal outcome in any discipline was not associated with follow-up through age 9 (0.112 ≤ p ≤ 0.999). For all disciplines, the group with suboptimal outcomes had a higher proportion of patients from geographic areas in the most disadvantaged quartile of social vulnerability index, with the strongest association in the group with suboptimal speech outcome (OR 6.75, 95% CI 0.841-81.1). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal outcomes and retention in team clinic were not statistically significantly associated, but clinically relevant associations were found between patients in the most disadvantaged quartile of social vulnerability and their outcomes. A patient-centered approach, including caregiver education about long-term care for patients with cleft palate, would allow for enhanced resource utilization to improve retention for patients of concern.

Buccal Myomucosal Flap Repair for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) is the incomplete separation of the nasal and oral cavities during speech sound production that can persist following primary palatoplasty. Surgical technique used in management of VPD (palatal re-repair versus pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty) is often dictated by the preoperative velar closing ratio and closure pattern. Recently, buccal flaps have increased in popularity in management of VPD. Here, the authors investigate the effectiveness of buccal myomucosal flaps in the treatment of VPD. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing secondary palatoplasty with buccal flaps at a single center between 2016 and 2021. Preoperative and postoperative speech outcomes were compared. Speech assessments included perceptual examinations, graded on a four-point scale of hypernasality, and speech videofluoroscopy, from which the velar closing ratio was obtained. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients underwent buccal myomucosal flap procedures for VPD at a median of 7.1 years after primary palatoplasty. Patients had significantly increased velar closing postoperatively (95% versus 50%; P < 0.001) and improved speech scores ( P < 0.001). Three patients (12%) had continued hypernasality postoperatively. There were no occurrences of obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of VPD with buccal myomucosal flaps leads to improved speech outcomes without the risk of obstructive sleep apnea. Traditionally, palatal re-repair techniques have been used for smaller preoperative velopharyngeal gaps; however, the addition of buccal flaps allows for anatomical velar muscle correction for patients with a larger preoperative velopharyngeal gap. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Evaluation of Discipline-Specific Outcomes Through a Multidisciplinary Team Clinic for Patients With Isolated Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and timing of provider-specific interventions for children with isolated cleft palate. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study involving review of medical records. SETTING: Multidisciplinary team care clinic at a tertiary academic children's hospital between January 2000 and July 2019. PATIENTS: Patients with isolated nonsyndromic cleft palate seen by an American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved team; 138 children were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study outcomes included incidence of secondary velopharyngeal management, tympanostomy tube insertion, speech therapy, hearing loss, dental/orthodontic treatment, and psychology interventions. Provider-specific outcomes were calculated for patients at ages 0 to 3, 3 to 5, and >5 years. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 7.0 years (interquartile range: 3.3-11.8 years). At their last team assessment, 42% of patients still had conductive hearing loss. The rate of tympanostomy tube insertions not done alongside a palatoplasty was highest for ages 3 to 5 and dropped after new American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation guidelines in 2013 (P = .015); 54% of patients received speech-language therapy during follow-up. Palatoplasty, psychology, and dental/orthodontic treatment were all less common than speech or ENT treatment (P < .01). Secondary palatoplasty was performed in 31 patients (22%). Patients who received speech, dental/orthodontic, or psychology intervention followed up longer than those who did not (9.8 vs 2.1 years, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Half of the patients terminated team follow-up by age 7, suggesting that burden of care outweighed perceived benefits of continued follow-up for many families. These results can be used to adjust protocols for children with isolated cleft palate.

Morphologic Severity of Craniosynostosis: Implications for Speech and Neurodevelopment.

BACKGROUND: Single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) can be associated with neurodevelopmental deficits. We examined the correlation between morphologic severity and incidence of speech-language or psychological concerns. METHODS: In 62 patients (33 sagittal, 17 metopic, and 12 unicoronal), morphologic severity was determined via preoperative computed tomography (CT). Severity metrics for sagittal, metopic, and unicoronal synostosis were adjusted cephalic index (aCI), interfrontal angle (IFA), and anterior cranial fossa area ratio (ACFR), respectively. Speech-language and psychological concerns were assessed at age ≥4.5 years and defined as recommendation for therapy or monitoring. RESULTS: Mean assessment age was 5.7 years; 32% had a speech-language concern and 44% had a psychological concern; 44% had neither. Sagittal: Mean aCI of those with a speech-language concern (0.62) and those without (0.62) were equivalent (P = .580), as were mean aCI of those with a psychological concern (0.62) and those without (0.62; P = .572). Metopic: Mean IFA with (117.9) and without (125.2) a speech-language concern were equivalent (P = .326), as were mean IFA with (120.2) and without (123.2) a psychological concern (P = .711). Unicoronal: Mean ACFR with (0.65) and without (0.69) a psychological concern (P = .423) were equivalent. However, mean ACFR with (0.74) and without (0.63) a speech-language concern were not (P = .022*). Bivariate rank correlation showed significant association between morphologic severity and speech-language score only for unicoronal synostosis (ρ = .722; P = .008*). CONCLUSION: A significant portion of patients with SSC had speech-language or psychological concerns. We found no correlation between morphologic severity and incidence of speech-language or psychological concerns for patients with sagittal or metopic synostosis. Morphological severity did correlate with speech concerns in patients with unicoronal synostosis.

The Reliability of Visual Ratings of Velopharyngeal Physiology for Speech.

BACKGROUND: Analyze intrarater and interrater reliability for evaluating endoscopic images of velopharyngeal (VP) physiology. METHOD: Speakers produced 9 speech stimuli representing 4 stimulus types: sustained phonemes, repetitions of "puh," single words, and short phrases. The 37-speaker participants included 16 patients with VP dysfunction and 21 control participants. Five raters independently rated the video images for degree of VP opening, location of opening, and pattern of closure. Outcome measures included intrarater and interrater measures of reliability and the effects of raters and stimulus type on ratings. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was acceptable, and ratings were logically consistent. Fixed effects regression coefficients for the patient and the control groups showed that raters were a significant source of variability for degree of opening and pattern of closing. Stimulus type was not a significant source of variation for any metric for the controls, but stimulus type was a significant determinant for degree of opening for patients. The degree of opening was larger for sustained phonemes than for the other speech stimuli. Ratings for degree of opening were most similar for repeated "puh." CONCLUSIONS: Interrater reliability needs to be improved so that the assessment procedure produces more consistent findings among clinicians, thus strengthening our evidence base for this procedure. Interrater additional research is needed to understand how the stimulus affects ratings of VP physiology, to identify stimuli that yield the most useful clinical information, and to understand how training affects the ratings of VP physiology.

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Use Among Patients Followed by a Multidisciplinary Cleft and Craniofacial Team.

OBJECTIVE: To establish preliminary data describing the number of patients who visit a multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial team who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) supports. DESIGN: This retrospective study consisted of chart reviews for all patients who visited a single site's multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial team for 1 calendar year. SETTING: A single multidisciplinary craniofacial team at a tertiary teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 59.9% (n = 278) were male and 40.1% (n = 186) were female. RESULTS: Of the sample population, 6.9% (n = 32) were AAC users as they received AAC intervention in a therapeutic context, while 93.1% (n = 432) were not. The AAC group had a mean age of 5.1 years (standard deviation [SD]: 4.2) and was 68.8% (n = 22) male. The non-AAC group had a mean age of 6.3 (SD: 4.9) and was 59.3% (n = 256) male. Within the AAC group, 40.6% (n = 13) were found to have an identified syndromic diagnosis in comparison to 17.6% (n = 76) of the non-AAC group (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report the prevalence of AAC use among patients in the care of multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial teams. Our findings suggest that a subset of craniofacial team patients may have complex communication disorders that require AAC supports. Craniofacial teams should be aware of resources available for these patients so that the patients' communication needs are met in the hospital, in school, and in the community.

Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Team Clinic for Patients With Isolated Cleft Lip.

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidences of secondary lip and nose operations, otolaryngology procedures, speech-language therapy, neurodevelopmental concerns, and dental and orthodontic issues in children with isolated cleft lip to inform multidisciplinary cleft team protocols. SETTING: An American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved team at a tertiary academic children's hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated through longitudinal clinic visits by a multidisciplinary cleft palate and craniofacial team between January 2000 and June 2018. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Children with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft alveolus (n = 92). RESULTS: Median age at final team visit was 4.9 years (interquartile range: 2.4-8.2 years). Secondary plastic surgery procedures were most common between ages 3 and 5 (135 per 1000 person-years), and the majority of these procedures were minor lip revisions. The rate of tympanostomy tube insertion was highest before age 3 (122 per 1000 person-years). By their final team visit, 88% of patients had normal hearing and 11% had only slight to mild conductive hearing loss. No patients had speech errors attributable to lip abnormalities. Psychological interventions, learning disabilities, and dental or orthodontic concerns were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with isolated cleft lip may not require long-term, longitudinal evaluation by cleft team specialists. Cleft teams should develop limited follow-up protocols for these children to improve resource allocation and promote value-based care in this patient population.

Surgical, Speech, and Audiologic Outcomes in Patients With Orofacial Cleft and Van der Woude Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical, speech, and audiologic outcomes in patients with Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) and compare them to patients with nonsyndromic cleft palate with or without cleft lip (NS-CP ±â€ŠL) treated at the same institution. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A single children's hospital at a major academic institution. PATIENTS: The records of 18 patients with VWS who had been treated at a single institution from 1989 to 2017 have been retrospectively examined. Thirty-eight patients with NS-CP ±â€ŠL who were also treated at the same institution during that same time frame were selected to closely match sex and date of birth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, clinical, surgical, and speech pathology data were gathered from medical charts. RESULT: By age 4, 88% of subjects with VWS and 76% of subjects with NS-CP ±â€ŠL (P = 0.732) had been, or were actively involved in, speech therapy. By age 10, 100% of remaining subjects with VWS and 58% of remaining subjects with NS-CP ±â€ŠL remained involved in speech therapy (P = 0.027).About 33% of patients with VWS and 16% of patients with NS-CP ±â€ŠL had a secondary procedure for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) (P = 0.171). CONCLUSION: The VWS group had more than twice the rate of secondary procedures for VPD repair, and a higher rate of continuing involvement for speech therapy at age 10. No differences were found in the rate of participation in speech therapy at or by age 4.

Adult Quality of Life Post Cleft Palate Repair: A Comparison of Two Techniques.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 1989, the Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal published the first randomized prospective cleft surgery study, comparing the Kriens intravelar veloplasty (IVV) with a non-IVV 2-flap repair. Results in that and follow-up publications yielded no difference between the 2 groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. The subjects have now reached adulthood. This study was designed to ask: Is there any difference between the groups in the outcomes that multidisciplinary team care addresses: speech intelligibility, facial growth, breathing while awake and asleep, attainment of education, and long-term socioeconomic status? METHODS: Enrollees from the original published study were invited to participate in a survey. Subjects responded to questions about speech therapy and speech satisfaction, additional surgery, breathing patterns, sleep quality/sleep disorder, and dental occlusion. Demographic information, information on education level, profession, and socio-economic status were queried. Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare results. RESULTS: Forty-two of the original 200 patients (20 Kriens IVV and 19 non-IVV) chose to participate. Average age at survey was 25 ±â€Š3 years. Analysis yielded no difference between the 2 respondent groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. There were no differences in speech outcome and satisfaction (8 questions, 0.30 < P < 0.97), sleep concerns (3 questions, 0.16 < P < 0.39), and dental occlusion (P = 0.69). Equivalent proportions of the 2 groups had been in speech therapy (P = 0.22). There was no difference in education attainment of the 2 groups (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The original randomized prospective trial suggested that there was no difference between the 2 surgery types in need for secondary velopharyngeal management. This long-term survey study on the same group of patients suggests that in young adulthood, the 2 groups have similar outcomes in terms of education, career choice, speech satisfaction, dental occlusion, and sleep disorder.

An Innovative Collaborative Treatment Model: The Community-Based Speech-Language Pathologist and Cleft Palate Team.

PROBLEM: Children with cleft-related articulation disorders receive ineffectual or inappropriate speech therapy locally due to lack of training and a disconnect between the team and local speech-language pathologists. SOLUTION: A collaborative care program that is billable for the team allows the local speech-language pathologist to earn continuing education units and facilitates effective local speech therapy. This program is the first of its kind, according to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Continuing Education Board for Speech Pathology.

A Comparison of the Need for Speech Therapy After 2 Palatal Repair Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the levator musculature during cleft palate repair has been suggested to be important in long-term speech outcomes. In this study, we compare the need for postoperative speech therapy between 2 intravelar veloplasty techniques. METHODS: Chart review was performed for patients with nonsyndromic cleft palate who underwent either primary Kriens or overlapping intravelar veloplasty before 18 months of age. All subjects completed a follow-up visit at approximately 3 years of age. Data obtained included documentation of ongoing or recommended speech therapy at age 3 years and reasons for speech therapy, which were categorized as cleft-related and non-cleft-related by a speech-language pathologist. RESULTS: One surgeon performed all Kriens procedures (n = 81), and the senior author performed all overlapping procedures (n = 25). Mean age at surgery (Kriens = 13.5 ± 1.4 months; overlapping = 13.1 ± 1.5 months; P = 0.188) and age at 3-year follow-up (Kriens = 3.0 ± 0.5 years; overlapping = 2.8 ± 0.5 years; P = 0.148) were equivalent in both groups. Cleft severity by Veau classification (P = 0.626), prepalatoplasty pure tone averages, (P = 0.237), pure tone averages at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.636), and incidence of prematurity (P = 0.190) were also similar between the 2 groups. At 3 years of age, significantly fewer overlapping intravelar veloplasty patients required cleft-related speech therapy (Kriens = 47%; overlapping = 20%; P = 0.015). The proportions of patients requiring non-cleft-related speech therapy were equivalent (P = 0.906). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years of age, patients who received overlapping intravelar veloplasty were significantly less likely to need cleft-related speech therapy compared with patients who received Kriens intravelar veloplasty. Cleft severity, hearing loss, and prematurity at birth did not appear to explain the difference found in need for speech therapy.

Progressive Tightening of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Improves Velopharyngeal Dysfunction in Early Outcomes of Primary Palatoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Management of the levator veli palatini with intravelar veloplasty has been shown to improve speech resonance. The senior author has introduced a more aggressive procedure where the levator is separately dissected, overlapped, and tightened. This study compares resonance results from four levator management protocols: non-intravelar veloplasty, Kriens intravelar veloplasty, radical intravelar veloplasty, and overlapping intravelar veloplasty. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 252 patients who underwent primary palatoplasty with speech follow-up at 3 years of age. Velopharyngeal function was evaluated with perceptual speech examinations, and subjects were scored on a four-point scale (0 = normal resonance; 1 = occasional hypernasality/nasal emission/turbulence/grimacing, no further assessment warranted; 2 = mild hypernasality/intermittent nasal turbulence/grimacing, velopharyngeal imaging suggested; and 3 = severe hypernasality, surgical intervention recommended). Fisher's exact test was used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: A single surgeon performed all the non-intravelar veloplasty (n = 92), Kriens intravelar veloplasty (n = 103), and radical intravelar veloplasty (n = 31), whereas the senior author performed the overlapping intravelar veloplasty (n = 26). Cleft severity proportions were equivalent across the four methods (p = 0.28). Patients who underwent overlapping intravelar veloplasty demonstrated significantly better velopharyngeal function, and none required further imaging or secondary surgery compared with the other three procedures (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Speech resonance outcomes at 3 years of age are improved and need for secondary velopharyngeal dysfunction management is reduced with more aggressive levator dissection and reconstruction during primary one-stage palatoplasty. Results were best when the muscle was overlapped. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

The Furlow palatoplasty for velopharyngeal dysfunction: velopharyngeal changes, speech improvements, and where they intersect.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how Furlow palatoplasty changes velopharyngeal morphology and speech characteristics, as well as how the anatomical and clinical results might be related. We hypothesized that Furlow palatoplasty would result in measurable velar elongation, tightening of the genu angle, and retropositioning of the levator sling and that the achievement of these modifications might be associated with clinical speech improvement. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative videofluoroscopic and speech data. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 29 patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency in the setting of previous cleft palate repair or submucous cleft palate. INTERVENTIONS: Furlow palatoplasty for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency. OUTCOME MEASURES: Lateral videofluoroscopy and perceptual speech examination were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively in order to measure velopharyngeal dimensions and speech quality. We describe anatomical and speech changes associated with the Furlow palatoplasty and undertake an exploratory analysis of the relationship between surgical changes to the velopharynx and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Furlow palatoplasty results in significant velar elongation, increased acuity of the genu angle, and retropositioning of the levator sling. Postoperative speech improvement was identified on the three subscales of resonance, nasal emission, and stops/plosives. Speech improvement and the absence of need for reoperation were most consistently associated with tightening of the genu angle. CONCLUSIONS: Furlow palatoplasty lengthens the palate, while both tightening and retropositioning the levator sling. These changes reflect transverse recruitment of lateral velar tissues, along with transverse tightening and anterior release of the muscle fibers, respectively. Levator tightening is most consistently associated with improved speech outcomes.

Evaluation of two palate repair techniques for the surgical management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: The Furlow palatoplasty is commonly used for the correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft patients. An alternative procedure is introduced involving a single Z-plasty with overlapping intravelar veloplasty (Woo palatoplasty). This study compared the results of both techniques in the correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who had undergone secondary palatoplasty for the correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency. All nonsyndromic patients with imaging data were evaluated. Data elements included preoperative and postoperative velopharyngeal gap size and perceptual speech examination results. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects were included: 30 subjects had undergone Furlow palatoplasty and 22 underwent Woo palatoplasty. Overall, a larger proportion of Woo (95 percent) than Furlow subjects (63 percent) did not require secondary surgery (p = 0.005). However, mean presurgery closure was significantly different between groups (p = 0.042). For a more refined assessment, only those with 80 percent or greater preoperative closure were evaluated. Successful results were achieved in 67 percent (10 of 15) in Furlow and in 100 percent (19 of 19) in Woo. Again, this finding was significant (p = 0.005). Linear regression analysis suggested a significant effect of cleft type (ß = 2.3, p = 0.013) on closure after repair, with decreased closure in cases with isolated cleft palate. CONCLUSIONS: The Woo palatoplasty compared favorably with Furlow palatoplasty for correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency. The technique appears to be a viable alternative for palatal re-repair, especially in circumstances when Furlow palatoplasty cannot be performed. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Effects of aural atresia on speech development and learning: retrospective analysis from a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic.

IMPORTANCE Aural atresia (AA) is associated with maximal conductive hearing loss in affected ears, and children with bilateral AA require amplification. Some recent research has suggested an increased risk for speech and learning problems among children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether increased risk for speech and learning problems exists among children with AA. DESIGN Retrospective medical record review. SETTING Multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic. PARTICIPANTS Children with unilateral or bilateral AA. INTERVENTIONS Records review, including evaluations by audiologists, speech pathologists, and psychologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of speech and/or language delay, prevalence of speech therapy and educational interventions, and parental report of psychosocial problems. RESULTS A total of 74 patients were identified who met inclusion and exclusion criteria: 48 with right-sided AA, 19 with left-sided AA, and 7 with bilateral AA. Children with AA demonstrated high rates of speech therapy (86% among bilateral, 43% among unilateral). Reports of school problems were more common among children with right-sided AA (31%) than those with left-sided AA (11%) or bilateral AA (0%) (P = .06). Educational interventions were common in all groups (33% right, 21% left, 43% bilateral). In the case of bilateral AA, all children who received additional interventions were enrolled in schools for the hearing impaired, without any identified learning deficiencies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Children with unilateral AA may be at greater risk of speech and learning difficulties than previously appreciated, similar to children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Whether amplification may alleviate this risk is unclear and warrants further study.

Videofluoroscopic and nasendoscopic correlates of speech in velopharyngeal dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare videonasendoscopy, lateral videofluoroscopy, and perceptual speech examination in the assessment of velopharyngeal dysfunction. DESIGN: Retrospective observational. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft palate team at a tertiary academic institution. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients who had undergone videonasendoscopy and lateral videofluoroscopy for suspected velopharyngeal dysfunction at our center were evaluated. Inclusion required that videonasendoscopy, lateral videofluoroscopy, and the perceptual speech exam were performed on the same day. A total of 88 patients were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures included percent closure on videonasendoscopy, percent closure on lateral videofluoroscopy, and quantitative scores for hypernasal resonance, nasal emission, and facial grimace. Additional outcome measures included linear and angular anatomic measurements obtained from lateral videofluoroscopy. RESULTS: Moderately strong correlation was found between closure estimates of videonasendoscopy and lateral videofluoroscopy (ρ = .583; p < .001). Lateral videofluoroscopy estimates of closure averaged 11.7% higher than videonasendoscopy. Closure correlated moderately with overall speech severity (ρ = .304; p = .005); whereas, a stronger correlation was seen with hypernasal resonance (ρ = -.479; p < .001). Patients exhibiting grimace had worse closure than those without (79.1% versus 70.7%; p = .035). Movement angle of the velum and change in genu angle correlated significantly with closure function (ρ = -.304; p = .034 and ρ = -.395; p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Videonasendoscopy and lateral videofluoroscopy closure estimates correlated moderately. Lateral videofluoroscopy tended to give smaller gap estimates. Hypernasal resonance and facial grimace are useful clinical indicators of large gap size. Velar movement angle and change in genu angle were identified as anatomical correlates of closure function.

Current training and continuing education needs of preschool and school-based speech-language pathologists regarding children with cleft lip/palate.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to obtain information regarding the education and experience of preschool and school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) regarding the assessment and treatment of children born with cleft lip and/or palate and to determine their continuing education needs in this area. METHOD: A 16-item mixed-methods survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data was distributed via postal mail to a geographically diverse random sample of 565 preschool and school SLPs. RESULTS: The response rate was 59%. With an average of 15.93 years in practice, respondents reported that they infrequently saw children with cleft lip/palate. When treating these children, respondents wanted communication with the cleft-craniofacial team, accessible continuing education through Web sites and conferences, and clinically practical information relevant to the school setting. CONCLUSION: When assessing and treating a low-incidence population such as children with cleft-related communication disorders, school-based SLPs need accessible, accurate continuing education resources and collaboration with specialists in the field.