Introduction: The treatment of late-presenting Perthes disease with extrusion is controversial and debatable. One of the options available is the labral shelf acetabuloplasty (LSA). Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of LSA in late-presenting Perthes disease in terms of clinic-radiological outcome measures. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with late presenting Perthes disease (Elizabethtown stage 2B onwards) treated by LSA by 2 experienced paediatric orthopaedic surgeons was performed. Data was collected of clinical parameters such as hip range of motion(ROM) and Harris Hip score and radiological parameters such as acetabular height, width and volume, shelf width, Centre Edge angle(CEA) and the lateral extrusion. Results: Thirty-five patients (28 males and 7 females) treated between 2012 to 2019 were analyzed. Majority were in Elizabethtown stage 3A (23) followed by 2B and 3B (12 each). At a mean follow up of 36 months, the hip ROM and the Harris Hip Score (from 65 ± 3.5 to 81.33 ± 7.12) improved significantly and there was a statistically significant improvement in terms of all radiological parameters. Majority of the hips were in Stulberg grade 3 (20) followed by grade 1 and 2 (7 each) and Stulberg 4 (1). There were no major complications in any of the patients of the series. Conclusion: Labral support shelf acetabuloplasty is a valuable surgery for late presenting Perthes disease and helps in maintenance of good coverage and allows restoration of range of motion over time.
BACKGROUND: A prospective study of motor milestones achieved in severe clubfeet treated by Ponseti method and comparison between unilateral and bilateral clubfoot will help us gain further insight of motor milestones in these children. METHODS: Prospective study of 150 consecutive children with idiopathic clubfoot who were treated by Ponseti method and in whom percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy was performed. The gross motor milestones recorded were: rolls from back to stomach, sitting without support, standing with assistance, walks with assistance, standing alone, walking alone. This was compared with published regional and World Health Organization (WHO) normal data. RESULT: 15 patients were excluded due to non-compliance and recurrence. Children with unilateral clubfoot (80 children) and bilateral clubfoot (55 children) showed a delay of 0.2-2.1 months in various milestones, and this was statistically significant when compared with both normal data. 95% children with unilateral clubfoot had independent ambulation by 17 months and in bilateral ambulation by 17.8 months. There was also a statistically significant difference in unilateral and bilateral clubfeet in all variables except sitting without support and walking with support. CONCLUSION: There is a delay in achievement in all children with clubfoot, with more delay in bilateral clubfoot as compared to unilateral clubfoot. The probable reasons could be plaster treatment, possible weakness due to tendoachilles tenotomy, use of orthosis or the inherent pathology associated with clubfeet. Parents hence need to be explained about this delay.
