Long-term functional and clinical outcome of combined targeted muscle reinnervation and osseointegration for functional bionic reconstruction in transhumeral amputees: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the combination of osseointegration and nerve transfers in 3 transhumeral amputees. DESIGN: Case series. PATIENTS: Three male patients with a unilateral traumatic transhumeral amputation. METHODS: Patients received a combination of osseointegration and targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Rehabilitation included graded weight training, range of motion exercises, biofeedback, table-top prosthesis training, and controlling the actual device. The impairment in daily life, health-related quality of life, and pain before and after the intervention was evaluated in these patients. Their shoulder range of motion, prosthesis embodiment, and function were documented at a 2- to 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: All 3 patients attended rehabilitation and used their myoelectric prosthesis on a daily basis. Two patients had full shoulder range of motion with the prosthesis, while the other patient had 55° of abduction and 45° of anteversion. They became more independent in their daily life activities after the intervention and incorporated their prosthesis into their body scheme to a high extent. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that patients can benefit from the combined procedure. However, the patients' perspective, risks of the surgical procedures, and the relatively long rehabilitation procedure need to be incorporated in the decision-making.

Targeted muscle reinnervation in bionic upper limb reconstruction: current status and future directions.

Selective nerve transfers are used in the setting of upper limb amputation to improve myoelectric prosthesis control. This surgical concept is referred to as targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and describes the rerouting of the major nerves of the arm onto the motor branches of the residual limb musculature. Aside from providing additional myosignals for prosthetic control, TMR can treat and prevent neuroma pain and possibly also phantom limb pain. This article reviews the history and current applications of TMR in upper limb amputation, with a focus on practical considerations. It further explores and identifies technological innovations to improve the man-machine interface in amputation care, particularly regarding implantable interfaces, such as muscle electrodes and osseointegration. Finally, future clinical directions and possible scientific avenues in this field are presented and critically discussed.

[Prosthetic Fitting Concepts after Major Amputation in the Upper Limb - an Overview of Current Possibilities]. / Prothetische Versorgungskonzepte nach Majoramputation der oberen Extremität ­ eine Übersicht gegenwärtiger Möglichkeiten.

BACKGROUND: The upper extremity and particularly the hands are crucial for patients in interacting with their environment, therefore amputations or severe damage with loss of hand function significantly impact their quality of life. In cases where biological reconstruction is not feasible or does not lead to sufficient success, bionic reconstruction plays a key role in patient care. Classical myoelectric prostheses are controlled using two signals derived from surface electrodes in the area of the stump muscles. Prosthesis control, especially in high amputations, is then limited and cumbersome. The surgical technique of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) offers an innovative solution: The major arm nerves that have lost their target organs due to amputation are rerouted to muscles in the stump area. This enables the establishment of cognitive control signals that allow significantly improved prosthesis control. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A selective literature review on TMR and bionic reconstruction was conducted, incorporating relevant articles and discussing them considering the clinical experience of our research group. Additionally, a clinical case is presented. RESULTS: Bionic reconstruction combined with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation enables intuitive prosthetic control with simultaneous movement of various prosthetic degrees of freedom and the treatment of neuroma and phantom limb pain. Long-term success requires a high level of patient compliance and intensive signal training during the prosthetic rehabilitation phase. Despite technological advances, challenges persist, especially in enhancing signal transmission and integrating natural sensory feedback into bionic prostheses. CONCLUSION: TMR surgery represents a significant advancement in the bionic care of amputees. Employing selective nerve transfers for signal multiplication and amplification, opens up possibilities for improving myoelectric prosthesis function and thus enhancing patient care. Advances in the area of external prosthetic components, improvements in the skeletal connection due to osseointegration and more fluid signal transmission using wireless, fully implanted electrode systems will lead to significant progress in bionic reconstruction, both in terms of precision of movement and embodiment.

Coronavirus Receptor Expression Profiles in Human Mast Cells, Basophils, and Eosinophils.

A major problem in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients is the massive tissue inflammation in certain target organs, including the lungs. Mast cells (MC), basophils (BA), and eosinophils (EO) are key effector cells in inflammatory processes. These cells have recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. We explored coronavirus receptor (CoV-R) expression profiles in primary human MC, BA, and EO, and in related cell lines (HMC-1, ROSA, MCPV-1, KU812, and EOL-1). As determined using flow cytometry, primary MC, BA, and EO, and their corresponding cell lines, displayed the CoV-R CD13 and CD147. Primary skin MC and BA, as well as EOL-1 cells, also displayed CD26, whereas primary EO and the MC and BA cell lines failed to express CD26. As assessed using qPCR, most cell lines expressed transcripts for CD13, CD147, and ABL2, whereas ACE2 mRNA was not detectable, and CD26 mRNA was only identified in EOL-1 cells. We also screened for drug effects on CoV-R expression. However, dexamethasone, vitamin D, and hydroxychloroquine did not exert substantial effects on the expression of CD13, CD26, or CD147 in the cells. Together, MC, BA, and EO express distinct CoV-R profiles. Whether these receptors mediate virus-cell interactions and thereby virus-induced inflammation remains unknown at present.

Nerve transfer reversal to treat co-contraction after anatomic brachial plexus reconstruction and Oberlin transfer: A case report.

Distal nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion have become standard of care in brachial plexus reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to draw attention to intractable co-contraction as a rare but significant adverse event of distal nerve transfers. Here we report of treatment of a disabling co-contraction of the brachialis muscle and wrist/finger flexors after median to brachialis fascicular transfer in a 61-year-old male patient. The primary injury was an postganglionic lesion of roots C5/C6 and a preganglionic injury of C7/C8 with intact root Th1 after a motor bicycle accident. After upper brachial plexus reconstruction (C5/C6 to suprascapular nerve and superior trunk) active mobility in the shoulder joint (supraspinatus, deltoid) could be restored. However, due to lacking motor recovery of elbow flexion the patient underwent additional median to brachialis nerve transfer. Shortly after, active elbow flexion commenced with rapid recovery to M4 at 9 months postoperatively. However, despite intensive EMG triggered physiotherapy the patient could not dissociate hand from elbow function and was debilitated by this iatrogenic co-contraction. After preoperative ultrasound-guided block resulted in preserved biceps function, the previously transferred median nerve fascicle was reversed. This was done by dissecting the previous nerve transfer of the median nerve fascicle to the brachialis muscle branch and adapting the fascicles to their original nerve. Postoperatively, the patient was followed up for 10 months without a complication and maintained M4 elbow flexion with independent strong finger flexion. Distal nerve transfers are an excellent option to restore function, however, in some patients cognitive limitations may prevent cortical reorganization and lead to disturbing co-contractions.

Nerve Transfers for Brachial Plexus Reconstruction in Patients over 60 Years.

Negative expectations regarding nerve reconstruction in the elderly prevail in the literature, but little is known about the effectiveness of nerve transfers in patients with brachial plexus injuries aged over 60 years. We present a series of five patients (1 female, 4 male) aged between 60 and 81 years (median 62.0 years) who underwent nerve reconstruction using multiple nerve transfers in brachial plexopathies. The etiology of brachial plexus injury was trauma (n = 2), or iatrogenic, secondary to spinal surgical laminectomy, tumor excision and radiation for breast cancer (n = 3). All but one patient underwent a one-stage reconstruction including neurolysis and extra-anatomical nerve transfer alone (n = 2) or combined with anatomical reconstruction by sural nerve grafts (n = 2). One patient underwent a two-stage reconstruction, which involved a first stage anatomical brachial plexus reconstruction followed by a second stage nerve transfer. Neurotizations were performed as double (n = 3), triple (n = 1) or quadruple (n = 1) nerve or fascicular transfers. Overall, at least one year postoperatively, successful results, characterized by a muscle strength of M3 or more, were restored in all cases, two patients even achieving M4 grading in the elbow flexion. This patient series challenges the widely held dogma that brachial plexus reconstruction in older patients will produce poor outcomes. Distal nerve transfers are advantageous as they shorten the reinnervation distance. Healthy, more elderly patients should be judiciously offered the whole spectrum of reconstructive methods and postoperative rehabilitation concepts to regain useful arm and hand function and thus preserve independence after a traumatic or nontraumatic brachial plexus injury.

Distal Nerve Transfers in High Peroneal Nerve Lesions: An Anatomical Feasibility Study.

The peroneal nerve is one of the most commonly injured nerves of the lower extremity. Nerve grafting has been shown to result in poor functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare anatomical feasibility as well as axon count of the tibial nerve motor branches and the tibialis anterior motor branch for a direct nerve transfer to reconstruct ankle dorsiflexion. In an anatomical study on 26 human body donors (52 extremities) the muscular branches to the lateral (GCL) and the medial head (GCM) of the gastrocnemius muscle, the soleus muscle (S) as well as the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) were dissected, and each nerve's external diameter was measured. Nerve transfers from each of the three donor nerves (GCL, GCM, S) to the recipient nerve (TA) were performed and the distance between the achievable coaptation site and anatomic landmarks was measured. Additionally, nerve samples were taken from eight extremities, and antibody as well immunofluorescence staining were performed, primarily evaluating axon count. The average diameter of the nerve branches to the GCL was 1.49 ± 0.37, to GCM 1.5 ± 0.32, to S 1.94 ± 0.37 and to TA 1.97 ± 0.32 mm, respectively. The distance from the coaptation site to the TA muscle was 43.75 ± 12.1 using the branch to the GCL, 48.31 ± 11.32 for GCM, and 19.12 ± 11.68 mm for S, respectively. The axon count for TA was 1597.14 ± 325.94, while the donor nerves showed 297.5 ± 106.82 (GCL), 418.5 ± 62.44 (GCM), and 1101.86 ± 135.92 (S). Diameter and axon count were significantly higher for S compared to GCL as well as GCM, while regeneration distance was significantly lower. The soleus muscle branch exhibited the most appropriate axon count and nerve diameter in our study, while also reaching closest to the tibialis anterior muscle. These results indicate the soleus nerve transfer to be the favorable option for the reconstruction of ankle dorsiflexion, in comparison to the gastrocnemius muscle branches. This surgical approach can be used to achieve a biomechanically appropriate reconstruction, in contrast to tendon transfers which generally only achieve weak active dorsiflexion.

Actual prosthetic usage in relation to functional outcomes and wearing time in individuals with below-elbow amputation.

BACKGROUND: Wearing time of a prosthesis is regarded as an indicator for success of prosthetic rehabilitation. However, prostheses are frequently worn for esthetic purposes only. Although different supervised measurements to assess prosthetic dexterity are used, it is not clear how performance in such tests translates into actual use in everyday life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the actual daily use of the prosthetic device in patients with below-elbow amputations by recording the number of grasping motions. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Upper extremity function was evaluated using different objective and timed assessments in five unilateral patients with below-elbow amputations. In addition, patients reported daily wearing time, and the number of performed prosthetic movements over a period of at least three months was recorded. RESULTS: The patients achieved a mean Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure score of 66.60 ± 18.64 points. The average blocks moved in the Box and Block Test were 20.80 ± 7.46, and the mean score in the Action Research Arm Test was 37.20 ± 5.45. The mean time for the Clothespin-Relocation Test was 26.90 ± 11.61 seconds. The patients reported a wearing time of an average of 12.80 ± 3.11 hours per day. The mean number of prosthetic motions performed each day was 257.23 ± 192.95 with a range from 23.07 to 489.13. CONCLUSIONS: Neither high functionality nor long wearing times necessitated frequent use of a prosthesis in daily life. However, frequent daily motions did translate into good functional scores, indicating that regular device use in different real-life settings relates to functionality.

Feasibility of a Wireless Implantable Multi-electrode System for High-bandwidth Prosthetic Interfacing: Animal and Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Currently used prosthetic solutions in upper extremity amputation have limited functionality, owing to low information transfer rates of neuromuscular interfacing. Although surgical innovations have expanded the functional potential of the residual limb, available interfaces are inefficacious in translating this potential into improved prosthetic control. There is currently no implantable solution for functional interfacing in extremity amputation which offers long-term stability, high information transfer rates, and is applicable for all levels of limb loss. In this study, we presented a novel neuromuscular implant, the the Myoelectric Implantable Recording Array (MIRA). To our knowledge, it is the first fully implantable system for prosthetic interfacing with a large channel count, comprising 32 intramuscular electrodes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the MIRA in terms of biocompatibility, functionality, and feasibility of implantation to lay the foundations for clinical application. This was achieved through small- and large-animal studies as well as test surgeries in a human cadaver. METHODS: We evaluated the biocompatibility of the system's intramuscular electromyography (EMG) leads in a rabbit model. Ten leads as well as 10 pieces of a biologically inert control material were implanted into the paravertebral muscles of four animals. After a 3-month implantation, tissue samples were taken and histopathological assessment performed. The probes were scored according to a protocol for the assessment of the foreign body response, with primary endpoints being inflammation score, tissue response score, and capsule thickness in µm. In a second study, chronic functionality of the full system was evaluated in large animals. The MIRA was implanted into the shoulder region of six dogs and three sheep, with intramuscular leads distributed across agonist and antagonist muscles of shoulder flexion. During the observation period, regular EMG measurements were performed. The implants were removed after 5 to 6 months except for one animal, which retained the implant for prolonged observation. Primary endpoints of the large-animal study were mechanical stability, telemetric capability, and EMG signal quality. A final study involved the development of test surgeries in a fresh human cadaver, with the goal to determine feasibility to implant relevant target muscles for prosthetic control at all levels of major upper limb amputation. RESULTS: Evaluation of the foreign body reaction revealed favorable biocompatibility and a low-grade tissue response in the rabbit study. No differences regarding inflammation score (EMG 4.60 ± 0.97 [95% CI 4.00 to 5.20] versus control 4.20 ± 1.48 [95% CI 3.29 to 5.11]; p = 0.51), tissue response score (EMG 4.00 ± 0.82 [95% CI 3.49 to 4.51] versus control 4.00 ± 0.94 [95% CI 3.42 to 4.58]; p > 0.99), or thickness of capsule (EMG 19.00 ± 8.76 µm [95% CI 13.57 to 24.43] versus control 29.00 ± 23.31 µm [95% CI 14.55 to 43.45]; p = 0.29) were found compared with the inert control article (high-density polyethylene) after 3 months of intramuscular implantation. Throughout long-term implantation of the MIRA in large animals, telemetric communication remained unrestricted in all specimens. Further, the implants retained the ability to record and transmit intramuscular EMG data in all animals except for two sheep where the implants became dislocated shortly after implantation. Electrode impedances remained stable and below 5 kΩ. Regarding EMG signal quality, there was little crosstalk between muscles and overall average signal-to-noise ratio was 22.2 ± 6.2 dB. During the test surgeries, we found that it was possible to implant the MIRA at all major amputation levels of the upper limb in a human cadaver (the transradial, transhumeral, and glenohumeral levels). For each level, it was possible to place the central unit in a biomechanically stable environment to provide unhindered telemetry, while reaching the relevant target muscles for prosthetic control. At only the glenohumeral level, it was not possible to reach the teres major and latissimus dorsi muscles, which would require longer lead lengths. CONCLUSION: As assessed in a combination of animal model and cadaver research, the MIRA shows promise for clinical research in patients with limb amputation, where it may be employed for all levels of major upper limb amputation to provide long-term stable intramuscular EMG transmission. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In our study, the MIRA provided high-bandwidth prosthetic interfacing through intramuscular electrode sites. Its high number of individual EMG channels may be combined with signal decoding algorithms for accessing spinal motor neuron activity after targeted muscle reinnervation, thus providing numerous degrees of freedom. Together with recent innovations in amputation surgery, the MIRA might enable improved control approaches for upper limb amputees, particularly for patients with above-elbow amputation where the mismatch between available control signals and necessary degrees of freedom for prosthetic control is highest.

Rehabilitation of high upper limb amputees after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a Delphi study based on a scoping literature review. INTRODUCTION: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) enables patients with high upper limb amputations to intuitively control a prosthetic arm with up to six independent control signals. Although there is a broad agreement regarding the importance of structured motor learning and prosthetic training after such nerve transfers, to date, no evidence-based protocol for rehabilitation after TMR exists. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We aimed at developing a structured rehabilitation protocol after TMR surgery after major upper limb amputation. The purpose of the protocol is to guide clinicians through the full rehabilitation process, from presurgical patient education to functional prosthetic training. METHODS: European clinicians and researchers working in upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation were invited to contribute to a web-based Delphi study. Within the first round, clinical experts were presented a summary of recent literature and were asked to describe the rehabilitation steps based on their own experience and scientific evidence. The second round was used to refine these steps, while the importance of each step was rated within the third round. RESULTS: Experts agreed on a rehabilitation protocol that consists of 16 steps and starts before surgery. It is based on two overarching principles, namely the necessity of multiprofessional teamwork and a careful selection and education of patients within the rehabilitation team. Among the different steps in therapy, experts rated the training with electromyographic biofeedback as the most important one. DISCUSSION: Within this study, a first rehabilitation protocol for TMR patients based on a broad experts' consensus and relevant literature could be developed. The detailed steps for rehabilitation start well before surgery and prosthetic fitting, and include relatively novel interventions as motor imagery and biofeedback. Future studies need to further investigate the clinical outcomes and thereby improve therapists' practice. CONCLUSION: Graded rehabilitation offered by a multiprofessional team is needed to enable individuals with upper limb amputations and TMR to fully benefit from prosthetic reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Low.

Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees - have innovations had an impact on device acceptance?

PURPOSE: There is a large body of evidence demonstrating high rates of prosthesis abandonment in the upper extremity. However, these surveys were conducted years ago, thus the influence of recent refinements in prosthetic technology on acceptance is unknown. This study aims to gather current data on prosthetic usage, to assess the effects of these advancements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 68 traumatic upper limb amputees treated within the Austrian Trauma Insurance Agency between the years 1996 and 2016. Responses were grouped by the year of amputation to assess the effect of time. RESULTS: The rejection rate at all levels of amputation was 44%. There was no significant difference in acceptance between responders amputated before or after 2006 (p = 0.939). Among users, 92.86% (n = 13) used a myoelectric, while only one amputee (7.14%, n = 1) used a body-powered device. Most responders complained about the comfort (60.87%, n = 14) as well as the weight of the device (52.17%, n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: The advancements of the last decade in the arena of upper limb prosthetics have not yet achieved a significant change in prosthetic abandonment within this study cohort. Although academic solutions have been presented to tackle patient's complaints, clinical reality still shows high rejection rates of cost-intensive prosthetic devices.Implications for rehabilitationAbandonment rates in prosthetic rehabilitation after upper limb amputation have shown to be 50% and higher.The advancements of the last decade in the arena of upper limb prosthetics have not yet achieved a significant change in prosthetic abandonment.Well-structured and patient-tailored prosthetic training as well as ensuring the amputee's active participation in the decision making process will most likely improve prosthetic acceptance.

Fascicular shifting in the reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries: an anatomical and clinical evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Until recently, autologous sensory nerve grafting has remained the gold-standard technique in peripheral nerve reconstruction. However, there are several disadvantages to these grafts, such as donor site morbidity, limited availability, and a qualitative mismatch. Building on this shortage, a new concept, the fascicular shift procedure, was proposed and successfully demonstrated nerve regeneration in a rat nerve injury model. This approach involves harvesting a fascicular group distal to a peripheral nerve injury and shifting it to bridge the defect. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical applicability of this technique in brachial plexus reconstruction. METHODS: The supra- and infraclavicular nerves of the brachial plexus were bilaterally explored in 18 formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens. Following dissection, their fascicular shifting potential was evaluated. The medial antebrachial cutaneous and sural nerves were investigated and used as references for the required cross-sectional area of potential nerve grafts. Furthermore, 29 brachial plexus injuries, which qualified for surgical repair, were subjected to retrospective analysis. The intraoperatively measured lengths of the harvested and ultimately transplanted nerve grafts served as a basis to assess graft requirements in brachial plexus lesions. RESULTS: The transplanted nerve grafts measured a total length of 51.9 ± 28.1 cm in brachial plexus injuries. The individual inserted nerve grafts averaged 10.3 ± 5.1 cm. In the anatomical exploration, the ulnar and median nerves qualified for fascicular shifting. Their fascicular graft lengths measured 26.6 ± 2.5 cm and 24.8 ± 5.2 cm, respectively. The long thoracic, suprascapular, musculocutaneous, thoracodorsal, and axillary nerves were not suitable for fascicular shifting. The sensory graft length of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve measured 20.6 ± 3.4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries, fascicular shifting of the ulnar and median nerves provides sufficient donor material. Even though potential donor length is limited in the radial nerve, it may still help to expand the surgical armamentarium in selected clinical scenarios. Overall, the fascicular shift procedure presents a novel alternative to allow modality-matched grafting in the reconstruction of large proximal nerve defects and was found to be an attractive option in brachial plexus reconstruction.

Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) improves the biological control interface for myoelectric prostheses after above-elbow amputation. Selective activation of muscle units is made possible by surgically re-routing nerves, yielding a high number of independent myoelectric control signals. However, this intervention requires careful patient selection and specific rehabilitation therapy. Here a rehabilitation protocol is presented for high-level upper limb amputees undergoing TMR, based on an expert Delphi study. Interventions before surgery include detailed patient assessment and general measures for pain control, muscle endurance and strength, balance, and range of motion of the remaining joints. After surgery, additional therapeutic interventions focus on edema control and scar treatment and the selective activation of cortical areas responsible for upper limb control. Following successful reinnervation of target muscles, surface electromyographic (sEMG) biofeedback is used to train the activation of the novel muscular units. Later on, a table-top prosthesis may provide the first experience of prosthetic control. After fitting the actual prosthesis, training includes repetitive drills without objects, object manipulation, and finally, activities of daily living. Ultimately, regular patient appointments and functional assessments allow tracking prosthetic function and enabling early interventions if malfunctioning.

[Babysitter nerve transfer from the thenar branch to the deep terminal branch of the ulnar nerve : An option to preserve the intrinsic hand muscles in proximal lesions of the ulnar nerve]. / "Babysitter"-Nerventransfer vom R. thenaris zum R. profundus nervi ulnaris : Eine Option zum Erhalt der intrinsischen Handmuskulatur bei hohen Läsionen des N. ulnaris.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this surgery is to achieve early reinnervation of the intrinsic hand muscles through axons of the median nerve, preventing irreversible atrophy of the muscle tissue. The nerve transfer is achieved via a babysitter graft, which is sutured end-to-side to the donor as well as the recipient nerve. The procedure is carried out in combination with a proximal reconstruction of the ulnar nerve. INDICATIONS: High-grade lesions of the ulnar nerve without spontaneous regeneration, particularly when lesions are located proximally and/or when patients present late. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Irreversible denervation of the intrinsic muscles; weakness or palsy of the thenar branch. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The approach is taken through a longitudinal incision over the volar wrist. The deep branch of the ulnar nerve as well as the thenar branch of the median nerve are visualized after transection of the flexor retinaculum. An autologous graft is then placed between the two nerves, sutured to the donor (thenar branch) as well as the recipient nerve (ulnar deep branch) via an epineural window in an end-to-side manner. This facilitates timely regeneration of motor axons from the median nerve into the intrinsic muscles, thereby preventing irreversible degeneration. Through the end-to-side nerve coaptation, damage to the donor nerve is reduced to a minimum. At the same time reconstruction of the ulnar nerve is performed proximally to the lesion, facilitating original reinnervation of the intrinsic muscles at a later time. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Postoperatively, Penrose drains are placed and a sterile hand dressing is applied. Drain removal and dressing change are performed on the first day, suture removal after 2 weeks. Physical therapy for mobility of the joints can be started as early as 1 week after surgery. After the first signs of motor and/or sensory reinnervation, a targeted retraining of daily skills should be initiated. RESULTS: This procedure has so far been reported on three patients with high-grade ulnar nerve injury. After a follow-up duration of 6 years, each achieved muscle strength of ≥ M3, with good to excellent overall regeneration according to the modified Bishop rating scale.

Avian extremity reconstruction via osseointegrated leg-prosthesis for intuitive embodiment.

For large avians such as vultures, limb loss leads to loss of ambulation and eventually death from malnutrition. Prosthetic devices may replace the limb, however, conventional prosthetic sockets are not feasible in feathered limbs and the extreme stress and strain of unreflected daily use in animals. Osseointegration is a novel technique, where external prosthetic parts are connected directly to a bone anchor to provide a solid skeletal-attachment. This concept provides a high degree of embodiment since osseoperception will provide direct intuitive feedback allowing natural use of the limb in gait and feeding. Here we demonstrate for the first time an osseointegrated bionic reconstruction of a limb in a vulture after a tarsometatarsal amputation with a longterm follow-up.

Prosthetic Embodiment and Body Image Changes in Patients Undergoing Bionic Reconstruction Following Brachial Plexus Injury.

Brachial plexus injuries with multiple-root involvement lead to severe and long-lasting impairments in the functionality and appearance of the affected upper extremity. In cases, where biologic reconstruction of hand and arm function is not possible, bionic reconstruction may be considered as a viable clinical option. Bionic reconstruction, through a careful combination of surgical augmentation, amputation, and prosthetic substitution of the functionless hand, has been shown to achieve substantial improvements in function and quality of life. However, it is known that long-term distortions in the body image are present in patients with severe nerve injury as well as in prosthetic users regardless of the level of function. To date, the body image of patients who voluntarily opted for elective amputation and prosthetic reconstruction has not been investigated. Moreover, the degree of embodiment of the prosthesis in these patients is unknown. We have conducted a longitudinal study evaluating changes of body image using the patient-reported Body Image Questionnaire 20 (BIQ-20) and a structured questionnaire about prosthetic embodiment. Six patients have been included. At follow up 2.5-5 years after intervention, a majority of patients reported better BIQ-20 scores including a less negative body evaluation (5 out of 6 patients) and higher vital body dynamics (4 out of 6 patients). Moreover, patients described a strong to moderate prosthesis embodiment. Interestingly, whether patients reported performing bimanual tasks together with the prosthetic hand or not, did not influence their perception of the prosthesis as a body part. In general, this group of patients undergoing prosthetic substitution after brachial plexus injury shows noticeable inter-individual differences. This indicates that the replacement of human anatomy with technology is not a straight-forward process perceived in the same way by everyone opting for it.

Successful salvage via re-osseointegration of a loosened implant in a patient with transtibial amputation.

CASE DESCRIPTION: Osseointegration is a relatively new technique for prosthetic limb attachment that offers various improvements for patients with amputation and facilitates joint preservation. We present a case of implant loosening during rehabilitation in a patient with transtibial amputation that was successfully managed through a combination of measures, aiming to promote re-osseointegration of the implant. OBJECTIVES: Not much is known about structured management of adverse events after osseointegration. Septic or aseptic loosening is currently regarded as implant failure, prompting removal and possible re-implantation at a later stage. The objective of this case report was to evaluate the feasibility of salvaging a loosened implant. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. TREATMENT: A novel treatment approach was employed to enable renewed osseointegration of the implant. First, the bone-implant interface was disrupted and renewed through axial rotation and distal repositioning of the implant. Afterwards, extracorporal shockwave therapy and antibiotic treatment were administered. Prosthetic rehabilitation was then started anew. Regular follow-up x-rays and clinical evaluations were conducted, including standardized outcome tests. OUTCOMES: These combined measures led to a successful re-osseointegration of the implant. In a 21-month follow-up, the patient regained a stable and secure gait pattern, using his prosthesis every day for 15 hours and scoring above average on standardized outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This represents the first report of implant salvage after failed primary osseointegration. As the associated risks of this novel treatment are very low, investigations are warranted to evaluate this approach on a larger scale.

Case Report: Bionic Reconstruction in an Adult With Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury.

Introduction: Many adults who had a severe Narakas IV obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) suffer from extensive impairments in daily living due to limited hand-arm function. The dramatic loss of axonal support at this very early age of development often render the entire extremity a biologic wasteland and reconstructive methods and therapies often fail to recover any functional hand use. In this scenario bionic reconstruction, including an elective amputation and a subsequent prosthetic fitting, may enable functional improvement in adults suffering from the consequences of such severe brachial plexus injuries. We here describe our experience in treating such patients and lay out the surgical rational and rehabilitation protocol exemplified in one patient. Case Presentation/Methods: A 27-year-old adult with a unilateral OBPI contacted our center. He presented with globally diminished function of the affected upper extremity with minimal hand activity, resulting in an inability to perform various tasks of daily living. No biological reconstructive efforts were available to restore meaningful hand function. An interdisciplinary evaluation, including a psychosocial assessment, was used to assess eligibility for bionic reconstruction. Before the amputation and after the prosthetic fitting functional assessments and self-reported questionnaires were performed. Results: One month after the amputation and de-rotation osteotomy of the humerus the patient was fitted with a myoelectric prosthesis. At the 1.5 year-follow-up assessment, the patient presented with a distinct improvement of function: the ARAT improved from 12 to 20 points, SHAP score improved from 8 to 29, and the DASH value improved from 50 to 11.7. The average wearing times of the prosthesis were 5 to 6 h per day (on 4-5 days a week). Discussion: The options for adults suffering from the consequences of severe OBPIs to improve function are limited. In selected patients in whom the neurological deficit is so severe that biologic hand function is unsatisfactory, an elective amputation and subsequent restoration of the hand with mechatronic means may be an option. The follow-up results indicate that this concept can indeed lead to solid hand function and independence in daily activities after amputation, subsequent prosthetic fitting, and rehabilitation.