Association Between Diseases and Symptoms Diagnosed in Primary Care and the Subsequent Specific Risk of Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported a possible prodrome in multiple sclerosis (MS) defined by nonspecific symptoms including mood disorder or genitourinary symptoms and increased health care use detected several years before diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate agnostically the associations between diseases and symptoms diagnosed in primary care and the risk of MS relative to controls and 2 other autoimmune inflammatory diseases with similar population characteristics, namely lupus and Crohn disease (CD). METHODS: A case-control study was conducted using electronic health records from the Health Improvement Network database in the United Kingdom and France. We agnostically assessed the associations between 113 diseases and symptoms in the 5 years before and after diagnosis in patients with subsequent diagnosis of MS. Individuals with a diagnosis of MS were compared with individuals without MS and individuals with 2 other autoimmune diseases, CD and lupus. RESULTS: The study population consisted of patients with MS (n = 20,174), patients without MS (n = 54,790), patients with CD (n = 30,477), and patients with lupus (n = 7,337). Twelve ICD-10 codes were significantly positively associated with the risk of MS compared with controls without MS. After considering ICD-10 codes suggestive of neurologic symptoms as the first diagnosis of MS, 5 ICD-10 codes remained significantly associated with MS: depression (UK: odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.34), sexual dysfunction (1.47, 1.11-1.95), constipation (1.5, 1.27-1.78), cystitis (1.21, 1.05-1.39), and urinary tract infections of unspecified site (1.38, 1.18-1.61). However, none of these conditions was selectively associated with MS in comparisons with both lupus and CD. All 5 ICD-10 codes identified were still associated with MS during the 5 years after diagnosis. DISCUSSION: We identified 5 health conditions associated with subsequent MS diagnosis, which may be considered not only prodromal but also early-stage symptoms. However, these health conditions overlap with prodrome of 2 other autoimmune diseases; hence, they lack specificity to MS.

Validation study of "Santé-Cerveau", a digital tool for early cognitive changes identification.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for a reliable, easy-to-use, widely available, and validated tool for timely cognitive impairment identification. We created a computerized cognitive screening tool (Santé-Cerveau digital tool (SCD-T)) including validated questionnaires and the following neuropsychological tests: 5 Word Test (5-WT) for episodic memory, Trail Making Test (TMT) for executive functions, and a number coding test (NCT) adapted from the Digit Symbol Substitution Test for global intellectual efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of SCD-T to identify cognitive deficit and to determine its usability. METHODS: Three groups were constituted including 65 elderly Controls, 64 patients with neurodegenerative diseases (NDG): 50 AD and 14 non-AD, and 20 post-COVID-19 patients. The minimum MMSE score for inclusion was 20. Association between computerized SCD-T cognitive tests and their standard equivalent was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Two algorithms (a simple clinician-guided algorithm involving the 5-WT and the NCT; and a machine learning classifier based on 8 scores from the SCD-T tests extracted from a multiple logistic regression model, and data from the SCD-T questionnaires) were evaluated. The acceptability of SCD-T was investigated through a questionnaire and scale. RESULTS: AD and non-AD participants were older (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 72.61 ± 6.79 vs 69.91 ± 4.86 years old, p = 0.011) and had a lower MMSE score (Mean difference estimate ± standard error: 1.74 ± 0.14, p < 0.001) than Controls; post-COVID-19 patients were younger than Controls (mean ± SD: 45.07 ± 11.36 years old, p < 0.001). All the computerized SCD-T cognitive tests were significantly associated with their reference version. In the pooled Controls and NDG group, the correlation coefficient was 0.84 for verbal memory, -0.60 for executive functions, and 0.72 for global intellectual efficiency. The clinician-guided algorithm demonstrated 94.4% ± 3.8% sensitivity and 80.5% ± 8.7% specificity, and the machine learning classifier 96.8% ± 3.9% sensitivity and 90.7% ± 5.8% specificity. The acceptability of SCD-T was good to excellent. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the high accuracy of SCD-T in screening cognitive disorders and its good acceptance even in individuals with prodromal and mild dementia stages. SCD-T would be useful in primary care to faster refer subjects with significant cognitive impairment (and limit unnecessary referrals) to specialized consultation, improve the AD care pathway and the pre-screening in clinical trials.