Cerebral palsy research network community registry adult surveys on function & pain: Successes, challenges, and future directions.

NARRATIVE SUMMARY: The formation of a patient-reported outcomes registry to provide information about functional changes and pain among adults with cerebral palsy (CP) was identified as a priority to address the gap in knowledge and practice about aging and CP. The Cerebral Palsy Research Network collaborated with consumers, clinicians, and researchers to create an interactive internet platform, MyCP, to host a Community Registry. MyCP also provides educational programming, access to webinars and community forums, and fitness opportunities. The registry hosts surveys on function and pain for adults with CP, which provide cross-sectional and longitudinal data about these important issues. Surveys include previously validated measures with normative values that have been used with other populations and investigator developed questions. Enrollment in the registry is growing but needs to reflect the population of adults with CP, which limits generalizability. Future initiatives involve strategies to increase consumer engagement and enrollment.

The critical need to accelerate cerebral palsy research with consumer engagement, global networks, and adaptive designs.

The prevalence of cerebral palsy (CP) varies globally, with higher rates and burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries. CP is a lifelong condition with no cure, presenting diverse challenges such as motor impairment, epilepsy, and mental health disorders. Research progress has been made but more is needed, especially given consumer demands for faster advancements and improvements in the scientific evidence base for interventions. This paper explores three strategies to accelerate CP research: consumer engagement, global clinical trial networks, and adaptive designs. Consumer engagement involving individuals with lived experience enhances research outcomes. Global clinical trial networks provide efficiency through larger and more diverse participant pools. Adaptive designs, unlike traditional randomized controlled trials, allow real-time modifications based on interim analyses, potentially answering complex questions more efficiently. The establishment of a CP Global Clinical Trials Network, integrating consumer engagement, global collaboration, and adaptive designs, marks a paradigm shift. The Network aims to address consumer-set research priorities. While challenges like ethical considerations and capacity building exist, the potential benefits for consumers, clinicians, researchers, and funding bodies are substantial. This paper underscores the urgency of transforming CP research methodologies for quicker translation of novel treatments into clinical practice to improve quality of life for those with CP.

Adults with cerebral palsy and functional decline: A cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported outcomes from a novel North American registry.

BACKGROUND: Adults with cerebral palsy (CP) have unique healthcare needs and risks, including high risk of functional decline. Understanding functional decline is an area of priority for CP research. OBJECTIVE: Describe factors associated with patient-reported changes in function among adults with CP living in the community. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of adult patient-reported outcomes collected by the CP Research Network (CPRN) Community Registry. RESULTS: Participants included 263 respondents (76% female (n = 200); mean age 42 years (SD 14); 95% White (n = 249); 92% non-Hispanic (n = 241)). Many reported functional changes, most commonly a decline in gross motor function since childhood (n = 158, 60%). Prevalence of gross motor decline varied significantly by Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level (p < 0.001), but neither hand function decline (p = 0.196) nor communication decline (p = 0.994) differed by GMFCS. All types of decline increased with increasing age, with statistically significant differences between age groups (p < 0.001 gross motor; p = 0.003 hand function; p = 0.004 communication). Those with spastic CP (n = 178) most commonly reported gross motor functional decline (n = 108/178, 60.7%). However, the prevalence of gross motor decline did not significantly differ between those with spastic CP and those without spastic CP (p = 0.789). CONCLUSIONS: Many adults in the CPRN Community Registry reported functional decline, most commonly in gross motor function. Functional decline across domains increased with age. Further research into risk stratification and preventive and rehabilitative measures is needed to address functional decline across the lifespan.

Adults with cerebral palsy and chronic pain experience: A cross-sectional analysis of patient-reported outcomes from a novel North American registry.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common among adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and an area of priority for research and treatment. OBJECTIVE: Describe the pain experience and its functional and quality of life impact among adults with CP with chronic pain in the community. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of adult patient-reported outcomes collected by the Cerebral Palsy Research Network Community Registry. RESULTS: Among all participants in the Community Registry, n = 205 reported having chronic pain, and 73 % of those (n = 149) completed the Chronic Pain Survey Bundle (75 % female; mean age 43 years (SD 14 years); 94 % White; 91 % non-Hispanic). Back and weight-bearing joints of lower extremities were most frequently reported as painful. There were no differences in average pain severity scores between varying GMFCS levels (H = 6.25, p = 0.18) and age groups (H = 3.20, p = 0.36). Several nonpharmacologic interventions were most frequently reported as beneficial. Participants with moderate to severe average pain scores (5-10) had higher levels of pain interference (p < 0.01) and depression (p < 0.01), and lower levels of satisfaction with social roles (p < 0.01) and lower extremity function (p < 0.01). Pain interference was significantly positively correlated with depression, and negatively correlated with upper and lower extremity function and satisfaction with social roles. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is experienced by adults with CP of varying ages and functional levels and is associated with several adverse quality of life and functional outcomes. Improved understanding of chronic pain in this population will facilitate the development and study of treatment interventions optimizing health, function, participation, and quality of life.

Uncertainties regarding cerebral palsy diagnosis: opportunities to operationalize the consensus definition.

Background and Objectives: Cerebral palsy (CP), the most common motor disability of childhood, is variably diagnosed. We hypothesized that child neurologists and neurodevelopmentalists, often on the frontlines of CP diagnosis in North America, harbor uncertainties regarding the practical application of the most recent CP consensus definition from 2006. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of child neurologists and neurodevelopmentalists at the 2022 Child Neurology Society Annual Meeting. Attendees were provided the 2006 CP consensus definition and asked whether they had any uncertainties about the practical application of the definition across four hypothetical clinical vignettes. Results: Of 230 attendees, 164 responded to the closing survey questions (71%). 145/164 (88%) expressed at least one uncertainty regarding the clinical application of the 2006 definition. Overwhelmingly, these areas of uncertainty focused on: 1) Age, both with regards to the minimum age of diagnosis and the maximum age of brain disturbance or motor symptom onset, (67/164, 41%), and 2) Interpretation of the term "non-progressive" (48/164, 29%). The vast majority of respondents (157/164, 96%) answered 'Yes' to the question: Do you think we should revise the 2006 consensus definition of CP? Discussion: We propose that the uncertainties we identified could be addressed by operationalizing the 2006 consensus definition to support a more uniform CP diagnosis. To address the most common CP diagnostic uncertainties we identified, we propose 3 points of clarification based on the available literature: 1) Motor symptoms/signs should be present by 2 years old; 2) CP can and should be diagnosed as early as possible, even if activity limitation is not yet present, if motor symptoms/signs can be reasonably predicted to yield activity limitation (e.g. by using standardized examination instruments, Brain MRI, and a suggestive clinical history); and 3) The clinical motor disability phenotype should be non-progressive through 5 years old. We anticipate that operationalizing the 2006 definition of CP in this manner could clarify the uncertainties we identified among child neurologists and neurodevelopmentalists and reduce the diagnostic variability that currently exists.

A multicenter initiative to reduce intrathecal baclofen pump surgical site infection: a Cerebral Palsy Research Network quality improvement project.

OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy is an effective treatment for spasticity and dystonia in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, ITB pump surgery is associated with one of the highest rates of surgical site infection (SSI) in medicine, leading to significant morbidity and expense. Surgical protocols have reduced the rate of SSI in children with other CNS implants, and single-center protocols have been effective in ITB surgery in pediatrics. The authors describe the first multicenter quality improvement (QI)-driven standardized protocol for ITB pump surgery in children with CP across the Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN), implemented with the aim of reducing ITB-associated SSI. METHODS: SSI was defined as a culture-positive infection, ITB pump system removal for suspected infection, or wound dehiscence with exposed hardware. Each center reported historical infection rates for at least 3 years before initiating the SSI protocol (preintervention phase). After initiation of a 13-step surgical protocol, a consecutive series of 130 patients undergoing 149 surgical procedures for ITB at four CPRN tertiary pediatric neurosurgery centers were prospectively enrolled at surgery during a 2-year study period (intervention phase). QI methodology was used, including development of a key driver diagram and tracking performance using run and control charts. The primary process measure goal was documented compliance with 80% of the protocol steps, and the primary outcome measure goal was a 20% reduction in 90-day infection rate. Patient characteristics were collected from the CPRN Research Electronic Data Capture registry, including age at surgery, BMI, Gross Motor Function Classification System level, and pattern of spasticity. RESULTS: The aggregated preintervention 90-day ITB SSI rate was 4.9% (223 procedures) between 2014 and 2017. During the intervention phase, 136 of 149 ITB surgeries performed met inclusion criteria for analysis. The mean documented compliance rate with protocol steps was 75%, and the 90-day infection rate was 4.4%, with an average of 42 days from index surgery to infection. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter QI initiative designed to reduce SSI in ITB surgery in children with CP. Ongoing enrollment and expansion of the protocol to other CPRN centers will facilitate identification of patient- and procedure-specific risk factors for SSI, and iterative plan-do-study-act cycles incorporating these data will further decrease the risk of SSI for ITB surgery in children.

Epilepsy and proxy-reported health-related quality of life in children and young people with non-ambulatory cerebral palsy.

AIM: To assess the association between epilepsy characteristics and proxy-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and young people with non-ambulatory cerebral palsy (CP) and seizures. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study of 164 children and young people (74 females, 90 males; mean age 10 years 6 months, range 2-21 years, SD 5 years 5 months). Caregivers completed the Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities (CPCHILD) in an outpatient setting. We utilized univariable linear regression and multivariable modeling to study relationships between variables and CPCHILD scores. RESULTS: Gross Motor Function Classification System levels were 37% IV and 63% V. Sociodemographic factors included the Child Opportunity Index (median 51, interquartile range [IQR] 25-80). A median of 2 (IQR 1-3) antiseizure medications (ASMs) were used, and days with seizures ranged from 0 (30%) to 28 (20%) days in the previous 4 weeks. Total CPCHILD scores decreased 2.3 points for each ASM (95% confidence interval [CI] -4.1 to -0.42). Compared to persons with focal epilepsy, those with generalized epilepsy had lower total CPCHILD scores (-5.7; 95% CI -11 to -0.55). Number of days with seizures was not associated with total CPCHILD scores. INTERPRETATION: Proxy-reported HRQoL was affected by epilepsy-specific features in children and young people with severe CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was lower with increasing numbers of antiseizure medications. Overall quality of life (QoL) scores were lower by a similar amount, independent of seizure frequency. HRQoL was lower in persons with recent hospital admissions for epilepsy.

Top 10 Research Themes for Dystonia in Cerebral Palsy: A Community-Driven Research Agenda.

Dystonia in cerebral palsy (DCP) is a common, debilitating, but understudied condition. The CP community (people with CP and caregivers) is uniquely equipped to help determine the research questions that best address their needs. We developed a community-driven DCP research agenda using the well-established James Lind Alliance methodology. CP community members, researchers, and clinicians were recruited through multiple advocacy, research, and professional organizations. To ensure shared baseline knowledge, participants watched webinars outlining our current knowledge on DCP prepared by a Steering Group of field experts (cprn.org/research-cp-dystonia-edition). Participants next submitted their remaining uncertainties about DCP. These were vetted by the Steering Group and consolidated to eliminate redundancy to generate a list of unique uncertainties, which were then prioritized by the participants. The top-prioritized uncertainties were aggregated into themes through iterative consensus-building discussions within the Steering Group. 166 webinar viewers generated 67 unique uncertainties. 29 uncertainties (17 generated by community members) were prioritized higher than their randomly matched pairs. These were coalesced into the following top 10 DCP research themes: (1) develop new treatments; (2) assess rehabilitation, psychological, and environmental management approaches; (3) compare effectiveness of current treatments; (4) improve diagnosis and severity assessments; (5) assess the effect of mixed tone (spasticity and dystonia) in outcomes and approaches; (6) assess predictors of treatment responsiveness; (7) identify pathophysiologic mechanisms; (8) characterize the natural history; (9) determine the best treatments for pain; and (10) increase family awareness. This community-driven research agenda reflects the concerns most important to the community, both in perception and in practice. We therefore encourage future DCP research to center around these themes. Furthermore, noting that community members (not clinicians or researchers) generated the majority of top-prioritized uncertainties, our results highlight the important contributions community members can make to research agendas, even beyond DCP.

Diagnostic preferences include discussion of etiology for adults with cerebral palsy and their caregivers.

AIM: To determine the views of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and their caregivers (CP community members) about carrying a CP diagnosis, an etiological diagnosis, or both diagnoses together. METHOD: We surveyed CP community members across two registries querying their views on carrying a CP diagnosis, one type of etiological diagnosis (specifically, a genetic diagnosis), or both. Open-ended responses were analyzed using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS: Of 197 respondents (108 adults with CP and 89 caregivers), most (75%) valued knowing the cause of their CP. Of those with a diagnostic preference, most preferred carrying both CP and etiological diagnoses together (68%). When compared with carrying an etiological diagnosis alone, significantly more respondents felt a CP diagnosis helped anticipate symptom evolution (84% vs 54%), explain symptoms to others (86% vs 48%), access services (86% vs 48%), and join support communities (78% vs 50%) (p <  0.01, χ2 test). INTERPRETATION: Most CP community members surveyed want to know the cause of their CP and would prefer carrying both CP and etiological diagnoses together. Clinical practice should evolve to meet these community needs.

Anterior versus posterior entry site for ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion: a randomized controlled trial by the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial was to determine if shunt entry site affects the risk of shunt failure. METHODS: The authors performed a parallel-design randomized controlled trial with an equal allocation of patients who received shunt placement via the anterior entry site and patients who received shunt placement via the posterior entry site. All patients were children with symptoms or signs of hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly. Patients were ineligible if they had a prior history of shunt insertion. Patients received a ventriculoperitoneal shunt after randomization; randomization was stratified by surgeon. The primary outcome was shunt failure. The planned minimum follow-up was 18 months. The trial was designed to achieve high power to detect a 10% or greater absolute difference in the shunt failure rate at 1 year. An independent, blinded adjudication committee determined eligibility and the primary outcome. The study was conducted by the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network. RESULTS: The study randomized 467 pediatric patients at 14 tertiary care pediatric hospitals in North America from April 2015 to January 2019. The adjudication committee, blinded to intervention, excluded 7 patients in each group for not meeting the study inclusion criteria. For the primary analysis, there were 229 patients in the posterior group and 224 patients in the anterior group. The median patient age was 1.3 months, and the most common etiologies of hydrocephalus were postintraventricular hemorrhage secondary to prematurity (32.7%), myelomeningocele (16.8%), and aqueductal stenosis (10.8%). There was no significant difference in the time to shunt failure between the entry sites (log-rank test, stratified by age < 6 months and ≥ 6 months; p = 0.061). The hazard ratio (HR) of a posterior shunt relative to an anterior shunt was calculated using a univariable Cox regression model and was nonsignificant (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.98-1.85; p = 0.062). No significant difference was found between entry sites for the surgery duration, number of ventricular catheter passes, ventricular catheter location, and hospital length of stay. There were no significant differences between entry sites for intraoperative complications, postoperative CSF leaks, pseudomeningoceles, shunt infections, skull fractures, postoperative seizures, new-onset epilepsy, or intracranial hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial comparing the anterior and posterior shunt entry sites has demonstrated no significant difference in the time to shunt failure. Anterior and posterior entry site surgeries were found to have similar outcomes and similar complication rates.

Establishing ranked priorities for future hydrocephalus research.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this initiative was to develop a ranked list of hydrocephalus research priorities as determined by the hydrocephalus patient community in conjunction with the healthcare and scientific community. METHODS: Using the validated methodology published by the James Lind Alliance (JLA), the Hydrocephalus Association (HA) administered two surveys and hosted a final prioritization workshop. Survey One solicited open-ended responses from the community. From these responses, a long list of priority statements was developed. This list was then consolidated into a short list of research priority statements, which, after a nonsystematic literature review, were verified as being research uncertainties. Survey Two asked the community members to select their top 10 priorities from the short list. The final prioritization leading to a final ranked top 20 list of hydrocephalus research priorities took place at a virtual workshop led by a team of trained facilitators, by means of an iterative process of consensus building. RESULTS: From Survey One, 3703 responses from 890 respondents were collected, leading to a long list of 146 priority statements. The consolidated short list contained 49 research priority statements, all of which were verified as uncertainties in hydrocephalus research. From an analysis of Survey Two responses, the top 21 research priority statements were determined. A consensus on these statements was reached at the virtual workshop, leading to a final ranked top 20 list of hydrocephalus research priorities, within which needs were apparent in several areas: development of noninvasive and/or one-time therapies, reduction of the burden of current treatments, improvement of the screening and diagnosis of hydrocephalus, improved quality of life, and improved access to care. CONCLUSIONS: By gathering extensive input from the hydrocephalus community and using an iterative process of consensus building, a ranked list of the top 20 hydrocephalus research priorities was developed. The HA will use this ranked list to guide future research programs and encourages the healthcare and scientific community to do the same.

The cerebral palsy research network: Building a learning health network for cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the growth of the Cerebral Palsy (CP) Research Network towards becoming a Learning Health Network in order to guide future development. METHODS: Thirteen CP Research Network leaders completed the Network Maturity Grid (NMG) which consists of six domains with eight to 10 components each. The six domains are Systems of Leadership, Governance and Management, Quality Improvement, Engagement and Community, Data and Analytics, and Research. Radar mapping was utilized to display mean scores on a 5-point ordinal scale (1 = not started to 5 = idealized state) across domains and for individual components within domains. Consensus was reached for top priorities for the next 3-5 years. RESULTS: Domain scores ranged from 2.4 in Quality Improvement to 3.2 in System of Leadership. The lowest scoring component was clinician clinical decision support and the highest was common purpose. The following priority areas of focus were agreed upon moving forward: development of leaders, financial sustainability, quality improvement education and training, patient reported data, data quality and validation, and primary data collection. CONCLUSION: Results from this project will be utilized for strategic planning to improve the network. Conducting regular self-assessments of the network with the NMG will be useful in achieving the network's ultimate goal to improve care and outcomes for individuals with CP.

Cerebral Palsy Research Network Clinical Registry: Methodology and Baseline Report.

OBJECTIVE: To apply practice-based evidence to clinical management of cerebral palsy (CP). The process of establishing purpose, structure, logistics, and elements of a multi-institutional registry and the baseline characteristics of initial enrollees are reported. DESIGN: A consensus-building process among consumers, clinicians, and researchers used a participatory action process. SETTING: Community, hospitals, and universities. PARTICIPANTS: More than 100 clinicians, researchers, and consumers and more than 1858 enrollees in the registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Consensus was that the purpose of registry was to (1) quantify practice variation, (2) facilitate quality improvement (QI), and (3) perform comparative effectiveness research (CER). Collecting data during routine clinical care using the electronic medical record was determined to be a sustainable plan for data acquisition and management. Clinicians from multiple disciplines defined salient characteristics of individuals and interventions for the registry elements. The registry was central to the clinical research network, and a leadership structure was created. A leading electronic health record platform adopted the registry elements. Twenty-four sites have initiated the data collection process and agreed to export data to the registry. Currently 12 are collecting data. Number of enrollees and characteristics were similar to other population registers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multi-institutional CP registry that contains the patient and treatment characteristics needed for QI and CER. The Cerebral Palsy Research Network registry elements are implemented in a versatile electronic platform and minimize burden to clinicians. The resultant registry is available for any institution to participate and is growing rapidly.

Registry-based Research in Cerebral Palsy: The Cerebral Palsy Research Network.

Registries are a powerful tool for clinical research. Clinical registries for cerebral palsy can aid in comparative effectiveness research, especially using the practice-based evidence model. The Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN) was initiated in 2014 as a patient-centered, multidisciplinary registry. The leadership group initiated a 4-stage participatory action research process: listen, reflect, plan/analyze, and take action. CPRN also joined with CP NOW, an advocacy group, to create a research agenda for cerebral palsy. With more than 20 centers and growing, CPRN hopes to generate evidence for developing best practices and measure their implementation and impact for individuals with cerebral palsy throughout North America.

Setting a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy: a participatory action research initiative.

AIM: To establish a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: We engaged a large cross-section of the extended community of people living with CP and those providing healthcare to people with CP ('the community') in an educational series and collaborative survey platform to establish an initial list of prioritized research ideas. After online workshops, a facilitated Delphi process was used to select the 20 highest priorities. Select participants attended an in-person workshop to provide comment and work toward consensus of research priorities. RESULTS: A research agenda for CP was developed by the community, which included consumers, clinicians, and researchers interested in advancing the established research agenda. The results included the top 16 research concepts produced by the process to shape and steward the research agenda, and an engaged cross-section of the community. INTERPRETATION: It has been shown that proactively engaging consumers with clinical researchers may provide more meaningful research for the community. This study suggests that future research should have more focus on interventions and outcomes across the lifespan with increased emphasis on the following outcome measures: function, quality of life, and participation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy was established. Comparative effectiveness of interventions, physical activity, and understanding ageing were leading themes. Longitudinal studies across the lifespan, clinical spectrum, and ages were highly ranked. Participants reported high value for participation outcomes. Participants reported great appreciation for the engagement between consumers and clinician researchers.

An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Item response theory has its origins in educational measurement and is now commonly applied in health-related measurement of latent traits, such as function and symptoms. This application is due in large part to gains in the precision of measurement attributable to item response theory and corresponding decreases in response burden, study costs, and study duration. The purpose of this paper is twofold: introduce basic concepts of item response theory and demonstrate this analytic approach in a worked example, a Rasch model (1PL) analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), a commonly used measure for oropharyngeal dysphagia. The results of the analysis were largely concordant with previous studies of the EAT-10 and illustrate for brain impairment clinicians and researchers how IRT analysis can yield greater precision of measurement.

Getting Started: A Call for Storytelling in Family Medicine Education.

BACKGROUND: In this article we introduce family medicine educators to storytelling as an important teaching tool. We describe how stories are a critical part of the work of family physicians. We review the rationales for family medicine educators to become skilled storytellers. We present the components of effective stories, proposing two different perspectives on how to imagine, construct, and present them. We provide a list of resources for getting started in storytelling and offer two personal vignettes that articulate the importance of storytelling in the authors' respective professional developments. We point the way forward for family medicine educators interested in integrating storytelling into their repertoire of teaching skills.

Report of a workshop on research gaps in the treatment of cerebral palsy.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is heterogeneous in etiology and manifestations, making research into relevant therapies difficult and limiting the generalizability of the results. We report here on the NIH CP symposium, where stakeholders from academic, clinical, regulatory, and advocacy backgrounds discussed the major challenges and needs for moving forward with clinical research in CP, and outlined priorities and action items. New information is constantly generated through research into pathogenesis and etiology. Clinical research and new therapeutic approaches need to keep pace, through large data registry integration and new research designs. Development of standardized data collection, increasing academic focus on CP research, and iterative approaches to treatment throughout the patients' lives, have all been identified as areas of focus. The workshop identified critical gaps and areas of focus to increase the evidence base for therapeutic approaches to determine which treatments work best for which patients in the near future. These include consolidation and optimization of databases and registries, updates to the research methodology, and better integration of resources and stakeholders.