What to Expect? Use of Supplemental Fixation With a Concomitant Dorsal Spanning Plate for Complex Intraarticular Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The dorsal spanning plate (DSP) is a versatile implant suitable for bridging severely comminuted intraarticular distal radius fractures [AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) 23-C.1-C.3]. It may be used alone or with supplemental fixation such as a volar locking plate (VLP) or fragment-specific fixation (FSF). Outcomes following DSP fixation with additional implants have not been specifically evaluated. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent internal fixation of a distal radius fracture by a single surgeon from 2017 to 2021. Patients were grouped according to implants used: DSP only, DSP + FSF, and DSP + VLP. Preoperative variables, treatment times, and wrist range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Functional wrist ROM was defined as minimum 80° combined flexion and extension. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients underwent surgery for wrist fracture, 33 of them were treated with a DSP: 8 DSP only, 6 DSP + VLP, and 19 DSP + FSF. Falls from height greater than 10 ft accounted for 52% of injuries, most of which were treated with a DSP + FSF. Treatment times and ROM were similar between subgroups. Wrist ROM did not improve significantly beyond 4 weeks following DSP removal. Overall, DSP patients recovered a mean wrist ROM of 85° (range 0°-130°) within a median 26 weeks total treatment period (range 12-68 weeks). CONCLUSION: Regardless of the construct used, if the distal radius articular surface is well reduced and other principles of fracture fixation are applied, most patients treated with a DSP can expect to regain functional wrist ROM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

Workplace Violence in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Survey of Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Membership.

INTRODUCTION: Workplace violence (WPV) in US health care is increasing, and many workers are likely to experience WPV during their careers. This study aims to assess the scope of WPV in orthopaedics. METHODS: A 20-item survey adopted from the World Health Organization's 'Workplace Violence in the Health Sector Country Case Studies Research Instruments Survey Questionnaire' was sent to Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons members, including residents and fellows. Deidentified responses were collected electronically over a 1-month period and assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 1,125 Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons members participated (5% response rate). Most respondents were male (86%) and identified with the majority ethnic group (80%). WPV of any type was reported by 77.1%. Verbal abuse was the most common type (71.6%), and patients were the most common perpetrators. WPV was most prevalent among traumatologists, tumor surgeons, female surgeons, and those with 0 to 15 years in practice. Female surgeons reported more WPV events per practice year (2.25 versus 0.65, P < 0.01) and increased likelihood of physical threats and physical assaults from coworkers ( P = 0.004). DISCUSSION: WPV in orthopaedic surgery is largely perpetrated by patients and directed toward traumatologists, tumor surgeons, female surgeons, and less experienced surgeons. These data can be used to address safety measures in the workplace.

The Hoffmann parallax: a prospective study to determine the benefit of Hoffmann's sign.

Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of age-related spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Despite the widespread use of provocative physical exam maneuvers in the workup of DCM, the clinical significance of Hoffmann's sign is controversial. Objective: The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of Hoffmann's sign for DCM in a cohort of patients treated by a single spine surgeon. Materials & Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of a Hoffmann sign on physical examination. Advanced imaging studies were independently reviewed by four raters for confirmation of a diagnosis of cervical cord compression. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and relative risk ratios for the Hoffmann sign were calculated, with subsequent Chi-square and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to further characterize correlative findings. Results: Fifty-two patients were included - of whom, thirty-four (58.6%) patients presented with a Hoffmann sign, and eleven (21.1%) patients demonstrated cord compression on imaging. The Hoffmann sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 35.7% (LR = 0.32; 0.16-1.16). Chi-square analysis revealed that imaging findings positive for cord compression were proportionally greater for patients lacking a Hoffmann sign than those with a confirmed Hoffmann sign (p =0.032) ROC analysis demonstrated that a negative Hoffmann sign performed moderately well in predicting cord compression (AUC.721; p =0.031). Conclusions: The Hoffmann sign is an unreliable marker for cervical cord compression, and the lack of a Hoffmann sign may be more predictive of cervical cord compression.

Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery Residencies Based on Allopathic Medical School Affiliation.

Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive and least diverse specialties in medicine. Affiliation of an orthopaedics with an allopathic medical school impacts research opportunities and early exposure to clinical orthopaedics. The purpose of this study is to examine the potential effect allopathic medical school affiliation has on orthopaedic surgery resident demographics and academic characteristics. Methods: All 202 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedics programs were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 consisted of residency programs without an affiliated allopathic medical school, and Group 2 consisted of programs with an affiliated allopathic medical school. Affiliations were determined by cross-referencing the ACGME residency program list with the medical school list published by Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Program and resident characteristics were then compiled using AAMC's Residency Explorer including region, program setting, number of residents, and osteopathic recognition. Resident characteristics included race, gender, experiences (work, volunteer, and research), peer-reviewed publications, and US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores. Results: Of the 202 ACGME-accredited orthopaedics residencies, Group 1 had 61 (30.2%) programs, and Group 2 had 141 (69.8%) programs. Group 2 had larger programs (4.9 vs. 3.2 resident positions/year; p < 0.001) and 1.7 times the number of residency applicants (655.8 vs. 385.5; p < 0.001). Most Group 2 residents were allopathic medical school graduates, 95.5%, compared with 41.6% in Group 1. Group 1 had 57.0% osteopathic medical school graduates, compared with 2.9% in Group 2. There were 6.1% more White residents in Group 1 residencies (p = 0.025), and Group 2 residencies consisted of 3.5% more Black residents in relation to Group 1 (p = 0.03). Academic performance metrics were comparable between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that candidates who successfully match into an orthopaedic surgery residency program achieve high academic performance, regardless of whether the program was affiliated with an allopathic medical school. Differences may be influenced by increased representation of minority faculty, greater demand for allopathic residents, or stronger emphasis on promotion of diversity in those residency programs. Availability of Data and Material: Available on reasonable request. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans following acetabulum open reduction internal fixation (ORIF): A survey of orthopaedic traumatologists.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the practices related to obtaining postoperative pelvic CT scans following acetabular ORIF and revision surgery rates. DESIGN: A 20-question survey published on the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) website assessed each surgeon's preference and rationale for or against the routine use of postoperative CT scans for acetabular fractures. PARTICIPANTS: Fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: We examined the percentage of surgeons ordering routine postoperative CT scans, surgeon demographics, and revision surgery rates based on these routine CT scan results. RESULTS: Responses were received from 57 surgeons. Practices varied regarding postoperative CT scans, with 16 surgeons (28%, Group A) routinely ordering them and 41 surgeons (72%, Group B) not ordering them on all patients. No significant difference in surgeon demographics were found between the groups. Majority of Group A report a revision surgery rate of <1% based on the results of the postoperative CT. Group A report routine postoperative scans were obtained to assess reduction, hardware placement, identify intra-articular fragments, and for educational purposes. Group B did not obtain routine postoperative CTs due to the following: unlikely to change postoperative treatment, adequate reduction and instrumentation placement assessed intraoperatively and by postoperative radiographs, and increased radiation exposure and cost to patients. Group B did report obtaining postop CT scans on select patients, with inadequate intraoperative imaging and postoperative neurological changes being the most common indications. CONCLUSION: The routine use of postoperative CTs following open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures is a controversial topic. While we recognize the role for postoperative CT scans in select patients, our study questions the clinical utility of these scans in all patients and in conclusion do not recommend this protocol.

Estimating the location of the posterior interosseus nerve during an extensor digitorum communis-splitting approach: a comparison of methods using the transepicondylar distance.

Background: The posterior interosseus nerve (PIN) may be encountered when using the extensile extensor digitorum communis (EDC)-splitting approach to the elbow. An accurate means of estimating its location remains elusive. The purpose of this investigation is to identify whether the methods described in previous studies can be improved upon to more accurately estimate the PIN's location using the transepicondylar distance (TED). Methods: Forty-five fresh-frozen cadavers were dissected using the EDC-splitting approach. Method A (N = 39) used an electronic caliper measuring along the midlateral border of the radius from the lateral epicondyle (LE) and radiocapitellar joint in supination, neutral position, and pronation. Method B (N = 16) used a sterile tape measure, measuring from the LE in pronation only along an axis from the LE to Lister's tubercle passing through the center capitellum. Results: In method A, the mean TED was 63.4 ± 6.1 mm. Of the 6 measurements, the TED was most correlated to the actual distance to the PIN from the LE in pronation (68.3 ± 7.3 mm; R2 = 0.266). The median difference between the estimated and actual distances was -5.6 mm (-19.3 mm to 7.6 mm). In method B, the mean TED was 68.4 ± 8.7 mm, and the mean measured distance from the LE in pronation was 68.7 ± 9.4 mm. The TED closely correlated with the measured distance to the PIN (R2 = 0.95, P < .001). The mean difference between the estimated and actual distances was ±2.0 mm (range -4.0 mm to 2.0 mm), significantly more precise than method A (P = .007). Conclusion: Using a tape measure, the TED predicted the PIN's location within a mean ±2 mm in pronation along an axis from the LE to Lister's tubercle, using an EDC-splitting approach. This technique is simple and comparatively more accurate than those used previously.

Does Construct Type Matter? A Retrospective Review Comparing Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures Treated with Standard Volar Plating versus Fragment-Specific Fixation.

Background Treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs) rests on anatomic internal fixation. Fragment-specific fixation (FSF) is applied when fracture pattern is too complex for standard volar plating (SVP), oftentimes with potential increased risk of complications. We hypothesized that patients undergoing FSF would achieve less wrist range of motion (ROM) with higher risk of complications compared with SVP. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 159 consecutive patients undergoing DRF fixation from 2017 to 2020. Patients < 18 years old, < 8 weeks' follow-up, open fractures, ipsilateral trauma, and fractures requiring dorsal spanning plate were excluded. Patient demographics, specific construct type, AO fracture classification, ROM, and complications were assessed. ROM was calculated using average flexion, extension, supination, and pronation. t -Tests were used to determine differences in ROM among construct types. Results Ninety-two patients met all inclusion criteria: 59 underwent SVP and 33 underwent FSF. Average wrist ROM for patients undergoing SVP was 57 degrees/50 degrees flexion-extension and 87 degrees/88 degrees supination-pronation; average ROM for patients undergoing FSF was 55 degrees/49 degrees flexion-extension and 88 degrees/89 degrees supination-pronation. No significant differences were identified when comparing final wrist flexion ( p = 0.08), extension ( p = 0.33), supination ( p = 0.35), or pronation ( p = 0.21). Overall reoperation rate was 5% and higher for FSF (12%) versus SVP (2%). Highest reoperation rate was observed in the double volar hook cohort (80%; N = 4). Conclusion Construct type does not appear to affect final ROM if stable internal fixation is achieved. SVP and FSF had similar complication rates; however, double volar hook constructs resulted in increased reoperations likely from fixation failure and plate prominence. Level of Evidence Level IV, retrospective review.

Patient-reported dissatisfaction following second side in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Around one third of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will eventually have the contralateral knee replaced. Overall patient satisfaction after staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty procedures performed on different days is reportedly similar to unilateral TKA. Nevertheless, in our anecdotal experience patients often report less satisfying outcomes following the second side. A cursory review of available literature tended to confirm that observation. We sought therefore to consolidate all of the available data on this issue to further investigate this phenomenon. AIM: To consolidate available published data revealing satisfaction scores among patients following staged bilateral TKA, and to evaluate the phenomenon of less satisfying results following TKA2. METHODS: A systematic review of available literature reporting on satisfaction with TKA1 and TKA2 after staged bilateral knee arthroplasty was undertaken using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. From 427 records, five full-length articles met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The data were then extracted and assessed on the basis of the Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/). RESULTS: A total of 1889 patients with an average age of 68 (range: 38-92) underwent staged bilateral TKA with outcomes reported at 1 year following each TKA with a mean 21.9 mo between surgeries (range: 2 d to 14.5 years). Overall satisfaction with both knees was 83.70% (1581) and dissatisfaction with both knees was 2.75% (52). In the remaining 13.56% (256) who were dissatisfied with one side, 61.0% were dissatisfied with TKA2, and 39.0% were dissatisfied with TKA1. Patient-reported outcome scores for TKA2 were frequently lower than TKA1 even in patients reporting overall satisfaction with both knees. CONCLUSION: At 1-year follow-up, there was a 50% greater risk of dissatisfaction with TKA2 among the 13.56% of patients reporting dissatisfaction in one knee after staged bilateral TKA. Whether the interval between procedures or long-term follow-up changes these results requires further investigation.

Current Requirements and Attitudes Toward Research: A Survey-Based Analysis of Orthopedic Surgery Programs.

Objective The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) guidelines require scholarly activity but do not specify what research-related activity is necessary to meet this requirement. The current components and opinions regarding research and its implementation that qualify as scholarly activity are unknown among US orthopedic surgery programs. We aimed to survey program directors of orthopedic surgery programs to evaluate and better understand the current state of research during training. Design A survey was sent to the program directors of all ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery between 2019 and 2020 with questions evaluating each program's research requirements and barriers to improvement. Results One-hundred eighteen (N=118) surveys were collected from 94 academic (79.6%) and 24 community (21.4%) programs. Although nearly all (97.5%) programs required research for graduation, only 45% of them allotted protected time: 52 academic programs (55.3%) allotted a median of nine weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 8-12 weeks) of dedicated time and 13 community programs (54.2%) allotted six weeks (IQR: 4-28 weeks) (p=0.595). We distinguished dedicated research as either consecutive weeks or a formal research track for a year. All programs indicated a desire for an increased focus on basic science compared to the current focus on outcomes-based research (p=0.04). The greatest identified obstacle to research improvement reported by community programs was faculty and resource commitment (p=0.003). The overall level of satisfaction with the current research experience among directors is 50.8%. Conclusion Despite differences between academic and community programs, directors agree on shifting the focus of research toward basic science. To improve preclinical research, additional time may be required, and individualized improvement plans should be undertaken at academic and community programs alike.