The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2022.

This article summarises expert discussion on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which took place during the 24th World Gastrointestinal Cancer Congress (WGICC) in Barcelona, July 2022. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to ensure an optimal diagnosis and staging of HCC, planning of curative and therapeutic options, including surgical, embolisation, ablative strategies, or systemic therapy. Furthermore, in many patients with HCC, underlying liver cirrhosis represents a challenge and influences the therapeutic options.

The Combination of APRI and ALBI Facilitates Preoperative Risk Stratification for Patients Undergoing Liver Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCTx) is performed for most patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). However, chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI) has been associated with poor postoperative outcome. To date, however, no clinically applicable and noninvasive tool exists to assess CALI before liver resection. METHODS: Routine blood parameters were assessed in 339 patients before and after completion of NeoCTx and before surgery. The study assessed the prognostic potential of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), the albumin-bilirubin grade (ALBI), and their combinations. Furthermore, an independent multi-center validation cohort (n = 161) was included to confirm the findings concerning the prediction of postoperative outcome. RESULTS: Higher ALBI, APRI, and APRI + ALBI were found in patients with postoperative morbidity (P = 0.001, P = 0.064, P = 0.001, respectively), liver dysfunction (LD) (P = 0.009, P = 0.012, P < 0.001), or mortality (P = 0.037, P = 0.045, P = 0.016), and APRI + ALBI had the highest predictive potential for LD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.695). An increase in APRI + ALBI was observed during NeoCTx (P < 0.001). Patients with longer periods between NeoCTx and surgery showed a greater decrease in APRI + ALBI (P = 0.006) and a trend for decreased CALI at surgery. A cutoff for APRI + ALBI at - 2.46 before surgery was found to identify patients with CALI (P = 0.002) and patients at risk for a prolonged hospital stay (P = 0.001), intensive care (P < 0.001), morbidity (P < 0.001), LD (P < 0.001), and mortality (P = 0.021). Importantly, the study was able to confirm the predictive potential of APRI + ALBI for postoperative LD and mortality in a multicenter validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Determination of APRI + ALBI before surgery enables identification of high-risk patients for liver resection. The combined score seems to dynamically reflect CALI. Thus, APRI + ALBI could be a clinically relevant tool for optimizing timing of surgery in CRCLM patients after NeoCTx.

Long-term outcomes of patients with 10 or more colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Although the number of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is decreasingly considered as a contraindication to surgery, patients with 10 CLM or more are often denied liver surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome after liver surgery and to identify prognostic factors of survival in such patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of a multicentre cohort of patients with CLM (N=12 406) operated on, with intention to resect, from January 2005-June 2013 and whose data were prospectively collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry. RESULTS: Overall, the group ⩾10 CLM (N=529, 4.3%) experienced a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 30%. A macroscopically complete (R0/R1) resection (72.8% of patients) was associated with a 3- and 5-year OS of 61% and 39% vs 29% and 5% for R2/no resection patients (P<0.0001). At multivariate analysis, R0/R1 resection emerged as the strongest favourable factor of OS (HR 0.35 (0.26-0.48)). Other independent favourable factors were as follows: maximal tumour size <40 mm (HR 0.67 (0.49-0.92)); age <60 years (HR 0.66 (0.50-0.88)); preoperative MRI (HR 0.65 (0.47-0.89)); and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.73 (0.55-0.98)). The model showed that 5-year OS rates of 30% was possible provided R0/R1 resection associated with at least an additional favourable factor. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection might provide long-term survival in patients with ⩾10 CLM staged with preoperative MRI, provided R0/R1 resection followed by adjuvant therapy. A validation of these results in another cohort is needed.

PARAGON II - A single arm multicentre phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy using irinotecan bead in patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy confers a 3-year progression free survival advantage following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), but is associated with significant toxicity. Chemoembolisation using drug eluting PVA microspheres loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) allows sustained delivery of drug directly to tumour, maximising response whilst minimising systemic exposure. This phase II single arm study examined the safety and feasibility of DEBIRI before resection of CRLM. METHODS: Patients with resectable CRLM received lobar DEBIRI 1 month prior to surgery, with a radiological endpoint of near stasis. The trial had a primary end-point of tumour resectability (R0 resection). Secondary end-points included safety, pathologic tumour response and overall survival. RESULTS: 40 patients received DEBIRI, with a median dose of 103 mg irinotecan (range 64-175 mg). Morbidity was low (2.5%, CTCAE grade 2) with no evidence of systemic chemotoxicity. All patients proceeded to surgery, with 38 undergoing resection (95%, R0 resection rate 74%). 30-day post-operative mortality was 5% (n = 2), with neither death TACE related. 66 lesions were resected, with histologic major or complete pathologic response seen in 77.3% of targeted lesions. At median follow up of 40.6 months, 12 patients (34.3%) had died of recurrent disease with a median overall survival of 50.9 months. Nominal 1, 3 and 5-year OS was 93, 78 & 49% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Resection after neoadjuvant DEBIRI for CRLM is feasible and safe. Single treatment with DEBIRI resulted in tumour pathologic response and median overall survival comparable to that seen after systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00844233).

ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries. Over the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, the clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly due not only to an increase in the number of patients being referred for and undergoing surgical resection of their localised metastatic disease but also to a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapy and an expansion in the use of ablative techniques. This reflects the increase in the number of patients that are being managed within a multidisciplinary team environment and specialist cancer centres, and the emergence over the same time period not only of improved imaging techniques but also prognostic and predictive molecular markers. Treatment decisions for patients with mCRC must be evidence-based. Thus, these ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.

Variations in genes involved in dormancy associated with outcome in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Tumor dormancy has been described as a state of hibernation. Dormancy can be switched to proliferation by different pathways, which may play a critical role in tumor recurrence. In this study, we investigated genetic variations within genes involved in tumor dormancy and their association with recurrence and outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) who underwent neoadjuvant bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genomic DNA was extracted from resected CLM (FFPE) from 149 patients. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 14 genes associated with dormancy were analyzed by direct Sanger DNA sequencing and evaluated for response, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence patterns. RESULTS: NME1 rs34214448 C>A was significantly associated with RFS in univariable analysis (P = 0.039) and with intrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.014). NOTCH3 rs1044009 T>C and CD44 rs8193 C>T showed a significant difference in 3-year OS rates (P = 0.004 and P = 0.042, respectively). With respect to radiological response, CD44 rs8193 C>T variant genotypes were associated with a significantly higher response rate (P = 0.033). Recursive partitioning analyses revealed that Dll4 rs12441495 C>G, NME1 rs34214448 C>A and NOTCH3 rs1044009 T>C were the dominant SNPs predicting histological response, RFS and OS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that gene variations within genes involved in tumor dormancy pathways are associated with response and outcome in patients with resected CLM. These data may lead to new and more effective treatment strategies targeting tumor dormancy.

Histological response, pattern of tumor destruction and clinical outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab or cetuximab in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

AIM: We investigated whether the type of antibody [bevacizumab (bev) or cetuximab (cet)] added to neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy before curative liver resection was associated with histological response, the pattern of tumor destruction and clinical outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: We investigated 138 patients with KRAS wild-type status (codon 12, 13 and 61) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bev (n = 101) or cet (n = 37). The primary endpoint was histological response. Secondary endpoints were necrosis and fibrosis of metastases, radiological response, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Histological response was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.19). A significantly higher fraction of patients in the bev group showed necrosis of the metastases of ≥ 50% (P < 0.001), while a higher fraction of patients in the cet group showed fibrosis of ≥ 40% (P = 0.030). Radiological response was not significantly different (P = 0.17). Median RFS was significantly shorter in the cet group in univariable analysis (HR 1.59 (95% CI 1.00, 2.51), P = 0.049), but this difference did not remain significant in multivariable analysis (P = 0.45). The 3-year OS rate was not significantly different (P = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to combination chemotherapy showed more necrosis but less fibrosis of metastases compared to cetuximab and a trend towards higher histological and radiological response and longer RFS. Further investigations of biological tumor characteristics are required to individualize treatment combinations.

Plasma thrombospondin 1 as a predictor of postoperative liver dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Liver regeneration following liver resection involves a complex interplay of growth factors and their antagonists. Thrombospondin 1 has recently been identified as a critical inhibitor of liver regeneration by the activation of transforming growth factor ß1 in mice, and preliminary data seem to confirm its relevance in humans. This study aimed to confirm these observations in an independent validation cohort. METHODS: Perioperative circulating levels of thrombospondin 1 were measured in patients undergoing liver resection between January 2012 and September 2013. Postoperative liver dysfunction was defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery and classification of morbidity was based on the criteria by Dindo et al. RESULTS: In 85 patients (44 major and 41 minor liver resections), plasma levels of thrombospondin 1 increased 1 day after liver resection (mean 51·6 ng/ml before surgery and 68·3 ng/ml on postoperative day 1; P = 0·001). Circulating thrombospondin 1 concentration on the first postoperative day specifically predicted liver dysfunction (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0·818, P = 0·003) and was confirmed as a significant predictor in multivariable analysis (Exp(B) 1·020, 95 per cent c.i. 1·005 to 1·035; P = 0·009). Patients with a high thrombospondin 1 concentration (over 80 ng/ml) on postoperative day 1 more frequently had postoperative liver dysfunction than those with a lower level (28 versus 2 per cent) and severe morbidity (44 versus 15 per cent), and their length of hospital stay was more than doubled (19·7 versus 9·9 days). CONCLUSION: Thrombospondin 1 may prove a helpful clinical marker to predict postoperative liver dysfunction as early as postoperative day 1.

Variations in genes involved in immune response checkpoints and association with outcomes in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases.

In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), liver resection offers the possibility of cure and long-term survival. The liver is a highly immunogenic organ harboring ~80% of the body's tissue macrophages. Emerging data demonstrate a critical role of the immune response for cancer treatment. We investigated variations within genes involved in immune response checkpoints and their association with outcomes in patients with CLM who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab and liver resection. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in nine genes (CCL2, CCR2, LAG3, NT5E, PDCD1, CD274, IDO1, CTLA4 and CD24) were analyzed in genomic DNA from 149 patients with resected bevacizumab-pretreated CLM by direct Sanger DNA sequencing, and correlated with response, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), probability of cure and recurrence patterns. IDO1 (indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase) rs3739319 G>A and CD24 rs8734 G>A showed a significant difference in 3-year OS rates. In addition, IDO1 rs3739319 G>A was significantly associated with extrahepatic recurrence. Recursive partitioning analyses revealed that IDO1 rs3739319 G>A was the dominant SNP predicting RFS and OS. Our data suggest that variants within genes involved in immune response checkpoints are associated with outcomes in patients with resected CLM and might lead to improved treatment strategies modulating anti-tumor immune response by targeting novel immune checkpoints.

Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the OLIVIA multinational randomised phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer, chemotherapy can downsize metastases and facilitate secondary resection. We assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX-6 (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin) or FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OLIVIA was a multinational open-label phase II study conducted at 16 centres in Austria, France, Spain, and the UK. Patients with unresectable liver metastases were randomised to bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) plus mFOLFOX-6 [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) then 2400 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)] or FOLFOXIRI [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), irinotecan 165 mg/m(2), folinic acid 200 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 3200 mg/m(2) (46-h infusion)] every 2 weeks. Unresectability was defined as ≥1 of the following criteria: no possibility of upfront R0/R1 resection of all lesions; <30% residual liver volume after resection; metastases in contact with major vessels of the remnant liver. Resectability was evaluated by multidisciplinary review. The primary end point was overall resection rate (R0/R1/R2). Efficacy end points were analysed by intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: In patients assigned to bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI (n = 41) or bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 (n = 39), the overall resection rate was 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45% to 76%] and 49% (95% CI 32% to 65%), respectively (difference 12%; 95% CI -11% to 36%). R0 resection rates were 49% and 23%, respectively. Overall tumour response rates were 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) with bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI and 62% (95% CI 45% to 77%) with bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18·6 (95% CI 12.9-22.3) months and 11·5 (95% CI 9.6-13.6) months, respectively. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were neutropenia (bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI, 50%; bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6, 35%) and diarrhoea (30% and 14%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher response and resection rates and prolonged PFS versus bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Toxicity was increased but manageable with bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00778102.

Survival of patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in a multidisciplinary concept (CELIM study).

BACKGROUND: Initially, unresectable colorectal liver metastases can be resected after response to chemotherapy. While cetuximab has been shown to increase response and resection rates, the survival outcome for this conversion strategy needs further evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with technically unresectable and/or ≥5 liver metastases were treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (arm B) and evaluated with regard to resectability every 2 months. Tumour response and secondary resection data have been reported previously. A final analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was carried out in December 2012. RESULTS: Between December 2004 and March 2008, 56 patients were randomised to arm A, 55 to arm B. The median OS was 35.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.2-44.2] months [arm A: 35.8 (95% CI 28.1-43.6), arm B: 29.0 (95% CI 16.0-41.9) months, HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.66-1.61), P = 0.9]. The median PFS was 10.8 (95% CI 9.3-12.2) months [arm A: 11.2 (95% CI 7.2-15.3), arm B: 10.5 (95% CI 8.9-12.2) months, HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.79-1.74), P = 0.4]. Patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 36) achieved a better median OS [53.9 (95% CI 35.9-71.9) months] than those who did not [21.9 (95% CI 17.1-26.7) months, P < 0.001]. The median disease-free survival for R0 resected patients was 9.9 (95% CI 5.8-14.0) months, and the 5-year OS rate was 46.2% (95% CI 29.5% to 62.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a favourable long-term survival for patients with initially sub-optimal or unresectable colorectal liver metastases who respond to conversion therapy and undergo secondary resection. Both FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, appear to be appropriate regimens for 'conversion' treatment in patients with K-RAS codon 12/13/61 wild-type tumours. Thus, liver surgery can be considered curative or alternatively as an additional 'line of therapy' in those patients who are not cured. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00153998, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Local recurrence rates after radiofrequency ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases. Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer #40004 and #40983.

AIM: The aim of this study is to describe local tumour control after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (RES) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in two independent European Organisations for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) studies. BACKGROUND: Only 10-20% of patients with newly diagnosed CLM are eligible for curative RES. RFA has found a place in daily practice for unresectable CLM. There are no prospective trials comparing RFA to RES for resectable CLM. METHODS: The CLOCC trial randomised 119 patients with unresectable CLM between RFA (±RES)+adjuvant FOLFOX (±bevacizumab) versus FOLFOX (±bevacizumab) alone. The EPOC trial randomised 364 patients with resectable CLM between RES±perioperative FOLFOX. We describe the local control of resected patients with lesions ≤4 cm in the perioperative chemotherapy arm of the EPOC trial (N=81) and the RFA arm of the CLOCC trial (N=55). RESULTS: Local recurrence (LR) rate for RES was 7.4% per patient and 5.5% per lesion. LR rate for RFA was 14.5% per patient and 6.0% per lesion. When lesion size was limited to 30 mm, LR rate for RFA lesions was 2.9% per lesion. Non-local hepatic recurrences were more often observed in RFA patients than in RES patients, 30.9% and 22.3% respectively. Patients receiving RFA had a more advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: LR rate after RFA for lesions with a limited size is low. The local control per lesion does not appear to differ greatly between RFA and surgical resection. This study supports the local control of RFA in patients with limited liver metastases. Future studies should evaluate in which patients RFA could be an equal alternative to liver resection.

KRAS status and outcome of liver resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of KRAS mutation in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab before liver resection is unclear. METHODS: The KRAS and BRAF status of resected CLM was assessed in prospectively studied patients. Mutations were correlated with recurrence-free and overall survival. Only patients with remaining vital tumour cells in the resected specimen and those without disease progression were analysed; those with progressive disease did not undergo resection. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled. Fifteen (25 per cent) had a KRAS mutation, but none of the 60 patients had a BRAF mutation. The radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab, assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, was partial in 52 patients (87 per cent) and the remaining eight had stable disease. The partial response rate was similar in patients with a KRAS mutation and those with the wild-type gene (12 of 15 versus 40 of 45 patients; P = 0·400). KRAS mutation had a negative prognostic effect on recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2·48, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·26 to 4·89; P = 0·009) and overall survival (HR 3·51, 1·30 to 9·45; P = 0·013). CONCLUSION: This study provided further evidence for the prognostic importance of KRAS status in terms of recurrence-free and overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab elicited a response, irrespective of KRAS status, in this selected group of patients with CLM.

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab persistently inactivates VEGF at the time of surgery despite preoperative cessation.

BACKGROUND: When anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) antibody bevacizumab is applied in neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis, 5-6 weeks between last bevacizumab dose and liver resection are currently recommended to avoid complications in wound and liver regeneration. In this context, we aimed to determine whether VEGF is inactivated by bevacizumab at the time of surgery. METHODS: Fifty colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases received neoadjuvant chemotherapy ± bevacizumab supplementation. The last dose of bevacizumab was administered 6 weeks before surgery. Plasma, subcutaneous and intraabdominal wound fluid were analysed for VEGF content before and after liver resection (day 1-3). Immunoprecipitation was applied to determine the amount of bevacizumab-bound VEGF. RESULTS: Bevacizumab-treated individuals showed no increase in perioperative complications. During the entire monitoring period, plasma VEGF was inactivated by bevacizumab. In wound fluid, VEGF was also completely bound by bevacizumab and was remarkably low compared with the control chemotherapy group. CONCLUSION: These data document that following a cessation time of 6 weeks, bevacizumab is fully active and blocks circulating and local VEGF at the time of liver resection. However, despite effective VEGF inactivation no increase in perioperative morbidity is recorded suggesting that VEGF activity is not essential in the immediate postoperative recovery period.

Pathologic response to bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases and its correlation with survival.

For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM), hepatic resection currently offers the best chance for long-term survival. Preoperative chemotherapy is now integral to the management of these patients, conferring a disease-free survival advantage over surgery alone in patients with 'upfront' resectable disease and enabling some initially unresectable CLM to become resectable. However, although surgery may improve long-term survival, up to 65.0% of patients will experience disease recurrence at 5 years and reliable prognostic factors are needed to predict those patients who are more likely to experience recurrence after resection. Recently, pathologic tumor response, defined as the 'objective measurement of residual cancer cells in resected tissue,' has been identified as a reliable prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving preoperative chemotherapy and has been shown to correlate with improved survival after resection of CLM. Addition of the targeted biologic agent bevacizumab to preoperative chemotherapy is associated with an increase in pathologic response rate and an increase in survival compared with chemotherapy alone in patients undergoing hepatic resection. This review discusses the data in support of pathologic response rate as an important new outcome endpoint after hepatic resection of CLM and considers the evidence to date on pathologic response to bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy in metastatic CRC and its correlation with survival.

The role of biological agents in the resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Surgically resecting liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CLMs) offers the only potentially curative option. Chemotherapy-induced downsizing of CLMs increases the proportion of patients with resectable metastases. Several recent studies have reported that adding a biological agent such as cetuximab, panitumumab or bevacizumab to chemotherapy could further increase response and resectability rates. This overview discusses the reported resection rates for biological agents combined with chemotherapy and the difficulties of cross-trial comparisons, the pre-, peri- and postoperative roles of biological agents, particularly with regards to comparisons of surgical complications, and ongoing clinical trials in which the resectability of CLMs is a predefined end point. Currently, targeted therapies combined with chemotherapy probably increase the resection rate of CLMs, although this has been shown in only one phase III randomised study and it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the relative efficacy and safety of the different available biological agents in terms of converting unresectable CLMs to resectable lesions. Available data for each of them are discussed. More data from phase III trials are expected to confirm the utility of the different biological agents in converting patients with unresectable CLMs to a resectable status.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MR imaging versus multidetector-row CT in the detection of colorectal metastases in fatty liver using intraoperative ultrasound and histopathology as a standard of reference.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at 3.0 T with 64-row MDCT in the detection of colorectal liver metastases in diffuse fatty infiltration of the liver after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with colorectal liver metastases and at moderate to severe steatosis (25-90%) underwent prospectively preoperative tri-phasic MDCT (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (3-T Magnetom Trio, Siemens). All patients underwent surgical resection of liver metastases. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was carried out, which served as the standard of reference, together with histopathology. RESULTS: Overall, 68 metastases (range, 0.4-6 cm; 31/68 metastases [46%] ≤ 1 cm) were found at histology. MDCT detected 49/68 lesions (72%), and MRI 66/68 (97%, p < 0.001). For lesions ≤ 1 cm, MDCT detected only 13/31 (41.9%) and MRI 29/31 (93%, p < 0.001). Eight false-positive lesions were detected by MDCT, seven small lesions by MRI. There was no statistically significant difference between the two modalities in the detection of lesions > 1 cm (p = 0.250). IOUS detected all metastases and revealed two false-positive diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI is superior to 64-row MDCT in detecting colorectal liver metastases ≤ 1 cm during preoperative staging in patients with liver steatosis. A combination of MRI and IOUS may further improve the outcome of surgical treatment.

Value of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement before liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Portal hypertension associated with liver cirrhosis increases the risk of postoperative complications after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the role of preoperative hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) assessment in identifying portal hypertension. METHODS: All patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between January 2000 and December 2009 at the Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, were analysed retrospectively. HVPG was assessed prospectively in a subset of patients before liver resection. The influence of this assessment on postoperative complications was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were enrolled, of whom 39 underwent HVPG measurement. Mean(s.d.) HVPG was 6·4(3·0) and 4·3(1·4) mmHg in patients with and without postoperative complications respectively (P = 0·028). Complication rates differed significantly at a cut-off HVPG value of 5 mmHg: 11 of 21 patients with a gradient of 1-5 mmHg developed complications versus 12 of 14 patients with a higher value (P = 0·045). HVPG exceeding 5 mmHg was associated with worse liver fibrosis (P = 0·004), higher rates of postoperative liver dysfunction (5 of 13 versus 1 of 18; P = 0·022) and ascites (7 of 14 versus 3 of 21; P = 0·022), and a longer hospital stay (median (range) 11 (7-26) versus 8 (4-20) days; P = 0·034). Overall postoperative morbidity did not differ between patients who had preoperative HVPG assessment and those who did not (P = 0·142). CONCLUSION: Preoperative HVPG assessment predicted liver fibrosis and postoperative complications.

Molecular markers and biological targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 11th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2009.

The article summarizes the expert discussion and recommendations on the use of molecular markers and of biological targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), as well as a proposed treatment decision strategy for mCRC treatment. The meeting was conducted during the 11th ESMO/World Gastrointestinal Cancer Congress (WGICC) in Barcelona in June 2009. The manuscript describes the outcome of an expert discussion leading to an expert recommendation. The increasing knowledge on clinical and molecular markers and the availability of biological targeted therapies have major implications in the optimal management in mCRC.