Different immune contextures underlie tumor site-specific responses to immune checkpoint blockade in esophageal cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Heterogeneous responses to ICIs have been reported previously. Here, we describe a patient with advanced ESCC exhibiting a response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab for more than 6 months except primary resistant esophageal tumor. The esophageal tumor had higher regulatory T cells, neutrophils, and mast cells scores estimated by NanoString platform than hepatic tumor. The immunohistochemistry study confirmed higher expression levels of Foxp3, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in the esophageal tumor. The different immune contextures may underlie the heterogeneous responses to ICI combination in this ESCC patient.

A Single-Arm Phase Ib/II Study of Lenvatinib plus Eribulin in Advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Satisfactory treatment options for advanced leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma are limited. The LEADER study (NCT03526679) investigated the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib plus eribulin. METHODS: LEADER is a multicenter phase Ib/II study for advanced leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma. The phase Ib part enrolled 6 patients to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) with the starting dose of lenvatinib 18 mg/day and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 D1, D8 every 21 days. The primary endpoint of the phase II part was objective response rate (ORR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, with phase Ib patients preplanned to be included in the efficacy analysis. Translational analyses were based on the transcriptomic data obtained from the NanoString nCounter platform. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled (leiomyosarcoma 21, liposarcoma 9); the median age was 59. One patient had to temporarily stop lenvatinib due to grade 2 arthritis in the first cycle, meeting DLT criteria. Four of 6 patients had to decrease the dose of lenvatinib to 14 mg between cycles two and three. RP2D was determined at lenvatinib 14 mg/day and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2. The confirmed ORR was 20%, and the ORR was not significantly different between phase Ib/II cohorts (P = 0.23). The median progression-free survival was 8.56 months (95% confidence interval, 4.40-not reached). Translational studies suggested increased dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus eribulin has a manageable safety profile and exhibits promising efficacy for treating advanced leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.

B Cells in Tumor Microenvironment Associated With The Clinical Benefit to Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Blockade Therapy in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background: B cells and B cell-related gene signatures in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are associated with the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy in several cancer types, but not known for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced ESCC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy were retrospectively included. A targeted RNA profiling of 770 immune-related genes from archival ESCC tissues was performed. Differential immune-related pathways and the levels of infiltrating immune cells were estimated through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and CIBERSORT, respectively. CD19 and CD138 expression were evaluated through immunohistochemistry (IHC). The markers evaluated were correlated with clinical benefit (CB; defined as either objective response or stable disease for ≥6 months) and survival. Results: A total of 64 patients were enrolled. The transcriptome analysis based on 25 patients revealed that B cell signature was significantly increased in patients with CB (P <.05) and correlated with a longer PFS (P = .032) and OS (P = .013). Multiple genes representative of B cells, B cell functions, and plasma cells were upregulated in patients with CB. On further analysis of B cell subtypes in patients with CB, increase of naïve B cells (P = .057) and plasma cells (P <.01) was found but not memory B cells (P = .27). The CD19 expression in tumor stroma, detected by IHC, was higher in patients with CB (P = .033). Conclusion: B cells in the TME were associated with CB in patients with advanced ESCC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy.

Deleterious alterations of DNA damage response and repair genes and clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene alteration has been demonstrated as a biomarker for anti-PD-1 therapy in several cancer types, its role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unknown. METHODS: Patients with advanced ESCC treated with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy were enrolled. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1. Archival ESCC tissues were analyzed using FoundationOne CDx. Deleterious alterations, defined by loss of function, of DDR genes were correlated with patient survival by Cox proportional hazards model. The prognostic significance of deleterious alterations of DDR genes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-ESCC cohort was explored. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) was 19%. The median tumor mutational burden was 4 mutations/Mb (0-20); none of the tumors were microsatellite instable. Compared with patients with wild-type or other alterations of DDR genes (N = 35, 81%), those with deleterious alterations of DDR genes (N = 8, 19%) had a higher ORR (38 vs. 14%), longer median progression-free survival (4.1 vs. 2.0 months), and significantly longer median overall survival (OS; 27.7 vs. 6.1 months, P = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, harboring deleterious alterations of DDR genes was a favorable prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.31 [95% CI: 0.11-0.91], P = 0.033). In the TCGA-ESCC cohort, the presence of deleterious alterations of DDR genes was not a favorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Deleterious alterations of DDR genes may be associated with improved prognosis and efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced ESCC.

Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression on immune cells or tumor cells for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression may influence the prognosis of patients with localized esophageal cancer. The current study compared the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression between tumor cells and immune cells. METHODS: Archival esophageal tumor tissue samples were collected from patients who received paclitaxel and cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in three prospective phase II trials. PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells was examined immunohistochemically by using the SP142 antibody and scored by two independent pathologists. The association of PD-L1 expression with patient's outcomes was analyzed using a log-rank test and Cox regression multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was positive (≥ 1%, TC-positive) in 55 patients; PD-L1 expression on immune cells was high (≥ 5%, IC-high) in 30 patients. TC-positive status was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.63, P = 0.035), whereas IC-high status was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.44, P = 0.0024). Multivariate analysis revealed that TC-positive, IC-high, and performance status were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival and that IC-high and performance status were independent factors for OS. Furthermore, the combination of IC-high and TC-negative status was associated with the optimal OS, whereas that of TC-positive and IC-low status was associated with the worst OS. CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells may have different prognostic value for patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving neoadjuvant CRT. A combination of these two indexes may further improve the prognostic prediction.

Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma May Be Affected by Tumor Sites.

INTRODUCTION: Heterogeneous tumor response has been reported in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study investigated whether the tumor site is associated with the response to ICIs in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Patients with ESCC who had measurable tumors in the liver, lung, or lymph node (LN) according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and received ICIs at 2 medical centers in Taiwan were enrolled. In addition to RECIST 1.1, tumor responses were determined per individual organ basis according to organ-specific criteria modified from RECIST 1.1. Fisher test or χ2 test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 37 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate per RECIST 1.1 was 13.5%. Measurable tumors in the LN, lung, and liver were observed in 26, 17, and 13 patients, respectively. The organ-specific response rates were 26.9%, 29.4%, and 15.4% for the LN, lung, and liver tumors, respectively (p = 0.05). The organ-specific disease control rates were 69.2%, 52.9%, and 21.1% for the LN, lung, and liver tumors, respectively (p = 0.024). Five (27.8%) among 18 patients harboring at least 2 involved organs had heterogeneous tumor response. CONCLUSION: The response and disease control to ICIs may differ in ESCC tumors located at different metastatic sites, with a lesser likelihood of response and disease control in metastatic liver tumors than in tumors located at the LNs and lung.

Low-dose nab-paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy in heavily pretreated pancreatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Heavily pretreated pancreatic cancer patients have a grave prognosis. In this case series study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for such patients. METHODS: The data of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients (n = 40) treated with nab-paclitaxel after the failure of gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidines at our institution in 2013-2015 were reviewed. RESULTS: The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was two (range, 1-6). Eighteen patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥2. The regimens comprised nab-paclitaxel combined with the following drugs: gemcitabine (n = 28), gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidine (n = 3), platinum and fluoropyrimidine (n = 4), fluoropyrimidine (n = 4), and irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine (n = 1). The median dose of nab-paclitaxel was 63 (range, 51-72) mg/m2/dose, with the schedule of D1/15, D1/8, and D1/8/15 followed in 23, 14, and 3 patients, respectively. The median overall survival was 5.1 (95% CI, 4.6-5.7) months. Among 32 evaluable patients, two partial responses and six stable diseases were observed. The median progression-free survival was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.9-3.2) months. Grade 3/4 leucopenia or neutropenia was observed in three and two patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia was observed in four patients. Other significant (grade 3 or more) nonhematological toxicities were not frequent, except for sepsis/infection (n = 7). However, more severe anemia or sepsis/infection was significantly associated with disease control. CONCLUSION: In heavily pretreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, low-dose nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy was fairly tolerable with modest efficacy.

Differential Organ-Specific Tumor Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exhibit significant clinical activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study explored whether tumor response to ICIs in HCC varies among different organs. METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients with advanced HCC who had received ICIs. Patients with measurable diseases were enrolled. Organ-specific response criteria, adapted from RECIST 1.1 and immune-related RECIST, were used to evaluate the objective response to ICIs in tumors located in the liver, lung, lymph node, and other intra-abdominal sites. RESULTS: Of the 75 enrolled patients with advanced HCC, 51 and 11 patients had chronic hepatitis B virus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection, respectively. Regarding ICI treatment, 58, 1, and 16 patients had undergone anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) alone, anti-CTLA4 mAb alone, and anti-PD-1 mAb plus anti-CTLA4 mAb, respectively; 20 and 55 patients had received ICIs as first-line or ≥second-line therapy. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 28.0%. In total, 58, 34, 19, and 18 patients had measurable hepatic tumors and lung, lymph node, and other intra-abdominal metastases, and the corresponding organ-specific ORRs were 22.4, 41.2, 26.3, and 38.9%, respectively. Of the 39 patients who had both hepatic and extrahepatic tumors, 12 had disease control in extrahepatic tumors while progressive disease (PD) in hepatic tumors, whereas only 4 exhibited disease control in hepatic tumors while PD in extrahepatic tumors (p = 0.046, McNemar test). Of the 16 patients with only evaluable tumors in the liver and lungs at baseline, 8 had disease control in the lungs while PD in the liver, and none experienced disease control in the liver while PD in the lungs (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The hepatic tumors of HCC may be less responsive to ICIs than extrahepatic lesions. Lung metastases responded most favorably to ICIs. The mechanisms underlying this differential response to ICIs warrant further investigation.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Use of Antibiotics Associated With Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study explored the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and use of antibiotics in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled from two referral centers in Taiwan. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or a stable disease for ≥6 months via Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1. Clinicopathological factors' impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed via Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. The median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 6.1 months, respectively. The median NLR at baseline was 6.40, and 21 patients received antibiotics. Both high NLR and use of antibiotics were associated with inferior PFS (p=0.028 and p<0.001, respectively) and OS (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: High NLR and use of antibiotics were associated with inferior survival in advanced ESCC patients receiving ICIs.

Postoperative Imaging and Tumor Marker Surveillance in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Background: Pancreatic cancer is a catastrophic disease with high recurrence and death rates, even in early stages. Early detection and early treatment improve survival in many cancer types but have not yet been clearly documented to do so in pancreatic cancer. In this study, we assessed the benefit on survival resulting from different patterns of surveillance in daily practice after curative surgery of early pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had received curative surgery between January 2000 and December 2013 at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into one of four groups, based on surveillance strategy: the symptom group, the imaging group, the marker group (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and/or carcinoembryonic antigen), and the intense group (both imaging and tumor marker assessment). Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and post-recurrence overall survival (PROS) were evaluated. Results: One hundred and eighty-one patients with documented recurrence or metastasis were included in our analysis. The median OS for patients in the symptom group, imaging group, marker group, and intense group were 21.4 months, 13.9 months, 20.5 months, and 16.5 months, respectively (p = 0.670). Surveillance with imaging, tumor markers, or both was not an independent risk factor for OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in median RFS (symptom group, 11.7 months; imaging group, 6.3 months; marker group, 9.3 months; intense group, 6.9 months; p = 0.259) or median PROS (symptom group, 6.9 months; imaging group, 7.5 months; marker group, 5.0 months; intense group, 7.8 months; p = 0.953) between the four groups. Multivariate analyses identified poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (≥1), primary tumor site (tail), and tumor grade (poor differentiation) were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Surveillance with regular imaging, tumor marker, or both was not an independent risk factor for OS of pancreatic cancer patients who undergo curative tumor resection.

Number of Resected Lymph Nodes and Survival of Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The association of extended lymph node (LN) dissection with improved outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is debatable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed data from patients with esophageal cancer enrolled in three phase II clinical trials of preoperative paclitaxel and cisplatin-based CRT during 2000-2012. Patients with ESCC who underwent planned esophagectomy were enrolled. The number of resected LNs and other clinicopathological factors were analyzed regarding their impact on progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In total, 139 patients were included. The median PFS and OS were 24.4 and 31.8 months, respectively. The median number of resected and positive LNs were 19 (range=2-96) and 0 (range=0-9), respectively. The mean number of positive LNs did not differ significantly among quartile groups of total resected LNs (quartile 1: 2-12, 2: 13-19, 3: 20-29, and 4: 30-96). The resected LN number analyzed as dichotomies divided by the median or as continuous variables was not associated with PFS or OS. However, in an exploratory analysis, patients of quartiles 2 and 3 had longer PFS and OS than those with quartiles of 1 and 4 in multivariate analysis (p=0.019 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although extensive LN dissection was not associated with improved survival, resection of 13-29 LNs was associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving preoperative paclitaxel and cisplatin-based CRT.

Association of MDM2 expression with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

This study evaluated the prognostic roles of murine double minute 2 (MDM2) and p53 in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. A total of 137 advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma patients who were treated with gemcitabine-based palliative chemotherapy were reviewed, selected from 957 patients with pancreatic malignancy between 2008 and 2013 at our hospital. Immunohistochemical staining for MDM2 and p53 with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues was independently reviewed. Nuclear or cytoplasmic expression of MDM2 and p53 was found in tumor cells of 30 (21.9%) and 71 (51.8%) patients, respectively. Patients with MDM2 expression had shorter median overall survival (OS) (3.7 vs 5.8 mo; P = .048) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (1.5 vs 2.5 mo; P < .001); by contrast, p53 expression was not correlated with OS or PFS. In the multivariate analysis, MDM2 expression (hazard ratio = 1.731; P = .025) was an independent and unfavorable prognostic factor of OS. Additionally, MDM2 expression was significantly associated with progressive disease (PD) and death (P = .015) following first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. In advanced pancreatic cancer patients, MDM2 expression is associated with shorter OS and PFS after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Computed tomographic characteristics for patients with unresectable gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Although current staging workups could differentiate most patients with operable from inoperable advanced gastric cancers, there are still some patients with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis, defined as only metastasis with multiple subcentimeter lesions in peritoneum, receiving unnecessary open-close procedures. The computed tomography (CT) of the patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis was retrospectively identified and then thoroughly reviewed by two independent radiologists unaware of the peritoneal carcinomatosis status. Of the 798 patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer between January 2007 and December 2010, 52 patients harboring advanced gastric cancer with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis receiving surgery with curative intent were identified. Descriptive statistic was used for the radiologic characteristics. The most common radiologic characteristic of CT was omental fat stranding (57.7%), followed by omental clustered subcentimeter nodules (53.8%), distant enlarged lymph node (40.4%), distant grouping of small lymph nodes (36.5%), peritoneal nodules or thickening (34.6%), minimal loculated ascites (21.2%), intestinal wall thickening or irregularity (9.6%), and hydronephrosis or hydroureter without stone or urothelial lesion (5.8%). Comprehensively reviewing the radiologic characteristics of CT may identify the patients harboring advanced gastric cancer with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Perspectives on the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy with DNA repair inhibitors in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is highly lethal. Current research that combines radiation with targeted therapy may dramatically improve prognosis. Cancerous cells are characterized by unstable genomes and activation of DNA repair pathways, which are indicated by increased phosphorylation of numerous factors, including H2AX, ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2, DNA-PKcs, Rad51, and Ku70/Ku80 heterodimers. Radiotherapy causes DNA damage. Cancer cells can be made more sensitive to the effects of radiation (radiosensitization) through inhibition of DNA repair pathways. The synergistic effects, of two or more combined non-lethal treatments, led to co-administration of chemotherapy and radiosensitization in BRCA-defective cells and patients, with promising results. ATM/Chk2 and ATR/Chk1 pathways are principal regulators of cell cycle arrest, following DNA double-strand or single-strand breaks. DNA double-stranded breaks activate DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs). It forms a holoenzyme with Ku70/Ku80 heterodimers, called DNA-PK, which catalyzes the joining of nonhomologous ends. This is the primary repair pathway utilized in human cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiosensitization, induced by inhibitors of ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2, Wee1, PP2A, or DNA-PK, has been demonstrated in preclinical pancreatic cancer studies. Clinical trials are underway. Development of agents that inhibit DNA repair pathways to be clinically used in combination with radiotherapy is warranted for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Association of radiotherapy with favorable prognosis in daily clinical practice for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy is currently used in definitive therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance, pattern of care, and use of RT in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2011, patients with invasive pancreatic carcinoma and prior exposure to systemic chemotherapy were included. We used Cox regression model and propensity score matching for prognostic analyses and logistic regression for analyzing the factors impacting the use of RT. RESULTS: We identified 217 pancreatic cancer patients (74 with unresectable stage II or III and 143 with stage IV). Of all patients, 90.8% had adenocarcinoma, and only 19.2% (42/217) received RT with doses ranging from 50 to 55 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions using modern RT techniques. Logistic regression showed stage (P < 0.001) and initial CA 19-9 level (P = 0.026) were significantly predictive of the choice of RT as a first-line treatment, whereas the second-line use of RT was associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and longer progression-free survival. Patients with RT had a better median survival than those without it (14.6 vs 8.1 months, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, RT remained a good prognostic factor for overall survival. CONCLUSION: The use of RT might be associated with a favorable clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Further exploration of RT as a first-line therapy or second-line therapy for locally advanced or even metastatic pancreatic cancer is warranted.

Postchemoradiotherapy Pathologic Stage Classified by the American Joint Committee on the Cancer Staging System Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether the postchemoradiotherapy (post-CRT) pathologic stage predicts the outcomes of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing preoperative CRT followed by surgery. METHODS: From three phase II trials of preoperative CRT for locally advanced ESCC, 140 patients were included. Preoperative CRT comprised twice weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin-based regimens and 40-Gy radiotherapy in 20 fractions. The post-CRT pathologic stage was classified according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition staging system. The prognostic effects of clinicopathologic factors were analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 61.9 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 24.5 and 30.9 months, respectively. The post-CRT pathologic stage was 0 in 34.5%, I in 12.9%, II in 29.3%, III in 13.6%, and ypT0N1-2 in 6.4% of the patients. The median PFS was 47.2, 25.9, 16.0, 9.4, and 15.1 months, and the median OS was 57.4, 34.1, 26.2, 14.1, and 17.6 months for patients with post-CRT pathologic stage 0, I, II, III, and ypT0N1-2, respectively. In multivariate analysis, performance status (p < 0.001), tumor location (p = 0.016), and extranodal extension (p = 0.024) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, whereas performance status (p < 0.001) and post-CRT pathologic stage (p = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: The post-CRT pathologic stage classified by American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition staging system predicted the survival of locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent preoperative paclitaxel and cisplatin-based CRT followed by esophagectomy.

Sequential gemcitabine and platinum versus first-line combination of gemcitabine and platinum for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of combinational versus sequential gemcitabine and platinum on prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and three patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were selected. They were divided into GemP (first-line gemcitabine and platinum), Gem-then-P(sequential gemcitabine and platinum), Gem/other (first-line gemcitabine-based therapy without subsequent platinum),and Gem (first-line gemcitabine-based therapy without subsequent systemic therapy) groups. The Kaplan­Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Cox regression model and propensity score matching were used for prognostic analyses. RESULTS: The median survival was 12.5 months [95 %confidence interval (CI), 11.2-13.7] in the GemP group(N = 65), 8.3 months (95 % CI 5.0-11.7) in the Gem-then-P group (N = 35), 11.6 months (95 % CI 4.6­18.5) in the Gem/other group (N = 26), and 4.7 months (95 % C I3.3-6.0) in the Gem group (N = 77) (P<0.001). Considering the GemP and Gem-then-P groups, performance status, serum creatinine, and response to first-line treatment were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in the multivariate analysis. No specific factors were identified for predicting the choice between GemP and Gem-then-P. CONCLUSIONS: First-line gemcitabine and platinum-based combinations were not superior to sequential gemcitabine and platinum for overall survival. The best sequence of chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer should be explored in future clinical trials.