Pancreatitis in a 57-Year-Old Female Two Weeks After Initiation of Empagliflozin.

Background/Objective: Pancreatitis is a common diagnosis requiring hospital admission, associated with significant costs. Although pancreatitis is an established side-effect with other diabetes medications, such as Glucagon like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 inhibitors, the association with SGLT2 inhibitors is not established. We present a patient with empagliflozin associated drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) and a review of published case reports. Case Report: A 57-year-old woman with T2DM presented to the hospital with severe abdominal pain. Her vital signs on presentation were temperature 98.3 F, blood pressure 139/79 mm Hg, pulse 62/min, and respiratory rate 15/min, saturating 99% on room air. Labs were notable for white blood cell count 12.8 (4.5-10.8 10∗3 µl), lipase- 36 (7-60 U/L), calcium- 9.4 (8.5-10.5 mg/dL), and triglycerides- 150 (35-150 mg/dL). Computed tomography abdomen showed induration of the peripancreatic fat, suggesting pancreatitis. No alcohol use was reported. DIAP and idiopathic pancreatitis were considered possible etiologies. Medication history revealed that the patient was started on empagliflozin 2 weeks before this admission. Empagliflozin was discontinued and she was discharged on metformin and glipizide. Discussion: Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) inhibitors are increasingly used for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure. The association of these medications with pancreatitis, its timeline, and the underlying mechanisms are yet to be understood. This case is intended to add to the existing limited literature on this side effect. Conclusions: With the increasing use of SGLT2 inhibitors, more cases of DIAP are being reported. Physicians need to consider SGLT2 inhibitors as a possible cause of pancreatitis after excluding other etiologies.

Enhancing Patient Literacy on Calcium Supplementation: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess patients' knowledge and identify barriers in interpreting calcium on supplement and nutrition labels and to determine whether education would be beneficial. METHODS: Patients with conditions requiring calcium supplementation were included in this study. Participants were first given a 9-question pre-education survey. They were then taught how to read calcium on labels using the educational cards developed. This was followed by a 7-question posteducation survey. Endocrinologists were surveyed to assess their experience in treating patients who required calcium supplementation. RESULTS: Before education, 31 (33%) and 37 (40%) of the participants felt that the supplement and nutrition labels, respectively, were confusing. After education, only 2 (2%) and 6 (6%) of the participants, respectively, still felt the same. There was a significant improvement in the interpretation of calcium citrate (Citracal) and calcium carbonate (TUMS) labels, with a trend of improvement in reading a milk label. Of the 47 endocrinologists surveyed, only 5 (11%) felt that their patients often or always knew the correct amount of calcium to be taken. Two-thirds 30 (64%) of the endocrinologists always or often explained to their patients how to interpret calcium labels. About half 23 (49%) of the endocrinologists always or often needed to take time to look up the calcium content of supplements. For most endocrinologists 29 (62%), this took at least 2 to 4 minutes. CONCLUSION: Our patients had trouble interpreting calcium labels, and the use of educational cards was effective in improving calcium literacy.

Monitoring Endocrine Complications of Immunotherapy: A Screening Tool.

Introduction The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy in recent years. Immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies against checkpoint molecules, including programmed death (PD)-1, PD ligand (PD-L)1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA)-4, has become a cornerstone in cancer therapy. However, due to the physiologic role of checkpoint molecules in preventing autoimmunity, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged as frequent complications. As the use of immunotherapy increases, a better understanding of irAEs and screening tools for timely diagnosis and management are needed. Materials and methods We surveyed oncology providers at our institution with 10 questions assessing their knowledge, and comfort levels in diagnosing and managing endocrine irAEs. We created an endocrine clinic referral order specifically for oncology-related endocrinopathies and created a screening tool for diagnosing these endocrinopathies. We met with our oncology providers in three different hour-long sessions. A post-intervention survey was sent out six months after our initial meeting to assess changes in the participants' knowledge and comfort levels. We also reviewed the electronic medical records system for the number of new referrals to endocrinology clinic. Results A total of 27 (N) participants responded to the initial survey and 14 (n) responded to the subsequent survey six months later. Based on the initial survey, only a minority (26%) of respondents were comfortable diagnosing and managing (15%) immunotherapy-related adrenal dysfunction whereas more respondents were comfortable diagnosing (55%) and managing (56%) thyroid dysfunction. The majority (67%) of the respondents knew which immunotherapies commonly are implicated in hypophysitis but only 42% of them were aware of the next steps of its management. We noted a significant increase in self-reported comfort levels in diagnosing (p < 0.05) and managing (p < 0.05) adrenal disorders post-intervention. There was also a trend of improvement in participants' comfort levels regarding diagnosing and managing thyroid dysfunction, management of hypophysitis, and immunotherapies implicated in thyroid dysfunction but the changes did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant change in their knowledge regarding immunotherapies implicated in hypophysitis and natural history of thyroid dysfunction in this setting. In the six months following our intervention, 30% (n=21) of the patients referred to the endocrine clinic were for immune-related endocrinopathies compared to 19% (n=7) of patients over a similar duration before the intervention. Data on the time between referral and endocrinology appointment was available for 16 out of the 21 patients and the mean (±SD) time to endocrine clinic appointment was 2.66 (±1.95) weeks. Nine (43%) of the 21 referred patients were seen in endocrinology clinic within two weeks. Conclusions Although immune-related endocrinopathies are rarely fatal, they have a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Endocrinopathies are typically manageable with prompt recognition and treatment. But the subtle and non-specific manifestations make the diagnostic process a challenge. Standardized and practical screening tools can help in diagnosing these adverse events promptly, seeking specialized care if needed and may also aid in reducing healthcare-related costs.

Predictors of Mortality in Hypercalcemia of Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Hypercalcemia is sometimes observed in patients with cirrhosis, but very little is known about the epidemiology in patients with hypercalcemia of chronic liver disease (HCLD) or how its presence may modulate the overall mortality risk. We assessed the associations between the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with HCLD with 90-day mortality. METHODS: A systematic search of the medical records at our institution over a 10-year period was performed to retrospectively identify subjects with HCLD during inpatient admission. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to detect the risk factors for all-cause 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects with HCLD were identified using stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria to exclude individuals with other secondary causes of hypercalcemia. A total of 35 subjects had 90-day vital status available, which revealed 40% mortality. The model for end-stage liver disease sodium score and duration of inpatient hypercalcemia were positively associated with mortality with respective odds ratios of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.06-3.23) and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.04-1.49) in a univariate regression model and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.04-1.62) and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.04-1.71) in a multivariable regression model. The admission and peak serum calcium levels were not associated with mortality. Only 6 subjects received bisphosphonates or calcitonin during their admission, limiting our ability to assess the impact of treatment on outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients admitted to the hospital with HCLD, the duration of hypercalcemia was positively associated with 90-day mortality, providing a potential interventional target to reduce mortality in this high-risk population. Studies to validate the utility of treating hypercalcemia are required.

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF GLUCOSTABILIZER IN THE MANAGEMENT OF DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of GlucoStabilizer software intravenous insulin (IV) dosing in comparison to American Diabetes Association protocol-directed provider-guided insulin dose adjustment (PGIA). Methods: GlucoStabilizer calculates the dose of IV insulin required to reach a prescribed target glucose range. GlucoStabilizer has not been fully studied in DKA. This retrospective study compared outcomes in patients with DKA before and after the implementation of GlucoStabilizer. Insulin doses were administered based on GlucoStabilizer calculations or PGIA. The analysis evaluated before-after changes in the amount of insulin used, time to target, hypoglycemia or hypokalemia events, and the time to DKA resolution. Results: We studied 77 patients with insulin doses calculated by GlucoStabilizer and 69 patients with PGIA dosing. GlucoStabilizer was superior to PGIA. Patients treated with GlucoStabilizer-calculated doses did not experience hypoglycemia (N = 0 versus N = 10; P<.001). The 10 unique PGIA patients had a total of 18 episodes with 17 between 55 to 69 mg/dL; 1 <54 mg/dL, and no episodes <40 mg/dL. The GlucoStabilizer group required less insulin to reach DKA resolution (59.2 versus 101.2 units; P<.001). Time to glycemic target and DKA resolution were similar (6.7 versus 4.6 hours; P = .132) and (9.8 versus 9.9 hours; P = .803), respectively. No difference in the incidence of hypokalemia was seen (N = 9 versus N = 11; P = .48). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the Gluco Stabilizer settings that can be successfully used in the management of DKA with the avoidance of hypoglycemia. Patients treated with GlucoStabilizer-calculated doses experienced no hypoglycemia and required less insulin as compared to those managed with PGIA. Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; ED = emergency department; eGMS = electronic glycemic management systems; ICU = intensive care unit; IV = intravenous; PGIA = protocol-directed provider-guided insulin dose adjustment.