Acute outcome of chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalizsation in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of total chronic total occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge in interventional cardiology. There is only insignificant knowledge reported in the literature about age differences in CTO recanalization. We analyzed in this study the issue of the impact of age on procedural characteristics, complications and short-term outcome. METHODS: Between 2012-2016 we included 440 patients. They underwent PCI for at least one CTO. Antegrade and retrograde CTO techniques were applied. The retrograde approach was used only after failed antegrade intervention. Continuous data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation; categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages unless otherwise specified. We used Twosamplet- t-test with equal variance to test the significant differences of the variables between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Procedural success proved independently of age. There was no significant interaction between age and procedural success (p=0.5). Complication rates were low in both groups (2.7% vs. 4%; p=0,4) with no difference in statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in an aging society patients with severe coronary artery disease and chronical total occlusions an interventional therapy should be used more intensively. It can be performed safe and feasible.

Gender-based acute outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total coronary occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of total chronic coronary occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge. Insignificant data are reported in the literature about gender differences in CTO-PCI in the era of new drug-eluting stents. In this study we analysed the impact of gender on procedural characteristics, complications and acute results. METHODS: Between 2010-2015 we included 780 consecutive patients. They underwent PCI for at least one CTO. Antegrade and retrograde CTO techniques were applied. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CTO-PCI were mainly men (84%). Male patients were younger (66.9 years ±10.6 vs. 61.1 years ±10.4; p < 0.001), more often smokers, but less frequently had a history of coronary artery disease (24.4% vs. 32.7%; p = 0.085) compared with female patients. Female patients more often had diabetes mellitus (29.6% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.55) and hypertension (82.7% vs. 80.7%; p = 0.55). There were no differences with respect to the amount of contrast fluid, fluoroscopy time and examination time as well as to the length of the stent or the number of the stents. The stent diameter was slightly smaller in women, which was not surprising because the lumen calibre tends to be smaller in women than in men (3.0 mm (2.5-3) vs. 3.0 mm (3-3.5); p < 0.001). The success rates were 81.0% in women and 80.1% in men. There was no significant interaction between gender and procedural success and complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study suggests that women and men have a comparable success rate at a low complication rate after recanalisation of CTO.

Validity of the J-CTO Score and the CL-Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of total chronic coronary occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge in interventional cardiology. To predict the probability of a successful intervention different scoring systems are available. We analyzed in this study the validity of two scoring systems, the Japanese CTO score (J-CTO score) and the newly developed Clinical and Lesion-related score (CL Score). METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015 we included 379 consecutive patients. They underwent PCI for at least one CTO. Antegrade and retrograde CTO techniques were applied. The retrograde approach was used only after failed antegrade intervention. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CTO PCI were mainly men (84%). The overall procedural success rate was 84% (±0.4). The mean J-CTO score was 2.9 (±1.3) and the mean CL score was 4.3 (±1.7). The CL score predicted more precisely the interventional results than the J-CTO score. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the previously presented CL score is superior to the J-CTO score in identifying CTO lesions with a likelihood for successful recanalization. Generally it appears to be a helpful tool for selecting patients and identifying the appropriate operator.