Volumetric measurements of weak current-induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution.

PURPOSE: Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. METHODS: A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo-based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. RESULTS: Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the ∆ B z , c $$ \Delta {B}_{z,c} $$ and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. CONCLUSION: Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.

On the reconstruction of magnetic resonance current density images of the human brain: Pitfalls and perspectives.

Magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) of the human brain aims to reconstruct the current density distribution caused by transcranial electric stimulation from MR-based measurements of the current-induced magnetic fields. So far, the MRCDI data acquisition achieves only a low signal-to-noise ratio, does not provide a full volume coverage and lacks data from the scalp and skull regions. In addition, it is only sensitive to the component of the current-induced magnetic field parallel to the scanner field. The reconstruction problem thus involves coping with noisy and incomplete data, which makes it mathematically challenging. Most existing reconstruction methods have been validated using simulation studies and measurements in phantoms with simplified geometries. Only one reconstruction method, the projected current density algorithm, has been applied to human in-vivo data so far, however resulting in blurred current density estimates even when applied to noise-free simulated data. We analyze the underlying causes for the limited performance of the projected current density algorithm when applied to human brain data. In addition, we compare it with an approach that relies on the optimization of the conductivities of a small number of tissue compartments of anatomically detailed head models reconstructed from structural MR data. Both for simulated ground truth data and human in-vivo MRCDI data, our results indicate that the estimation of current densities benefits more from using a personalized volume conductor model than from applying the projected current density algorithm. In particular, we introduce a hierarchical statistical testing approach as a principled way to test and compare the quality of reconstructed current density images that accounts for the limited signal-to-noise ratio of the human in-vivo MRCDI data and the fact that the ground truth of the current density is unknown for measured data. Our results indicate that the statistical testing approach constitutes a valuable framework for the further development of accurate volume conductor models of the head. Our findings also highlight the importance of tailoring the reconstruction approaches to the quality and specific properties of the available data.

Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance current-density imaging (MRCDI) combines MRI with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES; 1-2 mA) to map current flow in the brain. However, usage of MRCDI is still hampered by low measurement sensitivity and image quality. METHODS: Recently, a multigradient-echo-based MRCDI approach has been introduced that presently has the best-documented efficiency. This MRCDI approach has now been advanced in three directions and has been validated by phantom and in vivo experiments. First, the importance of optimum spoiling for brain imaging was verified. Second, the sensitivity and spatial resolution were improved by using acquisition weighting. Third, navigators were added as a quality control measure for tracking physiological noise. Combining these advancements, the optimized MRCDI method was tested by using 1 mA TES for two different injection profiles. RESULTS: For a session duration of 4:20 min, the new MRCDI method was able to detect TES-induced magnetic fields at a sensitivity level of 84 picotesla, representing a twofold efficiency increase against our original method. A comparison between measurements and simulations based on personalized head models showed a consistent increase in the coefficient of determination of ΔR2 = 0.12 for the current-induced magnetic fields and ΔR2 = 0.22 for the current flow reconstructions. Interestingly, some of the simulations still clearly deviated from the measurements despite the strongly improved measurement quality. This highlights the utility of MRCDI to improve head models for TES simulations. CONCLUSION: The achieved sensitivity improvement is an important step from proof-of-concept studies toward a broader application of MRCDI in clinical and basic neuroscience research.

Safety evaluation of a new setup for transcranial electric stimulation during magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial electric stimulation during MR imaging can introduce safety issues due to coupling of the RF field with the stimulation electrodes and leads. OBJECTIVE: To optimize the stimulation setup for MR current density imaging (MRCDI) and increase maximum stimulation current, a new low-conductivity (σ = 29.4 S/m) lead wire is designed and tested. METHOD: The antenna effect was simulated to investigate the effect of lead conductivity. Subsequently, specific absorption rate (SAR) simulations for realistic lead configurations with low-conductivity leads and two electrode types were performed at 128 MHz and 298 MHz being the Larmor frequencies of protons at 3T and 7T. Temperature measurements were performed during MRI using high power deposition sequences to ensure that the electrodes comply with MRI temperature regulations. RESULTS: The antenna effect was found for copper leads at » RF wavelength and could be reliably eliminated using low-conductivity leads. Realistic lead configurations increased the head SAR and the local head SAR at the electrodes only minimally. The highest temperatures were measured on the rings of center-surround electrodes, while circular electrodes showed little heating. No temperature increase above the safety limit of 39 °C was observed. CONCLUSION: Coupling to the RF field can be reliably prevented by low-conductivity leads, enabling cable paths optimal for MRCDI. Compared to commercial copper leads with safety resistors, the low-conductivity leads had lower total impedance, enabling the application of higher currents without changing stimulator design. Attention must be paid to electrode pads.