Assessing Inequities in Cervical Cancer Quality of Care and Survival Related to Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Factors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect that race and socioeconomic factors have on the provision of care to cervical cancer patients based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended treatment guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To do this, we completed a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeon's Nation Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. We identified all reported cases of cervical cancer in that period. Two cohorts were created using self-reported racial demographic data, Hispanic- and White, non-Hispanic-identified patients. Our primary outcome variables were adherence to NCCN-recommended treatment and 5-year overall survival. Adherence to NCCN-recommended treatment was determined by the provision of surgical and/or radiation and/or chemotherapy treatment based on the clinical stage at time of diagnosis and the presence or absence of lymphovascular space invasion. We used bivariate analyses to compare baseline characteristics between the 2 cohorts, multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of 5-year survival, and Cox proportional hazards models to compute survival by group. RESULTS: The difference in NCCN-adherent care between the 2 cohorts was found to be not statistically significant (p = .880). A log rank (Mantel-Cox) χ2 test showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in overall survival with the Hispanic-identified patients living longer (p < .001). Our study is limited by the effect large databases confer on finding statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic-identified women with cervical cancer receive NCCN-compliant care and live longer than their White, non-Hispanic counterparts.

Sexual and Marital Dysfunction in Women With Gynecologic Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Sexual dysfunction can be a long-term issue for women with gynecologic cancer. This study assesses the extent of sexual and marital dysfunction women face following treatment of a gynecologic cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of women with gynecologic cancer was conducted using a 181-item survey. Sexual dysfunction was measured by change in the Female Sexual Function Index score; marital dysfunction was measured by change in Intimate Bond Measure from prediagnosis to posttreatment. Paired t tests and Fisher exact test were used to compare women with dysfunction to those without dysfunction. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty women were enrolled (mean age, 56.0 [SD, 12.0] years). Among all women, sexual function declined from a score of 21.3 (SD, 10.4) prior to 15.3 (SD, 10.2) (P < 0.001), and sexual activity decreased from 6.1 (SD, 6.8) to 2.6 (SD, 4.9) times per month following treatment (P < 0.001). Among the 208 women who were sexually active at the time of study, sexual dysfunction after treatment was associated with younger age (50.9 [SD, 11.7] years to 57.3 [SD, 12.3] years), ovarian (40.7% vs 30.7%) or cervical (21.0% vs 10.2%) cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy treatment (72.8% vs 50.4%), and being in a relationship (97.3% vs 82.7%). Among women in relationships, 27% experienced marital dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Women who are younger, have an ovarian or cervical cancer diagnosis, receive chemotherapy, or are in a committed relationship are at particularly high risk of sexual dysfunction. These women should be provided information about the risks associated with their cancer treatment.

Histopathology Discrepancy of Preoperative Endometrial Sampling and Final Specimen: How Does This Influence Selective Lymph Node Dissection?

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative histology is a major component in the perioperative selective lymph node (LN) dissection decision process. Discrepancy between preoperative endometrial sampling and final specimen histopathology is generally accepted. The goals of this project are to determine if discrepancy of histopathology is associated with alteration of adjuvant treatment or outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer at a single institution from 2010 to 2014. All patients had preoperative endometrial sampling. Histopathology discrepancy was evaluated for potential in variation of perioperative LN dissection. Criteria for not performing LN dissection was defined as preoperative endometrioid histology, grade 1 or 2 lesion, myometrial invasion of 50% or less, and primary tumor diameter 2 cm or less. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were identified; 44 were excluded because of no preoperative pathology or no residual disease on final pathology. Discrepancy of histopathology was noted in 64/308 (20.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.2%-25.3%) patients. Preoperative endometrioid histology was noted in 272 patients, and 17/272 (6.3%; 95% CI, 3.4%-9.1%) had preoperative sampling reviewed as a grade 1 or 2 endometrioid lesion and final specimen was upgraded to grade 3. Downstaging occurred in 3/272 (1.1%; 95% CI, 0%-2.3%) patients with preoperative grade 3 lesion and final specimen demonstrated grade 1 or 2 disease. All 3 patients' primary tumor diameter was greater than 2 cm and therefore received LN dissection. Histopathological discrepancy that would alter perioperative LN dissection decision based on the aforementioned criteria occurred in 2/272 (0.7%; 95% CI, 0%-1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a 20% discrepancy of preoperative and postoperative histopathology, discrepancy that would alter a perioperative decision for LN dissection occurs in only 0.7% of cases in this retrospective single-institutional experience. Myometrial invasion and tumor size may be more influential than histology in LN selection criteria.

Evaluation of Preoperative Chest Imaging in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Current national guidelines recommend preoperative thoracic imaging for all patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. The objective of this project was to report the incidence of pulmonary metastasis in endometrial cancer patients and describe tumor and patient characteristics to better identify a low-risk population for thoracic involvement. We evaluated the ideal modality of preoperative imaging for both low-risk and high-risk populations based on the risk of pulmonary involvement. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing surgical evaluation for endometrial cancer at a single institution from 2010 to 2014 was performed. Low-risk patients were defined as having a preoperative pathology sample showing grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer and a physical examination not concerning for extrauterine disease spread. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were evaluated, of which 327 (92.9%) had preoperative thoracic imaging. Twenty-six patients had benign pathology or no preoperative sampling, leaving 301 patients for analysis. There were 228 (75.7%) of 301 patients classified as low-risk by our criteria. There were 20 (8.8%) of 228 low-risk patients with initial imaging concerning for pulmonary metastasis, but follow-up showed no evidence of disease. No low-risk patients (0/228; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0.02%) had pulmonary metastasis. There were 4 (1.3%) of 301 (95% CI, 0%-0.04%) patients diagnosed with pulmonary metastasis based on preoperative imaging, and 4 (1.3%) of 301 (95% CI, 0.01%-0.04%) patients with recurrent pulmonary disease. Median time to pulmonary recurrence was 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pulmonary metastasis found on preoperative imaging is exceptionally low in our defined low-risk population. All of the patients with pulmonary involvement either initially or upon recurrence had high-risk features. Given our findings, we would recommend that providers consider chest x-ray as the appropriate screening modality for the low-risk population and chest computed tomography for the high-risk population.

Outcomes of women with atypical glandular cells on preoperative cytology and endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the prognostic importance of preoperative cervical cytologic diagnosis with atypical glandular cells (AGC) or malignant cells (MC) as a predictor of poor outcomes in endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 563 patients were surgically staged for endometrial adenocarcinoma from 2002 to 2012 at our institution. Of these patients, 106 were included to perform a case-control study (39 patients with AGC or MC and 67 controls). Included patients were not significantly different from excluded patients and were matched for age, race, and body mass index. Outcome variables included presence of extrauterine disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage ≥II) and high intermediate risk (HIR) disease. Further analysis sought to improve the prediction combining AGC or MC with other factors, such as grade and CA-125 levels. Standard statistical analyses were used. RESULTS: Among the patients with AGC or MC, 53.8% had HIR disease compared with 30.3% with normal cervical cytologic diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-6.09; P = 0.02). Extrauterine disease was found in 43.6% of patients with AGC or MC compared with that of 15.2% in patients with normal cervical cytologic diagnosis (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.72-10.90; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed that AGC or MC was an independent predictor of HIR disease (OR, 8.41; 95% CI, 1.34-52.78; P = 0.02) and extrauterine disease (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 1.26-18.1; P = 0.02). The combination of elevated CA-125 levels with AGC or MC cervical cytologic diagnosis increased the statistical prediction of extrauterine disease (OR, 13.3; 95% CI, 3.1-56.8; P < 0.01) and HIR disease (OR, 5.83; 95% CI, 1.44-23.71; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AGC or MC on preoperative cervical cytology are at risk for extrauterine and HIR disease. These preoperative findings should warn surgeons of the potential of extrauterine or occult metastatic disease.