High body mass index is not a contraindication for an arthroscopic ligament repair with biological augmentation in case of chronic ankle instability.

PURPOSE: Obesity remains frequently mentioned as a contraindication for lateral ankle ligament repair. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results of an arthroscopic lateral ligament repair with biological augmentation between patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 and less than 30. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with an isolated lateral ankle instability were treated with an arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair with biological augmentation using the inferior extensor retinaculum (IER). Patients were divided into two groups according to their BMI: ≥ 30 (Group A; n = 26) and < 30 (Group B; n = 43). Patients were pre-and post-operatively evaluated, with a minimum of 2 years follow-up, and using the Karlsson Score. Characteristics of the patients, complications, ankle instability symptoms recurrence, and satisfaction score were recorded. RESULTS: In group A, the median Karlsson Score increased from 43.5 (Range 22-72) to 85 (Range 37-100) at follow-up. Complications were observed in seven patients (27%). Nineteen patients (73%) reported that they were "very satisfied". One patient (4%) described persistent ankle instability symptoms. In group B, the median Karlsson Score increased from 65 (Range 42-80) to 95 (Range 50-100) at follow-up. Complications were observed in four patients (9%). Thirty-three patients (77%) reported that they were "very satisfied". Two patients (5%) described persistent ankle instability symptoms. Pre-operative and at last follow-up Karlsson Score, results were significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant statistical difference in favour of satisfaction score, complications and recurrence of ankle instability between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ATFL repair with biological augmentation using IER gives excellent results for patients with BMI ≥ 30. Compared to patients with BMI < 30, they present a slightly lower preoperative and postoperative Karlsson score, however, with a similar satisfaction rate, but are at higher risk of transient superficial peroneal nerve dysesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Lower limb deformities and limb length discrepancies in hereditary multiple exostoses.

There is a high rate of lower limb deformity and limb length discrepancy in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses (HME). The aim of this study was to evaluate the type and frequency of lower limbs axial deviation and limb length discrepancy and the type of exostoses being risk factors for theses deformities. We retrospectively reviewed standing full-length radiograph of 32 HME patients (64 limbs) followed in our institution between October 2009 and December 2020. Patient demographics were recorded. Radiographic analysis of the coronal limb alignment was performed, limb length discrepancy was measured and topography of the exostoses was recorded. We propose a classification of lower legs in 2 groups and 4 types according to the presence and the location of exostoses. In group I, there is an intertibio- fibular exostose with fibular origin at the level of the tibiofibular joints. In type IA, at the level of the distal tibiofibular joint with ascension of the distal fibula; in type IB at the level of the proximal tibiofibular joint with a bracketing effect on the proximal tibia and a lateral slope of the proximal tibial growth plate; the type IC is combining features of both IA and IB. In group II, there is no intertibio-fibular exostose coming from the fibula and no growth abnormality is obvious. A clinically notable lower limb discrepancy (LLD) of ≥2 cm was found in 19% of our patients. Approximately 33% of patients had a knee valgus deformity and 44% had an ankle valgus deformity. The knee valgus deformity was due to fibular growth anomalies and not to distal femur anomalies. The majority of lower legs had fibular growth anomalies (72%) which was a significant risk factor for knee valgus deformity and leg length discrepancy. On the contrary, we found no correlation between number, location and volume of distal femoral exostoses and genu valgum nor leg length discrepancy. Presence of intertibio-fibular exostoses is a risk factor for knee valgus deformity and leg length discrepancy. The presence of these exostoses should lead to a close follow-up of the patient.

Higher sensitivity with the lever sign test for diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of the "lever sign test" to diagnose ACL rupture and to compare this test to the two most commonly used, the Lachman and anterior drawer test. METHOD: This prospective study was performed in the ED of the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels, Belgium) from March 2017 to May 2019. 52 patients were included undergoing knee trauma, within 8 days, with an initial radiograph excluding a fracture (except Segond fracture or tibial spine fracture). On clinical investigation, patients showed a positive lever sign test and/or a positive Lachman test and/or a positive anterior drawer test. Exclusion criteria were a complete rupture of the knee extensor mechanism and patellar dislocation. All the physicians involved in this study were residents in training. An MRI was performed within 3 weeks for all included patients after the clinical examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were investigated for all three tests with MRI used as our reference standard. RESULTS: Forty out of 52 patients suffered an ACL rupture (77%) and 12 did not (23%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the lever sign test were respectively 92.5%, 25% 82% and 50%. Those of the Lachman test were 54%, 54.5%, 81% and 25%, and those of the anterior drawer test were 56%, 82%, 90.5% and 37.5%. Twelve out of 40 ACL ruptures (30%) were diagnosed exclusively with a positive lever sign test. CONCLUSION: When investigating acute ACL ruptures (< 8 days) in the ED, the lever sign test offers a sensitivity of 92.5%, far superior to that of other well-known clinical tests. The lever sign test is relatively pain-free, easy to perform and its visual interpretation requires less experience. Positive lever sign test at the ED should lead to an MRI to combine high clinical sensitivity with high MRI specificity.