Real-world effectiveness of omadacycline and impact of unapproved omadacycline prescription claims among adult outpatients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is an amino-methylcycline antibiotic that is indicated for the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Like many new antibiotics, there are scant real-world effectiveness data for omadacycline. There is also a high potential that an omadacycline prescription is rejected or reversed, and it is not known whether patients who have an unapproved omadacycline claim are at higher risk for 30-day emergency department (ED)/inpatient (IP) visits. OBJECTIVE: To describe the real-world effectiveness of omadacycline and assess the impact of unapproved omadacycline claims among adult outpatients with CABP or ABSSSIs. METHODS: The study population included patients who received 1 or more omadacycline outpatient prescriptions from a large US claims database (October 2018 to September 2020) and had a diagnosis for CABP or ABSSSI. The approval status of omadacycline claims was determined. The proportion of all-cause 30-day ED/IP visits among patients with an approved vs unapproved claim was compared. RESULTS: 404 patients met the inclusion criteria (CABP: 97; ABSSSI: 307). Of the 404 patients, 146 (36%) had an unapproved claim (CABP: 28; ABSSSI: 118). Overall, the proportion of 30-day ED/IP visits (yes/no) for those with an unapproved and approved claim was 28% vs 17%, respectively (P < 0.05). The overall adjusted 30-day ED/IP visits incidence difference was 11% (95% CI = 2 - 19), corresponding to an adjusted number needed to treat of 9 (95% CI = 5 - 43). CONCLUSIONS: A high incidence (36%) of unapproved omadacydine claims was observed in this study. Patients with unapproved daims had an 11% higher incidence of 30-day all-cause ED/IP visits than patients with approved claims. DISCLOSURES This study was funded by Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc (King of Prussia, PA). Dr Lodise is a consultant to Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and has received consultancy payments. Drs Gunter, Sandor, and Berman are employees and shareholders of Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr Mu, Ms Gao, Ms Yang, and Ms Yim are employees of Analysis Group. Analysis Group has received payment from Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc, to conduct part of this study.

Omadacycline and Clostridioides difficile: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to summarize in vitro, preclinical, and human data related to omadacycline and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for "omadacycline" AND ("Clostridium difficile" OR "C difficile" OR "Clostridioides difficile") for any studies published before February 15, 2022. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (AERS) was searched for omadacycline (for reports including "C. difficile" or "CDI" or "gastrointestinal infection"). The publications list publicly available at Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Web site was reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Publications presenting primary data on omadacycline and C. difficile published in English were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Preclinical and clinical evidence was extracted from 14 studies. No case reports in indexed literature and no reports on FDA AERS were found. Omadacycline has potent in vitro activity against many C. difficile clinical strains and diverse ribotypes. In phase 3 studies, there were no reports of CDI in patients who received omadacycline for either community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Omadacycline should be considered a low-risk antibiotic regarding its propensity to cause CDI. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the burden of CDI on patients and the health care system should be a priority. Patients with appropriate indications who are at heightened risk of CDI may be suitable candidates for omadacycline therapy. In these patients, omadacycline may be preferable to antibiotics with a high CDI risk.

Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey Among Adults With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections who Received Either Omadacycline or Linezolid in a Phase 3 Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trial.

This analysis of data from a Phase 3 study of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections showed that successful oral treatment with omadacycline (n = 368) or linezolid (n = 367) was associated with improvement in health-related quality of life.