Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Células Gigantes , Polimialgia Reumática , Síndrome de Sjögren , Humanos , Polimialgia Reumática/complicaciones , Polimialgia Reumática/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Sjögren/complicaciones , Síndrome de Sjögren/diagnóstico , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Whether patients with osteoporosis should be screened for celiac disease is controversial. The objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of asymptomatic celiac disease in a cohort of patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: We studied 140 patients (133 postmenopausal women and 7 men) aged 40-75 years (mean age, 62.9+/-9.4 years) with primary osteoporosis diagnosed by absorptiometry (spine or hip T-score <-2.5SD). We routinely measured serum and urinary calcium, serum phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, 25-OH-vitamin D3, and IgG and IgA antigliadin antibodies. Patients with positive antigliadin antibody tests were tested for antitransglutaminase antibodies. RESULTS: A history of fractures were noted in 52 (37%) patients, with 57 peripheral and 54 vertebral fractures overall. Vitamin D deficiency was found in 60 (43%) patients. IgG antigliadin antibodies were positive in 11 (8%) patients, IgA antigliadin antibodies in 11 (8%) patients, and both antibodies in 4 (3%) patients. Antitransglutaminase antibodies were negative in all patients. No significant differences in laboratory test or absorptiometry results were found between patients with versus without IgA antigliadin antibodies. The T-score at the spine was nonsignificantly lower in patients with than without IgG antigliadin antibodies (-3.17+/-0.49 and -2.82+/-0.77, P=0.076). CONCLUSION: We found no excess risk of celiac disease in our cohort of patients with osteoporosis. Despite the small sample size, our results cast doubt on the need for celiac-disease screening in osteoporotic patients who have no gastrointestinal symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Celíaca/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad Celíaca/sangre , Enfermedad Celíaca/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Gliadina/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/inmunología , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/sangre , Osteoporosis/complicacionesAsunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Autoinmunidad/fisiología , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/inmunología , Esclerosis Múltiple/fisiopatología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Few prospective placebo-controlled studies have evaluated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of peripheral psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate second-line treatments used in clinical practice in patients with psoriatic arthritis. METHOD: We studied a cross-section of 100 consecutive patients seen by hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists for psoriatic arthritis. PATIENTS: The 55 men and 45 women had a mean age of 48 years (range, 17-79 years) and a mean disease duration of 7 years (range, 1-24 years). RESULTS: The most commonly used DMARDs were sulfasalazine, gold, methotrexate, and hydroxychloroquine (64, 43, 41 et 17 patients, respectively). These drugs had been stopped because of inefficacy in 31%, 31%, 12%, and 53% of patients, respectively, and because of adverse events in 23%, 44%, 22%, and 41% of patients, respectively. At the time of the study, mean treatment durations were 15, 21, 34, and 12 months, respectively, and the drugs were still being used in 45%, 21%, 66%, and 6% of patients. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the value of methotrexate and salazopyrine. Methotrexate had the best risk/benefit ratio. Gold was often responsible for side effects. Hydroxychloroquine was inadequately effective and poorly tolerated.