RESUMEN
MPM is an aggressive disease with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and interest in exploring immunotherapy in this disease has been increasing. In the first line of treatment, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated an improvement in survival over chemotherapy. The presence of TILs has been recognized as a marker of antitumor immune response to chemotherapy in solid tumors. The aim of our study is to identify the effect of treatment on immune cells and the immune gene profile in MPM. We investigated the changes in expression of TILs in 10 human MPM paired tumor tissues using immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis from paired untreated and treated samples. In this small series, we demonstrated that during the evolution of disease without any treatment there was an increase in the inflammatory component in tumor samples. After systemic treatment there was a decrease in the number of TILs. We observed that after systemic treatment or disease progression immune gene signatures were suppressed. Our integrated analysis of paired samples with immune profile and genomic changes on MPM suggested that during the evolution of the disease the immune system tends to switch, turning off with treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Ki67 is a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer (BC). However, manual scoring (MS) by visual assessment suffers from high inter-observer variability which limits its clinical use. Here, we developed a new digital image analysis (DIA) workflow, named KiQuant for automated scoring of Ki67 and investigated its equivalence with standard pathologist's assessment. METHODS: Sequential immunohistochemistry of Ki67 and cytokeratin, for precise tumor cell recognition, were performed in the same section of 5 tissue microarrays containing 329 tumor cores from different breast cancer subtypes. Slides were digitalized and subjected to DIA and MS for Ki67 assessment. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate inter-observer reproducibility. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the prognostic potential. RESULTS: KiQuant showed an excellent correlation with MS (ICC:0.905,95%CI:0.878-0.926) with satisfactory inter-run (ICC:0.917,95%CI:0.884-0.942) and inter-antibody reproducibilities (ICC:0.886,95%CI:0.820-0.929). The distance between KiQuant and MS increased with the magnitude of Ki67 measurement and positively correlated with analyzed tumor area and breast cancer subtype. Agreement rates between KiQuant and MS within the clinically relevant 14% and 30% cut-off points ranged from 33% to 44% with modest interobserver reproducibility below the 20% cut-off (0.606, 95%CI:0.467-0.727). High Ki67 by KiQuant correlated with worse outcome in all BC and in the luminal subtype (Pâ¯=â¯0.028 and Pâ¯=â¯0.043, respectively). For MS, the association with survival was significant only in 1 out of 3 observers. CONCLUSIONS: KiQuant represents an easy and accurate methodology for Ki67 measurement providing a step toward utilizing Ki67 in the clinical setting.