The canonical Brucella species-host dependency is changing, however, the antibiotic susceptibility profiles remain unchanged.

Brucellosis is a chronic disease caused by Brucella species with a wide range of hosts, from marine mammals to terrestrial species, but with strict host preferences. With the zoonotic character, the prevalence of human brucellosis cases is a reflection of animal infections. This study aimed to identify 192 Brucella isolates obtained from various sources by Bruce-ladder PCR and to determine their antibiotic susceptibilities by gradient diffusion method (E-test). As a result of the PCR, all human isolates (n = 57) were identified as B. melitensis. While 58 (82.9%) of the cattle isolates were identified as B. abortus, 59 (90.8%) of the sheep isolates were identified as B. melitensis. In addition, 12 (17.1%) of the cattle isolates and 6 (9.2%) of the sheep isolates were determined as B. melitensis and B. abortus, respectively. The primary host change behavior of B. melitensis was 1.9 times higher than that of B. abortus. While gentamicin and ciprofloxacin susceptibilities of Brucella isolates were 100%, tetracycline, doxycycline, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin susceptibilities were 99%, 99%, 97.4%, 91.7% and 83.9%, respectively. The lowest sensitivity of the isolates was determined against to cefoperazone as 26%. A triple-drug resistance was detected in 1 B. abortus isolate that included simultaneous resistance to cefoperazone, rifampicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The high susceptibility profiles we found against to antibiotics such as tetracycline, doxycycline gentamicin and ciprofloxacin, used widely in treatment, are encouraging. However, the change in the canonical Brucella species-primary host preference suggests the need to reconsider eradication program, including updating vaccine formulations.

[Helicobacter pylori Positivity and Risk Analysis in Patients with Abdominal Pain Complaints]. / Abdominal Agri Yakinmali Hastalarda Helicobacter pylori Pozitifligi ve Risk Analizi.

Helicobacters have wide host diversity due to the their particular virulence and environmental factors and may cause infections in humans. As they live in and around the stomach the group is called as gastric helicobacters which particularly consists of Helicobacter pylori and Helicobacter heilmanni, Helicobacter felis, Helicobacter salomonis and many other species, as well. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate 195 patients (119 urban and 76 rural residents, 121 female and 74 male individuals between 18 and 93 years of age) in terms of gastric Helicobacter (H.pylori, H.felis and H.heilmanii) who have admitted to the Health Research and Application Center of Kafkas University Endoscopy Unit of the General Surgery Department with the complaints of abdominal pain. For this purpose, biopsy specimens obtained from various parts of the stomach (corpus and antrum) by endoscopy were analyzed with histopathological examination and PCR. Histopathological analysis sections were stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa and spiral-shaped helicobacters attached to the surface of the epithelium were investigated. For the direct analysis of Helicobacter in biopsy samples, 16S rRNA gene based genus-specific and urease B gene based species-specific PCR methods were used. Out of the 195 cases that were histopathologically evaluated 163 (83.58%) were found to be positive for gastric Helicobacter, while five were suspected and 27 were negative. Helicobacter spp. DNA were detected in 107 (54.87%) samples, of these samples 91 were histopathologically positive, 13 were negative and three were suspicious samples. Eighty seven (44.61%) of the samples were identified as H.pylori by species-specific PCR. H.felis and H.heilmannii could not be detected in any of the samples; meanwhile genus-specific PCR positive 20 samples were not identified. In this study, 42.85% of the individuals living in urban area and 47.36% of those living in rural area were identified as H.pylori positive. 46.28% of women and 41.89% of men were positive for H.pylori. The age range of H.pylori positive individuals were as follows: 60% of the individuals were between 15-24 years, 60.27% of the individuals were between 25-44 years, 34.66% of the individuals were between 45-64 years and 29.72% of the individuals were 65 and over. 42.64% of the cat or dog owners were found as H.pylori positive whereas H.pylori was positive in 45.66% of the individuals who do not own animals. No significant relationship was found between these determinants and the prevalence of the disease (p> 0.05). However, the positivity of H.pylori was higher in the 25-44 active working age group due to the increased agent exposure (p<0.05). This study is the first study on the prevalence of H.pylori in humans and analysis of possible risk factors in the region and hoped to provide useful information for the researchers working in this field.

The prevalence of tularemia in occupational groups that have contact with animals.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the current study was to investigate the presence of antibodies against Francisella tularensis in individuals in different occupations that have contact with animals in the Kars region of northeastern Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 201 blood samples specifically including 103 farmers, 45 clinical veterinarians, 42 butchers, and 11 hunters were analyzed. The results of the study were reported in relation to some sociodemographic features (age, sex, occupation, and experience) of the volunteers. The presence of antibodies was determined by a microagglutination (MA) test. In addition, positive sera were confirmed using an ELISA kit. RESULTS: Fifteen (7.46%) individuals, including fourteen farmers and one clinical veterinarian, were found to be positive for F. tularensis by both MA and ELISA with a titer range of 1/10 to 1/160. The highest seroprevalence rate was observed in farmers (13.59%), followed by clinical veterinarians (2.22%). The occurrence of tularemia was found to increase with age. CONCLUSION: Though the main route of tularemia outbreaks is water-borne in Turkey, it was determined that people whose occupations bring them into contact with animals are at risk. Similar studies are recommended in order to further clarify the epidemiology of the disease in the northeast of Turkey.