Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a Muscarinic M3 Receptor-Positive Allosteric Modulator ASP8302 Following Single and Multiple Ascending Oral Doses in Healthy Volunteers.

ASP8302 is an orally administered positive allosteric modulator of the muscarinic M3 receptor. Two Phase 1 studies were conducted, a first-in-human study in Europe and a Japanese phase 1 study. Both were randomized, participant- and investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending oral doses, parallel group, clinical studies in healthy volunteers. Both studies evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics and also included salivary secretion and pupil diameter as pharmacodynamic assessments. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or treatment-emergent adverse events reported leading to study discontinuation. There were no clinically relevant findings in any of the laboratory, vital signs, electrocardiogram assessments, or photosensitivity testing following multiple administration of up to 150 mg or up to 140 mg once daily for 14 days in the European first-in-human and Japanese Phase 1 study, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of ASP8302 were approximately linear over the dose range studied. There was no evidence of drug accumulation upon repeated dosing. In both studies, ASP8302 showed a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effect on saliva production at doses from 100 mg onward, which was maintained during repeated dosing. No effect was observed on pupil diameter. These data supported progression of ASP8302 into Phase 2 clinical trials for further clinical development.

Exercise training outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction depend on patient background.

Background: The aim of this study was to identify significant factors affecting the effectiveness of exercise training using information of the HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) study. Methods: Background factors influencing the effect of exercise training were comprehensively surveyed for 2,130 patients by multivariable Cox regression analysis with the stepwise variable selection, and only significant factors were selected that were statistically distinguished from dummy noise factors using the Boruta method. Results: The analysis suggested that the use of beta-blockers, pulse pressure, hemoglobin level, electrocardiography findings, body mass index, and history of stroke at baseline potentially influenced the exercise effect on all-cause death (AD). Therefore, a hypothetical score to estimate the effect of exercise training was constructed based on the analysis. The analysis suggested that the score is useful in identifying patients for whom exercise training may be significantly effective in reducing all-caused death and hospitalization (ADH) as well as AD. Such a subpopulation accounted for approximately 40% of the overall study population. On the other hand, in approximately 45% of patients, the effect of exercise was unclear on either AD or ADH. In the remaining 15% of patients, it was estimated that the effect of exercise might be unclear for ADH and potentially rather increase AD. Conclusions: This study is the first analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effects of various factors on the outcome of exercise training in chronic heart failure, underscoring the need to carefully consider the patient's background before recommending exercise training. However, it should be noted that exercise training can improve many outcomes in a wide variety of diseases. Therefore, given the limitations involved in post-hoc analyses of a single clinical trial, the characteristics of patients to whom the results of this analysis can be applied need attention, and also further research is necessary on the relationship between the degree of exercise and the outcomes. A new clinical trial would be needed to confirm the factors detected and the appropriateness of the score.

Model-based meta-analysis of changes in circulatory system physiology in patients with chronic heart failure.

To characterize and compare various medicines for chronic heart failure (CHF), changes in circulatory physiological parameter during pharmacotherapy were investigated by a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) of circulatory physiology. The clinical data from 61 studies mostly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reporting changes in heart rate, blood pressure, or ventricular volumes after treatment with carvedilol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, bucindolol, enalapril, aliskiren, or felodipine, were analyzed. Seven cardiac and vasculature function indices were estimated without invasive measurements using models based on appropriate assumptions, and their correlations with the mortality were assessed. Estimated myocardial oxygen consumption, a cardiac load index, correlated excellently with the mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation, and it explained differences in mortality across the different medications. The analysis based on the present models were reasonably consistent with the hypothesis that the treatment of HFrEF with various medications is due to effectively reducing the cardiac load. Assessment of circulatory physiological parameters by using MBMA would be insightful for quantitative understanding of CHF treatment.