Open-Angle Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Is Related to Dips Rather Than Increases in the Mean Arterial Pressure Over 24-H.

BACKGROUND: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) drives ocular perfusion. Excessive 24-h MAP variability relates to glaucoma, however, whether this is due to dips or increases in the blood pressure (BP) is undocumented. We investigated the association of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in relation to the 5 largest MAP dips/increases over 24-h, henceforth called dips/blips. METHODS: In the Maracaibo Aging Study (MAS), 93 participants aged ≥40 y (women, 87.1%; mean age, 61.9 y) underwent baseline ophthalmological and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring assessments. OAG was the presence of optic nerve damage and visual field defects. Statistical methods included logistic regression and the generalized R2 statistic. For replication, 48 OAG cases at the Leuven Glaucoma Clinic were matched with 48 controls recruited from Flemish population. RESULTS: In the MAS, 26 participants had OAG. OAG compared to non-OAG participants experienced longer and deeper dips (116.5 vs. 102.7 minutes; to 60.3 vs. 66.6 mm Hg; -21.0 vs. -18.0 mm Hg absolute or 0.79 vs. 0.81 relative dip compared to the preceding reading). The adjusted odds ratios associated with dip measures ranged from 2.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-4.85; P = 0.009) to 3.39 (95% CI, 1.36-8.46; P = 0.008). On top of covariables and 24-MAP level/variability, the dip measures increased the model performance (P ≤ 0.025). Blips did not associate with OAG. The case-control study replicated the MAS observations. CONCLUSIONS: Dips rather than increases in the 24-h MAP level were associated with increased risk for OAG. An ophthalmological examination combined with 24-h BP monitoring might be precautious steps required in normotensive and hypertensive patients at risk of OAG.

Global optical coherence tomography measures for detecting the progression of glaucoma have fundamental flaws.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the problems involved in using global OCT measures for detecting progression in early glaucoma. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Eyes from 76 patients and 28 healthy controls (HC) had a least two OCT scans at least 1 year apart. To determine the 95% confidence intervals (CI), 151 eyes (49 HC and 102 patients) had at least two scans within 6 months. All eyes had 24-2 mean deviation ≥-6dB. The average (global) thicknesses of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cRNFL), GONH, and of the retinal ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (RGCLP), Gmac, were calculated. Using quantile regression, the 95% CI intervals were determined. Eyes outside the CIs were classified as "progressors." For a reference standard (RS), four experts evaluated OCT and VF information. RESULTS: Compared to the RS, 31 of the 76 (40.8%) patient eyes were identified as progressors (RS-P), and 45 patient, and all 28 HC, eyes as nonprogressors (RS-NP). The metrics missed (false negative, FN) 15 (48%) (GONH) and 9 (29%) (Gmac) of the 31 RS-P. Further, GONH and/or Gmac falsely identified (false positive, FP) 10 (22.2%) of 45 patient RS-NP eyes and 7 (25%) of the 28 HC eyes as progressing. Post-hoc analysis identified three reasons (segmentation, centring, and local damage) for these errors. CONCLUSIONS: Global metrics lead to FPs and FNs because of problems inherent in OCT scanning (segmentation and centring), and to FNs because they can miss local damage. These problems are difficult, if not impossible, to correct, and raise concerns about the advisability of using GONH and Gmac for detecting progression.