Scalp hair loss is not random across follicular units: A new insight into human hair ageing.

OBJECTIVES: Scalp hair has the greatest number of hairs (typically 1-5) per follicular unit but is also the most susceptible body site to hair loss with age. Hence, we set-out to determine the degree to which scalp hair parameters change with age in women and men, any sex differences thereof and whether hair loss is random across follicular units. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 200 Chinese men and 200 Chinese women (30-69 years). Image analysis and manual counting methods were used to measure occipital located hair parameters from 6 × 8 mm shaved scalp photographs and plucked hair microscopy images. RESULTS: Of the five hair parameters, the number of hairs per follicular unit had the greatest (negative) correlation with age in both men and women. Men had a greater number of hairs and follicular units than women on average but had a greater decrease in the number of hairs per follicular unit with age, particularly for the loss of multi-hair (3+) follicular units. The loss of hairs with age was significantly different to that expected by a random loss of hairs across follicular units and better described by a model of increased hair loss risk the greater number of hairs per follicular unit. CONCLUSIONS: We have found evidence of hair loss preferentially occurring in multi-hair follicular units, which was more pronounced in men. These data suggest that part of the reason scalp hair is more susceptible to hair loss than on other body sites is due to the greater presence of multi-hair follicular units on the scalp.

OBJECTIFS: Le cuir chevelu possède le plus grand nombre de cheveux (généralement de 1 à 5) par unité folliculaire, mais c'est aussi le site le plus sensible à la perte de cheveux avec l'âge. Nous avons donc entrepris de déterminer dans quelle mesure les paramètres des cheveux du cuir chevelu changent avec l'âge chez les femmes et les hommes, quelles sont les différences entre les sexes et si la perte de cheveux est aléatoire entre les unités folliculaires. MÉTHODES: Étude transversale rétrospective portant sur 200 hommes et 200 femmes chinois (30-69 ans). Des méthodes d'analyse d'image et de comptage manuel ont été utilisées pour mesurer les paramètres des cheveux situés dans la région occipitale à partir de photographies du cuir chevelu rasé de 6x8 mm et d'images microscopiques de cheveux arrachés. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 5 paramètres capillaires, le nombre de cheveux par unité folliculaire présentait la corrélation la plus forte (négative) avec l'âge, tant chez les hommes que chez les femmes. Les hommes avaient en moyenne un plus grand nombre de cheveux et d'unités folliculaires que les femmes, mais le nombre de cheveux par unité folliculaire diminuait davantage avec l'âge, en particulier pour la perte d'unités folliculaires à plusieurs cheveux (3+). La perte de cheveux avec l'âge était significativement différente de celle attendue par une perte aléatoire de cheveux dans les unités folliculaires, et mieux décrite par un modèle d'augmentation du risque de perte de cheveux plus le nombre de cheveux par unité folliculaire est élevé. CONCLUSIONS: Nous avons trouvé des preuves que la perte de cheveux se produit préférentiellement dans les unités folliculaires à plusieurs cheveux, ce qui était plus prononcé chez les hommes. Ces données suggèrent qu'une partie de la raison pour laquelle les cheveux du cuir chevelu sont plus sensibles à la perte de cheveux que sur d'autres sites du corps est due à la plus grande présence d'unités folliculaires à cheveux multiples sur le cuir chevelu.

Mortality is Written on the Face.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether facial or surrounding (eg, hair and clothing) cues have the strongest influence on the perceived age of subjects in photographic images, and which drives links between perceived age and survival. METHODS: In 2001, 187 Danish twin pairs (n = 374) aged 70+ years were photographed generating passport-type images. The faces of the twins in these images were swapped creating two new images per twin pair (748 images in total). Ten nurses rated the perceived age of the twin from the original and swapped facial images. The survival of the twins was determined through to the end of 2013. RESULTS: Changing the face or its surrounding significantly changed the perceived age of the images, with only a marginal difference between their effect sizes (difference of 0.5 years, 95% confidence interval CI -0.1 to 1.1). Perceived age, adjusting for chronological age, and sex, was a predictor of survival up to 7 years (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.25) and also 7-12 years (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12) after the photographs were taken. Where the older looking twin died first they had a significantly older looking face (1.4 years older, 95% CI 0.3-2.6) but not surrounding (0.3 years older, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.4) compared to where the older looking twin died second. CONCLUSIONS: Facial visual cues but not hair or clothing cues drive the link between perceived age and survival.

The specificity and patterns of staining in human cells and tissues of p16INK4a antibodies demonstrate variant antigen binding.

The validity of the identification and classification of human cancer using antibodies to detect biomarker proteins depends upon antibody specificity. Antibodies that bind to the tumour-suppressor protein p16INK4a are widely used for cancer diagnosis and research. In this study we examined the specificity of four commercially available anti-p16INK4a antibodies in four immunological applications. The antibodies H-156 and JC8 detected the same 16 kDa protein in western blot and immunoprecipitation tests, whereas the antibody F-12 did not detect any protein in western blot analysis or capture a protein that could be recognised by the H-156 antibody. In immunocytochemistry tests, the antibodies JC8 and H-156 detected a predominately cytoplasmic localised antigen, whose signal was depleted in p16INK4a siRNA experiments. F-12, in contrast, detected a predominately nuclear located antigen and there was no noticeable reduction in this signal after siRNA knockdown. Furthermore in immunohistochemistry tests, F-12 generated a different pattern of staining compared to the JC8 and E6H4 antibodies. These results demonstrate that three out of four commercially available p16INK4a antibodies are specific to, and indicate a mainly cytoplasmic localisation for, the p16INK4a protein. The F-12 antibody, which has been widely used in previous studies, gave different results to the other antibodies and did not demonstrate specificity to human p16INK4a. This work emphasizes the importance of the validation of commercial antibodies, aside to the previously reported use, for the full verification of immunoreaction specificity.