The coronavirus disease clavicle study: a predictor of future trauma trends.

Background: Clavicle fractures are a common presentation to the emergency department after falls and sporting injuries. During 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought with it a long period of social isolation, resulting in a change of behavior patterns and, in return, the presentation of fractures to our local hospitals. The effects of this global pandemic on the presentation and management of clavicles were noted with particular interest to the change in mechanism and its future implications. Methods: We performed a longitudinal observational study in 10 hospitals in the North West of England, reviewing all patients presenting with a clavicle fracture during 6 weeks in the first peak of COVID-19 pandemic and compared these with the same period in 2019. Collection points included the patient demographics, fracture characteristics, mechanism of injury, and management. Results: A total of 427 clavicle fractures were assessed with lower numbers of patients presenting with a clavicle fracture during the COVID-2020 period (n = 177) compared with 2019 (n = 250). Cycling-related clavicle fractures increased 3-fold during the pandemic compared with the 2019 control group. We also noted an overall increase in clavicle fractures resulting from higher energy trauma as opposed to low energy or fragility fracture. We also found a faster time to surgery in the COVID cohort by 2.7 days on average when compared with 2019. Conclusions: Government restrictions and the encouragement of social distancing led to behavioral changes with a vast increase in cyclists on the road. This created a significant rise in clavicle fractures related to this activity. This is likely to be further driven by the government pledge to double cyclists on the road by 2025 in the United Kingdom. We forecast that this increase in cyclists, a behavior change accelerated by the pandemic, is a reliable predictor for future trauma trends.

Using Fracture Patterns and Planned Operative Modality to Identify Fractured Neck of Femur Patients at High Risk of Blood Transfusion.

Background Fractured neck of femurs is common, serious injuries usually requiring operative management. Red blood cell transfusions are often required to treat perioperative anaemia, but these are not without adverse effects. Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to identify subgroups of fractured neck of femur patients more likely to require red blood cell transfusions. We try to identify targeted strategies to reduce blood transfusion-associated adverse effects and thus improve outcomes. Design and methods A retrospective cohort study of 324 patients. Patients were divided into cohorts based on radiological fracture patterns and operations performed. Data were collected from patient records, picture archiving and communication systems, the local transfusion laboratory, and the national hip fracture database. The primary outcome was blood transfusion rates in different fracture patterns in fractured necks of femur patients. The secondary outcome was blood transfusion rates in different operation types for fractured neck of femur patients. Chi-squared tests for independence were performed. Results 14.9%, 34.7% and 33.3% of patients with intracapsular, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, respectively, received blood transfusions. There was a significant relationship between fracture pattern and blood transfusion (X 2 (2, N = 324) = 17.1687, p = 0.000187). 47% of patients receiving long intramedullary nails, 45% of short intramedullary nails, 27% of open reduction internal fixations, 18% of hemiarthroplasties and 9% of total hip arthroplasties resulted in blood transfusions. There was a significant relationship between operative modality and blood transfusion (X 2 (4, N = 302) = 22.0184, p = 0.000199). Conclusion In patients who have sustained a fractured neck of the femur, the fracture pattern and operative modality are both independently associated with the rates of red blood cell transfusion. In these identified groups, we propose that increased vigilance and awareness regarding transfusion avoiding strategies are utilised with the goal of improving patient outcomes.