Bendamustine/Rituximab Plus Cytarabine/Rituximab, With or Without Acalabrutinib, for the Initial Treatment of Transplant-Eligible Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients: Pooled Data From Two Pilot Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a moderately aggressive lymphoma subtype, generally viewed as incurable. For younger, fit patients, the standard of care remains various high-dose cytarabine-based induction regimens followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplant and 3 years of rituximab maintenance. Despite reasonably good outcomes, with median progression-free survival in the range of 7 to 9 years, most patients eventually relapse, indicating a need to improve the safety and tolerability of remission induction strategies. METHODS: Given the impressive activity of bendamustine/rituximab (BR) in older patients with MCL, we developed an induction regimen modeled after the Nordic Regimen but substituted BR in place of R-CHOP. In a second pilot study, we incorporated the second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), acalabrutinib, into the regimen. The primary endpoint of both studies was stem cell mobilization success rate. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent stem cell harvest in both studies. CONCLUSION: The experience from our single institution pilot study suggested that sequential rather than alternating BR and cytarabine/rituximab (CR) was easier to administer from the standpoint of toxicities and subsequent dose modifications. Safety and efficacy data from the 2 pilot studies, FitMCL 1.0 and 2.0, were similar. The pilot studies provided preliminary safety data supporting the development of the NCTN trial EA4181, assessing three different induction regimens with or without acalabrutinib.

Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bispecific antibodies combine antigen recognition sites from two or more antibodies into a single construct allowing simultaneous binding to multiple targets. Bispecific antibodies exist which can redirect immune effector cells against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) targets. This review will highlight the progress to date and the challenges in developing bispecific antibodies for the treatment of AML. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, a number of bispecific antibody formats including bispecific T cell engagers, dual affinity retargeting proteins, and tandem diabodies are in clinical development for AML. These antibodies target antigens present on AML blasts, including CD33, and the low affinity IL3 receptor, CD123. T cell redirecting bispecific antibodies in early phase clinical trials for AML include AG330, flotetuzumab, JNJ-63709178, and AMV564. Bispecific antibodies represent a promising immunotherapeutic approach for the treatment of cancer. The results of ongoing studies in AML will elucidate the potential for these agents in AML.

Lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil alone or combined with immunoglobulin for preventing hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the liver graft is a grave complication following liver transplantation for HBV cirrhosis. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) seems effective in increasing survival after liver transplantation. HBIg and anti-viral drugs are given alone or in combination for its prevention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of different regimens for preventing HBV reactivation following liver transplantation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until February 2010. We attempted to identify further trials by reviewing the reference lists and contacting the principal authors of identified trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials addressing benefits and harms of lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for preventing recurrent HBV infection in patients who are liver transplanted due to HBV infection with or without hepatocellular carcinoma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the trials for risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors whenever information was lacking. We collected information on adverse events. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen in serum after liver transplantation. Relative risks were calculated from individual trials. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials, recruiting 136 participants, were included. Two trials compared lamivudine alone versus HBIg alone. Randomisation was performed one week after transplantation in one of the trials and after six months after transplantation in another; from transplantation until randomisation, HBIg alone was given to all patients in the two trials. A third trial compared combination treatment with lamivudine and HBIg versus lamivudine alone after one month of combination treatment, and a fourth trial compared the combination of lamivudine and HBIg versus a combination of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil after at least 12-month of lamivudine and HBIg combination treatment. Statistically significant differences were not detected in any of the comparisons and outcomes. All trials were open-labelled, and none of the trials were adequately powered to show a difference in HBV recurrence. No meta-analyses were performed since the identified trials assessed different comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review could not derive clear evidence from randomised clinical trials for the treatment of patients with chronic HBV following liver transplantation for preventing recurrence of HBV infection. Large randomised clinical trials comparing long-term combination treatment to each of the monotherapy alone, including the newer antiviral drugs, are needed.