Reduced Left Ventricular Twist Early after Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction as a Predictor of Left Ventricular Adverse Remodelling.

BACKGROUND: The left ventricular (LV) remodelling process represents the main cause of heart failure after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) can detect early deformation impairment, while also predicting LV remodelling during follow-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the STE parameters in predicting cardiac remodelling following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of 60 patients with acute STEMI and no history of prior myocardial infarction treated with PCI. The patients were assessed both by conventional transthoracic and ST echocardiography in the first 12 h after admission and 6 months after the acute phase. Adverse remodelling was defined as an increase in LVEDV and/or LVESV by 15%. RESULTS: Adverse remodelling occurred in 26 patients (43.33%). By multivariate regression equation, the risk of adverse remodelling increases with age (by 1.1-fold), triglyceride level (by 1.009-fold), and midmyocardial radial strain (mid-RS) (1.06-fold). Increased initial twist decreases the chances of adverse remodelling (0.847-fold). The LV twist presented the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict adverse remodelling (AUROC = 0.648; 95% CI [0.506;0.789], p = 0.04). A twist value higher than 11° has a 76.9% specificity and a 72.7% positive predictive value for reverse remodelling at 6 months.

Considering Diastolic Dyssynchrony as a Predictor of Favorable Response in LV-Only Fusion Pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Background: CRT improves systolic and diastolic function, increasing cardiac output. Aim of the study: to assess the outcome of LV diastolic dyssynchrony in a population of fusion pacing CRT. Methods: Diastolic dyssynchrony was measured by offline speckle-tracking-derived TDI timing assessment of the simultaneity of E″ and A″ basal septal and lateral walls. New parameters introduced: E″ and, respectively, A″ time (E″T/A″T) as the time difference between E″ (respectively, A″) peak septal and lateral wall. Patients were divided into super-responders (SR), responders (R), and non-responders (NR). Results: Baseline characteristics: 62 pts (62 ± 11 y.o.) with idiopathic DCM, EF 27 ± 5.2%; 29% type III diastolic dysfunction (DD), 63% type II, 8% type I. Average follow-up 45 ± 19 months: LVEF 37 ± 7.9%, 34%SR, 61%R, 5%NR. The E″T decreased from 90 ± 20 ms to 25 ± 10 ms in SR with significant LV reverse remodeling (LV end-diastolic volume 193.7 ± 81 vs. 243.2 ± 82 mL at baseline, p < 0.0028) and lower LV filling pressures (E/E' 13.2 ± 4.6 vs. 11.4 ± 4.5, p = 0.0295). DD profile improved in 65% of R with a reduction in E/E' ratio (21 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 4 ms, p < 0.0001). Significant cut-off value calculated by ROC curve for LV diastolic dyssynchrony is E″T > 80 ms and A″T > 30 msec. Conclusions: The study identifies the cut-off values of diastolic dyssynchrony parameters as predictors of favorable outcomes in responders and super-responder patients with fusion CRT pacing. These findings may have important implications in patient selection and follow-up.

Update in LV Only Fusion CRT Pacing: Annals and Future Perspectives.

Triple-chamber cardiac devices are utilized for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and is the standard-of-care therapy for heart failure (HF) patients in the current guidelines. In the setting of biventricular (BIV) pacing it involves a mandatory implantation of right ventricular (RV) lead that allows simultaneous BIV pacing with 0 ms VV (ventricular to ventricular) interval. Nevertheless, it seems that response to CRT is not related to RV lead position. RV pacing is known for deleterious effects on RV/Left Ventricle (LV) function and should not be used in persons with normal atrioventricular conduction (AV) and sinus rhythm. As it compensates for the additional asynchrony induced by unnecessary stimulation of RV pacing, only pacing the left ventricle (LV) may result in improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes and a decrease in the number of individuals who do not respond to the procedure. Furthermore, leadless LV fusion CRT pacing without RV lead could be a potential CRT therapy alternative to BIV pacing in nonischemic heart failure patients with preserved AV conduction. The aim of our study is to made an update in cardiac resynchronization therapy with LV only fusion pacing.

Nonischemic Super-Responders in Fusion CRT Pacing with Normal Atrioventricular Conduction.

Background: Fusion CRT pacing (FCRT) is noninferior to biventricular pacing, according to the current data. The aim of this study is to assess the response to FCRT and to identify predictors of super-responders (SRs) in a nonischemic population with normal AV conduction. Methods: LV-only CRT patients (pts) with a right atrium/left ventricle pacing system implanted in two CRT centers in Romania were included. Device interrogation, exercise tests, echocardiography, and individualized drug optimization were performed every 6 months during close follow-up. SRs pts were defined as those with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) improvement ≥30% and stable ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45%. Results: A total of 25 out of 83 pts (31%) were SRs, with nonischemic LBBB low EF cardiomyopathy (50 male, 62 ± 9 y.o.) initially included. Mean follow-up was 5 years ± 27 months. Patients were divided in two groups: SRs and non-SRs (52 responders/6 hypo-responders). Two predictors were found in the SRs group: a higher baseline LVEF (SRs 29 ± 5% vs. non-SRs 26 ± 5%, p = 0.02) and a lower pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (SRs 38 ± 11 mm Hg vs. non-SRs 50 ± 15 mmHg, p = 0.003). Baseline severe mitral regurgitation was found in 11% of SRs vs. 64% in the non-SRs group. Conclusions: SRs in the selected NICM-FCRT group are significative high. Higher baseline LVEF and mild pulmonary arterial hypertension were independently associated with super-response.

Innovations in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are essential for the management of a variety of cardiac conditions, including tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and medically refractory heart failure (HF). Recent advancements in CIED technology have led to innovative solutions that overcome shortcomings associated with traditional devices or address unmet needs. Leadless pacemakers, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and extravascular ICDs eliminate lead-related complications common with conventional pacemakers or ICDs. Conduction system pacing (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing) is a more physiologic method of pacing and avoids the deleterious consequences associated with long-term right ventricular pacing. For HF-related devices, cardiac contractility modulation is an emerging therapy that bridges a gap for many patients ineligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy and has been shown to improve HF symptoms and decrease hospitalizations and mortality in select patients. Implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitors help guide HF management and reduce hospitalizations. Lastly, new phrenic nerve stimulating devices are being utilized to treat central sleep apnea, a common comorbidity associated with HF. While further long-term studies are still underway for many of these new technologies, it is anticipated that these devices will become indispensable therapeutics in the expanding cardiovascular armamentarium.

A Novel and Simple Exercise Test Parameter to Assess Responsiveness to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

This study assessed the value of heart rate recovery index (HRRI), a new parameter of an exercise test, as the predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods: Consecutive patients receiving a CRT device were followed up after implantation and every 6 months. An effort test (ET) was quantified by minimum heart rate/maximum heart rate, as well as acceleration and deceleration times. HRRI was calculated as the ratio between acceleration and deceleration time (AT/DT) and compared to outcome. We used logistic regression to assess the predictive value of HRRI for responders and non-responders to CRT. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes. Results: A total of 109 patients (74 men, mean age 63.3 ± 9.8 years) were analyzed; permanent long-term fusion CRT pacing was possible in 65 patients. Patients were assigned to two groups: responders and non-responders (98/11 patients). During a mean follow-up of 36 months, 545 ETs were performed. HRRI was significantly higher in responders versus non-responders (3.16 ± 2 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for HRRI as a predictor of CRT response was 1.51 (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve = 0.844). Responders had significant left-ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LV end-diastolic volume = 240 ± 90 mL vs. 217 ± 89 mL, p < 0.001) and higher LV ejection fraction (26 ± 5.8% vs. 35 ± 8.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: HRRI computation during routine ET is useful for the evaluation of responsiveness to CRT.